Minutes of the 30th Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held during 28th
& 29th November, 2011 at IOCL Conference Room, 5th
Floor, Core 6, Scope Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110 003.
30.0 Opening Remarks of the Chairman
At the outset, Chairman welcomed the members of the
Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1). Thereafter, agenda items were taken up
for discussion.
30.1 Confirmation of the Minutes of the 29th
Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 24th
- 25th October, 2011.
The minutes
of the 29th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1)
held on 24th - 25th October, 2011 were confirmed.
30.2.0 Consideration of the Projects
28th November, 2011
Proposals for Environmental Clearance
30.2.1 Proposed Ferro Alloys Plant (1x5 MVA and 1x9 MVA
Submerged Electric Arc Furnace to manufacture 27,601 TPA of Ferro Manganese, 19,842
TPA of Silico Manganese, 22,253 TPA of Ferro Chrome and 9,660 TPA of Ferro
Silicon) at Plot No. 262/B & 263/A, Growth Center, APIIC, Village & Mandal
Bobbili, Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Siri Smelters
& Energy Pvt. Limited - regarding Environmental Clearance
The
project authorities and their consultant, M/s Sri Sai Manasa Nature Tech Pvt. Ltd.,
Hyderabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project
and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of
Reference (ToRs) awarded during the 25th Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 29th – 30th June, 2011 for
preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Ferro alloy plants are listed at S. No. 3(a)
under Primary Metallurgy Industry of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006
under Category ‘A’ and appraised at Central level.
M/s. Siri Smelters & Energy Pvt. Ltd. have
proposed for a Ferro Alloys
Manufacturing Unit (Phase – I:
1 X 5 MVA & Phase – II : 1 X 9 MVA SEAF for manufacture of 27,601 TPA Ferro Manganese, 19,842 TPA
of Silico Manganese, 22,253 TPA of Ferro Chrome and 9,660 TPA of Ferro Silicon)
at Plot No. 262/B & 263/A, Growth Center, APIIC, Village
& Mandal Bobbili, Vizianagaram District, Andhra
Pradesh. Total land
acquired is 4.99 acres of which green belt will be developed in 1.66
acres. No forest land is involved in the
project area. No National park / Wildlife Sanctuaries / Tiger Reserve is
located within 10km distance of the project area. However, Bobilli Protected
Forests, Vempudam Reserve Forests and Koduru Reserve Forests are located at a
distance of 3.7 km (NNW), 9.4 km(N) and 9.6 km(SE) respectively. Total cost of
the proposed project will be Rs. 41.8 Crores (Phase – I: Rs. 16.8 Crores &
Phase – II: Rs. 25.0 Crores). Rs. 1.35 Crores and Rs. 15.0 lakhs
will be earmarked towards total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for
environmental pollution control measures.
Following will be the proposed facilities
and products:
Facility |
Plant configuration |
Product |
Production Capacity |
Submerged Electric Arc furnaces |
Phase – I : 1 x 5 MVA Phase – II : 1 x 9 MVA |
Ferro Manganese Silico Manganese Ferro Chrome Ferro Silicon |
27,601 TPA 19,842 TPA 22,253 TPA 9,660 TPA |
Total |
79,356 TPA |
Manganese
ore, coal/coke, Dolomite, quartz, Fe-Mn
Slag, carbon paste, Dry Briquetes, Cr. Ore, Magnesite, MS rounds,
Mill scale, casting sheets will be used as raw materials. Manufacturing process
involves smelting of charge materials in submerged arc furnace.
Ambient
air quality has been monitored for PM10, SO2 and NOx. The baseline
concentration of these parameters is 46.3 µg/m3, 11.5 µg/m3 and
13.8 µg/m3 respectively. The incremental concentration due to this
project will be 0.7, 1.9 and 1.0 µg/m3 respectively. The resultant
concentration of these parameters will be within the prescribed standards. The
predominant wind direction is towards SSW, SW and W. The impact distance is 1.5
to 3.4 km. With the mitigative measures proposed, there will not be significant
impacts on the RFS located at a distance of 9.4 to 9.6 km.
Dust
extraction system with Pulse Jet bag filters and Gas cleaning unit will be
provided to submerged arc furnace. Water sprinkling system will be provided to
control fugitive dust emissions from material handling.
The
total fresh water requirement will be 26.8 KLD, which will be supplied by APIIC
from ground water through bore wells. No process wastewater will be generated.
Maximum recycling of waste water will be done after proper treatment. Domestic
wastewater will be sent to septic tank followed by dispersion trench.
Wastewater generated from Jigging machine will be recycled and when it becomes
non-recyclable with contamination of sand soil it will be discharged. Zero
effluent discharge will be maintained.
Ferro-Manganese
slag will be reused in Silico-Manganese manufacture, Silico Manganese and Ferro
Silicon slag will be used in constructional works and for filling low lying
areas or dumped at a separate place (slag yard). Ferro Chrome slag will be sent
for Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for the Chrome content in
the slag. If Cr2O3 content is less than 0.2%, slag will
be used in construction and infrastructure developmental activities. If Cr2O3 content is
greater than 0.2%, slag will be sent to Cr. Recovery Plant. A chrome recovery
plant for recovering the chrome content in the slag is proposed. Waste slag
after chrome recovery will be disposed for filling low lying areas. Bag filter
dust will be sent to fly ash brick manufacturing units.
Noise
absorbing materials will be used in the construction of buildings etc. and less
noise generating machinery will be installed. Total power requirement of 132
KVA will be met from the substation.
The
project is exempted from the public hearing, as per 7(i) III (b) of EIA
Notification, 2006 as it is located in Andhra Pradesh Special Economic Zone (APSEZ)
developed by Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC).
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance subject to submission of arsenic concentration in the
ground water and stipulation of the following specific conditions along with
other environmental conditions:
13. At least 5 % of the total
cost of the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals
needs and item-wise details along with time
bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at Bangalore. Implementation of such program shall be ensured
accordingly in a time bound manner.
30.2.2 Proposed
Ferro Alloy manufacturing Unit with 2 x 6 MVA submerged electric arc furnaces
in two phases at Sy. No: 468, 470, 471 & 472 of Narasappaguda Village,
Kothur Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Sri Shyam Baba
Ferro Alloys Pvt. Limited - regarding Environmental Clearance
The
project authorities and their consultant, M/s Team Labs and Consultants Pvt. Ltd.,
Hyderabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project
and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of
Reference (ToRs) awarded during the 16th Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 22nd – 24th November, 2010 for
preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Ferro alloy plants are listed at S. No. 3(a)
under Primary Metallurgy Industry of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006
under Category ‘A’ and appraised at Central level.
M/s Sri Shyam Baba Ferro Alloys Pvt. Limited have proposed for Ferro Alloy
manufacturing Unit with 2 x 6 MVA submerged electric arc furnaces in two phases
at Sy. No: 468, 470, 471 & 472 of Narasappaguda Village, Kothur Mandal,
Mahaboobnagar District, Andhra Pradesh. The
company has 10.15 acres of land for the proposed plant of which 3.35 acres of
the project area will be developed as green belt. The nearest human
settlement from the site is Narasappaguda village which is at a distance of 1.4
km from the site in South direction.
Major road accessibility to the site is NH-7 at a distance of 4.25 km in East
direction. Nearest Railway station from the proposed site is Timmapur at a
distance of 3.3 Km in east direction. Maisamma Cheruvu is at a distance of 4.8 Km from the site in east
direction. There are no
ecologically sensitive areas like reserved forests, national parks and wildlife
sanctuaries within 10 km radius from the proposed site. Total cost of the project is Rs.10.0 Crores and Rs. 2.18 Crores have
been earmarked towards the capital cost for environmental protection measures.
The Manufacturing Capacities and Plant
Facilities are as follows:
S. No |
Description |
Furnace Capacity |
Capacity (TPA) |
||
Phase-I |
Phase-II |
Total |
|||
1 |
Ferro Silicon (Fe Si) |
6 MVA |
4,470 |
4,470 |
8,940 |
2 |
Silico Manganese (Si Mn) |
6 MVA |
9,500 |
9,500 |
19,000 |
3 |
Ferro Manganese( Fe Mn) |
10,000 |
10,000 |
20,000 |
The above ferro alloys will be manufactured
in a Submerged Electric Arc Furnace on campaign basis. All these products could
be produced in the same furnace with minor modifications. Ferro chrome is not proposed for production in
this plant.
Ambient air quality monitoring has
been carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx
at ten locations including the Project Site. The highest reported value for
these parameters are 42 mg/m3,
27 mg/m3,
11 mg/m3
and 9 mg/m3
respectively. The VOC’s and HC values are observed to be below detectable
limits. The cumulative concentrations including predicted values are within the
prescribed standards for National Ambient Air Quality. The sources of air
pollution and noise pollution from the unit are submerged electric arc furnace
and standby DG set. Bag filter will be provided as control equipment for
furnace, acoustic enclosure/silencer for DG set with sufficient stack height as
per CPCB guidelines. The fugitive emissions will be controlled by providing bag
filter as control equipment. The Ambient Noise Level will be within 44-56 dB
(A) in day time and 33 - 42 dB (A) in night time.
The total water requirement for the
two phases will be 55 m3/day and will be drawn from ground water
through bore wells. The wastewater generated from the plant will be cooling
tower blow down of 10 m3/day which will be reused for dust
suppression and green belt after treatment. The
cooling tower blow down will be collected in an equalization tank to prevent
fluctuations of flow rate. The effluent will be sent to neutralization tank.
Lime will be added in the neutralization tank to neutralize the effluent pH.
The overflow from the settling tank shall be used for on land irrigation.
Domestic effluent (7.5 m3/day) shall be sent to septic tank followed
by soak pit.
The solid waste generated from the
unit is slag from the ferro alloy manufacturing which will be used
for construction material/reused. Slag from ferro-manganese will be used as
construction material. Bag filter dust and solids from settling tank will be
sold to the brick manufacturers. The solid waste will be subjected to TCLP test
to ascertain that it is non hazardous, before disposal. Sludge collected from the settling tank will be sent to sludge drying
beds. Sludge cakes from sludge drying beds will be used for manufacture of
bricks.
Public hearing for the project was
conducted by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board on 21.06.2011. The
issues raised during the public hearing were regarding provision of employment
to the local people, pollution control measures, green belt development, rain
water harvesting etc. All these issues have been addressed and incorporated in
the final EIA / EMP report.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance subject to stipulation of the following specific
conditions along with other environmental conditions:
13. At least 5 % of the total
cost of the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public
Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound action plan should
be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bangalore.
Implementation of such program shall be ensured accordingly in a time bound
manner.
30.2.3 Proposed 4x6 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace for
manufacturing Ferro Alloys at Hathkhoj Industrial Area, Tehsil & District
Durg in Chhattisgarh by M/s Hira Alloys & Wires Ltd.- regarding
Environmental
Clearance
The
Project authorities and their consultant, M/s. Anacon Labs Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be
undertaken as per Terms of Reference (ToRs) awarded during the 24th
Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 19th – 20th May, 2011 for
preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Ferro alloy plants are listed at S. No. 3(a)
under Primary Metallurgy Industry of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006
under Category ‘A’ and appraised at Central level.
M/s Hira Alloys and Wires Ltd., a Unit of Hira Group of Industries
have proposed to set up a 4x6 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace for manufacturing Ferro
Alloys at Hathkhoj Industrial Area, Tehsil & District Durg in Chhattisgarh.
The project area is 3.763 ha and green belt will be developed in 33% of the
project area. There are no national parks/wildlife sanctuaries/reserved forests
or protected forests within 15 km radius. No forest land is involved. The total
cost of the project is Rs 47.1 Crores. Rs. 4.0 Crores and Rs.
0.75 Crores will be earmarked towards total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.
The
products proposed to be produced are as given follows:
Process |
Product |
Capacity (TPA) |
Ferro Alloy (Submerged Arc
Furnace) |
Pig Iron |
95,000 |
Ferro Manganese |
75,000 |
|
Silico Manganese |
52,000 |
|
Ferro Silicon |
23,500 |
|
Alumino Thermic Process |
Medium Carbon Ferro Manganese |
3,000 |
Low Carbon Ferro Manganese |
3,000 |
|
Ferro Titanium |
3,000 |
|
Ferro Molly |
3,000 |
The raw materials required for the
ferro alloy process are manganese ore (1,97,100 TPA), Carbon paste (1,971 TPA)
& Coke/Coal (45,990 TPA), Titanium (200 TPA) Molybdenum (200 TPA) and for
the alumino thermic process are manganese ore (3,180 TPA), aluminium powder (750
TPA), lime powder (750 TPA), silico manganese chips (2,250 TPA), MS scrap etc.(300
TPA) and Calcium fluoride (90 TPA). The manganese ore will be sources from
mines at A, MP, Bellary and Orissa. Titanium and molybdenum will be imported,
carbon paste will be sourced from M/s Western Electro Carbon Limited and ACM
Enterprises etc. Coke / coal will be sourced from SAIL Bhilai and Dhanbad.
Ambient air
quality monitoring has been carried at 12 locations from March to May, 2011 for
PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx. Values of these
parameters range from 28-45 µg/m3, 16-28 µg/m3, 8-18 µg/m3
and 17-26 µg/m3 respectively. Values conform to the prescribed
standards.
Adequate stack
height (30 m) will be provided for each furnace fro dispersion of gaseous
emissions. For each furnace, high efficiency bag filters will be provided at material handling and transfer points to control
particulate matter emissions. Raw material handling section would be provided
with dust suppression/dust collection systems. Greenbelt development will be
developed all along the plant boundary. Asphalting of road within the plant will
be carried to control fugitive emissions.
The make-up water requirement of 140m3/day
will be met from CSIDC. Ferro-Alloy Plant will operate on dry basis and
there would be no generation of wastewater. Waste water from Cooling Towers
will be treated and reused within plant. Sanitary wastewater will be treated in septic
tank/soak pits.
Slag from Ferro manganese is used as raw material
for Silico Manganese. Slag from Silico Manganese process is crushed and used
for civil works. Fines of metal are recycled in the process or used as raw
material in brick units. Domestic waste will be vermi-composted and used as
manure in green belt development / plantation. Used lube oil will be disposed
off through authorised vendors.
High noise sources such as compressors will be
housed inside the building to reduce the noise impacts. Personal protection
equipment will be provided to employees. Power
requirement of 25 MW will be supplied by Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board
(CSEB).
The
project is exempted from the public hearing, as per 7(i) III (b) of EIA
Notification, 2006 as it is located in notified
industrial area.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance subject to submission of revised plant layout showing the truck
parking area, rain water harvesting panel and green belt, which has been
furnished by the proponent and stipulation of the following
specific conditions along with other environmental conditions:
11. Aluminium powder should be properly
stored and handled especially for absorption of moisture. Adequate Safety
precautions shall be taken, moisture control in reactor etc. since alumino
thermic process is a risk sensitive process.
13. At least 5 % of the total
cost of the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals
needs and item-wise details along with time
bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at Bhopal. Implementation of such program shall be ensured accordingly
in a time bound manner.
14. Proper parking for transportation
vehicles and facilities for drivers & cleaners shall be provided.
30.2.4 Proposed 4x6 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace for
manufacturing Ferro Alloys at Hathkhoj Industrial Area, Tehsil Durg, District
Raipur in Chhattisgarh by
M/s Narmada Ispat Ltd.- regarding Environmental
Clearance
The
Project authorities and their consultant, M/s. Anacon Labs Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be
undertaken as per Terms of Reference (ToRs) awarded during the 24th
Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 19th – 20th May, 2011 for preparation
of EIA/EMP. All the Ferro alloy plants are listed at S. No. 3(a) under Primary
Metallurgy Industry of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006 under Category ‘A’
and appraised at Central level.
M/s Narmada Ispat Ltd., a Unit of Hira Group of Industries
have proposed to set up a 4x6 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace for manufacturing Ferro
Alloys at Hathkhoj Industrial Area, Tehsil & District Durg in Chhattisgarh.
The project area is 3.012 ha and green belt will be developed in 33% of the
project area. There are no national parks/wildlife sanctuaries/reserved forests
or protected forests within 15 km radius. No forest land is involved. The total
cost of the project is Rs 47.1 Crores. Rs. 4.0 Crores and Rs.
0.75 Crores will be earmarked towards total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures.
The
products proposed to be produced are as given follows:
Process |
Product |
Capacity (TPA) |
Ferro Alloy (Submerged Arc
Furnace) |
Pig Iron |
95,000 |
Ferro Manganese |
75,000 |
|
Silico Manganese |
52,000 |
|
Ferro Silicon |
23,500 |
|
Alumino Thermic Process |
Medium Carbon Ferro Manganese |
3,000 |
Low Carbon Ferro Manganese |
3,000 |
|
Ferro Titanium |
3,000 |
|
Ferro Molly |
3,000 |
The raw materials required for the
ferro alloy process are manganese ore (1,97,100 TPA), Carbon paste (1,971 TPA)
& Coke/Coal (45,990 TPA), Titanium (200 TPA), Molybdenum (200 TPA) and for
the alumino thermic process are manganese ore (3,180 TPA), aluminium powder (750
TPA) lime powder (750 TPA), silico manganese chips (2,250 TPA), MS scrap etc.(300
TPA) and Calcium fluoride (90 TPA).
Ambient air
quality monitoring has been carried at 12 locations from March to May, 2011 for
PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx. Values of these
parameters range from 28-45 µg/m3, 16-28 µg/m3, 8-18 µg/m3
and 17-26 µg/m3 respectively. Values conform to the prescribed
standards.
Adequate
Stack Height (30 m) will be provided for each furnace. For each furnace, high
efficiency bag filters will be provided at material handling and transfer points to control particulate matter.
Raw material handling section would be provided with dust suppression/dust
collection systems. Greenbelt development will be developed all along the plant
boundary. Asphalting the road within the plant premises is proposed.
The water requirement is 140 m3/day
and will be supplied by CSIDC. Ferro-Alloy Plant will operate on dry basis and
there would be no generation of wastewater. Wastewater from Cooling Towers will
be treated and reused within plant. Sanitary wastewater will be treated in septic
tank/soak pits.
Slag from Ferro manganese will be used as raw
material for Silico Manganese. Slag from Silico Manganese process will be crushed
and used for civil works. Fines of metal will be recycled in the process or
used as raw material in brick units. Domestic waste will be vermi-composted and
used as manure in green belt development / plantation. Used lube oil will be
disposed off through authorised vendors.
High noise sources such as compressors will be
housed inside the building to reduce the noise impacts. Personal protection
equipment will be provided to employees. Power
requirement of 25 MW will be supplied by Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board
(CSEB).
The
project is exempted from the public hearing, as per 7(i) III (b) of EIA
Notification, 2006 as it is located in notified
industrial area.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for
environmental clearance subject to submission of revised plant layout showing the truck
parking area, rain water harvesting panel and green belt, which has been
furnished by the proponent and stipulation of the following
specific conditions along with other environmental conditions:
11. Aluminium powder should be properly
stored and handled especially for absorption of moisture. Adequate Safety
precautions shall be taken, moisture control in reactor etc. since alumino
thermic process is a risk sensitive process.
13. At least 5 % of the total
cost of the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals
needs and item-wise details along with time
bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at Bhopal. Implementation of such program shall be ensured accordingly
in a time bound manner.
14. Proper parking for transportation
vehicles and facilities for drivers & cleaners shall be provided.
30.2.5 Proposed
expansion of Asbestos Fibre Cement Roofing Sheets (Corrugated and Flat) from
72,000 TPA to 1,20,000 MTPA at Village-Sinugra, Dist-Kutchh, Gujarat by M/s Ramco Industries Ltd. - regarding Environmental Clearance
The Project authorities and their
consultant, M/s Anand consultants, Ahmedabad, gave a detailed presentation on
the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection
measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference (ToRs) awarded
during the 12th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) held on 26th –
28th July, 2010 for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the Asbestos Plants are listed at S.No.4 (c) under
Category ‘A’ of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006 and appraised at the
Central level.
M/s Ramco Industries Ltd. have proposed for
expansion of Asbestos Fibre Cement
Roofing Sheets manufacturing unit from 72,000 TPA to 1,20,000 MTPA at
Village-Sinugra, Dist-Kutchh, Gujarat. The existing
project area is 50,180 m2 of which green belt has been developed in 12,300
m2 of plant area. The proposed expansion will be carried out in the
existing premises and an additional green belt of 4,700 m2 is
proposed. The additional production capacity would be achieved by optimum
utilization of the existing machineries and facilities without any cost investment
for the plant and machinery. Raw asbestos fibre, cellulose, cement and fly ash
are the raw materials that will be used. Asbestos Fibre Cement Roofing
Sheets (Corrugated and Flat & Accessories) are manufactured using Hatscheck
technology and the entire manufacturing process is a totally enclosed system.
Fibre dust, cement dust, fly ash dust and
pulverizer dust collection systems are provided with bag filters followed by a
stack of 15 m height for dispersion of emissions. Water requirement of 70 m3/d
will be met from the Gujarat Infrastructure Ltd. About 5 m3/d of
waste water will be generated, which will be recycled back. The domestic
effluent will be disposed through septic tank/soak pit. The solid waste
generated in the form of waste asbestos will be recycled. The discarded drums
and waste lubricating oil will be sold to the authorized recyclers. Power
requirement will be met from the Paschim Gujarat Viz Company Limited (PGVCL).
Besides, DG set of 750 KVA will be installed.
Public hearing for the project was
conducted by the Gujarat Pollution Control Board on 06.09.2011. The issues
raised during the public hearing were regarding provision of employment to the
local people, pollution control measures, irrigation facilities, medical
facilities etc. All these issues have been addressed and incorporated in the
final EIA / EMP report.
The
Committee after detailed deliberation has sought the following information for
reconsideration without
calling the project proponent, if the information found is satisfactory.
i.
Revised
plant layout showing the green belt, rain water harvesting pond and trucks
parking area.
ii.
Compliance
status to the conditions stipulated while according environmental clearance for
the existing capacity and to the NOC granted by the SPCB.
iii.
Cumulative
impact on the Ambient Air Quality, Stack emissions, Work Zone fiber
concentration due to the existing and proposed expansion.
iv.
Asbestos
concentration in the work zon and stack emission data in the existing units of
M/s Ramco Industries Limited.
v.
Details
of Occupational Health Surveillance of the workers.
vi.
Deflouridation
plan for provision of drinking water to the local people.
vii.
Compliance
report of all the ToRs.
viii.
Commitment
for continuous monitoring of noise for minimum 8 hours.
30.2.6 Expansion of Foundry unit from 60,000 MTPA to 1,50,
000 MTPA at Village Bevinahalli, Tehsil & District Koppal in Karnataka by M/s Kirloskar
Ferrous Industries Limited (KFIL) - regarding reconsideration for Environmental
Clearance
The above proposal was considered
and discussed in the 28th Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) meeting held during 26th & 27th
September, 2011. The
Committee noted that the presentation regarding the project should be TOR-wise.
The Committee also desired following additional information for reconsideration
of the project:
i.
Details
regarding compliance to the conditions stipulated for the existing capacity and
NOC granted by the State Pollution Control Board.
ii.
Revised
lay out plan showing the green belt of atleast 20 m width all around the plant.
iii.
Trace
metal analysis of RSPM.
iv.
Trace
metal analysis of raw material.
v.
Data
on characteristics of treated effluent.
vi.
Measures
for fluoride management in the drinking water.
The above information was submitted by the PP and M/s Kirloskar consultants Ltd., Pune & M/s Eco Laboratories &
Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Mohali also made a presentation TOR-wise before
the EAC. The compliance to the conditions stipulated in the EC dated
6.8.2007 for the existing capacity was submitted. The revised layout plan
earmarking 20 m wide for greenbelt all around the plant was submitted. Trace
metal analysis of RSPM was submitted, which showed that the trace elements such
as lead, chromium, arsenic, nickel are well below the standards. Trace metal
analysis for all key raw materials was submitted and trace metals concentration
was below detectable limit. Report of Karnataka State Pollution Control Board
for treated effluent was submitted and characteristics of BOD & other
parameters were below the stipulated limit. The fluoride levels in water are
below the permissible drinking water standard of 1.5 mg/l as per IS:10500,
however, a plan for de-fluoridation was submitted for supplying in villages
where levels are between 1 to 1.5 mg/l.
The committee noted that the existing
green belt is not uniform & dense and needs to be taken care in the
proposed expansion. The Committee sought a revised layout plan showing the
solid waste processing areas, artificial lakes etc.
The PP submitted two drawings. Drawing-1
showing the plant layout with reservoir for storage of dam supply water and
artificial lakes for rain water storage. In addition, the planning for
re-plantation of green belt as well as for filling the gaps in existing green
belt around the boundary was also shown. Drawing-2 showing enlarged view
of existing and proposed foundry layout plan clearly marking solid waste
processing areas (Sand Reclamation Plant) location was submitted. The said
reclamation plant shall be put at a estimated cost of Rs.14.72 Crores so that
the waste sand is not sent out and is consumed within.
After
detailed deliberation, the Committee recommended the proposal for environmental
clearance subject to stipulation of the following specific conditions along
with other environmental conditions:
i.
The company shall install wet scrubber and bag filters etc. to control the particulate emissions
below 50 mg/Nm3.
iii.
Gaseous emission levels including secondary fugitive emissions
from all the sources shall be controlled within the latest permissible limits
issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated 30th May, 2008 and
regularly monitored. Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be
followed.
v.
The
total water requirement shall not exceed 120 KLD. No effluent shall be
discharged and ‘zero’ discharge shall be adopted.
vi.
Risk and Disaster Management Plan along with the mitigation
measures shall be prepared and a copy submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at Bangalore, KSPCB and CPCB within 3
months of issue of environment clearance letter.
vii.
As proposed, green belt shall be developed in 33 % of the plant
area. Selection of plant species shall be as per the CPCB guidelines in
consultation with the DFO.
ix.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project shall be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to
the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bangalore. Implementation of such program
should be ensured accordingly in a time bound manner.
30.2.7 Expansion of Cement Plant (from 50 TPD to 350 TPD of
Ordinary Portland and Portland Puzzolona Cement) at Dag No- 76, Bennibari
Industrial Estate, Village -Bennibari, Mouza: Howly, District Baksa in Assam by
M/s
Kailashpati Cement (P) Limited - regarding reconsideration for Environmental
Clearance
As per the information submitted to
MoEF was not circulated among the EAC members, the proposal was deferred and
will be considered on circulation of additional information.
Proposals
for TORs
30.2.8
Expansion
cum modernization of existing Integrated Steel Plant at Village Ginigera,
Tehsil & District Koppal in Karnataka by M/s Kalyani Steels Limited -
regarding TORs
The Committee noted that the plant
layout involves a railway siding, stockyard on one side of National Highway
(NH) and the plant on other side. Therefore, the Committee sought a revised
plant layout considering the railway siding, raw material handling area and NH.
30.2.9
Proposed
2.0 MTPA Integrated Steel Plant along with 500 MW Captive Power Plant and 0.5
MTPA Auto grade productions at Tangi Choudwar, District Cuttack in Orissa by M/s
Amtek Metal & Mining Limited - regarding TORs
The Committee noted that a large area
of forest land is involved in the project and recommended to recast the proposal
by excluding forest land and optimizing the land & power requirement. Also
the proposal should be recast unit-wise and accordingly work out the land
requirement.
30.2.10
Proposed
4x18 MVA and 2x12 MVA capacity Submerged Arc Furnace for production of 1,19,500
TPA of Low, Medium & High Carbon Ferro Alloys or 2,53,440 TPA Pig Iron
along with 1x500 TPD capacity of Sinter Plant for production of 1,56,000 TPA of
Sinter at Village Bada Hariharpur, District Saraikela - Kharsawan in Jharkhand
by M/s Adhunik Power and Natural Resources Limited - regarding TORs
The
project authorities and their consultant,
M/s Environmental Research and Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Bhubaneswar, gave a
detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed
environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the proposed
Terms of Reference for preparation of EIA/EMP report. All the Ferro Alloy Plants are
listed at S.No. 3(a) under category ‘A’ of the schedule of EIA Notification,
2006 and appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s Adhunik
Power and Natural Resources Limited have proposed for 4x18 MVA and 2x12 MVA capacity
Submerged Arc Furnace for production of 1,19,500 TPA of Low, Medium & High Carbon
Ferro Alloys or 2,53,440 TPA of Pig Iron along with 1x500 TPD capacity of
Sinter Plant for production of 1,56,000 TPA of Sinter at Village Bada
Hariharpur, District Saraikela - Kharsawan in Jharkhand. The land requirement
for the project is 40 acres, of which 39.77 acres of land is acquired and green
belt will be developed in 14 acres of plant area and River Sanjay and Kharkhai
flow at a distance of 6.0 to 7.0 kms. Protected Forest is present within 10 km
and Dalma Sanctuary is beyond 10 km of project site. Total
cost of the project is Rs. 353.0 Crores and Rs. 10.0 Crores is allocated for
the EMP.
Details regarding manufacturing facilities and production capacities are
as follows:
Product Mix Envisaged
for Submerged Arc Furnaces (SAF) |
|||
Item |
Plant Rating |
Nos |
Production TPA |
Ferro Silicon |
SAF 18 MVA |
2 |
25500 |
Ferro Manganese |
SAF 18 MVA |
1 |
36000 |
Silico Manganese |
SAF 18 MVA |
1 |
25000 |
SAF 12 MVA |
2 |
33000 |
|
Total |
96 MVA |
6 |
119500 |
Or Pig Iron |
96 MVA |
- |
253440 |
Product Mix Envisaged
for Sinter Plant |
|||
Sinter |
Sinter Plant 500 TPD |
1 |
156000 |
The raw materials required for the production of
Ferro-manganese, silico-manganese and Ferro Silicon comprise of different
grades of manganese ore, Ferro-manganese slag, quartz, dolomite, coke and
Charcoal / Petcoke.
Bag
filters with heat exchangers will be provided to control fumes and dust
emission from the SAF. Suction hood followed by bag filters will be provided to
the tapping process. Dry fog dust suppression system and bag filters will be
used to control dust emission during the process and water sprinkling will be
done to suppress the dust during raw material handling.
The
makeup water requirement for the plant is estimated as 700 m3/d,
which will be sourced from River Subarnarekha. Wastewater will be reused after
adequate treatment and sewage will be sent to septic tank followed by soak pit.
Production of Ferro Silicon generates slag.
Entire slag generated in Ferro Silicon production will be sold to Iron
and Steel Foundry. Major part of slag generated by production of Ferro
Manganese will be utilized for production of Silico Manganese and part of it will
be dispatched to running Ferro Alloy Plant of group company AML at Rourkela. At
present AML is purchasing the slag from MOIL and other private suppliers. Slag
generated by Silico Manganese will be utilized in road construction; road fill
and other applications.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project
2.
If
the project site is located within 10 kms of Saraikela, a severely polluted
area, the comments from Member Secretary, JSPCB shall be obtained.
3.
Photographs
of the plant area.
4.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
5.
A
copy of the mutual agreement for land acquisition signed with land oustees.
6.
Firm
Coal linkages should be submitted along with the EIA report
7.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site. A photograph of the site should also be included.
8.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
9.
Topography
of the area should be given clearly indicating whether the site requires any
filling. If so, details of filling, quantity of fill material required, its
source, transportation etc. should be given.
10. Location of national
parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius should
specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved forests,
wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of the project
site.
11. Project site layout
plan showing raw materials, fly ash and other storage plans, bore well or water
storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas, water
bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be included.
12.
Coordinates
of the plant site as well as ash pond with topo sheet co-ordinates of the plant
site as well as ash pond with topo sheet should also be included.
13. Details and
classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
14. Rehabilitation &
Resettlement (R & R) should be as per policy of the State Govt. and a
detailed action plan should be included.
15. Permission from the
tribals, if tribal land has also to be acquired along with details of the
compensation plan.
16. Permission and
approval for the use of forest land, if any, and recommendations of the State
Forest Department. .
17. A list of industries
containing name and type in 25 km radius should be incorporated.
18. Residential colony
should be located in upwind direction.
19. List of raw material required
from coal linkage, analysis of all the raw materials and source along with mode
of transportation should be included. All the trucks for raw material and
finished product transportation must be “Environmentally Compliant”.
20. Petrological and
Chemical analysis and other chemical properties of raw materials used (with GPS
location of source of raw material) i.e. ores, minerals, rock, soil, coal,
iron, dolomite quartz etc. using high definition and precision instruments
mentioning their detection range and methodology such Digital Analyzers, AAS
with Graphite furnace, ICPMS, MICRO-WDXRF, EPMA, XRD, Nano studies or at least
as per I30-10500 and WHO norms. This analysis should include trace element and
metal studies like Cr (vi) Ni, Fe, As, Pb, Zn, Hg, Se, S etc. Presence of
radioactive elements (U, Th etc.), if applicable, should also be
included..
21.
Petrography,
grain size analysis and Major element analysis of raw material and soil from
project site and raw material should be done on the same parameters along with
analysis for SiO2, Al2O3, MgO, MnO, K2O,
CaO, FeO, Fe2O3, P2O5, H2O,
CO2.
22. If the rocks, ores,
raw material has trace elements their petrography, ore microscopy, XRD,
elemental mapping EPMA, XRF is required to quantify the amount present in it
and hence future risk involved while using it and management plan.
23. Action plan for
excavation and muck disposal during construction phase.
24. Studies for fly ash,
muck, slurry, sludge material disposal and solid waste generated, if the raw
materials used has trace elements and a management plan should also be
included.
25. Manufacturing process
details for all the plants should be included.
26. Mass balance for the
raw material and products should be included.
27. Energy balance data
for all the components of steel plant including proposed power plant should be
incorporated.
28. Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
29. Data generated in the
last three years i.e. air, water, raw material properties and analysis (major,
trace and heavy metals), ground water table, seismic history, flood hazard
history etc.
30.
One
season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative
humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except
monsoon) should be collected. The monitoring stations should take into account
the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors
including reserved forests.
31. Ambient air quality
at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project
site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
32. The suspended
particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence
of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporating of RSPM data.
33. Determination of
atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features.
34. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the
kiln and WHRB should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
35. Action plan to follow
National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by the Ministry vide
G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should be included.
36. Ambient air quality
monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day
(24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following :
i) Emissions (g/second) with and without
the air pollution control measures
ii) Meteorological inputs (wind speed,
m/s), wind direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity
& mixing height) on hourly basis
iii) Model input options for terrain, plume
rise, deposition etc.
iv) Print-out of model input and output on
hourly and daily average basis
v) A graph of daily averaged
concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval
covering the exact location of GLC.
vi) Details of air pollution control
methods used with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate
estimation with respect to each pollutant
vii) Applicable air quality standards as
per LULC covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to
the applicable Air quality standard. In case of expansion project, the
contribution should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.
viii) No. I-VII are to be repeated for
fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry
ix) Graphs of monthly average daily
concentration with down-wind distance
x) Specify when and where the ambient air
quality standards are exceeded either due to the proposed plant alone or when
the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi) Fugitive dust protection or dust
reduction technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
37. A plan for the
utilization of waste/fuel gases in the WHRB for generating power have to be set
out.
38. Impact of the
transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment
should be assessed and provided. The alternate method of raw material and end
product transportation should also be studied and details included.
39. One season data for
gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is necessary.
40. An action plan to
control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources as per
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated
30th May, 2008.
41. Presence of
aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for
recharging the aquifer should be included.
42. Source of
surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included. Information regarding
surface hydrology and water regime should be included.
43. Ground water analysis
with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to quantify the
area and volume of aquifer and its management.
44. Ground water modeling
showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included
45.
Column
leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20 oC
- 50 oC should be conducted and included.
46.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site should be submitted to
harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the
ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to
conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources. Rain water harvesting and groundwater
recharge structures may also be constructed outside the plant premises in
consultation with local Gram Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground
water level. Incorporation of water harvesting plan for the project is
necessary, if source of water is bore well.
47. Permission for the
drawl of water from the State Irrigation Department or concerned authority and
water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and
reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the
water conservation should be included.
48. A note on the impact
of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
49. Surface water quality
of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at
eight locations must be ascertained.
50. If the site is within
10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation Mapping is required at
1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well
as flood occurrence frequency.
51. A note on treatment
of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different purposes
should be included.
52. Provision of traps
and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil, grease
and cleaning agents.
53. If the water is mixed
with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further transport
should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the
transport capacity.
54. Wastewater
characteristics (heavy metals, anions and cations, trace metals, PAH) from any
other source should be included.
55. The pathways for
pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied for
surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water
with a monitoring and management plans.
56. Ground water
monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological
features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as
also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and
Aquatic) is vital.
57. Geotechnical data by
a bore hole of upto 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground water
level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk
Management in the area.
58. Action plan for
solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU
regarding utilization of ash should also be included.
59. Details of evacuation
of ash, details regarding ash pond impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so details of the lining etc. needs to be addressed.
60. A note on the
treatment, storage and disposal of all type of slag should be included. Identification
and details of land to be used for SMS slag disposal should be included.
Details of secured land fill as per CPCB guidelines should also be included.
61. End use of solid
waste and its composition should be covered.
Toxic metal content in the waste material and its composition should
also be incorporated particularly of slag.
62. All stock piles will
have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to ground
water.
63. Action plan for the
green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than 1,500
trees per ha. giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule
etc. should be included. The green belt should be around the project boundary
and a scheme for greening of the travelling roads should also be incorporated.
All rooftops/terraces should have some green cover.
64. Detailed description
of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with special
reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
65. Disaster Management
Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed and
included.
66. Occupational health:
a) Details of existing Occupational &
Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and
whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not
within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so
that health of the workers can be preserved,
b) Details of exposure specific health
status evaluation of worker. If the
workers’ health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays,
Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision
and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical
examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month
analyzed data of abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of
exposure and department wise.
c) Annual report of heath status of
workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.
67. Details regarding infrastructure
facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour
force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck
drivers during operation phase.
68.
Impact
of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as road network and
whether any additional infrastructure needs to be constructed and the agency
responsible for the same with time frame.
69. Environment Management
Plan (EMP) to mitigate the adverse impacts due to the project along with item
wise cost of its implementation. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum
for environmental pollution control measures should be included.
70. Public hearing issues raised and commitments made by the project
proponent on the same should be included separately in EIA/EMP Report in the
form of tabular chart.
71. At least 5 % of the
total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social
Commitment based on public hearing issues and item-wise details along with time
bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic development activities
need to be elaborated upon.
72. Plan for the
implementation of the recommendations made for the steel plants in the CREP
guidelines must be prepared.
73. A note on
identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
74. Any litigation
pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of
Law against the project, if so, details thereof should also be included.
It
was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by
the Expert Appraisal Committee-1
(Industry) should be considered for
preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in
addition to all the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’
given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP
report shall be submitted to Jharkhand State Pollution Control Board for public
hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in
the EIA report. The final EIA report
shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
The TORs prescribed shall be valid for
a period of two years for submission of the EIA/EMP reports along with public hearing
proceedings.
30.2.11 Proposed Ferro Alloy Plant with 3x3.6 MVA Submerged
Electric Arc Furnace (Si-Mn: 10,204 TPA,
Fe-Mn:14,195 TPA, Fe-Cr: 5,722 TPA, Fe-Si: 2,484 TPA) and 20 TPD
Manganese Ore Sinter Plant at Plot No. 256/B & 257/B, APIIC Growth Centre, Village
& Mandal Bobbili, District Vizianagram, Andhra Pradesh by M/s Victoria Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. - regarding TORs
The
project authorities and their consultant,
M/s Vision Labs, Hyderabad, gave a detailed presentation on the salient features
of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken
along with the proposed Terms of Reference for preparation of EIA/EMP
report. All the Ferro
Alloy Plants are listed at S.No. 3(a) under category ‘A’ of the schedule of EIA
Notification, 2006 and appraised by the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s
Victoria Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. have proposed for Ferro Alloy Plant with 3x3.6
MVA Submerged Electric Arc Furnace (Si-Mn: 10,204 TPA, Fe-Mn:14,195 TPA, Fe-Cr: 5,722 TPA, Fe-Si:
2,484 TPA) and 20 TPD Manganese Ore Sinter Plant at Plot No. 256/B & 257/B,
APIIC Growth Centre, Village & Mandal Bobbili, District Vizianagram, Andhra
Pradesh. Total land acquired is 4.0 acres of which green belt will be developed in 1.25 acres of plant
area. The project area is a notified industrial area and a copy of Gazette
Notification has been submitted. No National Park / Wildlife Sanctuary /
Biosphere reserves are located within 10 km distance. Bobilli scrub forest is
located at a distance of 3.5 km. Total cost of
the project is Rs. 15 Crores and Rs. 1.0 Crore is allocated for environment
protection measures.
Manganese
Ore, Chrome Ore fines, Coke /Coal, Dolomite, Quartz, Mill Scale, Ferro
Manganese slag, Carbon Electrode Paste etc. are the raw materials that will be
used. Dust extraction system comprising
of reverse pulse jet type bag filter, suction hood, duct, stack etc. will be
provided to SAF and dust suppression system will be provided to the screen
house and the storage yard.
The
water requirement is estimated as 40 m3/d, which will be supplied by
APIIC. There would be no generation of wastewater
from manufacturing of Ferro Alloys. Only domestic waste water will be generated,
which will be sent to septic tank followed by Soak pit. Fe-Mn slag will
be reused in Si-Mn production process. Silico-Manganese slag, Ferro Silicon
slag and Ferro Chrome slag will be used in road construction works, brick
making, leveling low lying areas etc. after conducting TCLP test. Bag Filter Dust will be sold to
brick manufacturing units.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive summary of the project.
2.
Photographs of plant area.
3.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
4.
Coal linkage documents
5.
Proposal
should be submitted to the Ministry for environment clearance only after
acquiring total land. Necessary documents indicating acquisition of land should
be included.
6.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in
7.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
8.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within
9.
A
list of industries within 10 km radius of the plant area.
10.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
11.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials and other storage plans, bore well or
water storage, aquifers (within
12.
List
of raw material required, Chemical analysis of all the raw materials including
Trace Elements and source along with mode of transportation should be included.
All the trucks for raw material and finished product transportation must be
“Environmentally Compliant”.
13.
Quantification
& Characterization of solid /hazardous waste & its action plan for
management should be included.
14.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
15.
Energy
balance data for all the components of ferro alloy plant should be
incorporated.
16.
Design
details of Ferro Alloy Plant and manufacturing process details should be
included.
17.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
18.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
19.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction.
Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
20.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
21.
Air
quality modeling for ferro alloy plant for specific pollutants needs to be
done. APCS for the control of emissions
should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
22.
Ambient
air quality as per National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by
the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should
be included.
23.
Air
Quality Impact Predication Modelling based on ISCST-3 or the latest models.
24.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided.
25.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
26.
Presence
of aquifer/aquifers within
27.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included.
28.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
29.
‘Permission’ for the drawl of water should be
obtained. Water balance data must be provided.
30.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
31.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures.
32.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (
33.
If
the site is within
34.
Pretreatment
of raw water, treatment plant for waste water should be described in detail.
Design specifications may be included.
35.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
36.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources should also be included.
37.
Identification
and details of land to be used for all type of slag disposal in the secured
land fill as per CPCB guidelines should be included.
38.
End
use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
39.
Provision
of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for the slag and its end
use should be included.
40.
Action plan for chrome recovery and its solid waste
management plan.
41.
Acton
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area should be included.
42.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
43.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
44.
Details
regarding expected Occupational & Safety Hazards. Protective measures
for Occupational Safety & Health
hazards so that such exposure can be kept within permissible exposure level so
as to protect health of workers. Health of the workers with special reference
to Occupational Health. Plan of exposure specific health status evaluation of
workers; pre placement and periodical health status of workers; plan of
evaluation of health of workers by pre designed format, chest x ray,
Audiometry, Spirometry Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and
any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations
and plan of monthly and yearly report of
the health status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and
Safety.
45.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic
development activities need to be elaborated upon.
46.
Total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures should also be included.
47.
Public
hearing issues raised and commitments made by the project proponent on the same
should be included separately in EIA/EMP Report in the form of tabular chart
with financial budget for complying with the commitments made.
48.
Any
litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by
any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
It was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by the
Expert Appraisal Committee-1 (Industry)
should be considered for preparation of
EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the
relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III
and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be
submitted to the Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The
issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA
report. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining
environmental clearance.
The TORs prescribed shall be valid for
a period of two years for submission of the EIA/EMP along with Public hearing
proceedings.
30.2.12 Expansion of CTD/TMT Bars and Billets manufacturing
Unit (Existing CTD/TMT Bars capacity (1,00,000 TPA) and proposed 1,50,000 TPA
and Billets proposed capacity- 2,50,000 TPA) at # 293-296, Phase - IV,
Industrial Area, Chopanki (Bhiwadi), District Alwar in Rajasthan by M/s RGTL Industries Limited -
regarding TORs
The proponent did not attend the
meeting. The Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by
the proponent.
30.2.13
Expansion
of Steel Manufacturing Unit at Village Ajnali, Opp. Focal Point, Mandi Gobindgarh,
District Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab by M/s
Bhawani Industries Limited - regarding TORs
The project authorities
and their consultant, M/s CPTL Envirotech, Chandigarh gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project along with the draft Terms of
Reference for the preparation of EIA/EMP Report. Although the proposed
project is a Category ‘B’, since the plant site falls within 10km of critically polluted area, as per the General Condition of EIA Notification, 2006, the
project has been appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s Bhawani Industries Limited have proposed for expansion of Steel Manufacturing Unit at
Village Ajnali, Opp. Focal Point, Mandi Gobindgarh, District Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab.
The project area is about 37.47 Acres. The unit is
situated within 10 km distance of critically Polluted area of Mandi Gobindgarh.
There are no Wild Life Sanctuaries, Reserved /Protected Forests or Defence
Installations, Rivers and Hill Ranges within 10 km of the project. Total Cost
of the Project is
M/s
Bhawani Industries Ltd. are currently manufacturing Steel Ingots, Billets, Flats, Strip, ERW pipes, G.I pipes at
Village Ajnali, Opp. Focal Point, Mandi
Gobindgarh, District- Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab.
The existing approved capacity is of 200 MTD Concast
Billet, 50 MTD Steel Ingots, 110 MTD Flats, Strip, 60 MTD ERW Pipes & 80
MTD G.I. Pipes for which they have provided two nos Induction Furnace of capacities
20 & 6 TPH and a Rolling Mill. The Industry now proposes to enhance the
capacity of the unit by installing one Arc Furnace of capacity 20 TPH and one
Rolling mill. The capacity of the unit after expansion for Concast Billets will be increased to 400 MTD,
in addition TMT bars/wire rod will be added with a capacity of 200 MTD. There
is no increase in other items.
The raw materials used are MS/CI Scrap/, Sponge/Pig Iron, Silico
Manganese Alloys. The total power demand for the unit after expansion will be
about 31.673 MW. This demand will be met by sourcing power from Punjab State
Power Corporation Limited from the nearby Sub-station. For Air Pollution
Control, cyclones & bag filters have been provided to Induction & Arc
furnaces and wet scrubber to rolling mills. The water requirement for domestic
purpose will be 16 m3/day and for cooling purpose will be 45 m3/day.
Total water requirement will be 61 m3/day. There is no generation of
process wastewater. Domestic waste water will be treated through STP. and the
same will be used within the plant premises for plantation. The solid wastes
from the bag filters will be stored in a pit of R.C.C. Construction and sent to
TSDF site. Slag from the furnace, (23 TPD) will be given to cement manufactureers
for further use.
The Committee noted that the green belt of the existing unit is not
satisfactory and needs to be taken care of in the proposed expansion.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project.
2.
Photographs
of the existing and proposed plant area.
3.
Compliance to the
conditions stipulated in the Environmental Clearance/NOC granted by the SPCB.
4.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
5.
Coal linkage documents
6.
Proposal
should be submitted to the Ministry for environment clearance only after
acquiring total land. Necessary documents indicating acquisition of land should
be included.
7.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in
8.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
9.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within
10.
A
list of industries within 10 km radius of the plant area.
11.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
12.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials and other storage plans, bore well or
water storage, aquifers (within
13.
List
of raw material required, Chemical analysis of all the raw materials including
Trace Elements and source along with mode of transportation should be included.
All the trucks for raw material and finished product transportation must be
“Environmentally Compliant”.
14.
Quantification
& Characterization of solid /hazardous waste & its action plan for
management should be included.
15.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
16.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
17.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
18.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction.
Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
19.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
20.
Air
quality modeling for ferro alloy plant for specific pollutants needs to be
done. APCS for the control of emissions
should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
21.
Ambient
air quality as per National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by
the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should
be included.
22.
Air
Quality Impact Predication Modeling based on ISCST-3 or the latest models.
23.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided.
24.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
25.
Presence
of aquifer/aquifers within
26.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included.
27.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
28.
‘Permission’ for the drawl of water should be
obtained. Water balance data must be provided.
29.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
30.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures.
31.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (
32.
If
the site is within
33.
Pretreatment
of raw water, treatment plant for waste water should be described in detail.
Design specifications may be included.
34.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
35.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources should also be included.
36.
Identification
and details of land to be used for all type of slag disposal in the secured
land fill as per CPCB guidelines should be included.
37.
End
use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
38.
Provision
of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for the slag and its end use
should be included.
39.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area should be included.
40.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
41.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
42.
Details
regarding expected Occupational & Safety Hazards. Protective measures for
Occupational Safety & Health hazards so that such exposure can be kept
within permissible exposure level so as to protect health of workers. Health of
the workers with special reference to Occupational Health. Plan of exposure
specific health status evaluation of workers; pre placement and periodical
health status of workers; plan of evaluation of health of workers by pre
designed format, chest x ray, Audiometry, Spirometry Vision testing (Far &
Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre
placement and periodical examinations and plan of monthly and yearly report of
the health status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and
Safety.
43.
Public hearing issues raised and commitments made by
the project proponent on the same should be included separately in EIA/EMP
Report in the form of tabular chart.
44.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals needs and item-wise details along
with time bound action plan should be prepared and incorporated.
45.
Total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures should also be included.
46.
Any
litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by
any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
It
was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by
the Expert Appraisal Committee-1
(Industry) should be considered for preparation
of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the
relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix
III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP report shall be
submitted to Punjab Pollution Control Board for public hearing. The issues
emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report shall be
submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
The TORs prescribed shall be valid for
a period of two years for submission of the EIA/EMP reports along with public hearing
proceedings.
30.2.14 Expansion of existing induction furnace from 40 TPD
to 250 TPD/90,000 TPA ingots/ Billets) along with installation of 9 MVA SAF for
manufacture ferro Alloys 54
TPD/19,440 TPA (Ferro Manganese/Silico Manganese)at Sy. No. 439/2 & 440/2, Village Wadiyaram, District Medak in Andhra
Pradesh by M/s Mohan Steels (India) Pvt. Ltd. - regarding TORs
The
project authorities and their consultant, M/s Consafe
Science (India), Hyderabad, gave a detailed presentation on the salient
features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be
undertaken along with the proposed Terms of Reference for preparation of
EIA/EMP report. All
the Ferro Alloy Plants are listed at S.No. 3(a) under category ‘A’ of the
schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and appraised by
the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s
Mohan Steels (India) Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for expansion of existing
induction furnace from 40 TPD to 250 TPD/90,000 TPA ingots/ Billets along with
installation of 9 MVA SAF for manufacture of ferro Alloys 54 TPD/19,440 TPA (Ferro Manganese/Silico Manganese) at Sy. No. 439/2 & 440/2, Village Wadiyaram, District
Medak in Andhra Pradesh. Total land acquired is 6.09 acres of which green belt will be developed in 33 % of the total
project area. The project area is a notified industrial area and a copy of
Gazette Notification is submitted. Total cost of
the project is Rs. 25 Crores and Rs. 2.5 Crores is allocated for pollution
control measures.
Following are the details of existing and
proposed expansion facilities:
S.No |
Existing |
Product |
Proposed Expansion |
Product |
1 |
Induction Furnace 4TPC |
40 TPD Ingots/Billets |
Induction Furnace 25TPC |
250 TPD / 90,000TPA (Ingots / Billets_ |
2 |
Ferro Alloy |
-- |
9 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace |
54TPD/19440TPA (Ferro Manganese/Silico Manganese) |
Fume extraction system followed by wet scrubber is provided to the
Induction Furnace and Bag filters will be provided to Submerged Arc Furnace. The
total water requirement is 50 KLD, which will be met from bore well and
surface water. The slag from IF will be
crushed in crusher, the iron particles are removed and non ferrous particles
are sold to brick Manufacturers and dust will be sold to brick
manufacturers.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project.
2.
Photographs
of the existing and proposed plant area.
3.
Compliance to the
conditions stipulated in the Environmental Clearance/NOC granted by the SPCB.
4.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
5.
Coal linkage documents
6.
Proposal
should be submitted to the Ministry for environment clearance only after
acquiring total land. Necessary documents indicating acquisition of land should
be included.
7.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in
8.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
9.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within
10.
A
list of industries within 10 km radius of the plant area.
11.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
12.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials and other storage plans, bore well or
water storage, aquifers (within
13.
List
of raw material required, Chemical analysis of all the raw materials including
Trace Elements and source along with mode of transportation should be included.
All the trucks for raw material and finished product transportation must be
“Environmentally Compliant”.
14.
Quantification
& Characterization of solid /hazardous waste & its action plan for
management should be included.
15.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
16.
Energy
balance data for all the components of ferro alloy plant should be
incorporated.
17.
Design
details of Ferro Alloy Plant and manufacturing process details should be
included.
18.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
19.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
20.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble
fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
21.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
22.
Air
quality modeling for ferro alloy plant for specific pollutants needs to be
done. APCS for the control of emissions
should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
23.
Ambient
air quality as per National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by
the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should
be included.
24.
Air
Quality Impact Predication Modeling based on ISCST-3 or the latest models.
25.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided.
26.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
27.
Presence
of aquifer/aquifers within
28.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included.
29.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
30.
‘Permission’ for the drawl of water should be
obtained. Water balance data must be provided.
31.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
32.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures.
33.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (
34.
If
the site is within
35.
Pretreatment
of raw water, treatment plant for waste water should be described in detail.
Design specifications may be included.
36.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
37.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources should also be included.
38.
Identification
and details of land to be used for all type of slag disposal in the secured
land fill as per CPCB guidelines should be included.
39.
End
use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
40.
Provision
of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for the slag and its end
use should be included.
41.
Commitment
that no Ferro chrome will be manufactured without prior approval of the
Ministry.
42.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area should be included.
43.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
44.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
45.
Details
regarding expected Occupational & Safety Hazards. Protective measures for
Occupational Safety & Health hazards so that such exposure can be kept
within permissible exposure level so as to protect health of workers. Health of
the workers with special reference to Occupational Health. Plan of exposure
specific health status evaluation of workers; pre placement and periodical
health status of workers; plan of evaluation of health of workers by pre
designed format, chest x ray, Audiometry, Spirometry Vision testing (Far &
Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement
and periodical examinations and plan of monthly and yearly report of the health
status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.
46.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals needs and item-wise details along
with time bound action plan should be prepared and incorporated.
47.
Total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures should also be included.
48.
Any
litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by
any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
It was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed
by the Expert Appraisal Committee-1
(Industry) should be considered for
preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in
addition to all the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’
given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The final EIA
report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental
clearance. Public hearing is not
required as per Para 7(i) III (b) of EIA Notification, 2006 as the project is
located in notified industrial area.
The TORs prescribed shall be valid for
a period of two years for submission of the EIA/EMP report.
30.2.15 Proposed Modernization of existing Coke Oven Plant by
installing a Coal Washery (25 TPH or 60,000
TPA) at Dag No. 14,15,19,20 of Patta
No.36, Village Ambher, Jorabhat, Taluk Sonapur, District Kamrup (M), Assam by M/s R.P. Associates Pvt. Ltd. - regarding TORs
The
project authorities gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the proposed Terms of
Reference for preparation of EIA/EMP report. All the Coke Oven Plants < 2,50,000 & > 25,000
Tonnes/Annum are covered under Category (B) as per para 4(b) of the Schedule of the EIA
notification 2006, but due to absence of SEIAA/SEAC for Assam, the proposal has
been appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) in the Ministry.
M/s R.P.
Associates Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for modernization of existing Coke Oven
Plant by installing a Coal Washery (25 TPH or
60,000 TPA) at Dag No. 14,15,19,20 of Patta No.36, Village Ambher, Jorabhat, Taluk
Sonapur, District Kamrup (M), Assam. No Defense
Installation, Biosphere Reserve, National Park/Wild Life Sanctuary,
Ecologically Sensitive Area are present within 10 km radius. No new land will be acquired for the proposed
modernization and 0.0136 ha of the existing
project area of 1.6454 ha will be utilized.
The total
cost of the project will be Rs. 83.84 Lakhs. Rs. 10 Lakhs
and Rs. 2 Lakhs will be earmarked towards total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures. The project site is in
Seismic Zone-V.
The existing plant is a Low Ash Metallurgical Coke (LAMC)
Oven with a installed capacity of 40,095 MTPA and was installed in the year
2005. To improve the quality of end product, the company is
proposing to install a coal washing
facility (25 TPH or 60,000 TPA) in which ash content of coal will be reduced. To manufacture
40,095 MTPA of coke (finished product) 70,400 MTPA of raw coal will be required
considering a yield of 57%. Out of 70,400 MT, 42,000 MT washed coal will be used and balance 28,400
MT unwashed coal will be used for blending. To produce 42,000 MT of washed coal 60,000 MT
of raw coal will be required. Input coal
would be obtained by trucks from privately owned mines produced by rat hole
mining. The technology used for the coal washing is wet process
technology using self generated slurry as a media.
About 18,000 TPA of rejects would be
sold to local coal supplier for use as a
fuel in the FBC based power plants. Water requirement will be 4 m3/day. No industrial waste water
will be generated due to proposed project and plant would operate on a zero discharge
basis.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1. Executive summary of
the project.
2. Photographs of the
existing and proposed plant area.
3. Compliance to the conditions stipulated in the Environmental
Clearance/NOC granted by the SPCB.
4. A line diagram/flow
sheet for the process and EMP
5.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included. 3-D
view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from the
proposal site.
6.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
7.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius
should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved
forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of
the project site.
8.
A
list of industries within 10 km radius of the plant area.
9.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
10.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials and other storage plans, bore well or
water storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas,
water bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be
included.
11.
List
of raw material required and source along with mode of transportation should be
included. All the trucks for raw material and finished product transportation
must be “Environmentally Compliant”.
12.
Quantification
& Characterization of solid /hazardous waste & its action plan for
management should be included.
13.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
14.
Energy
balance data for all the components of plant should be incorporated.
15.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
16.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage
from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
17.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble
fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
18.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
19.
Air
quality modeling for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions should also
be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
20.
Ambient
air quality as per National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by
the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should
be included.
21.
Air
Quality Impact Predication Modeling based on ISCST-3 or the latest models.
22.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided.
23.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
24.
Presence
of aquifer/aquifers within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan
for recharging the aquifer should be included.
25.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included.
26.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
27.
‘Permission’ for the drawl of water should be
obtained. Water balance data must be provided.
28.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
29.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures.
30.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface
drains at eight locations must be ascertained.
31.
If
the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation
Mapping is required at 1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean
river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency.
32.
Pretreatment
of raw water, treatment plant for waste water should be described in detail.
Design specifications may be included.
33.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
34.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources should also be included.
35.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area should be included.
36.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
37.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
38.
Geo-technical
data by a bore hole of upto 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground
water level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk
Management in the area and impacts due to land slides.
39.
Occupational
health:
a) Details of existing Occupational &
Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and
whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not
within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so
that health of the workers can be preserved,
b) Details of exposure specific health
status evaluation of worker. If the
workers’ health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays,
Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision
and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical
examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month
analyzed data of abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of
exposure and department wise.
c) Annual report of heath status of
workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.
40.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals need and item-wise details along
with time bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic development
activities need to be elaborated upon.
41.
Total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures should also be included.
42.
Any
litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by
any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
The
Expert Appraisal
Committee-1 (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the
EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the MOEF
for obtaining environmental clearance. The proposal is exempted from public hearing by
categorizing in B-2 category due to no increase in the project area, no increase in existing coke oven
production capacity,
only to improve the quality of final coke product, raw
coal washing unit will be installed and washed coal will be charged in the
oven, zero-discharge of wastewater will be followed, no increase in air
pollution etc.
The
TORs prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the
EIA/EMP report.
30.2.16 Proposed Steel Plant (Iron Ore Beneficiation: 2.0
MTPA; Pellet Plant: 1.2 MTPA; DRI (Sponge Iron) Plant: 3.0 Lakh TPA; Coal
Washery: 0.7 MTPA; Steel Melting Shop: 2.0 Lakh TPA; Rolling Mill: 2.0 Lakh
TPA) along with 50 MW Captive Power Plant (25 MW CFBC and 25 MW WHRB) at
Village Shahgarh, Tehsil Sihora, District Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh by M/s Refra Mining & Power Limited - regarding TORs
The project authorities and their consultant, M/s. J.M. EnviroNet Pvt.
Ltd., Gurgaon gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along
with the proposed Terms of Reference for preparation of EIA/EMP report. All
the Steel Plants are listed at S.No. 3(a) under category ‘A’ of the schedule of
EIA Notification, 2006 and appraised by the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s. Refra Mining &
Power Ltd. have proposed for a Steel Plant (Iron Ore Beneficiation: 2.0 MTPA;
Pellet Plant: 1.2 MTPA; DRI (Sponge Iron) Plant: 3.0 Lakh TPA; Coal Washery:
0.7 MTPA; Steel Melting Shop: 2.0 Lakh TPA; Rolling Mill: 2.0 Lakh TPA) along
with 50 MW Captive Power Plant (25 MW CFBC and 25 MW WHRB) at Village Shahgarh,
Tehsil Sihora, District Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh. Total land required for
the proposed project will be about 45 ha (110 acres) of which green belt
will be developed on an area of 37 acre, which is around 33% of the total
project area. No National Park / Wildlife Sanctuary / Biosphere reserve is
located within 10 km distance. No forest land is involved. Borha reserve forest falls within 10 km radius of study area.
No R&R is applicable. Total cost of the project is Rs. 912.0 Crores and Rs. 38.0 Crores
is earmarked for pollution control measures.
Details of proposed facilities
and their production capacities are given below:
S. No. |
Plant/Facility |
Capacity |
1. |
Iron
Ore Beneficiation |
2.0
Million TPA |
2. |
Iron
Ore Pelletizing Plant |
1.2
Million TPA |
3. |
DRI
(Sponge Iron) Plant |
3.0
Lakh TPA |
4. |
Coal
Washery |
0.7
MTPA |
5. |
Steel
Melting Shop |
2.0
Lakh TPA |
6. |
Rolling
Mill |
2.0
Lakh TPA |
7. |
Fly
ash Brick Plant |
1.0
Lakh TPA |
8. |
Captive
Power Plant |
50
MW (25 MW CFBC + 25 MW WHRB) |
Coal, dolomite, iron ore,
ferro alloy, pig iron are the raw materials required for the proposed steel plant. DRI
(coal based) route will be followed. CFBC based power plant of 25 MW and 25 MW
WHRB is proposed. Power Requirement for the plant will be 58 MW. Out of total requirement of power of 58 MW, 50 MW power will be of
captive generation and the balance will be out sourced from State Electricity
Board.
To control fugitive emissions, all the conveyors will be covered &
provided with hoods. The material will be kept moist by sprinkling water
while unloading from trucks. Stack emissions (PM) will be kept less than 50mg/Nm3
and appropriate Stack Height will be used in minimizing
the impact due to air pollution. Ambient air quality and stack emissions would
be regularly monitored to ensure that ambient air quality standards and
suggested limits on stack emission loads would be met.
Total
water requirement for the proposed project will be 6,050m3/day,
which will be met from the River Hiren a
tributary of Narmada which is at a distance of 1 Km away from the proposed
site. Zero effluent discharge will
be adopted. The slurry water will be recycled and used in the
process of iron ore beneficiation. Water reservoir will be created inside the project
area during the construction stage where rainwater and surface water runoff
will be collected and stored. Effluent from the DM/RO
(Power Plant) will be treated & reused. Treated water will be used in
the plantation. Domestic water will be treated in Sewage Treatment Plant (STP).
Dolo char (90,000
TPA) from DRI Plant will be used in the Captive Power Plant, Iron ore slimes (4,50,000
TPA) from the Iron Ore Beneficiation plant will be sold to brick manufacturers
and remaining will be used for filling of abundant mines, SMS slag (1,20,000
TPA) will be used on road as a filling material & for making Pozzolona slag
cement, Fly ash (53,600 TPA) from CFBC boiler will be sold to Cement Plants for
PPC cement and will be utilized within the plant’s fly ash brick manufacturing
unit, Bottom ash (9,000TPA) will be used as a filling material for levelling
site. Mill Scale (4,500 TPA) from Rolling Mill will be recycled back to
induction furnace and coal rejects (2,80,000 TPA) from Coal Washery will be sold
to Power plants and brick manufacturers.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project
2.
Photographs
of the plant area.
3.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
4.
A
copy of the mutual agreement for land acquisition signed with land oustees.
5.
Firm
Coal linkages should be submitted along with the EIA report
6.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site. A photograph of the site should also be included.
7.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
8.
Topography
of the area should be given clearly indicating whether the site requires any
filling. If so, details of filling, quantity of fill material required, its
source, transportation etc. should be given.
9.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius
should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved
forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of
the project site.
10. Project site layout
plan showing raw materials, fly ash and other storage plans, bore well or water
storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas, water
bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be included.
11.
Coordinates
of the plant site as well as ash pond with topo sheet co-ordinates of the plant
site as well as ash pond with topo sheet should also be included.
12. Details and
classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
13. Rehabilitation &
Resettlement (R & R) should be as per policy of the State Govt. and a
detailed action plan should be included.
14. Permission from the
tribals, if tribal land has also to be acquired along with details of the
compensation plan.
15. Permission and
approval for the use of forest land, if any, and recommendations of the State
Forest Department. .
16. A list of industries
containing name and type in 25 km radius should be incorporated.
17. Residential colony
should be located in upwind direction.
18. List of raw material
required from coal linkage, analysis of all the raw materials and source along
with mode of transportation should be included. All the trucks for raw material
and finished product transportation must be “Environmentally Compliant”.
19. Petrological and
Chemical analysis and other chemical properties of raw materials used (with GPS
location of source of raw material) i.e. ores, minerals, rock, soil, coal,
iron, dolomite quartz etc. using high definition and precision instruments
mentioning their detection range and methodology such Digital Analyzers, AAS
with Graphite furnace, ICPMS, MICRO-WDXRF, EPMA, XRD, Nano studies or at least
as per I30-10500 and WHO norms. This analysis should include trace element and
metal studies like Cr (vi) Ni, Fe, As, Pb, Zn, Hg, Se, S etc. Presence of
radioactive elements (U, Th etc.), if applicable, should also be
included..
20.
Petrography,
grain size analysis and Major element analysis of raw material and soil from
project site and raw material should be done on the same parameters along with
analysis for SiO2, Al2O3, MgO, MnO, K2O,
CaO, FeO, Fe2O3, P2O5, H2O,
CO2.
21. If the rocks, ores,
raw material has trace elements their petrography, ore microscopy, XRD,
elemental mapping EPMA, XRF is required to quantify the amount present in it
and hence future risk involved while using it and management plan.
22. Action plan for
excavation and muck disposal during construction phase.
23. Studies for fly ash,
muck, slurry, sludge material disposal and solid waste generated, if the raw
materials used has trace elements and a management plan should also be included.
24. Manufacturing process
details for all the plants should be included.
25. Mass balance for the
raw material and products should be included.
26. Energy balance data
for all the components of steel plant including proposed power plant should be
incorporated.
27. Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
28. Data generated in the
last three years i.e. air, water, raw material properties and analysis (major,
trace and heavy metals), ground water table, seismic history, flood hazard
history etc.
29.
One
season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative
humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except
monsoon) should be collected. The monitoring stations should take into account
the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors
including reserved forests.
30. Ambient air quality
at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project site
with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
31. The suspended
particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence
of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporating of RSPM data.
32. Determination of
atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features.
33. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the
kiln and WHRB should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
34. Action plan to follow
National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by the Ministry vide
G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should be included.
35. Ambient air quality
monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day
(24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following :
i)
Emissions
(g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures
ii) Meteorological inputs (wind speed,
m/s), wind direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity
& mixing height) on hourly basis
iii) Model input options for terrain, plume
rise, deposition etc.
iv) Print-out of model input and output on
hourly and daily average basis
v) A graph of daily averaged
concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval
covering the exact location of GLC.
vi) Details of air pollution control
methods used with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate
estimation with respect to each pollutant
vii) Applicable air quality standards as
per LULC covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to
the applicable Air quality standard. In case of expansion project, the
contribution should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.
viii) No. I-VII are to be repeated for
fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry
ix) Graphs of monthly average daily concentration
with down-wind distance
x) Specify when and where the ambient air
quality standards are exceeded either due to the proposed plant alone or when
the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi) Fugitive dust protection or dust
reduction technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
36. A plan for the
utilization of waste/fuel gases in the WHRB for generating power have to be set
out.
37. Impact of the
transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment
should be assessed and provided. The alternate method of raw material and end
product transportation should also be studied and details included.
38. One season data for
gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is necessary.
39. An action plan to
control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources as per
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated
30th May, 2008.
40. Presence of
aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for
recharging the aquifer should be included.
41. Source of
surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included. Information regarding
surface hydrology and water regime should be included.
42. Ground water analysis
with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to quantify the
area and volume of aquifer and its management.
43. Ground water modeling
showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included
44.
Column
leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20 oC
- 50 oC should be conducted and included.
45.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site should be submitted to
harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the
ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to
conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources. Rain water harvesting and groundwater
recharge structures may also be constructed outside the plant premises in
consultation with local Gram Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground
water level. Incorporation of water harvesting plan for the project is
necessary, if source of water is bore well.
46. Permission for the
drawl of water from the State Irrigation Department or concerned authority and
water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and
reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the
water conservation should be included.
47. A note on the impact
of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
48. Surface water quality
of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at
eight locations must be ascertained.
49. If the site is within
10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation Mapping is required at
1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well
as flood occurrence frequency.
50. A note on treatment
of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different purposes
should be included.
51. Provision of traps
and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil, grease
and cleaning agents.
52. If the water is mixed
with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further transport
should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the
transport capacity.
53. Wastewater
characteristics (heavy metals, anions and cations, trace metals, PAH) from any
other source should be included.
54. The pathways for
pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied for
surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water
with a monitoring and management plans.
55. Ground water
monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological
features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as
also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and
Aquatic) is vital.
56. Geotechnical data by
a bore hole of upto 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground water
level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk
Management in the area.
57. Action plan for
solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU
regarding utilization of ash should also be included.
58. Details of evacuation
of ash, details regarding ash pond impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so details of the lining etc. needs to be addressed.
59. A note on the
treatment, storage and disposal of all type of slag should be included.
Identification and details of land to be used for SMS slag disposal should be
included. Details of secured land fill as per CPCB guidelines should also be
included.
60. End use of solid
waste and its composition should be covered.
Toxic metal content in the waste material and its composition should
also be incorporated particularly of slag.
61. All stock piles will
have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to ground
water.
62. Action plan for the
green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than 1,500
trees per ha. giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule
etc. should be included. The green belt should be around the project boundary
and a scheme for greening of the travelling roads should also be incorporated.
All rooftops/terraces should have some green cover.
63. Detailed description
of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with special
reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
64. Disaster Management
Plan including Seismic hazard,
risk
assessment and damage control needs to be addressed and included.
65. Occupational health:
a) Details of existing Occupational &
Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and
whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not
within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so
that health of the workers can be preserved,
b) Details of exposure specific health status
evaluation of worker. If the workers’
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c) Annual report of heath status of
workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.
66. Details regarding infrastructure
facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour
force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck
drivers during operation phase.
67.
Impact
of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as road network and
whether any additional infrastructure needs to be constructed and the agency
responsible for the same with time frame.
68. Environment
Management Plan (EMP) to mitigate the adverse impacts due to the project along
with item wise cost of its implementation. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should be included.
69. Public hearing issues raised and commitments made by the project
proponent on the same should be included separately in EIA/EMP Report in the
form of tabular chart.
70. At least 5 % of the
total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social
Commitment based on public hearing issues and item-wise details along with time
bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic development activities
need to be elaborated upon.
71. Plan for the
implementation of the recommendations made for the steel plants in the CREP
guidelines must be prepared.
72. A note on
identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
73. Any litigation
pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of
Law against the project, if so, details thereof should also be included.
It
was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by
the Expert Appraisal Committee-1
(Industry) should be considered for
preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in
addition to all the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’
given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA/EMP
report shall be submitted to Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board for public
hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be incorporated in
the EIA report. The final EIA report
shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
The TORs prescribed shall be valid for
a period of two years for submission of the EIA/EMP reports along with public hearing
proceedings.
Any Other Items
30.2.17
Proposed
Modernization and expansion of the ongoing integrated green field Aluminium
Smelter Complex of Hindalco Industries Limited Unit: Mahan Aluminium, from 325
to 359 KTPA with installed captive coal based power plant from 750 MW to 900 MW
with installation of additional facilities for conversion of primary Aluminium
metal to finished product – regarding amendment
in environmental clearance
MoEF has accorded
Environmental Clearance vide letter no.
J-11011/217/2007- IA II (I) dated 18th March 2009 for establishing an integrated
Primary Aluminium Project of 325 KTPA along with a Coal based Captive Power
Plant of installed capacity 750 MW to M/s. ‘Mahan Aluminium` of M/s. Hindalco
Industries Limited at Village Bargawan, Tehsil Deosar in Singrauli District,
Madhya Pradesh.
It was informed that, the
project is under implementation and more than 75% construction has been
completed. The Primary Aluminium smelter is being constructed by adopting one
of the world’s best available technology (BAT) from M/s. Aluminium Pechiney,
France. Since the period from technology selection in 2006 and until now, the
technology supplier has upgraded the Aluminium Smelting Technology through
modernization and resource efficient technology named AP36. M/s Hindalco desires
to adopt this latest technology for the ongoing green field project at Mahan
Aluminium.
The modernized technology
of AP36 will produce 359 KTPA from the same facilities installed for 325 KTPA,
thus making it more resource and energy efficient. The additional production
can be achieved by installation of additional 24 nos. of electrolytic pots and additional
facilities for conversion of the major portion of the primary metal to
finished/ semi finished value added product categories viz. Flat Rolled
Products (plates & sheets), Foils, Cast slabs & billets and Extruded
& drawn products (wires & rods) with one of the lowest specific energy
consumption.
While the captive power
generating capacity of 750 MW will remain same as earlier, an additional unit
of 1x150 MW is proposed to be installed as a standby unit for ensuring
uninterrupted power supply to the aluminium smelter and operational
flexibility.
The
Committee noted that there is no additional land and water required. Although the
overall power requirement would increase from 624 to 695 MW, it would be met
from the CPP (750 MW) and lower power consumption by
80 KWh per ton of aluminium would be achieved. The alumina requirement would increase from 6.4
LTPA to 6.9 LTPA and would be met from captive refinery. The Committee sought
the quantitative reduction
in fluorine emissions due to the proposed modernization and plan for reducing
the generation of Spent Pot Lining (SPL).
The PP has submitted the above sought
information vide letter dated 2.12.2011, which says that to control fluoride
emissions from the smelting process, latest generation Gas Treatment Centre (GTC)
which has scrubbing efficiency of more than 98% will be used, use of covered
pots, use of latest high efficient
robotic cranes, reduction in Anode Effects, use of Graphitized Carbon Blocks to reduce
specific energy consumption and improved pot lining life will be done. It is
proposed to reduce the fluoride emissions to 0.67 kg “F”/t (~ 5 % reduction)
from as stipulated norm of 0.70 kg “F”/t in a span of 3 years. The use of graphitized
cathode blocks in all the pots is expected to give a better lining life (~1
year increase) as compared to the earlier generation of blocks used in AP-35
potlines. Therefore, the specific generation of SPL waste/t of Al produced at
the enhanced level will remain almost the same as in the case of 325kt/year. In
addition, concerted and continuous efforts in collaboration with premier
research institutions in the country and the Technology Supplier will be done to
explore the possibility of utilization of spent pot lining in a techno-economical
way.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for amendment in
environmental clearance dated 18.3.2009 i.e. for proposed Technology Upgradation of Aluminium Smelter
Plant from 325 KTPA to 359 KTPA, along with installation of additional
facilities for conversion of primary Aluminium metal to finished product and
Installation of Standby 150 MW Captive Power Plant in the ongoing integrated
green field Aluminium Smelter Complex of Hindalco Industries Limited Unit: Mahan
Aluminium.
30.2.18 Expansion
of Ferro Alloy Plant (Submerged Arc Furnace 4x16.5 MVA (existing): 1x33 MVA
(Proposed) along with Captive Power Plant (67.5 MW) at Kalinganagar Industrial
Complex (Growth Centre), Village : Kanchrigaon & Chandia, Mouza Duburi, Tehsil
Sukinda, District Jajpur, Orissa by M/s Rohit
Ferro-Tech Limited -
regarding amendment in environmental clearance
The
proponent did not attend the meeting. The Committee decided to consider the
project as and when requested by the proponent.
30.2.19 Expansion
of Pulp and Paper Mill by installation of new paper machine and balancing of
Hard Wood Pulp Mill and bagasse based pulp mill at Kagithapuram, District Karur
in Tamil Nadu by M/s Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited -
regarding amendment in environmental clearance
The committee noted that the proposal involves
change in pulping
process by installation of de-inking plant (300 TPD) and hence, recommended
that the PP may submit Form-1 and prefeasibility report etc. for issuance of
ToRs.
30.2.20 Proposed
Submerged Arc Furnace (1x6 MVA), (2x9 MVA) and (2x16.5 MVA) at Growth Centre,
Bobbilli, District Vijainagaram in Andhra Pradesh by M/s R.V.R. Smelters Pvt. Limited- regarding amendment in environmental
clearance
Environmental Clearance to the above
proposal was accorded vide letter no. J-11011/1039/2007- IA II (I) dated 28.02.2008. Since the
delivery of 16.5 MVA furnaces is taking long time, it is proposed to substitute
2 X 16.5 MVA furnaces with 2 X 6 MVA and 1 X 21 MVA furnaces. The total
production capacity, land, water and raw materials required will remain the
same and ferro chrome would be dropped from the product list. 33 % of the total
project area would be developed as green belt.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for amendment in
environmental clearance dated 28.02.2008 i.e. substitution of 2 X 16.5 MVA furnaces with 2 X 6
MVA and 1 X 21 MVA furnaces.
30.2.21 Integrated
Steel Plant (6.0 MTPA) and Captive Power Plant (1,000 MW) at Balkudra, Pataru,
Hazaribagh in Jharkhand by M/s Jindal Steel & Power
Limited - regarding change in configuration
Environmental Clearance to the above
proposal was accorded vide letter no. J-11011/77/2007- IA II (I) dated 22.09.2008. M/s Jindal Steel & Power Limited (JSPL)
have requested the Ministry for change in the captive power plant configuration
from 1,000 MW (3 x 330 MW sub-critical units) to 1,320 MW (2 x 660 MW supercritical
units). M/s JSPL and their consultant, M/s EMTRC Consultants, New Delhi have
also made a presentation before the EAC. It was informed that the steel plant work has started and two units have
started operating.
The
justification for above is as follows:
·
There
will be no change in land requirement for the project.
·
Supercritical
technology entails additional environmental benefits compared to conventional
technology like better plant efficiency, lower GHG emissions, CDM benefits,
lower specific coal consumption (0.64
Kg/Kwh to 0.61 Kg/Kwh) and water consumption (4788 kl/hour to 4000
kl/hour)
·
Captive
Coal Block for the proposed CPP was allotted by the Ministry of Coal. The coal
requirement of the works out to be 6.5 MTPA and the coal reserves and
sufficient for the plant life of 25 years.
Impact on
the Ambient Air Quality was assessed due to change in the configuration. The
incremental ground level concentration of RSPM due to 3x330 MW configuration
will be reduced from 0.84 µg/m3 to 0.46 µg/m3 due to
change in configuration. There would be slight increase in the levels of SO2
and NOx by 1.4 µg/m3 and 1.6 µg/m3 respectively. The
overall concentration of these parameters would be 13.1 µg/m3 and
12.1 µg/m3 resepctively.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee recommended the proposal for amendment in environmental clearance dated
22.09.2008
i.e. for changing the
project configuration from 1,000 MW (3 x 330 MW sub-critical units) to 1,320 MW
(2 x 660 MW supercritical units).
30.2.22 Expansion
of Integrated Iron and Steel Plant at J.L. No. 11, Jemua Mouza, Mejia Block,
District Bankura in West Bengal by M/s Sova Ispat
Limited- regarding change in configuration
Environmental Clearance to the above
proposal was accorded vide letter no. J-11011/724/2007- IA II (I) dated 01.08.2008 which
included the installation of 3 X 300 TPD sponge iron plant. The PP has
requested for an amendment in the sponge iron plant configuration i.e. 2 X 300
TPD + 3 X 100 TPD in place of 3 X 300 TPD. The justification given is that, deteriorating
quality of coal and prohibitive cost of high grade iron ore makes the operation
of a 3 X 100 TPD kiln more economically viable than a 1 X 300 TPD kiln. The
installed production capacity of the existing and proposed plants would remain
unchanged i.e. 90,000 TPA and 2,70,000 TPA. All the necessary measures
including individual stack for each of the kiln of required height etc. would
be implemented. The NOC for requested amended configuration has been granted by
the WBPCB on 7.4.2009.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for amendment in
environmental clearance dated 01.08.2008 i.e. sponge iron plant configuration of 2 X 300 TPD + 3
X 100 TPD in place of 3 X 300 TPD.
30.2.23 Ferro
Alloy Plant (14,400 TPA) with bio-mass based (rice husk) Power Plant (8 MW) at
Bojhara, District Raipur in Chhattisgarh by M/s Shri Bajrang
Power and Ispat Limited - regarding change in configuration
Environmental Clearance to the above
proposal was accorded vide letter no. J-11011/531/2007- IA II (I) dated 17.01.2008. The PP has
requested for an amendment in the configuration of ferro alloys plant due to
crisis of funds and recessionary market i.e. substitution of 1 X 8 MVA furnace
with 2X 4 MVA furnaces. The justification given is that, there will be
flexibility and reliability in plant operation and maintenances, flexibility to
produce different type of ferroalloys as per market dynamics. The total
production capacity, land, water and raw materials required will remain the
same.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the proposal for amendment in
environmental clearance dated 17.01.2008 i.e. substitution of 1 X 8 MVA furnace with 2X 4 MVA
furnaces.
30.2.24 Proposed
Blending and Cement Packing Plant of 2x1.5 MTPA
at Village Chidiya, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District Bhiwani in Haryana by M/s Lafarge India Pvt. Limited- regarding Clarification (Applicability
of Environmental Clearance and EIA Notification, 2006)
The Project Authorities and their
consultant, M/s B.S Envi Tech (p) Ltd. Hyderabad gave a detailed presentation
on the salient features of the project and requested to confirm about the
Applicability of EIA Notification, 2006 and the need for Environmental
clearance. They claimed that, it, being
a blending plant only and involving no Grinding of Clinker, does not figure in
the Schedule of EIA Notification and hence, does not require environmental
clearance.
The Committee
noted that, since it is only a blending unit, without involving grinding of
Clinker, the proposal does not attract the purview of EIA Notification, 2006 and hence does
not require Environmental Clearance.
30.2.25 Expansion of Steel Plant (Sponge Iron from
1,15,500 to 3,30,000 TPA; Induction
Furnaces-LRF-Concast from 1,15,000 to 2,87,500 TPA; Hot Metal- 1,55,966 TPA;
Rod/TMT Rolling Mill- 1,50,000 TPA, Coal Washery-7,00,000 TPA and Captive Power
Plant 48 MW through WHRB (24MW) and FBC (24MW) and CPP through BF gas- 4 MW) at
Village Uliburu, P.O. Nalda via Barbil District Keonjhar in Orissa by M/s Beekay Steel and
Power Limited – regarding Reconsideration of Amendment in Environmental
Clearance
In continuation to the minutes of the
29th EAC (Industry-1) meeting, the Committee after considering the comparative
pollution load of the expansion proposal with and without the Iron Ore
Beneficiation & Pelletization units, recommended that an EIA/EMP report is
necessary. However, Public Hearing has been exempted under Para 7(II) of EIA
Notification 2006 due to no additional land and water requirement, reduction in
the PM & incremental GLCs, more viability of the project etc. The Committee
also noted that the Public hearing for the expansion proposal was held in
February, 2010.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1. Executive summary of
the project.
2. Photographs of the
existing and proposed plant area.
3. Compliance to the conditions stipulated in the Environmental
Clearance/NOC granted by the SPCB.
4. A line diagram/flow
sheet for the process and EMP
5.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site.
6.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
7.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius
should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved
forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of
the project site.
8.
A
list of industries within 10 km radius of the plant area.
9.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
10.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials and other storage plans, bore well or
water storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas,
water bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be
included.
11.
List
of raw material required and source along with mode of transportation should be
included. All the trucks for raw material and finished product transportation
must be “Environmentally Compliant”.
12.
Quantification
& Characterization of solid /hazardous waste & its action plan for
management should be included.
13.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
14.
Energy
balance data for all the components of plant should be incorporated.
15.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
16.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage
from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
17.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble
fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
18.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
19.
Air
quality modeling for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions should also
be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
20.
Ambient
air quality as per National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by
the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should
be included.
21.
Air
Quality Impact Predication Modeling based on ISCST-3 or the latest models.
22.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided.
23.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
24.
Presence
of aquifer/aquifers within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan
for recharging the aquifer should be included.
25.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included.
26.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
27.
‘Permission’ for the drawl of water should be
obtained. Water balance data must be provided.
28.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
29.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures.
30.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface
drains at eight locations must be ascertained.
31.
If
the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation
Mapping is required at 1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean
river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency.
32.
Pretreatment
of raw water, treatment plant for waste water should be described in detail.
Design specifications may be included.
33.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
34.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources should also be included.
35.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area should be included.
36.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
37.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
38.
Occupational
health:
a) Details of existing Occupational &
Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and
whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not
within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so
that health of the workers can be preserved,
b) Details of exposure specific health
status evaluation of worker. If the
workers’ health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays,
Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision
and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical
examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month
analyzed data of abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of
exposure and department wise.
c) Annual report of heath status of
workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.
39.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals need and item-wise details along
with time bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic development
activities need to be elaborated upon.
40.
Total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures should also be included.
41.
Any
litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by
any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
The
Expert Appraisal
Committee-1 (Industry) decided that PAs may be
communicated the above ‘TORs’ for the preparation of EIA/EMP. As soon as the
EIA/EMP report is prepared, the same may be submitted by the PAs to the MOEF
for obtaining environmental clearance. The TORs prescribed
shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the EIA/EMP report.
30.2.26 Ferro
Alloys (2x18 MVA) Plant at Survey No. 1/2 to 29, 2/1 to 18, 3/1 o 25, 4/2 to
16, 5/1 to 5 and 5/7 to 9 at Golladi Village, Badnangi Mandal, Vizianagaram
District in Andhra Pradesh by M/s. Impex Metal and Ferro Alloys Limited -
Amendment in environmental clearance regarding.
M/s. Impex Metal and Ferro Alloys
Limited were accorded environmental clearance by the Ministry on 25th
March, 2010. While according
environmental clearance one of the specific conditions stipulated was that “No
charcoal should be used as fuel. Petcoke
shall be used instead of charcoal from the unknown source.” The above condition was stipulated due to the
concern for environment protection as the Charcoal was being produced earlier
by cutting forest wood/trees.
M/s. Impex Metal and Ferro Alloys
Limited have informed that the charcoal is one of the critical raw materials
for production of Ferro Silicon. For
production of one tone of ferro-silicon, 700 - 725 kg of fixed carbon is
required and is sourced through 80% from charcoal and balance by metallurgical
coke and coal. The company while applying for environmental clearance has shown
the requirement of 18,772 TPA of charcoal.
Charcoal is presently sourced from
producers in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. The Charcoal is produced by the
villagers by growing Prosopis Juliflora.
The
villagers in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu make Charcoal by growing a plant species Prosopis Juliflora and not
from by forest cut trees. The species is
grown in the semiarid environment. The
Charcoal produced from this process is inspected by the Forest Department and
clearance is given with the road permit duly stamped, signed and passes through
rigorous check posts. Several Ferro
Silicon manufactures are obtaining Charcoal from these villagers legally and
are using the same for the production of ferro alloys.
M/s. Impex
Metal and Ferro Alloys Limited have also obtained two truck loads of char coal
from two parties with proper documents and forest clearance.
The matter
was placed before the Expert Appraisal Committee. The Committee noted that the Company has
produced copies of purchase order and permission from the District Forest
Officer. The District Forest Officer,
vide his letter dated 28th July, 2011 has mentioned that on the
responsibility and recommendation of Forest Range Officer, Markapur sanctioned
is granted for transportation of Charcoal bags.
The permit should be got inspected at all Forest Check Posts on the way
and if irregularities are noticed, the contractor will be held responsible and
necessary action will be taken against him as per the existing rules.
In view of the above, the Committee
recommended that Charcoal can be used which is produced from the plant species
such as Prosopis Juliflora through the social forestry and not by cutting
forest trees. The Charcoal sourced should have valid permission from the
District Forest Officer. Therefore, the Condition No.1 should be amended from
“No Charcoal shall be used as fuel. Petcoke shall be used as fuel instead of
Charcoal from unknown source”
to
“Company
shall use Charcoal as fuel produced from the tree species through social
forestry and valid permission from the District Forest Officer in this regard.”
29th
November, 2011
Proposals for Environmental clearance
30.3.1 Proposed Rail Cast Steel Wheel (1,00,000 No/annum.)
project at Village Bela, Block Dariyapur, Dist. Saran (Chapra), Bihar by M/s
Indian Railways (Workshop Projects) - regarding Reconsideration
The above proposal was considered and discussed in the 28th Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1)
meeting held during 26th & 27th September, 2011. The
Committee deferred the project for reconsideration and sought the following
additional details:
i. The company shall explore the
alternative fuel instead of LPG. The company should have own producer gas plant
and oxygen plant.
ii. Details of steel making technology
shall be provided.
iii. Land requirement appears to be high
and should be optimized.
iv. Revised layout plan showing the green
belt all around the plant.
v. At least 5 % of the total cost of the
project shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on
locals need and item-wise details along with time bound action plan should be
prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhubaneswar. Implementation of such
program should be ensured accordingly in a time bound manner.
The above information was submitted by the PP and the PP
along with their consultant, M/s Shiva
Test House, Patna have also made a presentation before the EAC. It
was informed that, the usage of alternative fuels like HSD, CNG and producer
gas in place of LPG has been explored. However, use of LPG is the most
techno-economical option. The possibility of setting up of captive oxygen plant
is being explored. The steel making technology involves of forging (used
internationally in European Rail-Roads and in India by Durgapur Steel Plant
(DSP) and casting (used internationally in American Rail-Roads and in India by
Rail Wheel Plant, Yelahanka, Bangalore). The land requirement has already been
optimized and when compared to a plant of the same capacity at Yelahanka, the
land requirement is reduced by 11.8%. Revised layout plan was
submitted. A breakup of the budget for Enterprise Social Commitment was also
furnished.
The Committee
noted that the feasibility
of using producer gas as fuel in place of LPG has to be explored in detail;
Green belt shall be developed with a minimum 15-20 m width all around. Plant
layout shall be revised accordingly. The activities proposed for Enterprise
Social Commitment are mainly for the own project and employees and shall be
revised for non project and non employee related activities.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee recommended the proposal for environmental clearance subject to
stipulation of the following specific conditions along with other environmental
conditions:
i.
The company shall install wet scrubber and bag filters etc. to control the particulate emissions
below 50 mg/Nm3.
iii.
Gaseous emission levels including secondary fugitive emissions
from all the sources shall be controlled within the latest permissible limits
issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated 30th May, 2008 and
regularly monitored. Guidelines / Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be
followed.
iv.
The Company shall explore the
feasibility of using producer gas as fuel in place of LPG.
vi.
The
total water requirement shall not exceed 250m3/day. No effluent
shall be discharged and ‘zero’ discharge shall be adopted.
vii.
Risk
and Disaster Management Plan along with the mitigation measures shall be
prepared and a copy submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhubaneswar, BSPCB and CPCB within 3 months
of issue of environment clearance letter.
viii.
As proposed, green belt shall be developed in 33 % of the plant
area with a minimum 15-20 m width all around. Plant
layout shall be revised accordingly. Selection of plant species shall
be as per the CPCB guidelines in consultation with the DFO.
x.
At least 5 % of
the total cost of the project shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social
Commitment based on Public Hearing issues & locals need and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to
the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhubaneswar. Implementation of such program should be ensured
accordingly in a time bound manner.
30.3.2 Expansion of the Existing Paper Mill by installation
of new CWBN Paper making Facilities in the
existing premises at Village Phephartal & Khojanpur, District
Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh by M/s Security Paper Mill (A Unit of Security Printing & Minting
Corporation of India Ltd., wholly owned by Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance)
- regarding Environmental
Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant, M/s Envirotech East Pvt. Ltd.,
Kolkata, gave a detailed presentation on the
salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures
to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference (TORs) awarded during the 26th
Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1), held during 21st
– 22nd July, 2011 for preparation of EIA/EMP. Pulp and paper industry excluding manufacturing paper from
waste paper and manufacture of paper from ready pulp without bleaching are
listed at serial no. 5(i) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 under category
A and appraised at central level.
M/s Security
Paper Mill have proposed for new
CWBN Paper making Facilities in the existing premises at Village
Phephartal & Khojanpur, District Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh. Total proposed project will be set up in 5.5
acres of land area, which is already under the possession of the Company. The
land for the existing mill area is 52 acres and the total plant area is 345.53
acres. The Project Site is located at latitude 22°43¢10²N and longitude 77°42¢30²E (307 m above MSL). No national
parks/wild life sanctuaries are located within 10 km radius. Narmada River is
flowing at a distance of around 3.0 kms from the project site in north
direction. Nearest town Hoshangabad is around 3 kms. from the project site.
Total cost of the project is Rs. 488 Crores (excluding land component). Rs. 35
Crores and Rs. 5 Crores will be earmarked towards total capital cost and
recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures. No
litigation or court case is pending against the project and/or land.
The existing units
along with their capacities and product profile are as follows:
Unit |
Existing
Installed Capacity |
Product |
1) New Digester House 2) Rag Boiler House 3) Breaker Beater Section 4) Refiner section 5) Paper Machine 6) Calender &
Cutter Section 7) Finishing End |
408.794 Tons / Month Capacity utilization 250 Tons / Month |
Banknote Paper & Security Paper |
The proposed units along with their
capacities and product profile are as follows:
Unit |
Proposed
Capacity |
Product |
Cotton
Comber Pulp Mill (based on BIVIS Technology) Paper
Machine |
6,102 ADT (annual requirement) 6,000 TPA |
Cotton
Comber Pulp Banknote
Paper & Security Paper |
ADT: Air Dried Tonne
Cotton comber will be
used as the principal raw material supplemented by a small quantity of cotton
linter. The process technology as proposed for manufacture of paper pulp from
cotton combers is based on modern eco-friendly BIVIS pulping process followed
by highly sophisticated paper machine complex for production of Banknote paper/Security
paper conforming to international quality standards.
There will be no
process emissions from the proposed pulp & paper making plant. The new oil
fired boiler(s) will be the only source of emissions. Stack of adequate height
will be provided for the dispersion of the pollutants. During dry cotton
comber preparation, the cotton comber bale will pass through Bale opener,
Cyclone separator to remove heavy particles, condenser & step cleaner to
remove dirt & dust, Scanner & Blow Actuators to remove colored fibres
synthetic & Plastic Materials, Metal Detector to remove metalic
contaminants and shall be ultimately directed to dust extractor & dust
collector.
Total Water
requirement for the proposed project is about 2.7 MLD including domestic water
requirement of around 0.25 MLD, which will be sourced from Narmada River. The
water consumption will be only 25% of that of a conventional Paper Mill. An ETP
comprising of Primary, Secondary & Tertiary treatment system will be
set-up. Most of the treated effluent shall be reused in the process, plantation
etc. The balance quantity will pass through a concrete drain, ultimately
joining the river Narmada at approx. 3 km.
As per the existing practice, the entire treated effluent passing
through the concrete drain is being used by the local people for the irrigation
purpose. The existing practice is expected to continue in future also.
Complete cellulose
fibres, shorter in length (solid cotton pulp) will be recovered in effluent
treatment plant. It is proposed to make hand made paper from the recovered
fibers, which will not only generate revenue but also provide employment for
local women from nearby villages and has good demand in the market. Spent
lubricating oil/ used transformer oil is proposed to be sold to the vendors
authorized by Pollution Control Board.
Power requirement for
the proposed project is around 6.3 MW, which will be sourced from Madhya
Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. Ltd.Out of total plant area (existing
52 acres + proposed 5.5 acres), more than 20 acres of land is already covered
under greenbelt with plenty of plantation of various species.
The Committee took
note of the compliance status of the existing plant. The monitoring for Ambient
Air Quality, Stack Emissions, treated Effluent Quality for the existing plant
is being done on regular basis. The committee recommended that NaOH used should be
from a membrane process and not Hg. Cell process. Satellite phone in case of
emergency is essential.
Public hearing has
been exempted under 7-III (3) (f) of EIA Notification, 2006 i.e. project of
national importance.
After detailed deliberations, the
Committee recommended the proposal for environmental clearance subject to
submission of Revised AAQ Modeling, Dam break, Flood Hazard and Earth
Quake Management Plan, which has been furnished by the proponent and stipulation
of following specific conditions along with other environmental conditions:
(i)
Compliance
to all the specific and general conditions stipulated for the existing plant by
the Central/State Government shall be ensured and regular reports submitted to
the Ministry and its Regional Office at Bhopal.
(ii)
The project authority shall install multi cyclones, wet scrubbers with the
boilers to achieve the particulate emission below 50 mg/Nm3. The emissions from chemical recovery
section shall be controlled through primary and secondary ventury scrubbers.
Lime treatment for SO2 emissions shall be done
(iii)
Data
on ambient air, stack and fugitive emissions shall be regularly submitted
online to Ministry’s Regional office at Bhopal, SPCB and CPCB as well as hard
copy once in six months and display data on RSPM, SO2 and NOx
outside the premises at the appropriate place for the general public.
(iv)
In
case of treatment process disturbances/failure of pollution control equipment
adopted by the unit, the respective unit shall be shut down and shall not be
restarted until the control measures are rectified to achieve the desired
efficiency.
(v)
The
total water requirement shall not exceed 2.7 MLD. The industry shall ensure the
compliance of the standards for discharge of the treated effluent from the unit
as stipulated under the EPA rules or SPCB whichever is more stringent. The
company shall make efforts to limit the water consumption upto 50 m3/tonne
of product. Adequate steps including use of modern RO/UF based technologies
should be used to increase recycling and reduce water consumption.
(vi)
Adequate
number of influent and effluent quality monitoring stations shall be set up in
consultation with the State Pollution Control Board and regular monitoring
shall be carried out for all relevant parameters to maintain the effluent
treatment efficiency. The report shall be submitted to Ministry’s Regional
Office at Bhopal, SPCB and CPCB.
(vii)
The
company shall install Oxygen Delignification (ODL) Plant and shall maintain AOX
below 1 kg/tonne of paper production.
(viii)
ECF technology shall be used and lime
kiln shall be installed to manage lime sludge
(ix)
The
company shall submit the comprehensive water management plan along with
monitoring plan for the ground water quality and the level, within three months
from date of issue of this letter.
(x)
The
ash generated from the plant shall be disposed of in accordance with the
provisions of the Fly Ash Notification, 2003.
(xi)
The
project authority shall dispose of hazardous waste as per the provision of
Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2003.
(xii)
The
company shall develop green belt in 33% of the total land as per the CPCB
guidelines to mitigate the effect of fugitive emissions.
(xiii)
Occupational
health surveillance of the workers shall be done on a regular basis and records
maintained as per the Factories Act.
(xiv)
The
company shall make the arrangement for protection of possible fire hazards
during manufacturing process in material handling.
(xv)
All
the recommendations made in the Charter on Corporate Responsibility for
Environment Protection (CREP) for the pulp and paper sector shall be strictly
implemented.
(xvi)
At least 5 % of the total cost of the project shall be earmarked
towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals needs and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan shall be prepared and submitted to
the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhopal. Implementation of such program shall be ensured
accordingly in a time bound manner.
(xvii) Provision shall be made for the
housing of construction labour within the site with all necessary
infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile toilets, mobile
STP, Safe drinking water, medical health care, crèche etc. The housing may be
in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the
project.
30.3.3 Expansion of Sponge Iron Plant (300 TPD to 800 TPD),
Induction Furnace (1,35,000 TPA), Rolling Mill (1,20,000 TPA), Captive Power
Plant (16 MW of WHRB and 9 MW of AFBC) at Village Dhauhan, Tehsil Chunar,
District Mirzapur in Uttar Pradesh by M/s Shanti Gopal
Concast Limited- regarding Environmental Clearance
The project authorities and their
consultant, M/s Shiva Test House, Patna gave
a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed
environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference
(ToRs) awarded in December, 2008 and September, 2009 for preparation of
EIA/EMP. All the Steel Plants are listed at S. No. 3(a) under Primary
Metallurgy Industry of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006 under Category ‘A’
and appraised at Central level.
The Committee noted the complaints,
compliance status of NOC from SPCB, comments of SPCB in the last monitoring
report etc. and recommended that a site visit be undertaken by a sub-committee
for further consideration.
In the meanwhile, the proponent vide
letter dated 13.12.2011 informed the Ministry that due to the adverse market
conditions, not to pursue their application for environmental clearance any
further.
30.3.4
Proposed 2x9 Submerged Arc Furnace Ferro Alloy Plant
(Fe-Mn 36,960 TPA; Si-Mn 26,400 TPA) at J.L. No. 75 & 98, Mouza Sahebdihi
& Uttar Basudevpur, District Bankura in West Bengal by M/s Boris Ferro
Alloys (P) Limited - regarding Environmental Clearance
The proponent did not
attend the meeting. The Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested
by the proponent.
30.3.5 Proposed Asbestos Cement pipes and couplings manufacturing
unit (3600 TPA) at Plot no. 405, GIDC Estate, Dholka, District Ahmedabad in
Gujarat by
M/s Bhakti Associate - regarding Environmental
Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant,
M/s Consulting Engineers Group Ltd. Jaipur gave a
detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be
undertaken as per Terms of Reference (TORs) awarded during the 21st
Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 25th & 26th March, 2011 for preparation of EIA/EMP Report. All the Asbestos Cement Plants have been listed at Sl.
No. 4(c) of Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 as Category ‘A’ and appraised by
the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s Bhakti Associates have proposed Asbestos cement pipes and
couplings manufacturing unit at Plot No. 405, GIDC Estate, Dholka, Ahmedabad in
Gujarat. The capacity of the proposed project is 3,600 TPA. The proposed site
is situated on Dholka - Nadiad state highway. Nearest railway station is Dholka
is at about 4 Kms west of the proposed unit. Total land area of the project is
2,444 m2. Total cost of the
project is Rs. 80 lakhs. Raw materials required are
Chrysotile (White Asbestos), cement and fly ash. The total power requirement of
75 MW will be met from the State Electricity Board, Gujarat.
The palletized compact bags of asbestos fibres
will be emptied in an enclosed automatic debagging device. The shredded bags
will be sent to fibre mill. There
will be no manual handling/opening of asbestos fiber bags. The company will
install fully automatic asbestos fiber debagging system before commissioning
the unit.
To control the particulate emissions, it is
proposed to install bag filters to cement & ash silos and dust collector
will be attached to the fibre bag opening machine to arrest dust during loading
and unloading. Total water requirement of 6 m3/day will be met from
the Water Supply and Sewerage Board, Gujarat. Tanks of adequate capacity will be
developed for the collection and settlement of liquid effluent. Supernatant
liquid will be recycled for making fresh slurry. Zero discharge will be
adopted. Domestic
effluent will be disposed of through septic tank and soak pit. Solid waste after pulverization will
be recycled in the process as raw material.
Public hearing is not required as per
Para 7(i) III (b) of EIA Notification, 2006 as the project is located in
notified industrial area.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended the project for environmental
clearance subject to submission of raw material analysis including trace elements, AAQ Modeling, revised plant layout with a minimum 15-20 m width of
green belt all around and the following specific conditions
along with other
environmental conditions:
i.
The project proponent shall adhere to the prescribed BIS standards
and laws regarding use and handling of asbestos, safety of employees etc. Raw
materials like asbestos fibre and cement shall be transported in closed
containers. Asbestos fibre shall be brought in pelletized form in impermeable
bags and under compressed condition.
ii.
Only Chrysotile white asbestos fibre shall be used. Blue asbestos
shall not be utilized as raw material in the manufacturing process.
iii.
There shall be no manual handling/opening of asbestos fiber bags.
The company shall install fully automatic asbestos fiber debagging system
before commissioning the unit.
iv.
Fugitive emissions shall be controlled by bringing cement in
closed tankers, fly ash in covered trucks and asbestos in impervious bags
opening inside a closed mixer. Dust collectors shall be provided to Fibre mill,
Bag opening device (BOD), Cement and Fly ash silos to control emissions. Bag filters followed by wet washer
shall be provided at automatic bag opening machine, bag shredder, fibre mill
and to cement silo to collect the dust and recycle it into the process.
Fugitive emissions generated from hopper of Jaw crusher and Pulverizer shall be
channelized through hood with proper suction arrangement, bag filter and stack.
v.
The Company shall comply with total dust emission limit of 2 mg/Nm3 as notified under the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986. Adequate measures shall be adopted to control the process
emission and ensure that the stack emission of asbestos fibre shall not exceed
the emission limit of 0.2 fiber/cc. Asbestos
fibre in work zone environment shall be maintained within 0.1 fibre/cc.
vi.
Bags containing asbestos fibre shall be stored in enclosed area to
avoid fugitive emissions of asbestos fibre from damaged bags, if any.
vii.
Proper house keeping shall be maintained within the plant
premises. Process machinery, exhaust and ventilation systems shall be laid in
accordance with Factories Act. Better house keeping practices shall be adopted
for improvement of the environment within the work environment also. These
include:
(a) All monitoring transfer points
shall be connected to dust extraction system.
(b) Leakages or dust from machines and ducts
shall be plugged.
(c) Floor
shall be cleaned by vacuum cleaner only.
(d) Enclosed
belt conveyer shall be used instead of manual transportation of asbestos
within the premises.
viii.
Quarterly monitoring of pollutant (PM10, asbestos fibre
count) in the work zone area and stack(s) shall be undertaken by the Project
proponents. In addition, the asbestos fibre count in the work zone area shall
be monitored by an Independent monitoring agency like NIOH / ITRC / NCB or any
other approved agency and reports submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhopal, SPCB and CPCB.
ix.
Total water requirement from ground
water shall not exceed 6 m3/day and prior permission for the drawl
of ground water from bore wells shall be obtained from the State Ground Water
Department. All the recommendations of the
State Ground Water Department, Govt. of Gujarat shall be implemented in a time
bound manner.
x.
As reflected in the Environmental Management Plan, all the treated
effluent shall be recycled and reused in the manufacturing process. No process
water shall be discharged outside the premises and ‘zero’ discharge shall be
maintained. All the domestic wastewater shall be treated in septic tank
followed by soak pit and used for green belt development.
xi.
The Company shall ensure that the entire solid waste generated
including process rejects, cement, fly ash, dust from bag filters and empty
asbestos bag shall be recycled back in the manufacturing process. Process
sludge shall be 100% recycled and reused in the process. Hazardous waste shall be ground in
dust proof pulverizer with integrated bag filter and recycled back to the
process. Asbestos fibres which cannot be further recycled due to contamination
of iron dust shall be stored in HDPE lined secured landfill. The disposal
facilities for asbestos waste shall be in accordance with the Bureau of Indian
Standard Code.
xii.
The cut and damaged fibre bags shall immediately be repaired.
Empty fibre bags will be shredded into fine particles in a bag shredder and
recycled into the process. Piling of AC sheets shall be done in wet condition
only.
xiii.
The Company shall obtain a certificate from the supplier of
Chrysotile fibre that it does not contain any toxic or trace metals. A copy of
certificate shall be submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Forests.
xiv.
Regular medical examination of the workers and health monitoring
of all the employees shall be carried out and if cases of asbestosis are
detected, necessary compensation shall be arranged under the existing laws. A
competent occupational health physician shall be appointed to carry out medical
surveillance. Occupational health of all the workers shall be monitored for
lung function test, chest x-ray, sputum for acid-fast-bacilli (AFC) and
asbestos body (AB), urine for sugar and albumen, bloat tests for TLC, DLC, ESR,
Hb and records maintained for at least 40 years from the beginning of the
employment or 15 years after the retirement or cessation of employment
whichever is later. Occupational Health Surveillance shall be carried out as
per the directives of the Hon’ble Supreme Court including the recent Kalyaneswari case.
xv.
To educate the workers, all the work places where asbestos dust
may cause a hazard shall be clearly indicated as a dust exposure area through the
use of display signs which
identifies the hazard and the associated health effects.
xvi.
The company shall also undertake rain water harvesting measures
and plan of action shall be submitted to the Ministry of Environment and
Forests within three months.
xvii.
Green
belt shall be developed in at least 33 % of plant area as per the CPCB
guidelines in consultation with the DFO.
xviii.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals needs and item-wise details along
with time bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s
Regional Office at Bhopal. Implementation of such program should be ensured
accordingly in a time bound manner.
30.3.6 Fiber Cement Sheet Plant at Somnathpur Industrial
Estate, Plot No. Z5, IID Centre, Palsandha, Tehsil & District Balasore in
Orissa by
M/s Everest Industries Limited - regarding Reconsideration
The above proposal was considered and discussed in the 28th Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1)
meeting held during 26th & 27th September, 2011. The
Committee deferred the project for reconsideration without calling the project
proponent and sought the following additional details:
i.
Revised
lay out plan showing 20 m wide green belt all around the plant area
ii.
Trace
metal analysis of ground water and surface water
iii.
Trace
metal analysis of Chrysotile fiber and fly ash
iv.
Asbestos
concentration in the work place and stack emission data in the existing units
of M/s Everest Industries Limited.
v.
Details
of Occupational Health Surveillance of the workers
The above information was circulated by the PP to the EAC and was
found to be satisfactory. After detailed deliberations, the
Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to the
following specific conditions along
with other environmental conditions:
i.
The project proponent shall adhere to the prescribed BIS standards
and laws regarding use and handling of asbestos, safety of employees etc. Raw
materials like asbestos fibre and cement shall be transported in closed
containers. Asbestos fibre shall be brought in pelletized form in impermeable
bags and under compressed condition.
ii.
Only Chrysotile white asbestos fibre shall be used. Blue asbestos
shall not be utilized as raw material in the manufacturing process.
iii.
There shall be no manual handling/opening of asbestos fiber bags.
The company shall install fully automatic asbestos fiber debagging system
before commissioning the unit.
iv.
Fugitive emissions shall be controlled by bringing cement in
closed tankers, fly ash in covered trucks and asbestos in impervious bags
opening inside a closed mixer. Dust collectors shall be provided to Fibre mill,
Bag opening device (BOD), Cement and Fly ash silos to control emissions. Bag filters followed by wet washer
shall be provided at automatic bag opening machine, bag shredder, fibre mill
and to cement silo to collect the dust and recycle it into the process.
Fugitive emissions generated from hopper of Jaw crusher and Pulverizer shall be
channelized through hood with proper suction arrangement, bag filter and stack.
v.
The Company shall comply with total dust emission limit of 2 mg/Nm3 as notified under the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986. Adequate measures shall be adopted to control the
process emission and ensure that the stack emission of asbestos fibre shall not
exceed the emission limit of 0.2 fiber/cc. Asbestos fibre in work zone
environment shall be maintained within 0.1 fibre/cc.
vi.
Bags containing asbestos fibre shall be stored in enclosed area to
avoid fugitive emissions of asbestos fibre from damaged bags, if any.
vii.
Proper house keeping shall be maintained within the plant premises.
Process machinery, exhaust and ventilation systems shall be laid in accordance
with Factories Act. Better house keeping practices shall be adopted for
improvement of the environment within the work environment also. These include:
(a) All monitoring transfer points
shall be connected to dust extraction system.
(b) Leakages or dust from machines and
ducts shall be plugged.
(c) Floor
shall be cleaned by vacuum cleaner only.
(d) Enclosed
belt conveyer shall be used instead of manual transportation of asbestos
within the premises.
viii.
Quarterly monitoring of pollutant (PM10, asbestos fibre
count) in the work zone area and stack(s) shall be undertaken by the Project
proponents. In addition, the asbestos fibre count in the work zone area shall
be monitored by an Independent monitoring agency like NIOH / ITRC / NCB or any
other approved agency and reports submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bhubaneswar, SPCB and CPCB.
ix.
Total water requirement from ground
water shall not exceed 351 m3/day and prior permission for the drawl
of ground water from bore wells shall be obtained from the State Ground Water
Department. All the recommendations of the
State Ground Water Department, Govt. of Orissa shall be implemented in a time
bound manner.
x.
As reflected in the Environmental Management Plan, all the treated
effluent shall be recycled and reused in the manufacturing process. No process
water shall be discharged outside the premises and ‘zero’ discharge shall be
maintained. All the domestic wastewater shall be treated in septic tank
followed by soak pit and used for green belt development.
xi.
The Company shall ensure that the entire solid waste generated
including process rejects, cement, fly ash, dust from bag filters and empty
asbestos bag shall be recycled back in the manufacturing process. Process
sludge shall be 100% recycled and reused in the process. Hazardous waste shall be ground in
dust proof pulverizer with integrated bag filter and recycled back to the
process. Asbestos fibres which cannot be further recycled due to contamination
of iron dust shall be stored in HDPE lined secured landfill. The disposal
facilities for asbestos waste shall be in accordance with the Bureau of Indian
Standard Code.
xii.
The cut and damaged fibre bags shall immediately be repaired.
Empty fibre bags will be shredded into fine particles in a bag shredder and
recycled into the process. Piling of AC sheets shall be done in wet condition
only.
xiii.
The Company shall obtain a certificate from the supplier of
Chrysotile fibre that it does not contain any toxic or trace metals. A copy of
certificate shall be submitted to the Ministry of Environment and Forests.
xiv.
Regular medical examination of the workers and health monitoring
of all the employees shall be carried out and if cases of asbestosis are
detected, necessary compensation shall be arranged under the existing laws. A
competent occupational health physician shall be appointed to carry out medical
surveillance. Occupational health of all the workers shall be monitored for
lung function test, chest x-ray, sputum for acid-fast-bacilli (AFC) and
asbestos body (AB), urine for sugar and albumen, bloat tests for TLC, DLC, ESR,
Hb and records maintained for at least 40 years from the beginning of the
employment or 15 years after the retirement or cessation of employment
whichever is later. Occupational Health Surveillance shall be carried out as
per the directives of the Hon’ble Supreme Court including the recent Kalyaneswari case.
xv.
To educate the workers, all the work places where asbestos dust
may cause a hazard shall be clearly indicated as a dust exposure area through
the use of display signs which
identifies the hazard and the associated health effects.
xvi.
The company shall also undertake rain water harvesting measures
and plan of action shall be submitted to the Ministry of Environment and
Forests within three months.
xvii.
Green
belt shall be developed in at least 33 % of plant area as per the CPCB
guidelines in consultation with the DFO.
xviii.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on locals needs and item-wise details along
with time bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s
Regional Office at Bhubaneswar. Implementation of such program should be
ensured accordingly in a time bound manner.
30.3.7 Presentation on the
report of Centre for Science and Environment regarding environmental clearance
in steel and cement sector.
Mr. Chandra
Bhushan, Deputy Director General of CSE, made a
terse purposeful presentation to the Committee. On view
specifically was data on capacities for which environmental clearances
were accorded in the 11th five year plan for steel and cement
manufacture, state wise in the top 10 districts in the Country. It was
objectively urged, inter alia, that proliferation of capacity in excess of
that judiciously forecast be curbed in order to protect the environment, arrest
land grab to ward off unjustified dispossession propelled by perfidious
intent. Judgment of the Supreme Court in the Lafarge case and the imperative
need to strengthen and accord sanctity to public hearing process was
underlined. Inadequacy of consideration by the EAC was argued. Wise was the
presentation. It was amply explained that cumulative impact assessment has to
be precise with field visits at greater frequency. Agenda of each meeting
should permit detailed scrutiny, unfettered by time, items condensed.
Strengthening of CEPI and monitoring procedures has been a cry unheard.
The Committee appreciated the concern and care of
CSE with respect. Members, each in turn, sought to explain the basis of their
approach having regard to their specialization relating to earth, air and sea,
health of workers, welfare of tribals, amplitude and needs of human
settlements, societal welfare, national interest and common
cause. The EAC, they assured, takes a holistic view; while policy may have
to be perfected to improve the quality of sanctions. The Chairman thanked the
CSE for its judicious care and wholesome concern.
Proposals for TORs
30.3.8 Proposed Steel Plant along with 100 MW
Captive Power Plant (10 MW of WHRB and 90 MW of AFBC boiler) at Village and
Mouza Ichabatipur, District Dhenkanal in
Orissa by M/s Eurasia Stone Metal Limited - regarding TORs
The proponent did not
attend the meeting. The Committee decided to consider the project as and when
requested by the proponent.
30.3.9 Proposed Integrated Steel Plant along
with Captive Power Plant at Village Harlapur, Taluk Mundargi, District Gadag in
Karnataka by M/s Kalawati Ispat & Power Pvt. Ltd. - regarding TORs
The project authorities and their consultant, M/s Envirotech East Pvt.
Ltd., Kolkata gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures, to be undertaken along
with the draft Terms of Reference for the preparation of EIA/EMP report. All
the Steel Plants are listed at S.No. 3(a) under category ‘A’ of the schedule of
EIA Notification, 2006 and appraised by the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s Kalawati Ispat & Power Pvt.
Ltd. have proposed for an Integrated Steel Plant along with Captive Power Plant
at Village Harlapur, Taluk Mundargi, District Gadag in Karnataka. Total project
area will be around 1,640 acres of land. There are no sensitive areas
within 25 kms. of the project site. The cost of project is Rs. 7,026.58 Crores.
The Committee noted that the proposal also involves a gas based power plant in addition to the CPP and recommended that they
shall apply to the SEAC, Karnataka for gas based Power Plant. The
committee also recommended reducing the total land requirement for proposed
Steel Project with 346 MW CPP from 1,640 acres to 1,200 acres, including 200
acres to be earmarked exclusively for Rainwater Harvesting.
The proposed units (w/o gas based PP)
along with their capacities are as follows:
S.N. |
Products
|
Proposed Capacity |
1. |
Iron ore Beneficiation (7.2 MTPA) |
1X2.4 MTPA + 1X4.8 MTPA |
2. |
Iron ore Pelletisation (3.6 MTPA) |
1X1.2 MTPA + 1X2.4 MTPA |
3. |
Coal Washery (1.2 MTPA) |
1x1.2 MTPA |
4. |
Coke oven plant (1.2 MTPA) (non-recovery type) |
2X0.6 MTPA |
5. |
Sinter Plant (2.68 MTPA) |
2X1.34 MTPA (2x140 m2) |
6. |
DRI Plant (0.33 MTPA) |
2x500 TPD |
7. |
Blast Furnace (2.10 MTPA) |
2X 1200 m3 |
8. |
Converter
based Steel Melting Shop (1.826 MTPA) |
2X110 T |
9. |
Manganese
Ore Beneficiation & Sintering |
0.12 MTPA |
10. |
Ferro Alloy Plant |
4x9 MVA SAFs (0.06 MTPA) Silico
manganese & Ferro silicon |
11. |
Oxygen Plant (0.28 MTPA) |
1x450 TPD & 1X400 TPD |
12. |
Rolling Mill:
(Flat & Long Products) |
0.9 MTPA |
b. Cold Rolling Plant, Continuous
Galvanizing Line Plant & Color Coating Plant |
0.3 MTPA |
|
13. |
Seamless Pipes Plant |
0.2 MTPA |
14. |
Ductile Pipes Plant |
0.2 MTPA |
15. |
ERW Pipes Plant |
0.3 MTPA |
16. |
Lime & Dolo Plant |
0.2 MTPA (2x300 TPD) |
17. |
Captive Power Plant |
346 MW (106 MW based on WHRB & 240 MW based on CFBC boiler) |
18. |
Portland Cement Plant |
0.8 MTPA |
Iron Ore, Manganese Ore, Coal, Lime
Stone, Dolomite, Quartzite, Bentonite etc. are the major raw materials, which
will be used in the proposed plant process. All the transfer points will be
provided with dry fogging system. Power requirement will be around 333 MW,
which will be sourced from 346 MW Captive Power Plant. Dust Suppression
Systems/ Foggy Dust Arresters will be installed to control fugitive emissions
at various facilities inside the plant. Dust suppression will be done by water
sprinkling to control fugitive emissions due to transportation activities.
Particulate emissions from the plant will be controlled within 50 mg/ Nm3
with the use of high efficiency ESPs, Bag Filters etc. Stack of adequate height
will be provided at the respective units.
Total water requirement for the
proposed project will be 47,210 m3/day, which will be sourced from
Tungabhadra River as well as through Rain water Harvesting. An Effluent
Treatment Plant will be set up for treating the plant wastewater. Treated
wastewater will be recycled for various purposes inside the plant, thereby
adopting zero discharge concept.
Solid waste from Beneficiation unit
will be disposed off in a designated location. Slag, generated from Silico
Manganese process, bottom ash from Captive Power Plant as well as the SMS slag
will be used for land filling / Road Construction purpose. Dolo-char from the
DRI units and middlings/ rejects from Coal Washery will be used in FBC boiler.
Major part of BF slag and the fly ash, generated from Captive Power Plant
will be used in own cement plant and the balance will be sold as a raw material
to other cement and brick manufacturing plants. Mill scale and flue dust
will be sent to Sinter plant. Scraps generated from the process would be
used as raw materials in SMS / Sinter plant.
After detailed deliberations,
the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project
2.
Photographs
of the plant area.
3.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
4.
A
copy of the mutual agreement for land acquisition signed with land oustees.
5.
Firm
Coal linkages should be submitted along with the EIA report
6.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site. A photograph of the site should also be included.
7.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
8.
Topography
of the area should be given clearly indicating whether the site requires any
filling. If so, details of filling, quantity of fill material required, its
source, transportation etc. should be given.
9.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius
should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved
forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of
the project site.
10. Project site layout
plan showing raw materials, fly ash and other storage plans, bore well or water
storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas, water
bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be included.
11.
Coordinates
of the plant site as well as ash pond with topo sheet co-ordinates of the plant
site as well as ash pond with topo sheet should also be included.
12. Details and
classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included. Optimize
the land requirement.
13. Rehabilitation &
Resettlement (R & R) should be as per policy of the State Govt. and a
detailed action plan should be included.
14. Permission from the
tribals, if tribal land has also to be acquired along with details of the
compensation plan.
15. Permission and
approval for the use of forest land, if any, and recommendations of the State
Forest Department. .
16. A list of industries
containing name and type in 25 km radius should be incorporated.
17. Residential colony
should be located in upwind direction.
18. List of raw material
required from coal linkage, analysis of all the raw materials and source along
with mode of transportation should be included. All the trucks for raw material
and finished product transportation must be “Environmentally Compliant”.
19. Petrological and
Chemical analysis and other chemical properties of raw materials used (with GPS
location of source of raw material) i.e. ores, minerals, rock, soil, coal,
iron, dolomite quartz etc. using high definition and precision instruments
mentioning their detection range and methodology such Digital Analyzers, AAS
with Graphite furnace, ICPMS, MICRO-WDXRF, EPMA, XRD, Nano studies or at least
as per I30-10500 and WHO norms. This analysis should include trace element and
metal studies like Cr (vi) Ni, Fe, As, Pb, Zn, Hg, Se, S etc. Presence of
radioactive elements (U, Th etc.), if applicable, should also be
included..
20.
Petrography,
grain size analysis and Major element analysis of raw material and soil from
project site and raw material should be done on the same parameters along with
analysis for SiO2, Al2O3, MgO, MnO, K2O,
CaO, FeO, Fe2O3, P2O5, H2O,
CO2.
21. If the rocks, ores,
raw material has trace elements their petrography, ore microscopy, XRD,
elemental mapping EPMA, XRF is required to quantify the amount present in it
and hence future risk involved while using it and management plan.
22. Action plan for
excavation and muck disposal during construction phase.
23. Studies for fly ash,
muck, slurry, sludge material disposal and solid waste generated, if the raw
materials used has trace elements and a management plan should also be
included.
24. Manufacturing process
details for all the plants should be included.
25. Mass balance for the
raw material and products should be included.
26. Energy balance data
for all the components of steel plant including proposed power plant should be
incorporated.
27. Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
28. Data generated in the
last three years i.e. air, water, raw material properties and analysis (major,
trace and heavy metals), ground water table, seismic history, flood hazard
history etc.
29.
One
season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative
humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except
monsoon) should be collected. The monitoring stations should take into account
the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors
including reserved forests.
30. Ambient air quality
at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project
site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
31. The suspended
particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence
of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporating of RSPM data.
32. Determination of
atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground level
concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features.
33. Air quality modeling
for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln
and WHRB should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
34. Action plan to follow
National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by the Ministry vide
G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should be included.
35. Ambient air quality
monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day
(24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following :
i)
Emissions
(g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures
ii)
Meteorological
inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover,
relative humidity & mixing height by Sodar) on hourly basis
iii)
Model
input options for terrain, plume rise, deposition etc.
iv)
Print-out
of model input and output on hourly and daily average basis
v)
A
graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC scenario) with downwind distance at
every 500 m interval covering the exact location of GLC.
vi)
Details
of air pollution control methods used with percentage efficiency that are used
for emission rate estimation with respect to each pollutant
vii)
Applicable
air quality standards as per LULC covered in the study area and % contribution
of the proposed plant to the applicable Air quality standard. In case of
expansion project, the contribution should be inclusive of both existing and
expanded capacity.
viii) No. I-VII are to be repeated for
fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry
ix)
Graphs
of monthly average daily concentration with down-wind distance
x)
Specify
when and where the ambient air quality standards are exceeded either due to the
proposed plant alone or when the plant contribution is added to the background
air quality.
xi)
Fugitive
dust protection or dust reduction technology for workers within 30 m of the
plant active areas.
36. A plan for the
utilization of waste/fuel gases in the WHRB for generating power have to be set
out.
37. Impact of the
transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environment
should be assessed and provided. The alternate method of raw material and end
product transportation should also be studied and details included.
38. One season data for
gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is necessary.
39. An action plan to
control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources as per
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated
30th May, 2008.
40. Presence of
aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for
recharging the aquifer should be included.
41. Source of
surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included. Information regarding
surface hydrology and water regime should be included.
42. Ground water analysis
with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to quantify the
area and volume of aquifer and its management.
43. Ground water modeling
showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included
44.
Column
leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20 oC
- 50 oC should be conducted and included.
45.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site should be submitted to
harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the
ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to
conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources. Rain water harvesting and groundwater
recharge structures may also be constructed outside the plant premises in
consultation with local Gram Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground
water level. Incorporation of water harvesting plan for the project is
necessary, if source of water is bore well.
46. Permission for the
drawl of water from the State Irrigation Department or concerned authority and
water balance data including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and
reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the
water conservation should be included. Water requirement should be optimized.
47. A note on the impact
of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
48. Surface water quality
of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at
eight locations must be ascertained.
49. If the site is within
10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation Mapping is required at
1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well
as flood occurrence frequency.
50. A note on treatment
of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for different purposes
should be included.
51. Provision of traps
and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil, grease
and cleaning agents.
52. If the water is mixed
with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further transport
should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the
transport capacity.
53. Wastewater
characteristics (heavy metals, anions and cations, trace metals, PAH) from any
other source should be included.
54. The pathways for
pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied for
surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water
with a monitoring and management plans.
55. Ground water
monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological
features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as
also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and
Aquatic) is vital.
56. Geotechnical data by
a bore hole of upto 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground water
level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk
Management in the area.
57. Action plan for
solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU
regarding utilization of ash should also be included.