|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Expansion-cum-modernization of Bokaro Steel Plant from 4.5 MTPA hot metal to 5.77 MTPA hot metal at Bokaro Steel City, Jharkhand | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | SAIL/BOKARO STEEL PLANT | | (c)Registered Address | ENVIRONMENT CONTROL DEPARTMENT,BOKARO STEEL PLANT,ENVIRONMENT CONTROL DEPARTMENT,BOKARO STEEL PLANT,Bokaro,Mizoram-827001 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Central PSU | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Navin Prakash Srivastava | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | DY. GENERAL MANAGER | | (c)Address | ENVIRONMENT CONTROL DEPARTMENT,BOKARO STEEL PLANT,ENVIRONMENT CONTROL DEPARTMENT,BOKARO STEEL PLANT,,Bokaro,Mizoram-827001 | | (d)Pin code | 827001 | | (e)E-mail | kspp1955@rediffmail.com | | (f)STD Code. | 6542(f)Telephone No. | 246605 | | (g)Fax No. | 242099 | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non ferrous)
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/JH/IND/6949/2008 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/98087/2019 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | 49 | | (b)Pincode | 827001 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 23.6459 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 23.7174 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 86.0671 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 86.1439 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | F45C1, F45C2, F45B13, F45B14 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 243 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 5 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 3 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Jharkhand | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Jharkhand | Bokaro | Chas | Bokaro Steel City | | (2.) | Orissa | Sundargarh | Hemgir | Gopalpur (Telendih), Ratansara |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | J-11011/99/2007-IA.II(I) | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR | | | (f)Previous TOR Letter | NA | | (b)Date of Apply of EC | 29 Jul 2008 | | (c)Date of Issue of EC | 16 Oct 2008 | | (d)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 08 Dec 2018 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 4.3 |
| Bokaro Steel City | | State : | Jharkhand | | District : | Bokaro | | Tehsil : | Chas | | Village : | Bokaro Steel City |
| 130 | Repair & maintenance of handpumps, reopening of schools, development of roads, plantation in villages, plastic pollution control, promotion of solar energy etc. | Others | Additional District Collector |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Ranchi | | (iii)Letter No. | 103-211/08/EPE/3026 | | (iv)Status of Compliance | Partially Complied | | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | | (vi)Date of site visit | Nov 10 2018 12:00AM | | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Hot Metal | 4500000 | 1270000 | 5770000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Others | In-Plant Transfer | | (2.) | Crude Steel | 4200000 | 456000 | 4656000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Rail | |
|
| | | (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
| S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Hot Rolled Coil Finishing (HRCF) complex | HR shearing+slitting+HR packaging Lines | 0 | HR shearing+slitting+HR packaging Lines | No Change | | (2.) | Blast Furnace | 4 x 2000 m3 + 1 x 2586 m3 = 5.77 MTPA | 0 | 4 x 2000 m3 + 1 x 2586 m3 = 5.77 MTPA | No Change | | (3.) | Coke Oven | 8 (6W+2S) 5 m tall X69 Ovens = 3.442 MTPA | 0.77 MTPA | 4.212 MTPA | Addition | | (4.) | Hot Strip Mill | 4x260t RHF+Tandem Mill+HRC conveying= 4.5 MTPA | 0 | 4x260t RHF+Tandem Mill+HRC conveying= 4.5 MTPA | No Change | | (5.) | Raw Water Supply System | Tenu Canal from Damodar River | Alternate water pipeline system | Tenu Canal along with alternate water pipeline | Addiiton | | (6.) | Refractory Materials Plant | 3X270 + 1X270 t/d Dolomite Kilns=0.2449 MTPA | New Kiln of 450 TPD (0.1642 MTPA) | 0.4091 MTPA | Addition | | (7.) | Cold Rolling Mills | 1.2 MTPA CRM I&II + 1.2 MTPA CRM-III) | Debottlenecking of existing CRMs to 2.86 MTPA | 2.86 MTPA | Modernization | | (8.) | Slabbing Mill | 7 working soaking pit batteries | 0 | 7 working soaking pit batteries | No Change | | (9.) | Sinter Plant | 2 x 252 m2 + 312 m2 sintering m/c = 5 MTPA | Addition of new Sinter Plant of 3.7 MTPA | 8.7 MTPA | Addition | | (10.) | Pellet Plant | 0 | Installation of new 2.0 MTPA pellet plant | 2.0 MTPA | New | | (11.) | Oxygen Plant | 4 x 450 TPD + 1 x 550 TPD ASU + 1250 TPD O2 (BOO) | Addition of 1 x 1250 TPD O2 Plant (BOO) | 3950 TPD | Addition | | (12.) | Steel Melting Shops | SMS1=1.5, SMS2=3.3, Tot=4.8 MTPA | SMS1=1.306, SMS2=3.35, Total=4.656MTPA | SMS1=1.306, SMS2=3.35, Total=4.656MTPA | Modernization |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | 17 Jun 2016 | | (iv)Valid Upto | 31 Dec 2019 | | (v)File No. | JSPCB/HO/RNC/CT0-63953/2016/98 | | (vi)Application No. | Application dated 21-11-2015 | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 5219.1 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 365 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 17.22 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 91.4 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 689847 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 16911300 | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 17601147 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Non coking coal for PCI | 577000 | Tons per Annum | | Imported | Rail | | 350 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Limestone | 312260 | Tons per Annum | | Captive mines | Rail | | 1600 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | Iron Ore fines | 10785290 | Tons per Annum | | Captive mines | Rail | | 250 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Dolomite | 363870 | Tons per Annum | | Captive/Purchased from Bhutan | Road,Rail | | 300 | Others | Captive/Purchased from Bhutan | Copy of Linkage | | (5.) | Iron ore lump (BF grade) | 956300 | Tons per Annum | | Captive mines | Rail | | 250 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | | (6.) | Coking coal | 4582667 | Tons per Annum | | BCCL & imported from Australia, via Haldia port | Rail | | 350 | MoU | | Copy of Linkage | | (7.) | Bentonite | 23760 | Tons per Annum | | Purchased from Kachch region in Gujarat | Road | | 1500 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Mar 2018 To 31 May 2018 | | (b)Season | Summer | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 39.5 | 7.7 | 32.3 | 80 | | (2.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 59 | 27 | 57 | 60 | | (3.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 62.8 | 22.5 | 55.6 | 80 | | (4.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 99 | 49 | 98 | 100 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.5 | 7 | 8.5 | 8.5 | | (2.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 464 | 108 | 200 | 600 | | (3.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 1.37 | 0.26 | 1 | 1.5 | | (4.) | TSS | | | NA | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (5.) | Heavy Metals | | Iron | mg/l | | 0.488 | 0.05 | 1 | 1 | | (6.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 748 | 224 | 500 | 2000 | | (7.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 202 | 39 | 250 | 1000 | | (8.) | Others | Manganese | | mg/l | | 0.059 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 9 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 3 | 1 | C | | (2.) | COD | | NA | | 0 | 0 | A | | (3.) | pH | | NA | | 7.8 | 7.3 | A | | (4.) | DO | | mg/l | | 6.6 | 5.2 | A |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 7 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 64.8 | 40.5 | 65 | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 48.3 | 37.8 | 55 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 6 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 502 | 213 | | (2.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 11.5 | 1.1 | | (3.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 0.61 | 0.042 | | (4.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 549 | 90 | | (5.) | pH | | | 6.9 | 6.1 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 3.54 To 11 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 3.2 To 8.7 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 408000 | 5 | Copy of Permission Letter | modeOthers | Canal and Pipeline(Alternate) | Others | Dam & Intake well for pipeline | TDC/SAIL/RAGT - I/113/09-10 | 23 Mar 2010 | 555373 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Steel plant process | 36000 | 36000 | ZLD systems with Primary and secendary treatment systems | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 36000 | | | (2.) | Steel plant process | 16800 | 16800 | Primary & secondary treatment | Discharge into Surface Water Body | | | 16800 |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 52800 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 16800 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 36000 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | BOF Slag | Industrial Waste | | 512159 | Tons | 0 | Rail | | Others | 80% in sinter plant rest for bricks with fly ash | | (2.) | Ferric Oxide | Industrial Waste | | 7557 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | 100% sold as scrap | | (3.) | Coke Breeze | Industrial Waste | | 459784 | Tons | 0 | Conveyor Belt | | Others | 100% will be reused in sinter plant | | (4.) | BF sludge | Industrial Waste | | 28850 | Tons | 500 | Road | | Others | Sold in secondary market | | (5.) | BF Slag | Industrial Waste | | 2192750 | Tons | 0 | Rail | | Others | 100% utilization in cement plants | | (6.) | Mill scale | Industrial Waste | | 85645 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | 100% utilization in Sinter plant | | (7.) | BF flue dust | Industrial Waste | | 64643 | Tons | 0 | Rail | | Others | 100% utilization in Sinter plant | | (8.) | BOF sludge | Industrial Waste | | 37248 | Tons | 500 | Road | | Others | Sold in secondary market | | (9.) | Waste refractory | Industrial Waste | | 8151 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | 100% utilization in refractory/mortar production | | (10.) | ESP (RMP) dust | Industrial Waste | | 18972 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | 100% utilization in Sinter plant |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 47 | 8.3 | 0.4 | 47.41 | 60 | | (2.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 45 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 46.21 | 80 | | (3.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 88 | 5.8 | .8 | 88.81 | 100 | | (4.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 21 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 24.21 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | COB9 | Mixed Gas | 120 | 3 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 3.6,7.2,7.2 g/s | | (2.) | BF3 Stove | Mixed Gas | 70 | 3.5 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 1.1,2.7,0.8 g/s | | (3.) | SP2 Dedusting | Dedusting | 80 | 5 | Others | PM | 16.7 g/s | | (4.) | BF1 Stock House | Dedusting | 50 | 8.2 | Others | PM | 7.7 g/s | | (5.) | RMP7 | Mixed Gas | 51 | 1.2 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 0.6,4.7,3.2 g/s | | (6.) | BF5 Stove | Mixed Gas | 70 | 3.5 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 1.0,2.8,1.2 g/s | | (7.) | HSM RHF 1&2 | Mixed Gas | 120 | 7.2 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 4.4,39.3,13.1 g/s | | (8.) | BF4 Stove | Mixed Gas | 70 | 3.5 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 1.1,3.1,1.3 g/s | | (9.) | SMS2 LF1 | Mixed Gas | 80 | 1.25 | Others | PM | 0.9 g/s | | (10.) | SMS2 LF1 | Mixed Gas | 80 | 1.25 | Others | PM | 1.0 g/s | | (11.) | BF1 Stove | Mixed Gas | 70 | 3.5 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 1.1,2.9,1.2 g/s | | (12.) | Pellet Process | Mixed Gas | 55 | 3 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 3.9,7.8,7.8 g/s | | (13.) | BF2 Stove | Mixed Gas | 70 | 3.5 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 1.0,3.2,1.4 g/s | | (14.) | BF2 & BF3 Stock House | Dedusting | 50 | 8.2 | Others | PM | 7.6 g/s | | (15.) | SMS1 | Mixed Gas | 100 | 4.3 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 10.9,13.6,9.2 g/s | | (16.) | BF4&BF5 Stock House | Dedusting | 50 | 8.2 | Others | PM | 7.8 g/s | | (17.) | HSM RHF3&4 | Mixed Gas | 120 | 7.2 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 4.8,38.4,12.8 g/s | | (18.) | Pellet Dedusting | Dedusting | 35 | 1.5 | Others | PM | 1.3 g/s | | (19.) | SP2 Process | Mixed Gas, Coke Breeze | 100 | 7 | Others | PM,SO2,NOx | 25,100,50 g/s |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 256300 | | (b)Source | BPSCL Captive power plant and balance from DVC | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Copy of Agreement | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | Purchase from DVC | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 180 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 6973.68 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 6973.68 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 38299 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 867 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 2018 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 2621 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 5221.32 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 6973.68 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 1738 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Open Land | 1712 | | Total (ha.) | 59450 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Main Plant | | 3489.53 | | | (2.) | Area for Solid Waste Management | | 360.17 | | | (3.) | Green belt | | 1923.99 | | | (4.) | Water Reservoir | | 1199.99 | Cooling ponds |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | NPA | None | 0 | None | | (2.) | ESAs | None | 0 | None | | (3.) | ESZs | None | 0 | None | | (4.) | Corridors | None | 0 | None | | (5.) | Critically Polluted Area | Nil | 0 | Nil | | (6.) | Wildlife Corridors | None | 0 | None | | (7.) | WLS | None | 0 | None |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Forest | | PF near Narra and along Damodar river | 5 | Degraded forest | | (2.) | Defence Installations | | None | 0 | None | | (3.) | Archaeological Sites | | None | 0 | None |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 0 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | 0 | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Damodar River | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | North | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 5 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 0 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 785 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 0 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 0 | | (e)No. of working days | 365 | | (f)Total Manpower | 785 | |
|
|
| S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
|---|
| (1.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 1923.99 | 141.64 | 2065.63 | | (2.) | No. of Plants | 4573150 | 215000 | 4788150 | | (3.) | Funds Allocated | 0 | 186.75 | 186.75 | | (4.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 33.32 | 0.35 | 33.67 |
|
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Environmental | Implementation of Zero Liquid Discharge scheme, Revamping of Existing ESPs and Installation of high efficiency ESPs in new units, Implementation of latest state of the art technologies pollution reduction and energy conservation. | | (2.) | Social | Employment generation and expenditure of CER budget towards development and improvement of social infrastructure in the area. | | (3.) | Financial | Revenue generation for Central and state exchequer. Reduction in import of Automative grade steel. |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 1 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0068 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | MECON Limited | | (iii)Address | Vivekanand Path, Doranda, Ranchi, Jharkhand - 834002 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9470193793 | | (v)Landline No. | 0651248324 | | (vi)Email Id | envenggranchi@meconlimited.co.in | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 02 Oct 2019 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | 1. Closure report of non-compliances from Regional Office shall be furnished.
2. Authenticated English translation of the Public Consultation proceedings shall be furnished.
3. HIRA is not project specific and inadequate and it has not covered all the hazards associated with the facilities and activities. Accordingly, DMP shall be incorporated with the on-site emergency response systems.
4. Socioeconomic study including need based assessment shall be furnished. CER table may be re-worked out and basis for CER shall be evolved. | 16 Apr 2019 | | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 15 May 2019 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | The proposal cited above was considered during the 7th meeting of Reconstituted Expert Appraisal Committee [REAC] (Industry-I) held on 29-31st May, 2019. As per the minutes of the meeting, the committee observed that the project proponent had not clearly presented the salient aspects of the implementation status of the existing EC, associated conditions thereof and status of compliance of the conditions. The Committee further noted the mismatch between plant configuration and contents of the ToRs. Moreover, ToRs points have not been adequately addressed in the EIA/EMP report. The project proponent requested for more time to address the lacunae in the present proposal, and sought additional time to review and revise its proposal. In view of the aforesaid, and after detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended to return the proposal in its present form to the project proponent to enable them review and revise the same. In view of the above, it is requested to apply through PARIVESH as per the EAC recommendations. | 17 Aug 2020 | | 2. | ADS Reply Letter | The point-wise replies to the ADS is submitted for kind consideration of the Hon'ble MoEFCC. | 17 Aug 2020 | | 3. | NA | The proposal cited above was considered during the 7th meeting of Reconstituted Expert Appraisal Committee [REAC] (Industry-I) held on 29-31st May, 2019. As per the minutes of the meeting, the committee observed that the project proponent had not clearly presented the salient aspects of the implementation status of the existing EC, associated conditions thereof and status of compliance of the conditions. The Committee further noted the mismatch between plant configuration and contents of the ToRs. Moreover, ToRs points have not been adequately addressed in the EIA/EMP report. The project proponent requested for more time to address the lacunae in the present proposal, and sought additional time to review and revise its proposal.
In view of the aforesaid, and after detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended to return the proposal in its present form to the project proponent to enable them review and revise the same.
In view of the above, it is requested to apply as per the EAC recommendations. | 17 Aug 2020 | | 4. | NA | The proposal cited above was considered during the 7th meeting of Reconstituted Expert Appraisal Committee [REAC] (Industry-I) held on 29-31st May, 2019. As per the minutes of the meeting, the committee observed that the project proponent had not clearly presented the salient aspects of the implementation status of the existing EC, associated conditions thereof and status of compliance of the conditions. The Committee further noted the mismatch between plant configuration and contents of the ToRs. Moreover, ToRs points have not been adequately addressed in the EIA/EMP report. The project proponent requested for more time to address the lacunae in the present proposal, and sought additional time to review and revise its proposal.
In view of the aforesaid, and after detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended to return the proposal in its present form to the project proponent to enable them review and revise the same.
In view of the above, it is requested to apply as per the EAC recommendations. | 17 Aug 2020 | | 5. | NA | The proposal cited above was considered during the 7th meeting of Reconstituted Expert Appraisal Committee [REAC] (Industry-I) held on 29-31st May, 2019. As per the minutes of the meeting, the committee observed that the project proponent had not clearly presented the salient aspects of the implementation status of the existing EC, associated conditions thereof and status of compliance of the conditions. The Committee further noted the mismatch between plant configuration and contents of the ToRs. Moreover, ToRs points have not been adequately addressed in the EIA/EMP report. The project proponent requested for more time to address the lacunae in the present proposal, and sought additional time to review and revise its proposal.
In view of the aforesaid, and after detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended to return the proposal in its present form to the project proponent to enable them review and revise the same.
In view of the above, it is requested to apply as per the EAC recommendations. | 17 Aug 2020 | | 6. | ADS Reply Letter | Point-wise reply to Observations of EAC raised during 7th REAC(Ind-1) meeting of 31.05.2019. | 13 Aug 2020 | | 7. | NA | Kindly furnish the addition information sought by the EAC. | 18 Feb 2020 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Navin Prakash Srivastava | | Designation | DY. GENERAL MANAGER | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | SAIL/BOKARO STEEL PLANT | | Address | ENVIRONMENT CONTROL DEPARTMENT,BOKARO STEEL PLANT |
|