Untitled Page

Ministry of Environment & Forests (IA Division) ******

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 26^TH MEETING OF EXPERT APPRAISAL COMMITTEE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL OF MINING PROJECTS CONSTITUTED UNDER EIA NOTIFICATION, 2006.

The 26^th meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee for Environmental Appraisal of Mining Projects of the Ministry of Environment and Forests was held on April 16-18, 2012. The list of participants is annexed.

After welcoming the Committee Members, discussion on each of the agenda items was taken up ad-seriatim.

Item No. 1:

1.1 Confirmation of the minutes of the 25^th Meeting.

The minutes of the 25^th meeting were confirmed as circulated subject to following modification / additions:

(i) In item no. 2.15 relating to mining of flag stone by M/s Indira Pathar Shramik Shakhari Samiti, Madhya Pradesh, at the end of the 2^nd para, the following may be incorporated.

“The proponent shall get a confirmation from the SPCB regarding the level at which the public hearing proceedings were chaired and it will be certified that the level of the officer chairing the public hearing proceeding was not less than the rank of Additional District Magistrate as prescribed in the EIA Notification, 2006.”

1.2 Another issue was pointed out with regard to the minutes of the EAC meeting held in September, 2011, which was also taken on record for necessary correction. In item no. 2.29 relating to “Sriman Laterite & Iron Ore Mine of Sri K. Raghavacharyulu, Village Machanur, Mandal Pendlimarri, District Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh”, for the words “It was felt that the new lessee should first get the TORs transferred in their name following the prescribed procedure and thereafter submit the proposal for environment clearance”, the following words may be substituted “It was decided that the new lessee should first get the lease assigned in his name and thereafter submit the proposal for environment clearance.”

2.1 Turamdih Uranium Mine of M/s Uranium Corporation of India Ltd. located at District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand (EC)

The consideration of the project was deferred at the request of the project proponent.

2.2 Expansion in production capacity of Aditya Limestone Mine of M/s Grasim Industries Ltd. located at village Sawa, Sindaudi and others, District Chitorgarh, Rajasthan (Consultant: J.M. Environet Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon)

The proposal was considered by the Committee and the proponent made a presentation on the same. The proposal is for enhancement of production of limestone from 6.6 million TPA to 10.0 million TPA. The earlier EC was obtained on 17^th May, 2007. TOR for this project were prescribed in October, 2010. Public hearing has been held on 24.8.2011. Mine lease area is 760.692 ha. No forestland is involved in the project. However, it includes 145 ha of goucher land. No National Park / Sanctuary / Tiger / Elephant Reserve exist within 10 km of the mine lease. Two seasonal nallahs are reported to pass through the lease area. Murlia dam is at a distance of 1.3 km from the mine. Chittorgarh Fort is reported at a distance of 12.5 km from the mine site. Mine working will be opencast mechanized involving drilling and blasting. Ultimate working depth will be 45 m bgl (390 m AMSL). It is estimated that 47.18 million m3 of waste will be generated till the end of the mine life. The groundwater table is reported to vary between 385 m AMSL – 405 m AMSL. Mine working will intersect groundwater table. The total water requirement, after expansion, will be 598 kld, which will be obtained from bore well as well as rainwater stored in the mine pit. At the conceptual stage an area of 355.2 ha will be converted into water body. The baseline ambient air quality data showed that the levels are within permissible limit. Detailed hydro-geological study was also presented. It has been shown that within the mine lease area, there is adequate groundwater recharge while in the buffer zone, it is reported to be over exploited. The radius of influence is reported to be restricted to 360 m. The issues raised during public hearing were also considered and discussed during the meeting which inter-alia include peripheral development work / CSR activities in the surrounding area, impact due to blasting, augmentation of water supply, improvement of roads, school etc. The compliance of the earlier EC conditions were also presented and considered during the meeting. It was reported that there is no court case pending against the project.

Based on the presentation made and discussion held, the Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to following conditions:-

(i) Rainwater harvesting as also other measures for conservation of water and augmentation of groundwater resources shall be taken in consultation with the State Groundwater Board / Central Groundwater Authority.

(ii) Necessary prior clearance from Central Groundwater Authority shall be obtained for working below water level and for pumping of groundwater.

(iii) Necessary prior clearance as applicable from the competent authority in the State Government shall be obtained for use of goucher land involved in the project and necessary alternate arrangement for development of goucher land shall be made in the project.

2.3 Bihar Iron Ore Mines of M/s Nirmal Kumar Pradeep Kumar located at village Merelgara, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand (Consultant: Eco Care, Asansol)

The proposal was considered by the Committee and the proponent made a presentation on the same. The proposal is for renewal of mine lease which fell due on 25.11.2011 and enhancement of production of iron ore from 0.062 million TPA to 0.343 million TPA. TOR for this project were prescribed on 22.6.2010. Public hearing has been held on 25.9.2011. No Environment Clearance has been obtained for this project in the past. It is a violation case as the production from the mine has been enhanced during 2007-08 and 2008-09 without obtaining requisite prior environment clearance. The mine lease area is 66.781 ha, which include 51.686 ha of forestland. In addition, an area of 10 ha of non forestland outside the mine lease at a distance of about 1 km will also be used for dumping. Thus, the total project area will be 76.781 ha. The proponent have applied for diversion of 45.986 ha of forestland. It was also stated by the proponent that they already have 3.7 ha of broken up forestland prior to 25.10.1980. For the present, till forestry clearance is obtained, mine working will be restricted to 18.795 ha (15.095 ha of non forestland + 3.7 ha of broken up forestland). No National Park / Sanctuary is reported within 10 km of the mine lease, however, the mine is located within Singhbhum Elephant Reserve. As the said project is located in West Singhbhum, an identified severely polluted area, comments of State Pollution Control Board were also obtained and taken into consideration during the meeting. The SPCB has stated that many crusher units are presently closed and therefore, pollution due to transportation is limited. The AAQ data given by SPCB showed the levels within permissible limits. The mine working will be opencast mechanized involving drilling and blasting. Ultimate working depth will be 425 m AMSL. Life of mine is 31 years. It is estimated that 2.69 million m³ of waste will be generated during mine life. Presently, there are three dumps. At the conceptual stage an area of 3.7 ha of non forestland will be covered under waste dump. The baseline AAQ data showed that at Badajamda location in the buffer zone, the PM₁₀ values were on higher side. Mine working is already intersecting groundwater table. The proponent have submitted a copy of the letter from CGWA stating that NOC is not required as the total requirement of groundwater is 48.6 m³ kld. However, it was pointed out by the Committee that besides drawl of groundwater for the project, there will be pumping of groundwater due to working below groundwater table and therefore, the proponent may obtain requisite prior clearance from CGWA, as applicable for pumping of groundwater. The proponent have also prepared a site specific Wildlife Conservation Plan. The Committee desired that the Wildlife Conservation Plan may be got approved by the State Wildlife Department / Chief Wildlife Warden and implemented in the project. The issues raised during public hearing were also considered and discussed during the meeting, which inter-alia included employment opportunity to the locals, measures for pollution control provision of drinking water, peripheral development including education, safety in blasting, health care, maintenance of roads etc. It was reported that there is no court case pending against the project.

Based on the presentation made and discussion held, the Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to following conditions:-

(i) Necessary wildlife clearance as may be applicable to this project should be obtained. Measures for conservation of flora and fauna observed in the study area shall be undertaken. Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be implemented in consultation with the State Forests and Wildlife Department.

(ii) Adequate measures for control of air pollution in the area shall be taken and it shall be ensured that the pollution levels do not exceed the prescribed limits.

(iii) No working shall be undertaken in the forest area for which forestry clearance has not been obtained.

(iv) Necessary prior clearance, as applicable shall be obtained from CGWA for working below groundwater table.

(v) Appropriate measures for conservation of groundwater including rainwater harvesting shall be adopted in consultation with State Groundwater Board / Central Groundwater Authority.

2.4 Ghatkuri Iron Ore Mine of M/s Nirmal Kumar Pradeep Kumar located at village Tatiba, Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand (Consultant: Eco Care, Asansol)

The proposal was considered by the Committee and the proponent made a presentation on the same. The proposal is for renewal of mine lease, which would fall due for renewal in July, 2013 and enhancement of production of iron ore from 0.044 million TPA to 0.403 million TPA. It is a violation case as the production from the mine was enhanced after 2003-04 without obtaining requisite environment clearance. TOR for this project were prescribed on 22.6.2010. Public hearing has been held on 18.2.2012. Mine lease area is 149.7343 ha, which is a forestland. In addition, an area of 8.24 ha of non forestland outside the mine lease will be used for dumping of waste. Thus, the total project area becomes 157.9743 ha. No National Park / Sanctuary is reported within 10 km of the mine lease, however, the mine is located within Singhbhum Elephant Reserve. Karo Karampada Elephant corridor is at a distance of 8 km from the mine lease. Forestry clearance for the already broken up area of 13.96 ha of forestland has been obtained. As the said project is located in West Singhbhum, an identified severely polluted area, comments of State Pollution Control Board were also obtained and taken into consideration during the meeting. Mine working will be opencast mechanized involving drilling and blasting. Life of the mine is 106 years for the entire lease area and 22 years for the existing broken up area. Ultimate working depth will be 434 m AMSL. Groundwater table is reported at 418 m AMSL. Mine working will not intersect groundwater table. The proponent have obtained permission for drawl of 48.6 kld of water from Karo river. It is estimated that 4.5 lakh tonne of waste will be generated during the mine life. The SPCB has stated that many crusher units are presently closed and therefore, pollution due to transportation is limited. The AAQ data given by SPCB showed the levels within permissible limits. The baseline AAQ data showed that at Badajamda location in the buffer zone, the PM₁₀ values were on higher side. The proponent have also prepared a site specific Wildlife Conservation Plan. The Committee desired that the Wildlife Conservation Plan may be got approved by the State Wildlife Department / Chief Wildlife Warden and implemented in the project. The issues raised during public hearing were also considered and discussed during the meeting, which inter-alia included employment opportunity to the locals, measures for pollution control, provision of drinking water, construction of check dam on nallah, peripheral development including education, safety in blasting, health care, maintenance of roads etc. It was reported that there is no court case pending against the project.

Based on the presentation made and discussion held, the Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to following conditions:-

(ii) Adequate measures for control of air pollution in the area shall be taken and it shall be ensured that the pollution levels do not exceed the prescribed limits.

(iii) No working shall be undertaken in the forest area for which forestry clearance has not been obtained.

(iv) Appropriate measures for conservation of groundwater including rainwater harvesting shall be adopted in consultation with State Groundwater Board / Central Groundwater Authority.

2.5 Dharmapur Beneficiation Plant of M/s Geomin Industries Pvt. Ltd.

located at village Dharmapur, District Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh (Consultant: METAMORPHOSIS, Bangalore)

The proposal was considered by the Committee and the proponent made a presentation on the same. The proposal is for setting up of a iron ore beneficiation plant with a throughput capacity of 1.2 million TPA. TOR for this project were prescribed on 28.3.2011. Public hearing has been held on 20.10.2011. The land requirement for the project is estimated as 6.75 ha. No forestland is involved. Water requirement is 4,400 kld and the consumptive water requirement is 542 kld. Water requirement is to be met from Hiran river at a distance of about 3 km from the project site. The raw material (low grade ore) will be obtained locally from within a radius of 25 km. The beneficiation plant will be based on filter press technology. There will be no tailing pond as part of the project. The baseline AAQ data presented during the meeting showed the levels within permissible limit. However, the Committee desired that AAQ data in the pre-dominant downwind direction for one month additionally. The beneficiated ore will be transported from the plant site to the Goshalpur Railway siding at a distance of about 3 km by road and thereafter by rail. The issues raised during public hearing were also considered and discussed during the meeting, which inter-alia included; pollution of air, impact on agriculture, noise, water pollution etc. It was reported that there is no court case pending against the project.

Based on the presentation made and discussions held, the Committee sought information on the following:-

(i) One month AAQ data should be collected afresh, which may include at least one monitoring station within 500 m in the downwind direction and results furnished.

(ii) Contour map of the site with various activities relating to the project demarcated therein should be submitted.

(iii) The water requirement should be rechecked and reconfirmed. Steps should be taken to minimize the water requirement in the project by taking appropriate water conservation measures. Details in this regard should be furnished.

(iv) Filled in Questionnaire for environmental appraisal of industrial projects should be submitted.

(v) Availability of requisite quantity of raw material (low grade ore) should be shown with supporting documents and their transportation should also be furnished.

(vi) Assured availability of requisite quantity of water for the project from the Competent Authority should be furnished.

(vii) Details regarding disposal / management of waste / filer cake should be furnished.

(viii) It may clearly be shown whether there will be any tailing pond at all as part of this project. If, yes, details in this regard should be furnished. If no, it may be informed as to how the emergency situation when filter press is not working, will be dealt with.

It was decided that the proponent will submit the response / information on the above-mentioned points by 7^th June, 2012 and simultaneously circulate the same to the Members of the EAC and thereafter the proposal will be considered by the EAC during its meeting to be held in June, 2012.

2.6 Discussion regarding categorization of projects into ‘B1’ and ‘B2’.

The matter was briefly discussed and it was decided to continue further discussions on the subject during next meeting.

2.7 Chanchbani China clay & Silica Sand Mines of M/s Chanchbani China Clay Mines, Village Chanchbani, District Mayubhanj, Orissa (119.446 ha) (TOR)

In the absence of any authorised representative of the proponent, the consideration of the proposal was deferred to the next meeting to be held in May, 2012.

2.8 Kharai-Vayor Pozzolana Clay Mines of M/s Jaiprakash Associates Ltd., near village Kharai-Vayor, Taluka-Lakhpat & Abdasa, District Kutchh, Gujarat (Consultant: Min Mec Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi)

The proposal was considered by the Committee to determine the Terms of Reference (TOR) for undertaking detailed EIA study for the purpose of obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. For this purpose, the proponent had submitted information in the prescribed format (Form-1) along with pre-feasibility report.

The proposal is for opening of a new mine for production of 1.692 million TPA (ROM) of Pozzolana clay to meet the captive requirement for their cement plant as a raw mix requirement. The mine lease area is 432.3 ha, which includes 94.3089 ha of agriculture land. No forestland is involved. Narayan Sarovar Sanctuary is reported at a distance of 11.2 km from the mine lease. Mine working will be opencast mechanized involving drilling and blasting. Life of mine is 20 years. Ultimate working depth will be 10 m bgl. Groundwater table is reported at 42 m bgl. Water requirement is 30 kld, which will be obtained from desalination plant of their existing cement plant at a distance of about 12 km. The backfilling is proposed.

Based on the information furnished and presentation made, the Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study:-

1) A copy of the document in support of the fact that the proponent is the rightful lessee of the mine should be given.

2) All documents including approved mine plan, EIA and public hearing should be compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels, waste generation and its management and mining technology and should be in the name of the lessee.

3) All corner coordinates of the mine lease area superimposed on High Resolution Imagery/toposheet should be provided.

4) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

5) Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process/ procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

6) What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details of this system may be given.

7) Does the company have a system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

8) The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA such as waste generation etc should be for the life of the mine / lease period.

9) Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary and national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human settlements and other ecological features should be indicated. A rectified satellite imagery should be submitted.

10) Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass pre-operational, operational and post operational phases and submitted.

11) Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant Reserves (existing as well as proposed), if any, within 10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, if any, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above should be obtained from the State Wildlife Department/ Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished.

12) A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on primary field survey clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

13) Impact, if any, of change of land use should be given.

14) R&R plan / compensation details for the project affected people should be furnished. While preparing the R&R plan, the National Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs / STs and other weaker sections, need based sample survey, family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirement and action programmes prepared accordingly integrating the sectoral programme of line departments of the State Government.

15) One season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality (PM₁₀, SO₂ and NOx), water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected and the AAQ data so collected presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP report. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations should be such as to represent whole of the study area and justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind direction and location of sensitive receptors. There should be at least one monitoring station within 500 m of the mine lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical composition of PM10 particularly for free silica should be given.

16) Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors, if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction may also be indicated on the map.

17) The water requirement for the project, its availability and source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement for the project should be indicated.

18) Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the project should be provided.

19) Details of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the project should be given.

20) Impact of the project on the water quality both surface and groundwater should be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required should be provided.

21) Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will intersect groundwater. Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be provided. In case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed hydro geological study should be undertaken and report furnished. Necessary permission from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished.

22) Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through lease area and modification / diversion proposed, if any and the impact of the same on the hydrology should be brought out.

23) Details of rainwater harvesting proposed, if any, in the project should be provided.

24) Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. should be provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the same.

25) Quantity of solid waste generation to be estimated and details for its disposal and management should be provided. The quantity, volumes and methodology planned for removal and utilisation (preferably concurrently) of top soil should be indicated. Details of backfilling proposed, if any, should also be given. It may be clearly indicated that out of the total waste generated during the mine life, how much quantity would be backfilled and how much quantity would be disposed off in the form of external dump (number of dumps, their height, terraces etc. to be brought out).

26) The reclamation plan, post mine land use and progressive greenbelt development plan shall be prepared in tabular form (prescribed format) and submitted.

27) Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the project should be indicated. Projected increase in truck traffic as a result of the project in the present road network (including those outside the project area) should be worked out, indicating whether it is capable of handling the increased load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken by other agencies such as State Government) should be covered.

28) Details of the infrastructure facilities to be provided for the mine workers should be included in the EIA report.

29) Conceptual post mining land use and Reclamation and Rehabilitation of mined out area (with plans and with adequate number of sections) should be given in the EIA report.

30) Phase-wise plan of greenbelt development, plantation and compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under plantation and the species to be planted.

31) Occupational health impact of project should be anticipated and preventive measures initiated. Details in this regard should be provided. Details of pre-placement medical examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be incorporated in the EMP.

32) Public health implication of the project and related activities for the population in the impact zone should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial measures should be detailed along with budgetary allocation.

33) Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community proposed to be provided by project proponent should be indicated. As far as possible, quantitative dimensions may be given with time frame for implementation.

34) Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the environmental impacts which, should inter-alia also include the impact due to change of land use, due to loss of agricultural land and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other impacts of the projects.

35) Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and also incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.

36) Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project should be given.

37) The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards implementation of EMP should clearly be spelt out.

Besides the above, the below mentioned general points should also be followed:-

a) A note confirming compliance of the TOR, with cross referencing of the relevant sections / pages of the EIA report should be provided.

b) All documents may be properly referenced with index and continuous page numbering.

c) Where data are presented in the report especially in tables, the period in which the data were collected and the sources should be indicated.

d) Where the documents provided are in a language other than English, an English translation should be provided.

e) The Questionnaire for environmental appraisal of mining projects as prescribed by the Ministry shall also be filled and submitted.

f) Approved mine plan along with copy of the approval letter for the proposed capacity should also be submitted.

g) While preparing the EIA report, the instructions for the proponents and instructions for the consultants issued by MoEF vide O.M. No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 4^th August, 2009, which are available on the website of this Ministry should also be followed.

h) Changes, if any made in the basic scope and project parameters (as submitted in Form-I and the F.R for securing the TOR) should be brought to the attention of MoEF with reasons for such changes and permission should be sought, as the TOR may also have to be altered. Post Public Hearing changes in structure and content of the draft EIA/EMP (other than modifications arising out of the P.H. process) will entail conducting the PH again with the revised documentation.

The EIA report should also include (i) surface plan of the area indicating contours of main topographic features, drainage and mining area, (ii) geological maps and sections and (iii) sections of the mine pit and external dumps, if any, clearly showing the land features of the adjoining area.

After preparing the draft EIA (as per the generic structure prescribed in Appendix-III of the EIA Notification, 2006) covering the above mentioned issues, the proponent will get the public hearing conducted and take further necessary action for obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the EIA Notification, 2006.

2.9 Mudh Ball Clay, Fire Clay, China Clay, Red & Yellow Ochre and Silica Sand

Mine of M/s K.G. Mines & Minerals, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan (Consultant: Apex Min Tech Consultants, Udaipur)

The proposal is for renewal of mine lease which fell due on 17.8.2011 and enhancement of production of Ball Clay, Fire Clay, China Clay, Red & Yellow Ochre and Silica Sand from 50,000 TPA to 1,00,000 TPA. The earlier EC was granted on 28.2.2008. It is a violation case as the mine has continued to operate after it fell due for renewal without obtaining requisite prior environmental clearance. The mine lease area is 162.44 ha. No forestland is involved. Life of mine is 58 years. Mine working will be opencast semi-mechanised. The compliance of the earlier EC conditions was also seen and it was observed that the compliance needs improvement.

Based on the information furnished and presentation made, the Committee prescribed the following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA study:-

1) Status of compliance of the earlier EC conditions along with supporting documents and photographs should be submitted.

2) Year-wise production details since 1994 onwards should be given clearly stating the highest production achieved in any one year prior to 1994. It may also be categorically informed whether there had been any increase in production after the EIA Notification, 1994 coming into force w.r.t. the highest production achieved prior to 1994.

3) A copy of the document in support of the fact that the proponent is the rightful lessee of the mine should be given.

4) All documents including approved mine plan, EIA and public hearing should be compatible with one another in terms of the mine lease area, production levels, waste generation and its management and mining technology and should be in the name of the lessee.

5) All corner coordinates of the mine lease area superimposed on High Resolution Imagery/toposheet should be provided.

6) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

7) Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process/ procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

8) What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details of this system may be given.

9) Does the company have a system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

10) The study area will comprise of 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA such as waste generation etc should be for the life of the mine / lease period.

11) Land use of the study area delineating forest area, agricultural land, grazing land, wildlife sanctuary and national park, migratory routes of fauna, water bodies, human settlements and other ecological features should be indicated.

12) Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass pre-operational, operational and post operational phases and submitted.

13) A confirmation may be adduced, duly authenticated by the competent authority in the State Government to the effect whether the project falls in Aravalli and whether it is covered by the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 8.4.2005 in the contempt petition (c) 412/2004 in writ petition 202 of 1995 in the matter of Godavarman vs Union of India.

14) Location of National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant Reserves (existing as well as proposed), if any, within 10 km of the mine lease should be clearly indicated supported by a location map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden. Necessary clearance, if any, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above should be obtained from the State Wildlife Department/ Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and copy furnished.

15) A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on primary field survey clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

16) Impact, if any, of change of land use should be given.

17) R&R plan / compensation details for the project affected people should be furnished. While preparing the R&R plan, the National Rehabilitation & Resettlement Policy should be kept in view. In respect of SCs / STs and other weaker sections, need based sample survey, family-wise, should be undertaken to assess their requirement and action programmes prepared accordingly integrating the sectoral programme of line departments of the State Government.

18) One season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality (PM₁₀, SO₂ and NOx), water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna shall be collected and the AAQ data so collected presented date-wise in the EIA and EMP report. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations should be such as to represent whole of the study area and justified keeping in view the pre-dominant downwind direction and location of sensitive receptors. There should be at least one monitoring station within 500 m of the mine lease in the pre-dominant downwind direction. The mineralogical composition of PM₁₀particularly for free silica should be given.

19) Air quality modeling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors, if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction may also be indicated on the map.

20) The water requirement for the project, its availability and source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement for the project should be indicated.

21) Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the project should be provided.

22) Details of water conservation measures proposed to be adopted in the project should be given.

23) Impact of the project on the water quality both surface and groundwater should be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required should be provided.

24) Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether working will intersect groundwater. Necessary data and documentation in this regard may be provided. In case the working will intersect groundwater table, a detailed hydro geological study should be undertaken and report furnished. Necessary permission from Central Ground Water Authority for working below ground water and for pumping of ground water should also be obtained and copy furnished.

25) Details of any stream, seasonal or otherwise, passing through lease area and modification / diversion proposed, if any and the impact of the same on the hydrology should be brought out.

26) Details of rainwater harvesting proposed, if any, in the project should be provided.

27) Information on site elevation, working depth, groundwater table etc. should be provided both in AMSL and bgl. A schematic diagram may also be provided for the same.

28) Quantity of solid waste generation to be estimated and details for its disposal and management should be provided. The quantity, volumes and methodology planned for removal and utilisation (preferably concurrently) of top soil should be indicated. Details of backfilling proposed, if any, should also be given. It may be clearly indicated that out of the total waste generated during the mine life, how much quantity would be backfilled and how much quantity would be disposed off in the form of external dump (number of dumps, their height, terraces etc. to be brought out).

29) The reclamation plan, post mine land use and progressive greenbelt development plan shall be prepared in tabular form (prescribed format) and submitted.

30) Impact on local transport infrastructure due to the project should be indicated. Projected increase in truck traffic as a result of the project in the present road network (including those outside the project area) should be worked out, indicating whether it is capable of handling the increased load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure, if contemplated (including action to be taken by other agencies such as State Government) should be covered.

31) Details of the infrastructure facilities to be provided for the mine workers should be included in the EIA report.

32) Conceptual post mining land use and Reclamation and Rehabilitation of mined out area (with plans and with adequate number of sections) should be given in the EIA report.

33) Phase-wise plan of greenbelt development, plantation and compensatory afforestation should be charted clearly indicating the area to be covered under plantation and the species to be planted. The details of plantation already done should be given.

34) Occupational health impact of project should be anticipated and preventive measures initiated. Details in this regard should be provided. Details of pre-placement medical examination and periodical medical examination schedules should be incorporated in the EMP.

35) Public health implication of the project and related activities for the population in the impact zone should be systematically evaluated and the proposed remedial measures should be detailed along with budgetary allocation.

36) Measures of socio economic significance and influence to the local community proposed to be provided by project proponent should be indicated. As far as possible, quantitative dimensions may be given with time frame for implementation.

37) Detailed environmental management plan to mitigate the environmental impacts which, should inter-alia also include the impact due to change of land use, due to loss of agricultural land and grazing land, if any, occupational health impacts besides other impacts of the projects.

38) Public hearing points raised and commitment of the project proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to implement the same should be provided and also incorporated in the final EIA/EMP Report of the Project.

39) Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project should be given.

40) The cost of the project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards implementation of EMP should clearly be spelt out.

Besides the above, the below mentioned general points should also be followed:-

a) A note confirming compliance of the TOR, with cross referencing of the relevant sections / pages of the EIA report should be provided.

b) All documents may be properly referenced with index and continuous page numbering.

c) Where data are presented in the report especially in tables, the period in which the data were collected and the sources should be indicated.

d) Where the documents provided are in a language other than English, an English translation should be provided.

e) The Questionnaire for environmental appraisal of mining projects as prescribed by the Ministry shall also be filled and submitted.

f) Approved mine plan along with copy of the approval letter for the proposed capacity should also be submitted.

2.10 Gudha Ball Clay, Fire Clay, China Clay, Red & Yellow Ochre and Silica Sand Mine of M/s K.G. Mines & Minerals near village Gudha, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner, Rajasthan (Consultant Apex Min Tech Consultants, Udaipur)

The proposal is for renewal of mine lease which fell due on 16.8.2011 and enhancement of production of Ball Clay, Fire Clay, China Clay, Red & Yellow Ochre and Silica Sand from 75,000 TPA to 1,00,000 TPA. The earlier EC was granted on 9.1.2007. It is a violation case as the mine has continued to operate after it fell due for renewal without obtaining requisite prior environmental clearance. The mine lease area is 266.73 ha. No forestland is involved. Life of mine is 81 years. Mine working will be opencast semi-mechanised. The compliance of the earlier EC conditions was also seen and it was observed that the compliance needs improvement.