APPENDIX I | (See Paragraph-6) | FORM 1 | | Note : If space provided against any parameter is inadequate, Kindly upload supporting document under 'Additional Attachments if any' at the last part of the Form1. Please note that all such Annexures must be part of single pdf document. | (I) Basic Information | | | Is your project Comes under Notified Industrial Area | NA |
| | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | Yes |
| | Type of Violation | Started the work onsite without prior EC under EIA notification,2006. |
| | Details of Violation | Production without obtaining Environmental Clearance from MoEFCC, Govt. of India |
| 1. | |
Name of the Project/s | Daitari Iron Ore Mining Project | Brief summary of project | Annexure-Brief summary of project | Proposal Number | IA/OR/MIN/74015/2018 | Project Cost | 89375 lacs | |
| 2. | |
S. No. in the schedule | 1(a) Mining of minerals
| Project Sector | Non-Coal Mining | |
| 3. | Proposed capacity/area/length/tonnage to be handled/command area/lease area/number or wells to be drilled | 6.00 ha. | | 4. | New/Expansion/Modernization | Expansion | Proposal Number | IA/OR/MIN/7061/2007 | MoEFCC file number(Previous EC) | J-11015/1003/2007-I.A. II (M) | Uploaded EC letter | Annexure-Uploaded EC letter | | | 5. | Existing Capacity/Area etc. | 3.00 ha. | | 6. | Category of project i.e. 'A' or 'B' | A | | 7. | Does it attract the general condition? If yes, please specify | No | | | 8. | Does it attract the specific condition? If yes, please specify | No | | | 9. | |
Location of the project | Harichandrapur tahsil, Keonjhar & Jajpur district of Odisha | Shape of the project land | Block (Polygon) | Uploaded GPS file | Annexure-GPS file  | Uploaded copy of survey of India Toposheet | Annexure-Survey of india toposheet | Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Plot No.: District – Keonjhar, PS Daitari
No. – 8, Village –
Talapada, Khata no. 12: Plot no. 292; Khata no. 26: Plot
nos. 291, 293, 416, 417 ; Khata no. 27: Plot nos.
325,415; Khata no. 28: Plot nos. 297, 298, 299, 300,
301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310,
311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320,
321,322, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334,
335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344,
345, 346, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 418,
443, 444, 445, 446, 447; Khata no. 29: Plot nos. 324,
347, 348, 349, 350, 351, Rebana R.F. District – Jajpur,
Daitari R.F. | Town / Village | Village Talpada, Rebana Reserve Forest, Daitari
Protected Forest | State of the project | Orissa | |
| Details of State of the project |
---|
S.no | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name |
---|
(1.) | Orissa | Kendujhar | Harichandanpur | (2.) | Orissa | Jajpur | Sukinda | | 10. | |
Nearest railway station along with distance in kms | Daitari, 1 km | Nearest airport along with distance in kms | Bhubaneswar, 140 km | |
| 11. | Nearest Town/City/District Headquarters along with distance in kms | Brahamnipal town, District Hq. : Keonjhar ( 80 kmN); Jajpur ( 80 km SE) , 2 km | | 12. | Village Panchayats, Zila Parishad, Muncipal Corporation, Local body (Complete postal address with telephone nos. to be given) | Harichandrapur tahsil, Keonjhar &
Jajpur District of Odisha | | 13. | Name of the Applicant | Suman Krishna | | 14. | Registered Address | Odisha Mining Corporation Limited
OMC House, Post Box No.: 34, Bhubaneswar | | 15. | |
Address for correspondance: | Name of the Company | ODISHA MINING CORPORATION LIMITED | Name of the Applicant | Suman Krishna | Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | GENERAL MANAGER (GEO) | Pin code | 751001 | E-mail | envcl.omc@gmail.com | Telephone No. | 674-2377458 | Fax No. | 674-06742377458 | Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
| 16. | Details of Alternative Sites examined, if any. Location of these sites should be shown on a toposheet | No | |
| 17. | Whether part of Interlinked projects? | No | | 18. | Whether separate application of Interlinked project has been submitted? | N/A | | 19. | If Yes, MoEF file number | N/A | Date of submission | N/A | | | | 21. | Whether the proposal involves Approval/ Clearance under: if yes, details of the same and their status to be given | (i) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act,1980? | Yes | Status | Final(Stage-II) Approval Obtained | MoEF file number | 8-164/1997-FC | Date of In-Principle | 31/12/1899 | Date of final approval | 31/12/1899 | Area diverted | -1 ha. | Uploaded Clearance Letter | Annexure-Uploaded clearance letter | (ii) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the wildlife (Protection) Act,1972? | No | (iii) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the C.R.Z notification, 2011? | No | | | 22. | Whether there is any Government Order/Policy relevant/relating to the site? | No | |
| 23. | Whether any Forest Land Involved? | Yes | Area of Forest land Involved (hectares) | 846.3995 ha. | |
| 24. | Whether there is any litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up? | No | (a) Name of the Court | N/A | (b) Name of the Sub court | N/A | (c) Case No. | N/A | (d) Orders/directions of the court, if any and relevance with the proposed project | N/A | |
| 1 | Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.) | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details there of (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 1.1 | Permanent or temporary change in land use, land cover or topography including increase in intensity of land use (with respect to local land use plan) | Yes | Till now, an area of only 94.5711
ha land has been
utilized/degraded due to old
quarry / dump / trench and road.
At conceptual stage, total of
1018.3085 ha area will be
utilized for mining and allied
activities. Quarry floor, backfilled
surface and external dumps will
be biologically reclaimed.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.2 | Clearance of existing land, vegetation and buildings? | Yes | Out of 1018.31 ha of ML area,
about 213.3481 ha land has
been utilized till now. Additional
804.9604 ha of land will have to
be cleared for expansion of
existing quarries, dumping of
wastes and setting up of ore
processing facilities, roads etc.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.3 | Creation of new land uses? | No | As per Column 1.1 above.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.4 | Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore houses, soil testing? | No | Not required SOURCE: PFR | 1.5 | Construction works? | Yes | A new 1000 tph capacity OHP is
envisaged along with conveyor.
Rest most of the infrastructure /
service buildings (workshop,
stores, railway siding, township &
amenities are already in place.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.6 | Demolition works? | No | None SOURCE: PFR | 1.7 | Temporary sites used for construction works or housing of construction workers? | No | Not required as it is already
existing. SOURCE: PFR | 1.8 | Above ground buildings, structures or earthworks including linear structures, cut and fill or excavations and fill or excavations | Yes | Quarry area will increase from
61.63 ha to 571.5560 ha. Total
external dumps will be created
over an area of 279.8401 ha in
the conceptual period. Crushing &
screening plant and ore handling
facilities will be created over
20.7148 ha. SOURCE: PFR | 1.9 | Underground works including mining or tunnelling? | No | The project is an opencast
mine
SOURCE: PFR | 1.10 | Reclamation works? | Yes | Phase wise reclamation work will
be done over 571.5560 ha of
quarried out areas, 10.3419 ha
of mineral storage area,
279.8401 ha of OB dump area
and over 11.0661 ha of safety
barrier. SOURCE: PFR | 1.11 | Dredging? | No | None SOURCE: PFR | 1.12 | Offshore structures? | No | None SOURCE: PFR | 1.13 | Production and manufacturing processes? | Yes | 1. Opencast mining by
conventional shovel dumper
combination. 2. ROM iron ore
is/shall be crushed and screened
in existing 350TPH, 200TPH and
800 TPH OHP. An additional
1000tph capacity OHP has been
envisaged. 3. The finished
products are transported by
road/belt conveyor to Baliparbat
area stack yard and Railway
siding for final dispatch to buyers.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.14 | Facilities for storage of goods or materials? | Yes | 1. Iron ore will be stacked in the
open within ML area. 2. Fuel and
other consumable will be stored
at the mine’s centralized storage
facilities. 3. Explosives will be
stored in magazine located within
the ML area. SOURCE: PFR | 1.15 | Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid waste or liquid effluents? | Yes | Only solid wastes in the form of
overburden will be generated.
During 2016 there will be no
waste generation. However,
about 180.69 Mm3 of total waste
shall be generated till conceptual
period. Out of the above, around
60.69 Mcu.m shall be dumped in
existing external waste dump
and balance 120 Mcu.m waste
generated has been planned to
be backfilled for reclamation of
the worked out pit progressively.
Initially the OB/wastes shall be
dumped at the earmarked sites
given in conceptua | 1.16 | Facilities for long term housing of operational workers? | Yes | Townships at Daitari and
Baliparbat already exist. | 1.17 | New road, rail or sea traffic during construction or operation? | No | Not required as it is already
existing. SOURCE: PFR | 1.18 | New road, rail, air water borne or other transport infrastructure including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc? | No | Not required as it is already
existing. SOURCE: PFR | 1.19 | Closure or diversion of existing transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in traffic movements? | No | None SOURCE: PFR | 1.20 | New or diverted transmission lines or pipelines? | No | None SOURCE: PFR | 1.21 | Impoundment, damming, culverting, realignment or other changes to the hydrology of watercourses or aquifers? | No | None SOURCE: PFR | 1.22 | Stream crossings? | No | Only seasonal channels are
existing in the ML area. The
southeastern
part of the lease
area is drained by a number of seasonal channels which drain
into Talangi Nala which in turn
drains into the Damsal Nala,
which is the principal drainage
channel of the Sukinda valley.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.23 | Abstraction or transfers of water from ground or surface waters? | Yes | Average water consumption for
domestic and industrial use is
714 m3/day and 1972 m3/day
respectively. Portable water will
be drawn through borewell
and
industrial water by treated
recycled water. | 1.24 | Changes in water bodies or the land surface affecting drainage or run-off? | No | Diversion of a minor seasonal
drainage channel may be
required for quarry expansion.
However overall drainage pattern
of the area will be maintained.
SOURCE: PFR | 1.25 | Transport of personnel or materials for construction, operation or decommissioning? | Yes | 1.For transportation of personnel,
the public and private
transportation system will be
used. 2.Transportation of
materials outside the lease will be
partly by road and partly by rail
when the new 1000 tph OHP will
be commissioned.
3.Tippers/dumpers of adequate
capacity will be used for the
purpose. | 1.26 | Long-term dismantling or decommissioning or restoration works? | Yes | On exhaustion of mineral
reserves, the mine will be closed
down as per the Approved Mine
Closure Plan. Houses and
buildings will be handed over to
local villagers / State Govt. Tree
plantation will be carried out on
external dumps, backfilled areas,
quarry benches and floors. | 1.27 | Ongoing activity during decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment? | Yes | Green belt and plantations will
increase green cover. | 1.28 | Influx of people to an area in either temporarily or permanently? | Yes | The expanded mine shall employ
total of 1250 persons. All the
unskilled workers, most of the
semiskilled workers and a
significant number of skilled
workers will be local villagers or
from nearby towns. | 1.29 | Introduction of alien species? | No | None | 1.30 | Loss of native species or genetic diversity? | No | None | 1.31 | Any other actions? | No | None | | 2 | Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply): | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 2.1 | Land especially undeveloped or agricultural land (ha) | Yes | The mine lease is spread over
1018.3085 ha which comprises
of 846.3995 ha forest land
(Rebana RF & Daitari PF),
171.909 ha agricultural land,
waste land and grazing land.
Source:PFR | 2.2 | Water (expected source & competing users) unit: KLD | Yes | Average water consumption at
Daitari Iron Ore Mine for domestic
and industrial use is to the tune
of 714 m3/day and 1972
m3/day, respectively. Source:PFR | 2.3 | Minerals (MT) | No | None | 2.4 | Construction material – stone, aggregates, sand / soil (expected source – MT) | Yes | Construction activity for 1000
tph OHP & conveyor belt has
been envisaged. | 2.5 | Forests and timber (source – MT) | Yes | The mine lease is a part of
Rebana RF & Daitari PF. Source:
Toposheet | 2.6 | Energy including electricity and fuels (source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT),energy (MW) | Yes | Explosives: NG Based Slurry298.898
t/yr Fuel: HSD– 3300
KL/yr Source:PFR | 2.7 | Any other natural resources (use appropriate standard units) | No | None | | 3 | Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 3.1 | Use of substances or materials, which are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or the environment (flora, fauna, and water supplies | Yes | Explosives: NG Based Slurry 298.898
t/yr Fuel: 3300 KLHSD
Presently, OMC has a licensed
magazine of 18 t capacity for
storage of explosive but
considering the sensitivity of the
area, it is proposed to continue
the supply, charging & blasting
operation to external agency as
being done through tripatriate
agreement. Source: PFR | 3.2 | Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases) | No | None Source: Project Proponent | 3.3 | Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing living conditions? | Yes | The project will generate direct
employment as well as indirect employment. The income thus
generated will improve the
beneficiaries` living conditions
Source: PFR | 3.4 | Vulnerable groups of people who could be affected by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the elderly etc. | No | None Source: Project Proponent | 3.5 | Any other causes | No | None Source: Project Proponent | | 4 | Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or decommissioning (MT/month) | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 4.1 | Spoil, overburden or mine wastes | Yes | During the plan period (i.e. till
2016), there will be no waste
generation. However, about
180.69 Mm3 of total waste shall
be generated till conceptual
period. Source: PFR | 4.2 | Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial wastes) | Yes | In townships Source: PFR | 4.3 | Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste Management Rules) | No | None Source: PFR | 4.4 | Other industrial process wastes | No | None Source: PFR | 4.5 | Surplus product | No | None Source: PFR | 4.6 | Sewage sludge or other sludge from effluent treatment | No | None Source: PFR | 4.7 | Construction or demolition wastes | Yes | Construction of 1000 tph OHP &
conveyor belt has been
envisaged. There might be some
construction waste produced
while laying down foundation and
some miscellaneous scrap. | 4.8 | Redundant machinery or equipment | Yes | As per replacement schedule for
the machinery or equipment,
which has covered its economic
life will be replaced with new
equipment and old equipment will
be disposed of as scrap through
auction. Source: Project
Proponent | 4.9 | Contaminated soils or other materials | No | None Source: Project Proponent | 4.10 | Agricultural wastes | No | None | 4.11 | Other solid wastes | No | None | | 5 | Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air(Kg/hr) | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 5.1 | Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from stationary or mobile sources | Yes | Emissions from the diesel
powered HEMMs will contain NOx,
PM, CO, SO2. Source: PFR | 5.2 | Emissions from production processes | Yes | Fugitive Dust from mining
operations, haul roads and
crushing and screening of ore.
Source: PFR | 5.3 | Emissions from materials handling including storage or transport | Yes | Fugitive Dust. Source: PFR | 5.4 | Emissions from construction activities including plant and equipment | No | None Source: PFR | 5.5 | Dust or odours from handling of materials including construction materials, sewage and waste | Yes | Fugitive Dust. Source: PFR | 5.6 | Emissions from incineration of waste | No | None Source: Project Proponent | 5.7 | Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g. slash materials, construction debris) | No | None Source: Project Proponent | 5.8 | Emissions from any other sources | No | None | | 6 | Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat: | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 6.1 | From operation of equipment e.g. engines, ventilation plant, crushers | Yes | From dumpers, drills, dozers,
screens & crushers. Noise levels
will be less than 85 dB(A).
Source: Project proponent and
PFR | 6.2 | From industrial or similar processes | Yes | From Blasting operations (Refer
6.4 below) | 6.3 | From construction or demolition | No | None | 6.4 | From blasting or piling | Yes | From blasting as part of mining.
Transient noise due to blasting –
120 dB(A) max. once only in 24
hours. Ground vibrations will be
limited by limiting the explosive
charge. | 6.5 | From construction or operational traffic | Yes | From HEMMs. Noise levels will be
less than 85 dB(A) | 6.6 | From lighting or cooling systems | Yes | From lighting systems. | 6.7 | From any other sources | No | None | | 7 | Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea: | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 7.1 | From handling, storage, use or spillage of hazardous materials | No | Handling and storage of fuels will
be strictly followed as per MSIHC
Rules, 1989 and amendments
there of. Explosives are stored
and handled as per MMR1961
and Indian Explosive Act, 1884.
Source: Project Proponent | 7.2 | From discharge of sewage or other effluents to water or the land (expected mode and place of discharge) | No | No effluent/ water will be
discharged out of the mining
lease area. Maximum water recirculation
will be worked out and
will be utilized to meet industrial
water demand. Source: Project
Proponent & PFR | 7.3 | By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into the land or into water | No | All emissions to air, water and
land will be strictly as per the
prescribed limits. Thus no risk of
contamination in this regard.
Source: Project Proponent & PFR | 7.4 | From any other sources | No | None Source: Project Proponent
& PFR | 7.5 | Is there a risk of long term build up of pollutants in the environment from these sources? | No | None Source: Project Proponent
& PFR | | 8 | Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect human health or the environment | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 8.1 | From explosions, spillages, fires etc from storage, handling, use or production of hazardous substances | Yes | All preventive as well incidental
measures are being followed as
per Mines Rules and Regulations.
OMC shall strictly observe
Personnel & Safety Rules and Fire
Safety Rules. Source: Project
Proponent & PFR | 8.2 | From any other causes | No | None | 8.3 | Could the project be affected by natural disasters causing environmental damage (e.g. floods, earthquakes, landslides, cloudburst etc)? | No | Project is not in a Flood Prone, Earthquake prone or landslide
prone zone. No such natural
disaster is envisaged in the area.
Source: Project Proponent & PFR | | 9 | Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality | S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | 9.1 | Lead to development of supporting utilities, ancillary development or development stimulated   by the project which could have impact on the environment e.g.:
- Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply,waste or waste water treatment, etc.)
- housing development
- extractive industries
- supply industries
- Other
| No | 1. The mine’s existing township
will cater to the need of housing.
2. Ancillary services for repair and
maintenance of mining
machinery are expected to come
up. Source: Project proponent | 9.2 | Lead to after-use of the site, which could have an impact on the environment | Yes | Green Belt and plantation
developed in the mine lease will
restore some of the vegetation
cover. Some of the infrastructure
will be utilized by local villagers
after cessation of mining
activities. Source: Project
proponent | 9.3 | Set a precedent for later developments | Yes | Source: Project proponent | 9.4 | Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other existing or planned projects with similar effects | Yes | Source: Project proponent | | (III) | Environmental Sensitivity | S.No | Areas | Name/Identity | Aerial distance (within 15km.) Proposed project location boundary | 1 | Areas protected under international conventions, national or local legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value | Yes | Forest Area/Nearest LocationDistance
(km)/ DirectionFrom
Project Site 1. Daitari P.F.(
core
zone) 2. Mahagiri P.F.2.0SE
–
S SW
3. Rebna R.F.3.5
N
4.
Tamka R.F.7.0
ESE
Source:
Toposheet No. 73G/16 | 2 | Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests | Yes | As mentioned above Source:
Toposheet No. 73G/16 | 3 | Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration | Yes | 1.Elephant, 2.Sloth Bear 3.Python in buffer zone Source:
Earlier EIA/EMP Report | 4 | Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters | Yes | Talangi Nala – 1.4 km Kukurangi
Nala – 2.0 km Damsal Nala –
2.5 km Kusai Nadi – 6.5 km
Source: Toposheet | 5 | State, National boundaries | Yes | Not applicable Source:
Toposheet | 6 | Routes or facilities used by the public for access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas | No | Not applicable Source:
Toposheet | 7 | Defence installations | No | None Source: Toposheet | 8 | Densely populated or built-up area | Yes | 1. Daitari Township 0.5 km
2. Baliparbat Township 4 km
Source: Toposheet | 9 | Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community facilities) | Yes | Ancillary services (viz. Township,
School, hospital, market
complex, temple etc) are located
in Daitari Extension area and
Baliparbat area outside Daitari
ML area Source: Project
Proponent and Toposheet | 10 | Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources.(ground water resources,surface resources,forestry,agriculture,fisheries,tourism,minerals) | Yes | The mine lease is located on the
top of a steep hill range (Daitari
Range) adjacent to the funnel
shaped Sukinda Valley. Daitari
Range has rich Iron Ore deposits
and Sukinda valley is the largest
chromite deposit in the country.
Source: Mining plan | 11 | Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage.(those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) | No | None Source: Project Proponent | 12 | Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause the project to present environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic conditions) similar effects | No | None | | (IV) | Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies | Essential Detail Sought : NIL | Additional Detail Sought : NIL | (V) | Undertaking | | I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. | V.(i) | Name of Applicant | Suman Krishna | Designation | GENERAL MANAGER (GEO) | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | ODISHA MINING CORPORATION LIMITED | Address | Odisha Mining Corporation Limited
OMC House, Post Box No.: 34, Bhubaneswar |
| |
|