|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Setting up of a Greenfield Integrated Steel Plant for production of capacity 13.2 MTPA Crude Steel with 10 MTPA Cement grinding unit and 900 MW Captive Power Plant near Paradeep | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | JSW UTKAL STEEL LIMITED | | (c)Registered Address | JSW Utkal Steel Limited
Plot No. 3, Forest Park,
Bhubaneshwar, Odisha,,Khordha,Orissa-751009 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Shankarpratap Singh | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Director | | (c)Address | JSW Utkal Steel Limited, Plot No. 3, Forest Park, Bhubaneshwar,,Saheednagar,Khordha,Orissa-751009 | | (d)Pin code | 751009 | | (e)E-mail | mm@jsw.in | | (f)STD Code. | 674(f)Telephone No. | 2596117 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non ferrous)
| | Minor Activity | 1(d) Thermal Power Plants
| | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/OR/IND/74396/2018 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/234584/2021 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Please see Appendix 1-1 of Common EIA report | | (b)Pincode | 754141 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 20 | | Minutes | 11 | | Second | 58 | | From | | | Degree | 20 | | Minutes | 14 | | Second | 08 | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 86 | | Minutes | 30 | | Second | 53 | | From | | | Degree | 86 | | Minutes | 35 | | Second | 38 | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 73L/12, F45U12 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 13 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 0.5 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 3 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Orissa | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Orissa | Jagatsinghapur | Ersama | - | | (2.) | Orissa | Jagatsinghapur | Ersama | - | | (3.) | Orissa | Jagatsinghapur | Ersama | |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | IA-J-11011/524/2017-IA-II(I) | | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 13 Aug 2018 | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 19 Mar 2019 | | (d)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 20 Dec 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0.8 |
| Badadanda, in front of Jagannath temple | | State : | Orissa | | District : | Jagatsinghapur | | Tehsil : | Ersama | | Village : | Gadkujanga |
| 732 | Environmental Issues like air,water pollution and ground water contamination.Demand for employment.Demand for setting up hospital.Demand for establishment of skill development centre. etc | Others | Dist Magistrate & Collector |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
| 8.1. Project Configuration |
|---|
| S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Dolo Calcining Plant | 1 x 600 TPD | - | | (2.) | Cold Rolling Mill | 2 x 2.3 MTPA | PLTCM, CAL, CGL, CCL | | (3.) | Air Separation Plant (BOOT) | 6 x 2100 TPD | - | | (4.) | Tar Processing Plant (BOOT) | 300000 TPA | - | | (5.) | Lime Calcining Plant | 6 x 600 TPD | - | | (6.) | Lime Calcining Plant | 6 x 600 TPD | - | | (7.) | Cement Plant (BOOT) | 10 MTPA | Grinding and mixing of slag fly ash and clinker | | (8.) | Hot strip mill | 2 x 5.5 MTPA | Tinplate coil and Si steel - 2 x 0.25 MTPA each | | (9.) | Air Separation Plant (BOOT) | 6 x 2100 TPD | - | | (10.) | Pellet Plant | 4 x 8.0 MTPA, 32 MTPA | With 180 TPH grinding unit | | (11.) | DRI Plant | 1.2 MTPA | COG Gas based | | (12.) | Wire Rod Mill | 1 x 0.6 MTPA | - | | (13.) | Sinter Plant | 1 x 500 sq m, 5.775 MTPA | With sinter cooler waste heat recovery system | | (14.) | LF | 3 x 350 t + 2 x 180 t | - | | (15.) | Caster shop | Slab - 3 x 2, billet - 1 x 8, Billet/bloom - 1 x 6 | 13.2 MTPA | | (16.) | Caster shop | Slab - 3 x 2, billet - 1 x 8, Billet/bloom - 1 x 6 | 13.2 MTPA | | (17.) | BOF | 3 x 350 t + 2 x 180 t | 13.49 MTPA | | (18.) | Plate Mill | 1.5 MTPA | - | | (19.) | Captive Power Plant (BOOT) | 3 x 300 MW | By product gas and coal based | | (20.) | Slurry Dewatering system | 30.0 MTPA | Thickener, Filtration with water recovery system | | (21.) | Benzol refining Plant (BOOT) | 100000 TPA | - | | (22.) | Coke Ovens | 6 MTPA, 8 x 62 oven | Stamp charged with CDQ | | (23.) | Coke Ovens | 6 MTPA, 8 x 62 oven | Stamp charged with CDQ | | (24.) | RH | 3 x 350 t + 1 x 180 t | - | | (25.) | DRI Plant | 1.2 MTPA | COG Gas based | | (26.) | Hot strip mill | 2 x 5.5 MTPA | Tinplate coil and Si steel - 2 x 0.25 MTPA each | | (27.) | Medium Section Mill | 1.0 MTPA | - | | (28.) | Rebar Mill | 1 x 1.2 MTPA | - | | (29.) | Blast Furnace | 3 x 5350 cu m, 13.5 MTPA | - |
|
| 8.2. Product |
|---|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Long Products | 2800000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea | | (2.) | Hot Rolled Coils | 3630000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea | | (3.) | DRI | 380000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail | | | (4.) | Benzol Refining products | 100000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail | | | (5.) | Pellet | 14810000 | Tons per Annum | | Others | Sea | | (6.) | Cement | 10000000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea | | (7.) | Silicon Steel | 500000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea | | (8.) | Tinplate | 450000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea | | (9.) | Tar distillation products | 300000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail | | | (10.) | Cold Rolled Products | 3980000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea | | (11.) | Plates | 1180000 | Tons per Annum | | Road,Rail,Others | Sea |
|
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | N/A | | (iv)Valid Upto | N/A | | (v)File No. | NA | | (vi)Application No. | NA | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | NA | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 65000 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 2856 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 196.05 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 200 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 62529700 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 62529700 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | PCI | 2700000 | Tons per Annum | | Import - Australia/South Africa/Indonesia | Others | sea | 0 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Anthracite coal | 192000 | Tons per Annum | | Import - South Africa/Vietnam/Indonesia | Others | sea | 0 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | GYPSUM | 232000 | Tons per Annum | | Rajasthan, Gujarat | Road,Rail | | 1900 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Dolomite | 2350100 | Tons per Annum | | Import - Australia Domestic - Odisha | Road,Rail,Others | sea | 350 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (5.) | Bentonite | 320000 | Tons per Annum | | Import - Russia/International market | Others | sea | 0 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (6.) | Limestone | 4934500 | Tons per Annum | | Karnataka, Oman | Road,Rail,Others | sea | 1600 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (7.) | Quartzite | 270000 | Tons per Annum | | Rajasthan, Brazil | Road,Rail,Others | sea | 1900 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | | (8.) | Iron Ore fines | 4695300 | Tons per Annum | | Joda Barbil Koira region | Rail | | 330 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (9.) | Clinker | 5116000 | Tons per Annum | | Import - Mozambique/Australia/Canada | Others | sea | 0 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (10.) | Coke/Steam coal | 2700000 | Tons per Annum | | Mahanadi Coal Fields | Road,Rail,Others | sea | 450 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (11.) | Iron ore lump | 1187900 | Tons per Annum | | Joda Barbil Koira region | Road,Rail | | 330 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Apr 2019 To 29 Jun 2019 | | (b)Season | Summer | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 43.8 | 23.8 | 42.2 | 60 | | (2.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 23.8 | 4 | 21.5 | 80 | | (3.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 92.5 | 56.5 | 89.6 | 100 | | (4.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 45 | 7.8 | 42.5 | 80 | | (5.) | Others | CO | Mili Gram per Meter Cube | 0.68 | 0.1 | 0.63 | 2 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 2760 | 835 | 500 | 2000 | | (2.) | Others | Arsenic | | mg/l | | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | | (3.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1 | 1.5 | | (4.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 835.1 | 63.5 | 250 | 1000 | | (5.) | Heavy Metals | | Chromium | mg/l | | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | | (6.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 1120 | 124 | 200 | 600 | | (7.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | | (8.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.1 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 8.5 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | NA | | 8.1 | 6.7 | D | | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 5.6 | 3.25 | D | | (3.) | Others | Cr6+ | mg/l | | 0.1 | 0.1 | D | | (4.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 57.5 | 5.0 | D | | (5.) | COD | | mg/l | | 288.8 | 39.0 | D |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 10 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 75 | 52.8 | 65 | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 67.2 | 42.2 | 55 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 3 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | Electric Conductivity | Others | ds/m | 3.8 | 1.8 | | (2.) | pH | | | 7.2 | 7.1 | | (3.) | K(Potassium) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 950 | 720 | | (4.) | N(Nitrogen) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 890 | 680 | | (5.) | P(Phosphorus) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 685 | 410 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 0 To 5 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 0 To 5 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | NA | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 223200 | 84.22 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Intake Well | | WS-IWS-236/2021 25806 | 30 Sep 2021 | 244168 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Slurry dewatering | 36000 | 36000 | Discharge with interim period | Discharge into Seawater Body | | | 36000 | | (2.) | Captive power plant | 3120000 | 0 | Temperature to be controlled | Discharge into Seawater Body | | | 3120000 |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 3156000 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 3156000 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Fly Ash | Fly Ash | | 940000 | Tons | 0 | Road,Pipe Conveyor | | Others | used in cement plant | | (2.) | Steelmaking slag | Industrial Waste | | 2095000 | Tons | 70 | Road | | Others | used for construction after metal recovery | | (3.) | ZLD Salt | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 11000 | Tons | 120 | Road | | Authorized Recyclers | | | (4.) | Bottom Ash | Bottom Ash | | 240000 | Tons | 70 | Road | | Others | Sale for making pavement block | | (5.) | Mill scale & sludge | Industrial Waste | | 150000 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | used in sinter plant | | (6.) | Zinc Dross | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 30000 | Tons | 500 | Road | | Authorized Recyclers | | | (7.) | BF Slag | Industrial Waste | | 4050000 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | used in cement plant | | (8.) | Chrome Sludge | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 80 | Tons | 500 | Road | | Authorized Recyclers | | | (9.) | Flue dust | Industrial Waste | | 300000 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | used in sinter plant | | (10.) | Used and waste oil | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 1500 | Tons | 500 | Road | | Authorized Recyclers | | | (11.) | Decanter tank and tar storage tank sludge | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 800 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | reused in coke ovens |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 52.0 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 55.5 | 60 | | (2.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 44.3 | 6.2 | 8.9 | 53.2 | 80 | | (3.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 90 | 6.2 | 7.7 | 97.7 | 100 | | (4.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 21.5 | 6.2 | 6.6 | 28.1 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | BF2#2SH | NA | 70 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.05 | | (2.) | BF3#1SH | NA | 70 | 6.0 | PM10 | | 10.89 | | (3.) | MSM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 76.5 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 0.75 | | (4.) | MSM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 76.5 | 3.0 | SO2 | | 5 | | (5.) | TinL#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3 | NOx | | 1.67 | | (6.) | COB#3 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (7.) | COB#3 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | NOx | | 11.11 | | (8.) | COB#1CDQ | NA | 25 | 2.4 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (9.) | COB#1DE | NA | 25 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.67 | | (10.) | COB#3DE | NA | 25 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.67 | | (11.) | PLP3#1DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (12.) | PLP4#2DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (13.) | SP#WG | Coke breeze | 120 | 4.8 | NOx | | 23.61 | | (14.) | BF#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | NOx | | 33.125 | | (15.) | PLP2#2DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (16.) | BF3#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | SO2 | | 14.72 | | (17.) | CPP#1 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 8.33 | | (18.) | CPP#1 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (19.) | COB#4 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 2.78 | | (20.) | COB#2CDQ | NA | 25 | 2.4 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (21.) | PLP2#1DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (22.) | PLP1#WASTE GAS | By-product gas | 120 | 6.0 | PM10 | | 15 | | (23.) | BF1#1CH2 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (24.) | BF3#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | PM10 | | 2.94 | | (25.) | Lime Kiln#4 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (26.) | COB#4 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (27.) | COB#4 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | NOx | | 11.11 | | (28.) | SP#WG | Coke breeze | 120 | 4.8 | PM10 | | 2.36 | | (29.) | BF3#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | NOx | | 14.72 | | (30.) | SMS1#Primary1(Flare) | By-product gas | 80 | 2.2 | PM10 | | 2.17 | | (31.) | SMS1#SE | NA | 99 | 9.6 | PM10 | | 27.33 | | (32.) | SMS2#Primary 2 (Flare) | By-product gas | 80 | 1.9 | PM10 | | 1.48 | | (33.) | HSM-RHF#2 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | SO2 | | 8.33 | | (34.) | CRM-CGL#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | NOx | | 2.78 | | (35.) | CPP#2 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | NOx | | 27.78 | | (36.) | PPC#1 | By-product gas | 60 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 5.83 | | (37.) | PLP1#WASTE GAS | By-product gas | 120 | 6.0 | NOx | | 50 | | (38.) | BF1#2SGP | NA | 30 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (39.) | COB#2DE | NA | 25 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.67 | | (40.) | BF3#1SH | NA | 70 | 6.0 | PM10 | | 10.89 | | (41.) | BF3#1CH1 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (42.) | DR#Flue | COG | 60 | 4.2 | PM10 | | 0.69 | | (43.) | COB#1 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (44.) | COB#2 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | NOx | | 11.11 | | (45.) | BF3#2SGP | NA | 30 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (46.) | BF1#1CH1 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (47.) | Lime Kiln#3 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (48.) | PLP1#1DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (49.) | BF2#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | PM10 | | 2.94 | | (50.) | BF3#2SH | NA | 70 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.05 | | (51.) | DR#Screen | NA | 30 | 1.5 | PM10 | | 0.05 | | (52.) | Lime Kiln#6 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (53.) | SMS1#Primary 3 (Flare) | By-product gas | 80 | 2.2 | PM10 | | 2.17 | | (54.) | WRM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | SO2 | | 4.44 | | (55.) | CPP#2 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (56.) | PSC#1 | By-product gas | 60 | 4.0 | PM10 | | 7.5 | | (57.) | PSC#2 | By-product gas | 60 | 4.0 | PM10 | | 7.5 | | (58.) | PSC#3 | By-product gas | 60 | 4.0 | PM10 | | 7.5 | | (59.) | PSC#4 | By-product gas | 60 | 4.0 | PM10 | | 7.5 | | (60.) | SP#WG | Coke breeze | 120 | 4.8 | SO2 | | 23.61 | | (61.) | DR#Flue | COG | 60 | 4.2 | SO2 | | 0.69 | | (62.) | DR#Day bin | NA | 30 | 1.5 | PM10 | | 0.05 | | (63.) | Lime Kiln#1 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (64.) | WRM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | PM10 | | 0.67 | | (65.) | WRM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | NOx | | 4.44 | | (66.) | CPP#2 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 8.33 | | (67.) | CPP#3 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (68.) | COB#1 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | NOx | | 11.11 | | (69.) | COB#2 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 27.78 | | (70.) | PLP4#1DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (71.) | COB#4DE | NA | 25 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.67 | | (72.) | COB#4CDQ | NA | 25 | 2.4 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (73.) | BF1#1SH | NA | 70 | 5.0 | PM10 | | 10.89 | | (74.) | BF2#1SGP | NA | 30 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (75.) | SMS2#Primary 1 (Flare) | By-product gas | 80 | 1.9 | PM10 | | 1.48 | | (76.) | SMS2#Primary 3 (Flare) | By-product gas | 80 | 1.9 | PM10 | | 1.48 | | (77.) | SMS2#SE | NA | 80 | 6.8 | PM10 | | 13.86 | | (78.) | HSM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | SO2 | | 8.33 | | (79.) | HSM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | NOx | | 8.33 | | (80.) | CRM-CGL#2 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | NOx | | 2.78 | | (81.) | CPP#3 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | NOx | | 27.78 | | (82.) | COB#1 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 2.78 | | (83.) | BF2#1CH2 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (84.) | Lime Kiln#2 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (85.) | SMS1#Primary 2 (Flare) | By-product gas | 80 | 2.2 | PM10 | | 2.17 | | (86.) | HSM-RHF#2 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (87.) | PLP3#2DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (88.) | BF3#1SGP | NA | 30 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (89.) | BF#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | SO2 | | 33.125 | | (90.) | HSM-RHF#3 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | SO2 | | 8.33 | | (91.) | PM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.0 | SO2 | | 6.11 | | (92.) | CRM-CAL#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | NOx | | 5.55 | | (93.) | CPP#1 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | NOx | | 27.78 | | (94.) | COB#3CDQ | NA | 25 | 2.4 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (95.) | BF2#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | NOx | | 14.72 | | (96.) | BF2#1CH1 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (97.) | BF3#1CH2 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (98.) | DR#Flue | COG | 60 | 4.2 | NOx | | 6.94 | | (99.) | Dolo Kiln#1 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (100.) | PLP1#2DE | NA | 55 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (101.) | BF2#1SH | NA | 70 | 6.0 | PM10 | | 10.89 | | (102.) | BF2#2SGP | NA | 30 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (103.) | BF3#2SH | NA | 70 | 3.0 | SO2 | | 2.05 | | (104.) | BF3#1CH1 | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 4.44 | | (105.) | HSM-RHF#2 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | NOx | | 8.33 | | (106.) | PM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.0 | NOx | | 6.11 | | (107.) | COB#2 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 2.78 | | (108.) | COB#3 | COG | 140 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 2.78 | | (109.) | PLP1#WASTE GAS | By-product gas | 120 | 6.0 | SO2 | | 25 | | (110.) | BF#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | PM10 | | 2.94 | | (111.) | Lime Kiln#5 | NA | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 1.125 | | (112.) | SP#1DE | Coke breeze | 40 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 8.89 | | (113.) | BF1#2SH | NA | 70 | 5.0 | PM10 | | 2.05 | | (114.) | HSM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (115.) | HSM-RHF#3 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | NOx | | 8.33 | | (116.) | PM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 0.92 | | (117.) | RBM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.3 | SO2 | | 4.72 | | (118.) | CRM-CGL#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 0.42 | | (119.) | CRM-CGL#2 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 0.42 | | (120.) | CPP#3 | Coal | 100 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 8.33 | | (121.) | PPC#2 | By-product gas | 60 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 5.83 | | (122.) | BF1#1SGP | NA | 30 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.11 | | (123.) | BF2#1STOVE | By-product gas | 80 | 5.0 | SO2 | | 14.72 | | (124.) | DR#Prdt | NA | 30 | 1.0 | PM10 | | 0.24 | | (125.) | HSM-RHF#3 | By-product gas | 70 | 3.1 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (126.) | RBM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.3 | PM10 | | 0.71 | | (127.) | RBM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.3 | NOx | | 4.72 | | (128.) | MSM-RHF#1 | By-product gas | 76.5 | 3.0 | SO2 | | 5 | | (129.) | CRM-CAL#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 0.83 | | (130.) | TinL#1 | By-product gas | 65 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 0.25 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 1230000 | | (b)Source | Captive (1121000 kVA) and Grid (109000 kVA) | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Copy of Agreement | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 5 | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 30 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 1069.581 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 55.703 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 1125.284 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 13631 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 3291 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 2519 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 3140 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 1395 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 655 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 1909 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 17222 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Fisheries | 1704 | | Total (ha.) | 45466.0000 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Main Plant | | 701.284 | Including storage areas | | (2.) | Green belt | | 372 | 33% greenbelt | | (3.) | Area for Solid Waste Management | | 0.25 | TSDF | | (4.) | Water Reservoir | | 18.75 | - | | (5.) | Others | Rail, road &CRZ | 32 | CRZ IA-Sand dunes |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Critically Polluted Area | NA | 0 | NA | | (2.) | WLS | NA | 0 | NA | | (3.) | NPA | NA | 0 | NA | | (4.) | Corridors | NA | 0 | NA | | (5.) | Wildlife Corridors | NA | 0 | NA | | (6.) | ESZs | NA | 0 | NA | | (7.) | ESAs | NA | 0 | NA |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Defence Installations | | NA | 0 | NA | | (2.) | Archaeological Sites | | NA | 0 | NA | | (3.) | Forest | | Jatadhar PF | 1 | Protected Forest | | (4.) | Others | Protected Forest | Ramtara PF | 4.5 | Protected Forest |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | Yes | | (a)Forests Clearance Status | Under Process(Stage-II) | | (b)Legal Status of Forest Land | Protected | |
|
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 1125.28 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | Full acquisition by IDCO | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 6 | | (b)No. of Households | 142 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 142 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 142 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 9000 | | (f)Status of R&R | In-Progress | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Core Area | Jatadhar Mohan river | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Bay of Bengal(sea), Mahanadi, Jatadhar Mohan etc.(perennial river) | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | South East | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 0.5 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 3000 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 12000 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 12000 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 45000 | | (e)No. of working days | 330 | | (f)Total Manpower | 72000 | |
|
| 32. | | Green Belt in Ha: | | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 371.34 | | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 33.00 | | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 930000 | | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 250000000 | | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Environmental | Environmental Improvement in ecology and air quality of the region by initiatives such as water sprinkling on roads and social forestry. Increase in biodiversity through plantation programs. | | (2.) | Social | Generation of local employment. Strengthening of social infrastructure such as healthcare, education and physical infrastructure such as roads, water supply under socio-economic EMP. Provision of vocational training for better livelihood. | | (3.) | Financial | Direct and indirect revenue for State and Center in the form of various taxes and duties. Boost in the local economy through generation of income and appreciation of land prices. |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 1 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1828/RA 0131 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | M N Dastur & Co (P) Ltd. | | (iii)Address | P-17 Mission Row Extension; Kolkata-700013 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9433341156 | | (v)Landline No. | 0332225050 | | (vi)Email Id | sandip.m@dastur.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 29 Mar 2022 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | Your proposal is returned due to the lack of following:
On perusal of the application, it is noted that incomplete application has been uploaded by PP and the consultant.
• On perusal of the KML file, it is noted that PP has encroached upon the coastal area too for the purpose of setting up of ISP. PP may kindly clarify the factual status and demarcate the area for ISP and jetty project with different color codes.
Form 2
• In s.no.3, all the applicable schedule under EIA 2006 shall be mentioned.
• In s.no. 7.1 of Form 2, In s.no. 7.1, entire PH proceedings inter-alia including advertisements given for PH, SPCB cover letter, actual proceedings, attendance sheet, written representations & the response submitted, Authenticated English translation of the PH proceedings if any, shall be uploaded.
• In s.no. 9, several observations have been made by RO with respect to the compliance to the existing EC conditions. Action taken from PP (or) formal closure report from IRO shall be submitted.
• In s.no.15, in-principle letter obtained during 2018 for water withdrawal has been uploaded. Final copy of the water withdrawal permission shall be uploaded.
• In s.no. 24, Forest clearance obtained by the PP shall be uploaded.
• In s.no. 25, tree cutting permission issued by the competent authority shall be uploaded.
• In s.no.27, present status of R&R shall be submitted.
• Ins.no. 32, proper green belt diagram covering 33% plant area shall be uploaded.
• In s.no.34, CRZ details of the jetty project is missing.
EIA report
• Cover page should contain name of both the EIA consultants for ISP and Jetty project.
• Project specific Risk assessment has not been carried out.
• Issues raised by EAC and EIA report are mixed with each other and there is no clarity on the same.
• The presentation uploaded is not accessible at all.
• Annexures to the report is not legible at all.
In addition to the above, note on the interlinked project and the status of EC for the said project shall be elaborated. | 30 Nov 2021 | | 2. | Eds Reply Letter | Form 2 has been updated as per EDS points where applicable. Other changes have been made in the uploaded documents. Few documents have been uploaded in Google Drive and link shared with MoEFCC due to size constraints. | 22 Dec 2021 | | 3. | NA | Your application is again returned due to the repeated failure of the uploading of documents by the consultant and proponent
1. Points raised in the EDS have not been reflected in the Form
2. Uploaded revised kml file depicts that water body area is going to be encroached upon by the ISP. The said kml is not in consonance to the layout uploaded as well as page 13 of 39 of uploaded EIA report.
3. With respect to PH proceedings, it has been stated that google drive containing PH proceedings have been emailed to the member secretary. Such reply is highly inappropriate. Parivesh is a public domain platform wherein the all the documents have to be invariably uploaded on the relevant sections for ensuring wide transparency.
4. under s.no.34, crz project details can be uploaded. | 23 Dec 2021 | | 4. | Eds Reply Letter | Replies to EDS raised on 23.12.21 and 30.11.21 uploaded | 31 Dec 2021 | | 5. | NA | On perusal of the application, following shortcomings have been again noticed in the common EIA report.
1. OCZMA recommendations shall be submitted along with the common EIA report. Further, statutory documents as per the CRZ notification, 2019 shall also be uploaded.
2. HTL/LTL map does not contain scale and details of the authorized agency carried out the task. As per the said map, there is water body under CRZ IV B has been proposed as a green belt in the plant layout? PP may kindly clarify that water body under CRZ IVB can be utilized for green belt? Such activity is permissible under CRZ, 2019 notification. PP may please clarify.
3. Kindly indicate list of the industrial activities proposed by the PP in the CRZ area vis-a-vis with the permissible provisions of CRZ, 2019 notification. Also indicate the distance proposed to be maintained between plant boundary and HTL line explicitly on the CRZ map. | 06 Jan 2022 | | 6. | Eds Reply Letter | Replies to EDS dated 06.01.2022 regarding CRZ details have been uploaded | 07 Jan 2022 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | The recommendations of the EAC (Infra 1) committee meeting held on 10th March 2022 has been uploaded for Captive Jetty project. | 25 Mar 2022 | | 2. | ADS Raise Letter | ADS reply letter is uploaded as blank document. Screenshot is attached. It is requested to upload the ADS reply letter and supporting documents once again by the PP. | 25 Mar 2022 | | 3. | ADS Reply Letter | Please refer pages 16 to 21 of the enclosed pdf copy of MoM of EAC (Infra 1) dated 10.03.22 for recommendations of EAC for captive jetty project (Agenda 3.3 Proposal No. IA/OR/MIS/74417/2018; File No. 10-68/2018-IA.III) | 23 Mar 2022 | | 4. | ADS Raise Letter | It may be noted that instant proposal involves an interlinked component i.e. captive jetty for handling of 52 MTPA cargo for which EC&CRZ is yet to be obtained by the proponent. As per the MoEF&CC O.M. dated 24/12/2010 (copy enclosed), After the EIA report is prepared and conduct of public hearing, proposal for EC for all the sectoral components of the project shall be submitted simultaneously. After the proposals relating to the various components have been considered by the respective EAC and their recommendations made, these proposals will be processed on individual files for obtaining simultaneous approval of the competent authority.
In view of the above, it is requested to submit the recommendations of the EAC-Infra1 regarding the EC&CRZ for captive jetty project for processing of the proposal as mentioned above. | 04 Mar 2022 | | 5. | ADS Reply Letter | Replies to ADS dated 28.01.22 with Annexures and presentation | 07 Feb 2022 | | 6. | NA | The committee deferred the consideration of the proposal and sough following additional information | 04 Feb 2022 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Shankarpratap Singh | | Designation | Director | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | JSW UTKAL STEEL LIMITED | | Address | JSW Utkal Steel Limited
Plot No. 3, Forest Park,
Bhubaneshwar, Odisha |
|