Minutes of
the 34th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held
during 29th & 30th
March, 2012 at IOCL Conference Room, 5th Floor, Core 6, Scope
Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi -110003.
34.0 Opening Remarks of the Chairman
At the outset, Chairman welcomed the members of the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry-1). Thereafter, agenda items were taken up for discussion.
34.1
Confirmation of the Minutes of the 33rd Meeting of the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held on 27th – 28th
February, 2012.
Minutes of the 33rd Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) held on 27th – 28th February, 2012 were
confirmed.
34.2.0
Consideration of the Projects
29th
March, 2012
Proposals
for Environmental Clearance
34.2.1
Manufacturing of M.S. Rods, T.M.T. Bars, MS
Flanges, Angles, Squares & Channels of Quantity 4500 MT/m at R.S. No.
143/4, Village Thatchur, Taluk Ponneri Taluk, District Thiruvallur in Tamil
Nadu by M/s Shri Balaji Steel Industries
- regarding Environmental Clearance
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting. The
Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by the
proponent.
34.2.2
Replacement of existing induction furnace of
capacity 4.5 T/heat with 2 no. induction furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat and
installation of a steel rolling mill at Industrial Area-C, Kanganwal Road,
V.P.O Jugiana, GT Road, Ludhiana in Punjab by M/s Sudershan Forge Pvt. Limited - regarding Environmental Clearance
The
project authorities and their consultant, M/s CPTL Envirotech, Chandigarh gave a detailed presentation on the salient
features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference (TORs) issued by SEIAA, Punjab for preparation
of EIA/EMP report.
Although the proposed project is a Category ‘B’ project, since the plant site
falls within
10 km of critically polluted area, as per the General Condition of EIA Notification, 2006, the
project has been appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s
Sudershan Forge (P) Ltd. have proposed for replacement of existing induction
furnace of capacity 4.5 T/heat manufacturing 15,000 TPA steel ingots with 2 no.
of induction furnaces of capacity 8 T/heat and installation of a steel rolling
mill for manufacturing 60,000 TPA of steel Ingots and 60,000 TPA of TMT bars at
Industrial Area-C, Kanganwal Road, V.P.O Jugiana, GT Road, Ludhiana, Punjab The
total project area is 21,666 sq m and green belt will be developed in 35% of
the total area. There are no Wild Life Sanctuaries,
Reserved /Protected Forests or Defence Installations, Rivers and Hill Ranges
within 10 km radius of the project. Total Cost of the Project is
The
raw materials used are MS Scrap, Sponge Iron and Ferro Alloys. The total water
requirement is 23 m3/µ of which 17 m3/µ will be for cooling
purpose and 6 m3/µ will be for domestic purpose. Rain water
harvesting has been provided in the unit with a potential to harvest 2,900 m3/annum. The total power requirement of about 10,000 KW will be
met from the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited from the nearby
Sub-station.
Ambient air
quality monitoring was carried out within the study
area for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx and CO. Values of these parameters
range from 43 – 53 µg/m3,
70 – 83 µg/m3, 4.0 – 4.6 µg/m3, 21.0 – 24.0 µg/m3 and 0.4 – 0.5 mg/m3 respectively. The predicted incremental Ground Level
Concentration (GLC) due to the proposed project for PM10 is 2.2 µg/m3,
the resultant concentration is within the prescribed standard. For air
pollution control, cyclones & bag filters shall be provided to Induction
furnaces, wet scrubber to rolling mills and chimney of adequate height would be
provided for DG sets as per CPCB norms. There is no generation of process
wastewater and the cooling tower blow down will be recirculated. Domestic wastewater shall be
treated through STP and will be used within the premises for plantation.
The solid waste in the form of slag from the furnace,
(about 15-16 TPD), shall be given to cement plant for further use. The waste
from the bag filters shall be stored in impervious pit and sent to TSDF site.
Public
hearing/Public consultation was conducted by the Punjab Pollution
Control Board on 13.9.2011. The issues raised in the public hearing were
regarding provision of sewage treatment system in the area, pollution control
measures, employment to localpeople, CSR activities etc. which have been
addressed in the final EIA/EMP report.
After detailed deliberation, the
Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to
submission of Compliance of the existing unit along with the recent data
monitored by SPCB and the stipulation of following specific conditions along
with other environmental conditions:
i.
The company shall install wet
scrubber and bag filters etc. to control the particulate emissions below 50
mg/Nm3.
iii.
Gaseous emission levels including
secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources shall be controlled within
the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated
30th May, 2008 and regularly monitored. Guidelines / Code of
Practice issued by the CPCB should be followed.
iv.
The total water requirement shall not exceed
23 KLD. No effluent shall be discharged and ‘zero’ discharge shall be adopted.
vi.
Risk and Disaster Management Plan along with the mitigation
measures shall be prepared and a copy submitted to the Ministry’s Regional
Office at Chandigarh, SPCB and CPCB within 3 months of
issue of environment clearance letter.
vii.
As proposed, green belt shall be
developed in 33 % of the plant area. Selection of plant species shall be as per
the CPCB guidelines in consultation with the DFO.
ix.
At least 5 % of the total cost of
the project shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based
on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound action
plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at
Chandigarh. Implementation of such program should be
ensured accordingly in a time bound manner.
34.2.3
Ferro Alloys Manufacturing Unit (SEAF-4X24
MVA) at Timmapuram & Peddagummuluru
Villages, S. Rayavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnan Dist., Andhra Pradesh by M/s.
Ideal Resources Pvt. Ltd. - regarding
Environmental Clearance
The project authorities and their consultant,
M/s Sri Sai Manasa Nature Tech Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad gave a detailed
presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference (ToRs) awarded
during the 25th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) held on 29th - 30th June, 2011 for
preparation of EIA/EMP Report. All the Ferro alloy plants are listed at S. No.
3(a) under Primary Metallurgy Industry of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006
under Category’ A’ and appraised by the Expert
Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s
Ideal Resources (P) Ltd
have proposed for Ferro Alloy manufacturing unit of 4x24 MVA Submerged Electric
Arc Furnaces to produce 335.7 TPD of Ferro-Manganese and 221.06 TPD of Silico-manganese at Villages Timmapuram
& Peddagummuluru, Mandal S.Rayavaram & District Visakhapatnam of Andhra
Pradesh. The land required for the proposed project is 45.25 acres which is
already acquired and green belt will be developed in 17.49 acres (38.65%) of
plant area. No national park/wild life sanctuary/tiger reserve is located
within 10 km radius of the project site. Payakraopeta RF and Panduru RF
are at a distance of 5.5 km and 8.0 km respectively from the project site.
River Varaha and Bay of Bengal flow at a distance of 6.0 km and 7.0 km
respectively from the project site. No endangering species of flora/fauna have been
reported in the study area. Total cost of the project is Rs. 295.0 Crores. Rs.
24.15 Crores and Rs.0.4 Crores are earmarked towards total capital cost and
recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures.
.
Following will be the facilities and products from the
proposed project which will be manufactured in 2 phases:
FACILITY |
CAPACITY |
PRODUCTS |
PRODUCTION CAPACITY (TPD) |
Submerged Electric Arc Furnace |
4 x 24 MVA |
Ferro Manganese |
335.7 |
Silico Manganese |
221.06 |
The manufacturing process would involve preparation of raw
material, electric smelting, casting and finishing. Quartzite, Mill Scale, Coke
Breeze/Coal, Electrode Paste, Electrode Casting, Manganese Ore and Dolomite are
the Raw materials that will be required.
Ambient air
quality monitoring was carried within the study area
for PM10, SO2 and
NOx. The average values of these parameters are 58.9 µg/m3, 6.2 µg/m3 and 23.4 µg/m3 respectively. The predicted incremental ground level
concentrations (GLCs) due to the proposed project are 1.87 µg/m3, 4.65 µg/m3
and 2.47 µg/m3 respectively.
The resultant concentrations of these parameters are within the prescribed
standards.
Pulse Jet Bag Filters will be provided to control the
particulate emissions. Stack of 30 m height will be provided for
effective dispersion of particulate matter and gaseous emissions. Gas cleaning
unit and furnace hoods will also be provided. Fugitive dust would be arrested
by installation of water sprinklers. The initial water requirement will be 400 m3/d. The water
requirement of 148 m3/day will be sourced from the ground water.
Rain water harvesting pond will be developed in 3.24 acres of area. No process
wastewater is generated. Domestic wastewater will be treated in septic tank
followed by soak pit. Fe-Mn slag will be reused in Si-Mn manufacturing process
as one of the raw material and Si-Mn slag will be used for the brick
manufacturing. The bag filter dust will be sold to the +brick manufactures.
Public
Hearing/public consultation was conducted by the Andhra Pradesh Pollution
Control Board on 29th November, 2011. The issues raised in the
public hearing meeting were regarding provision of employment to local people,
pollution control measures, ground water depletion etc. which have been
addressed and included in the EIA/EMP report.
After detailed deliberation, the
Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to the
following specific conditions along with other environmental conditions:
13.
At least 5 % of the total cost of
the project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on
Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with
time bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to the Ministry’s
Regional Office at Bangalore. Implementation of such
program shall be ensured accordingly in a time bound manner.
34.2.4
Expansion of Ferro Alloys manufacturing
facility at Plot No. 368, Growth Centre, APIIC- Bobbili (Village & Mandal),
Vizinagaram Dist. Andra Pradesh by M/s. Berry Alloys Limited (BAL) -
regarding Environmental Clearance
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting. The
Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by the
proponent.
34.2.5
Cement Grinding Unit (0.75 MTPA) at Plot No.
Spl-1, Spl-2, RIICO Paryavaran Industrial Area, Village Sakatpura, Tehsil Ladpura, District
Kota, Rajasthan by M/s. Birla Corporation Limited - Environmental
Clearance
The project
authorities and their consultant, M/s Cholamandalam
MS Risk Services Limited, Chennai, gave a
detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and the proposed
environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference
(TORs) issued by SEIAA, Rajasthan for preparation of EIA/EMP report. The stand-alone cement grinding units are listed at S.No.
3(b) under category ‘B’ and appraised by the SEIAA/SEAC. Since the project site
falls within
10 km of Chambal wildlife sanctuary, as per the General Condition of EIA Notification, 2006, the
project has been appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1)
of MoEF.
M/s. Birla Corporation Limited have proposed for Cement Grinding
Unit (0.75 MTPA) at Plot No. Spl-1, Spl-2, RIICO Paryavaran Industrial Area, Village Sakatpura,
Tehsil Ladpura,
District Kota, Rajasthan. The project area is 5.72 ha which is acquired
and green belt will be developed in 33% of the area. The Chambal wildlife sanctuary is located at 3 km distance from the Sakatpura Industrial area and
adjacent to the existing Kota Super Thermal Power Plant. The Kota Super Thermal
Power Plant is in between the project site and the Chambal wildlife sanctuary. The project cost is Rs. 110 Crores and the cost towards EMP is
Rs. 4.9 Crores.
PPC
and OPC will be manufactured by using closed circuit grinding system. Fly ash drying
unit will also be installed. Clinker: 0.48 MTPA, Fly Ash: 0.225 MTPA and Gypsum: 0.045 MTPA are the raw materials that will be used. Clinker,
Fly ash and Gypsum will be sourced from the sister
unit at Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, Kota Super Thermal Power Plant and Bikaner,
Rajasthan respectively. The power requirement of 5 MVA will be sourced from
JVVNL.
Ambient air
quality monitoring was carried out within the study
area for PM10, SO2, and
NOx. Values of these parameters range from 89.5 - 93.9 µg/m3,
12.9 – 14.53 µg/m3,
and 16.62 – 18.55 µg/m3 respectively. The predicted maximum incremental
ground level concentration (GLC) due to the proposed project for PM10,
SO2 and NOx are 45.0 µg/m3,
45.0 µg/m3 and 25.0 µg/m3 respectively, the
resultant concentrations of which are within the prescribed standards. It is
proposed to install bag house to control the particulate emissions.
The water requirement of 72 m3/day will be sourced from
Chambal River downstream & rainwater harvesting. No process wastewater is generated. The sewage will be
treated in STP and used for green belt development. No hazardous waste except lube oils
will be stored at site. About 1,000 litres of lube oil will be generated which will be disposed
to authorized used oil recycling vendors. Ash generated from fly ash dryer will be reused for
cement grinding.
Rejects from
fly ash dryer facility would be sent back to KTPS ash pond.
The
Committee after detailed deliberations sought the following information for
reconsideration:
·
A copy of
application submitted to National Board for Wildlife
·
An authenticated
map regarding location of project site from Gharial
Sanctuary and Comments from Chief Wildlife Warden
·
Revised layout
plan after increasing the capacity of rain water harvesting pond
·
A copy of Gazette
notification of RIICO industrial area
·
Data on trace
element analysis of RSPM
·
Chemical and trace
element analysis of raw materials including fly ash
·
Noise level management
plan
·
Digital Elevation
Model and Flood Hazard history of the area
·
Commitment for
providing covered belt conveyor for fly ash transportation
·
Occupational health:
a)
Details of existing Occupational & Safety
Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and whether
they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,
what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of
the workers can be preserved,
b)
Details of exposure specific health status
evaluation of worker. If the workers’
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c)
Annual report of heath status of workers with
special reference to Occupational
Health and Safety.
d)
Plan and fund
allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and
sub-contract workers.
34.2.6
Proposed capacity
enhancement of cement plant from 1.2 MTPA (3,600 TPD) to 2.0 MTPA (6,000 TPD)
and installation of coal based CPP 80 MW (50 MW + 30 MW) at Village Chanderia,
District Chittorgarh in Rajasthan by M/s
Birla Corporation Limited – Environmental Clearance
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting. The
Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by the
proponent.
34.2.7
Expansion of Salem Cement Grinding Unit from
1.0 MTPA to 2.0 MTPA in SF Nos. 121, 123 and 124 Parts in Village Singhipuram,
Taluk Valapadi, District Salem in Tamil Nadu by M/s Madras Cements Limited -
regarding Environmental Clearance
The
project authorities and their consultant, M/s. Environmental System Consultants & Ambiente Lab
Solutions Private Limited, Chennai gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed
environmental protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference
(ToRs) awarded during the 31st Meeting of the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry-1) held during 22nd – 23rd December,
2011 for preparation of EIA/EMP. All stand alone cement grinding units are covered under Category ‘B’ as
per para 3(b) of the Schedule of the EIA notification 2006, but due to non
functioning of SEIAA/SEAC of Tamilnadu, the proposal has been appraised by the
Expert Appraisal Committee – I (Industry) in the Ministry.
M/s. Madras Cements Ltd. have proposed for the expansion of Salem
Cement Grinding Unit at village Singhipuram, Taluk Valapadi in Salem
District of Tamil Nadu from the existing 1.0 MTPA to 2.0 MTPA. No forest land and
rehabilitation/resettlement is involved in the proposal. For supporting infrastructures like truck parking, fuel bunk, green belt
etc., additional land of 6 Ha will be added to existing 8.1 Ha of area. On
expansion, green belt will be developed in additional 3 Ha (thus, total 5.83
Ha; 41% coverage). No ecologically sensitive areas such as National
Park/Sanctuary/Biosphere Reserve/Historical monuments, defence installations,
etc. exist within 10 km radius of the Plant site. There are reserved forests in
the Study Area viz. Vellalakundam RF (at a distance of 4.0 km in southwest),
Goodumalai RF (at a distance of 4.5 km in northwest) and Mangalapuram RF (at a
distance of 6.7 km the south). NOC from DFO, Athur was obtained. There is no
litigation/pending case against the proposal. Existing plant cost is Rs. 95.00 crores and project cost for expansion is
Rs.83.00 crores. Capital Cost for Pollution Control Measures is Rs.3.00 crores and Rs.5.00
lakhs per annum is the Operating Cost.
The
compliance to the conditions stipulated in the environmental clearance accorded
for existing plant on 5.10.2007 was presented before the Committee. The production enhancement would be by adding
a highly energy efficient POLYCOM Roller Press in series to the existing Ball
mill. Additional 3,000 Ton of Fly Ash Silo and a standby 7 MW DG Set
is also proposed. Controlled quantity of Clinker, Gypsum and Fly ash will
be fed to the POLYCOM roller press through Weigh feeders. Grinding of Clinker, Gypsum and Fly ash is in
the ratio of 65:5:30. All
point sources and material transfer points are provided with bag filters to
control particulate emissions <50 mg/Nm3. Dust collected from
various bag filters would be reused as raw material in the process of cement
grinding and there will be no solid waste generation from the Unit.
Ambient air
quality monitoring was carried out within the study
area for PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and NOx. The average values of these
parameters are 21.0 µg/m3,
39.0 µg/m3, 7.9 µg/m3 and 9.1 µg/m3 respectively. The predicted
incremental ground level concentration (GLC) due to the proposed project for PM10
is 1.96 µg/m3. The resultant concentration is within the
prescribed standards.
Entire plant operations are dry processes and fresh water requirement
will be 95 m3/day from existing 60 m3/day. 55 m3/day is required for cooling,
25 m3/day for domestic use and 15 m3/day for green belt
& dust control measures in addition to the treated sewage of 15 m3/day.
Permission from the CGWA has been obtained for 95 m3/day ground
water drawl vide Letter No. 21-4(267)/SECR/CGWA/2011-2078 dated 01.02.2012. On expansion,
additional domestic effluent (18 m3/day) will be generated. The
sewage from the Plant will be treated in the existing septic tank followed by
dispersion trench. Sewage generated from Guest House & Quarters will be
treated in a separate 20 KLD capacity Sewage Treatment Plant and treated sewage
of 15 KLD will be utilized for Green Belt development. Zero effluent discharge
would be adopted. Rain Water Harvesting Schemes are proposed to conserve the
water.
Public Hearing has been
exempted by categorising in B2 Category due to use of energy efficient
technology, no clinker production, Zero Effluent Discharge, utilisation of fly
ash and all solid wastes in the process, etc. and no eco sensitive area within
10 km radius.
After detailed deliberation, the
Committee recommended the project for environmental clearance subject to
submission of revised rain water harvesting plan with a minimum capacity of 2
months and the stipulation of following specific conditions along with other
environmental conditions:
i.
Particulate emissions shall be controlled
within 50 mg/Nm3 by
installing adequate air pollution control system viz. Bag filters and stacks of adequate
height etc. Data on ambient air, fugitive and stack emissions shall be
submitted to the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bangalore,
SPCB and CPCB regularly.
ii.
The National Ambient Air Quality Standards
issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should be followed.
iii.
Gaseous emission levels including secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources shall be
controlled within the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry and
regularly monitored. Guidelines/Code of Practice issued by the CPCB should be
followed.
iv.
The company shall install adequate dust
collection and extraction system to control fugitive dust emissions at various
transfer points, raw mill handling (unloading, conveying, transporting,
stacking), vehicular movement, bagging and packing areas etc. All the raw
material stock piles should be covered. A
closed clinker stockpile system shall be provided. All conveyers should be covered with
GI sheets. Covered sheds for storage of raw materials and fully covered
conveyers for transportation of materials shall be provided besides coal,
cement, fly ash and clinker shall be stored in silos. Pneumatic system shall be used for fly
ash handling.
v.
Asphalting/concreting of roads and water spray all around the
stockyard and loading/unloading areas in the cement plant shall be carried out
to control fugitive emissions. Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in
critical areas prone to air pollution and having high levels of SPM and RSPM
such as haul road, loading and unloading points, transfer points and other
vulnerable areas. It shall
be ensured that the ambient air quality parameters conform to the norms
prescribed by the Central Pollution Control Board in this regard.
vi.
Efforts shall be made to reduce impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment including
agricultural land. All the raw materials including fly ash should be
transported in the closed containers only and should not be overloaded.
Vehicular emissions should be regularly monitored.
vii.
Total water requirement shall not exceed 95 m3/day and necessary permission for
the drawl shall be obtained. All the treated wastewater should be recycled and reused in the process and/or for dust
suppression and green belt development and other plant related activities etc.
No process wastewater shall be discharged outside the factory premises and
‘zero’ discharge should be adopted.
viii.
Efforts shall be made to make use of rain water harvested. If
needed, capacity of the reservoir shall be enhanced to meet the maximum water
requirement. Only balance water requirement shall be met from other sources.
ix.
All the bag filter dust, raw meal dust, clinker dust and cement
dust from pollution control devices should be recycled and reused in the
process used for cement manufacturing.
Spent oil and batteries should be sold to authorized recyclers /
reprocessors only.
x.
Green belt shall be developed in at least 33 % area in and around the cement plant as
per the CPCB guidelines to mitigate the effects of air emissions in
consultation with local DFO.
xi.
At least 5 % of the total cost of the project shall be earmarked
towards the Enterprise
Social Commitment based on locals need and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan should be prepared and submitted to
the Ministry’s Regional Office at Bangalore.
Implementation of such program should be ensured accordingly in a time bound
manner.
34.2.8
Grinding unit of Cement of 200 TPD at Sy. No.
181/1, Village Peradam, Sathyavedu Mandal, Distt. Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh - by
M/s. Vishnu Maya Cements (P) Ltd. - regarding Environmental Clearance
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting. The
Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by the
proponent.
34.2.9
Setting up of 0.3 MTPA Non-recovery Coke Oven
along with 25 MW waste heat recovery Captive Power Plant at Blast Furnace Unit,
Plot No. 456 & 457, Baikampady Industrial Area, Panambur, Dist. Manglaore,
Karnataka by M/s. KIOCL Limited – regarding Environmental
Clearance
The project proponents and
their consultant, M/s KRS Enterprises, Bangalore gave a detailed
presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental
protection measures to be undertaken as per Terms of References (TORs) awarded
during the 25th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) held during 29th & 30th of June
2011 for preparation of EIA/EMP report. All the Coke
Oven plants (> 2,50,000 TPA)are listed at S.No. 4(b) in category ‘A’
of the Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and appraised at the Central level.
M/s KIOCL
Limited have proposed for setting up of 0.3 MTPA
non-recovery coke oven plant along with 25 MW Waste Heat Recovery CPP at their
Blast Furnace unit at Baikampady Industrial Area, Panambur, Mangalore,
Karnataka. Total project area is 153.875
acres, of which 48 acres has been earmarked for coke oven project and 51 acres
has been earmarked as green belt. No national park/wildlife
sanctuary/eco-sensitive area is located within 10 km radius of the project. No
forest land and R & R is involved. Total project cost is Rs. 452.22
Crores and Rs. 15.60 Crores has been earmarked towards environmental pollution
control measures.
Hard coking coal and semi soft coking coal will be
used as raw materials. Hard coking coal will be sourced from Australia, Canada,
USA, Mozambique & Indonesia. Semi soft coking coal will be sourced from
Australia, South Africa, Russia & Indonesia. Procurement of
coking coal will be through transparent, competitive, global tendering process.
Empowered Joint Committee (EJC) accredited by the Ministry of Steel would be
approached, being a PSU of the Steel Ministry, at the appropriate time
depending upon the time of requirement of coal.
Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried
at eight locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx
& CO. Values of these parameters range from 74 to 91 µg/m3, 37 -
52 µg/m3, 16 - 26 µg/m3, 29 – 54 µg/m3 &
1.0 -1.6 mg/m3 respectively. The predicted maximum
incremental ground level concentration (GLC) due to the proposed project for
PM, SO2 and NOx are 0.48
µg/m3, 7.3 µg/m3 and 0.79 µg/m3 respectively,
the resultant concentrations of which are within the prescribed standards.
The
sources of air pollution are dust from Coal handling & Coke sizing, Battery
operation, Coke quenching & Flue gas from Power Plant (SOX &
NOX). As a control
measure, dust suppression systems in conjunction with dust collectors i.e. bag
filters for coal and coke handling to restrict particulate emissions to within
50 mg/Nm3 will be installed. Modified wet quenching of coke
incorporating grit arrestor to minimize escape of particulate matter with water
vapor and sludge handling arrangement will be done. A stack of appropriate
height for dispersion of exhaust gases during battery operation & others
will be installed. Adequate length and size of the waste gas tunnel to restrict
particulate matter emissions from the stack within 50 mg/Nm3 will be
given.
Total make-up
water requirement for the non recovery coke oven plant, including the power
plant will be about 193 m3/hr. The source of water is from the
existing Pellet Plant Unit, Mangalore. The backwash from demineralised (DM)
Plant & Boiler blow down water will be
neutralized, diluted and used for greenbelt development and dust suppression.
Cooling tower blow down water will be utilized for coke quenching, coal and
coke handling, green belt development and miscellaneous use. The sewage generated will be treated in STP of capacity 50
KLD scheduled for implementation.
Coal &
Coke fines will be recycled with coal blend in the yard while the broken
refractory masses will be dumped in a waste yard and subsequently used for
filling & leveling of low-lying areas within the battery limit of the
plant. Noise pollution control measures will be
provided by way of providing silencers and sound proof cubicles /covers.
Public
hearing is not required as the unit is located in notified industrial area.
The
Committee after detailed deliberations deferred the proposal and sought the
following information for reconsideration:
·
Details regarding Coal linkage documents
·
Chemical and Trace element analysis of Raw
Materials
·
Revised layout plan to scale using AutoCAD
·
Data on ground water and surface water quality.
· Revised rain water harvesting plan with increased storage capacity of
the reservoir.
Proposals
for TORs
34.2.10
Expansion of paper production capacity from 70
TPD to 150 TPD, Agro Residue pulp production capacity from 30 to 100 TPD at
Village Rajau Paraspur & Bahadurpur
Karod, Tehsil Faridpur, District Bareilly in Uttar Pradesh by M/s Rama Shyma Papers Limited - regarding
TORs
The project authorities and their consultant, M/s Epsilon Projects Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow
gave a detailed presentation on the salient
features of the project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with
the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. Pulp
manufacturing and Pulp & Paper manufacturing industry is listed at
serial no. 5(i) of schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 under category A and appraised by the Expert Appraisal
Committee (Industry-1) in the MoEF.
M/s Rama Shyma Papers Limited have
proposed for expansion of paper production capacity from 70 to 150 TPD, Agro
Residue pulp production capacity from 30 to 100 TPD at Village Rajau Paraspur
& Bahadurpur Karod, Tehsil Faridpur,
District Bareilly in Uttar Pradesh. The expansion is
proposed within the existing plant premises. The project cost is Rs. 30.3
crores.
The paper
mill is presently producing Kraft Papers (70 TPD capacity) by recycling waste
papers. A Chemical Recovery Plant (CRP) of 120 TPD capacity is under installation to incinerate black liquor
to produce Soda Ash as by-product. The CRP is scheduled for operation by July
2012. Thereafter the existing 30TPD
agro residue pulping capacity will be utilised. The expansion project envisages production of Kraft papers (150 TPD) and
unbleached agro residue pulp (100 TPD) utilizing wheat straw and bagasse as raw
materials by Soda Pulping process. The recycled paper pulping capacity shall be
50 TPD. Additional power required for the project is 1,500 KVA, which shall be
drawn from the state UPPCL grid and additional DG sets will be provided for
power backup. Additional requirement of fuel, paddy husk, for the project is
estimated as 90 MT/Day.
At present
there are two boilers i.e. 14 TPH and 08 TPH. Multi-cyclone Dust collector and
wet scrubber will be installed for pollution control. A new boiler of 40 TPH
capacity with ESP is proposed to be installed under the project. The water requirement on completion of the project
shall increase from the present 1,064 to 2,045 KL/Day, i.e. additional 981
KL/Day, which will be met from the existing bore wells at site. The specific water consumption will be
reduced from 15.2 to 13.6 m3 per MT of product. The main polluting
effluent, black liquor, shall be shall be incinerated in the reactor of the
Chemical Recovery Plant, in which Soda Ash will be produced as by-product. The
remaining effluent resulting from the paper machine section after reuse and
recycling shall be treated in the existing ETP of the mill, which will be
further revamped as required. The main solid wastes generated in the
manufacturing process are Fly Ash from the boiler and Sludge from the Effluent
Treatment Plant. The fly ash shall be used for land filling as at present. The
ETP sludge will to be sold to the paper board manufacturers as per the present
practice. PPE shall be provided to all those working in high noise areas.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project.
2.
Photographs
of the existing and proposed plant area
3.
Compliance to the conditions stipulated in the Environmental
Clearance of existing plant. Recent monitoring report from SPCB, which shall
include data on AAQ, water quality, solid waste etc. shall be submitted.
4.
Has the unit received any notice under the
Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and
Water Acts? If so, compliance to the notice(s)
5. Coal
linkage documents
6.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
7.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
8.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests, if any, within 10 km.
radius should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover,
reserved forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc. in
10 km of the project site.
9.
Project
site layout plan to scale using AutoCAD showing raw materials, fly ash and
other storage plans, bore well or water storage, aquifers (within 1 km.)
dumping, waste disposal, green areas, water bodies, rivers/ drainage passing
through the project site should be included. Present land use based on
satellite imagery. Study area should be 10 Km radius from the boundary of the
plant.
10. A list of industries containing name
and type in 10 km radius should be incorporated.
11.
List of raw materials required and source
along with mode of transportation should be included. Raw material preparation
chapter should include: proper dust handling/suppression system to maintain
good house keeping & dust free atmosphere; dust masks to workers of
concerned area and provision of proper fire fighting equipment etc.
12.
Raw material management plan including provision
of wind curtain etc., to avoid blowing away of raw materials during summer/high
winds.
13.
Manufacturing process details for all the
plants should be included.
14.
Chapter on Pulping & Bleaching should
include: no black liquor spillage in the area of pulp mill; no use of elemental
chlorine for bleaching in mill.
15.
Chapter on Chemical Recovery should include:
no spillage of foam in chemical recovery plant, no discharge of foul condensate
generated from MEE directly to ETP; control of suspended particulate matter
emissions from the stack of fluidized bed combustion boiler through the
installation of ESP and the complete economics of Chemical recovery plant.
16.
Details on Sodium balance
17.
Plan for installation of Fibre recovery system
18.
To set up effective Black Liquor separation
system (from pulps), so as to obtain high solids in the black liquor and
facilitating complete removal of black liquor from the pulp
19.
Detailed break-up cost of the
equipments including source and technology edge over the conventional equipment
needs to be recorded in EIA Report.
20. Action plan to ensure that all
equipments like pumps, motors & other electricals are energy efficient.
Program for energy efficient lighting should also be incorporated.
21. Mass balance for the raw material and
products should be included.
22. Energy balance data for all the
components of paper plant including proposed power plant should be
incorporated.
23. Site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and
rainfall should be collected.
24. Data generated in the last one year
i.e. air, water, raw material properties and analysis (major, trace and heavy
metals), ground water table, seismic history, flood hazard history etc.
25. Data on existing ambient air, stack
emission, fugitive emissions data; water requirement and water balance cycle;
generation, re-utilization and disposal of solid/ hazardous waste for the
existing plant and predicted increase in pollution load (GLCs) due to proposed
expansion should be incorporated.
26. Point-wise compliance to the specific
and general conditions stipulated in the environmental clearance and consent to
operate for the existing plant.
27. Ambient air quality at 8 locations
within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project site with one
AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
28. Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporating of RSPM data.
29. Determination of atmospheric inversion
level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of
pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological
features.
30. Air quality modeling for paper plant
& power plant for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the
control of emissions from all the sources should also be included to control
emissions within the prescribed limits. Existing stack emissions data.
31. Cumulative affect of
the proposed and existing plants needs to be studied in detail particularly in
the change of ambient temperature due to heat dissipation, Ambient air quality
study, and odorous emissions etc.
32. Ambient air quality monitoring
modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day (24 hrs)
for maximum GLC along with following:
i)
Emissions
(g/second) with and without the air pollution control measures
ii)
Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind
direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing height using
SODAR) on hourly basis
iii)
Model input options for terrain, plume rise,
deposition etc.
iv)
Print-out of model input and output on hourly
and daily average basis
v)
A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC
scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact location
of GLC.
vi)
Details of air pollution control methods used
with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate estimation with
respect to each pollutant
vii)
Applicable air quality standards as per LULC
covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to the
applicable Air quality standard. In case of expansion project, the contribution
should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.
viii)
No. I-VII are to be repeated for fugitive
emissions and any other source type relevant and used for industry
ix)
Graphs of monthly average daily concentration
with down-wind distance
x)
Specify when and where the ambient air
quality standards are exceeded either due to the proposed plant alone or when
the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi)
Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction
technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
33.
Impact of the transport of the raw materials
and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed and
provided.
34. One season data for gaseous emissions
other than monsoon season is necessary.
35. Presence of aquifer(s) within 1 km of
the project boundaries and management plan for recharging the aquifer should be
included.
36.
Source of surface/ground water level, site
(GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph), metal trace element (as above)
chemical analysis for water to be used along with a Piper and Piper Duro-V diagram. If surface water is used from
river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage and distance from project
site should also be included.
37.
Reduce the water intake by
maximum recycling and as per the latest guidelines of CPCB for water
consumption for chemical grade pulps
38. Action plan for the tertiary treatment
of mill effluent before discharge to any water body, which should also be
specified.
39. Ground water analysis with bore well
data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to quantify the area and volume
of aquifer and its management.
40. Ground water modeling showing the
pathways of the pollutants should be included
41. Column leachate study for all types of
stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20oC-50oC should be
conducted and included.
42. Action plan for rainwater harvesting
measures at plant site should be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof
tops and storm water drains to use for the various activities at the project
site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other
sources. Rain water harvesting and groundwater recharge structures may
also be constructed outside the plant premises in consultation with local Gram
Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground water level.
43. Permission for the drawl of surface
water from the State Irrigation Department /CGWA and water balance data
including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged is
to be provided. ETP should be equipped with tertiary stage of treatment.
Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation should be included.
44. Commitment that fresh water
consumption will not be more than 75 m3/T of paper.
45. A chapter on efforts made to minimize
use of ground water; impact of ground water drawl on the surrounding area,
ground water table and impact of treated waste water usage for irrigation
should also be included. A detailed hydrological study carried out by the State
Govt. with reference to drawl of ground water should also be included. A
detailed action plan for mitigative measures should be included. Ground water
monitoring minimum at 8 locations should be ensured.
46. Surface water quality of nearby River
(60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at eight locations must
be ascertained.
47. A note on treatment of wastewater from
different plants, recycle and reuse for different purposes should be included.
48. Details
of ETP system as per the GANGA Basin Action Plan
49. Management
plan for Color in the effluents
50. Provision of traps and treatment plants
are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil, grease and cleaning agents.
51. Performance report of effluent
treatment plant to accommodate the additional effluent generated during
expansion.
52. If the water is mixed with solid
particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further transport should be
included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the transport
capacity.
53. The pathways for pollution via
seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied for surface water
(drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water with a
monitoring and management plans.
54. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also.
Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic) is vital.
55. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste
generation, storage, utilization and disposal from all the sources including
fly ash. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of ash should also be included.
Fly ash disposal plan on land owned by the mill should be included.
56. A note on the treatment, storage and
disposal of all type of solid/hazardous wastes should be included.
Identification and details of land to be used for solid/hazardous wastes
disposal should be included. Details of secured land fill as per CPCB
guidelines should also be included.
57. End use of solid waste and its
composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material
and its composition should also be incorporated.
58. The
photographs of progress with green belt development shall be submitted. Action plan for the green belt
development plan in 33 % area should be included. The green belt should be
around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the traveling roads
should also be incorporated. All rooftops/terraces should have some green
cover.
59. Detailed description of the flora and
fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with special reference to rare,
endemic and endangered species.
60. Disaster Management Plan including risk
assessment and damage control needs to be addressed and included.
61. Occupational health:
a)
Details
of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of
above mentioned hazards and whether they are within Permissible Exposure level
(PEL). If these are not within PEL, what measures the company has adopted to
keep them within PEL so that health of the workers can be preserved,
b)
Details
of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers?
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c)
Annual
report of heath status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health
and Safety.
d)
Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational
health & safety of all contract and sub-contract workers.
62. Detailed
list of CSR activities done till now along with the amount spent for each
activity.
63. At least 5 % of the total cost of the
project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment and
item-wise details along with time bound action plan should be included.
Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon. It is also suggested that a “Modern Hospital” facility
should be created for the Public, the need for which is strongly felt.
64. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should also be
included.
65. Public hearing issues raised and
commitments made by the project proponent on the same should be included
separately in EIA/EMP Report in the form of tabular chart with financial budget
for complying with the commitments made.
66. Any litigation pending against the
project and / or any direction / order passed by any Court of Law against the
project, if so, details thereof.
It was decided that ‘TORs’
prescribed by the Expert Appraisal
Committee-1 (Industry) should be considered for
preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above mentioned project in
addition to all the relevant information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’
given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. Where the documents provided are in a language other than
English, an English translation should be provided. The draft EIA/EMP
report shall be submitted to the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board for
public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be
incorporated in the EIA report. The final EIA report shall be submitted to the
Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance.
The TORs
prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the
EIA/EMP along with Public hearing reports.
34.2.11
Proposed Cement Plant of 3.6 MTPA Clinker,
5.5 MTPA Cement along with 100 MW Captive Power Plant at Village & Taluka
Sedam, District Gulbarga in Karnataka by M/s
Reliance Cement Company Pvt. Limited -
regarding TORs
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting. The
Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by the
proponent.
34.2.12
Expansion of Integrated Steel Plant at
Villages Ankulapaturu, Udatavaripalem, Kalavakonda, Mandal Chillakur, District
SPS Nellore in Andhra Pradesh by M/s
SBQ Steels Limited- regarding TORs
The project authorities
and their consultant, M/s Pioneer Enviro Laboratories & Consultants Pvt.
Ltd., Hyderabad gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the
project and proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along
with the draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All the
steel plants are listed at S.No. 3(a) in primary metallurgical industry under
category-A of
the Schedule of EIA notification 2006 and appraised
by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) in the MoEF.
M/s
SBQ Steels Limited is an existing plant, which is operating Sinter plant, Blast
furnace, Ladle furnace, Rolling Mill and Oxygen plant in Villages Ankulapaturu,
Kalavakonda & Udatavaripalem, Mandal Chillakur, District SPSR Nellore in
Andhra Pradesh. It is proposed to enhance the Integrated Steel Plant capacities
and installation of new beneficiation, pelletization Plants and lime kiln. The
proposed expansion will be taken up in the existing plant premises and in the
additional land adjacent to the existing plant site. Total land envisaged for
the existing and expansion project is 743.23 acres and 33% of the total area will be developed under greenbelt. No
National Park/Wild life sanctuary/Bird Sanctuary/Historic Place is located
within 10 km radius of the project site. Upputeru River
flows at 3.0 Kms distance from the plant. Pennaki pond is located at a distance
of 6.0 Kms from the plant. UV palem PF, Momidi RF, Vallipedu RF are within 10
Kms from the plant. Since Harjanwada (Hamlet of Ankulapaturu
village) is part of total land envisaged, it will be rehabilitated. Cost of the
expansion project is Rs. 2,241.6 Crores.
The following are the production capacities of existing
& expansion units:
S. No |
Unit |
Product |
Production
Capacity |
||
Existing
capacity (For which EC is
obtained and under implementation stage) |
Proposed
expansion capacity |
Total,
after proposed expansion |
|||
1.
|
Coke Oven Plant(Non
-recovery) |
Coke |
200000
TPA |
-- |
2,00.000 TPA |
2.
|
DRI Kiln |
Sponge
iron |
1,20,000TPA |
3,30,000
TPA |
4,50,000
TPA |
3.
|
Cement Plant |
Cement |
2,90,000TPA |
--- |
2,90,000TPA |
4.
|
Sinter Plant |
Sinter |
5,00,000
TPA |
--- |
5,00,000
TPA |
5.
|
Blast Furnace |
Hot
metal / pig
iron |
5,00,000
TPA |
--- |
5,00,000
TPA |
6.
|
SMS |
Billets
/ blooms |
5,50,000
TPA |
Reduction
of 5,50,000 TPA to 4,00,000 TPA and additionally 6,07,500 TPA |
10,07,500
TPA |
7.
|
Rolling Mill--Bar
Mill |
Bars |
5,00,000
TPA (reduced by
1,00,000TPA) |
--- |
4,00,000
TPA |
8.
|
Captive Power Plant |
Power |
90
MW |
45
MW |
135
MW |
9.
|
Oxygen Plant |
Oxygen |
60000
TPA |
60000
TPA |
120000
TPA |
10.
|
Wire rod mill |
Wire
rods |
--- |
4,00,000
TPA |
4,00,000
TPA |
11.
|
Lime Kiln |
Lime |
--- |
60000
TPA |
60000
TPA |
12.
|
Beneficiation Plant |
Iron
ore Concentrated |
--- |
12,24,500
TPA |
12,24,500
TPA |
13.
|
Pelletisation Plant |
Pellet |
--- |
12,00,000
TPA |
12,00,000
TPA |
14.
|
Coal
Gasifier - I |
- |
- |
3*
3.4 M - Double
Stage |
430,000
Nm3/day |
15.
|
Coal
Gasifier - II |
- |
- |
4*
3.4 M - Double
Stage |
515,000
Nm3/day |
Iron ore, coal, dolomite for sponge iron plant, Indian Coal
/ Imported Coal for power plant will be used as raw materials by proposed
expansion. Iron ore will be sourced from Bellary, Karnataka
from the Category A mines, for which the Hon’ble Supreme Court has given
permission. Power requirement will be
sourced from captive power plant. Railway siding is
proposed up to the site for transportation of raw materials/dispatch of finished
goods. Township for employees is envisaged in the proposed expansion.
Sponge Iron will be manufactured in coal based Direct Reduction (DR)
kilns. Billets will be manufactured by melting in Induction furnace and
casting in continuous casting machine. Rolled products (i.e. TMT Bars, Angels, Channels, Beams & Other Structural Steel and
Special Alloy steels) will be
manufactured in reheating furnace land coal fired rolling mill. Waste
heat recovery boiler (WHRB) and FBC boiler will be installed.
The Iron Ore concentrate is taken to the proportioning
section where Bentonite will be added. This proportioned mixture is fed to
rotating drum, which thoroughly mixes the Ore and Bentonite. This mixture will
be taken to the Ball mill where the mixture is thoroughly ground to desired
fineness and moisture. This fine mixture will be taken in a surge bin from
there it will be fed to Pelletiser through weigh feeders. From the Pelletiser,
green pellets will be discharged on to a collecting conveyor which takes the
product to the screening section. From the Roller Screen, charge of 8-16
fraction will be taken to the Traveling Grate Oven. The cooled pellets will be
discharged from the annular cooler on a belt conveyor, which carries the final
product to the silos or stock pile as the case may be, from where it will be
dispatched to the customers. The exhaust waste flue gases from the sponge iron
kilns will pass through waste heat recovery boilers (WHRB). FBC boiler will
also be provided to generate steam by using char (solid waste from Sponge iron
manufacturing) and coal as fuel. The steam generated from WHRB & FBC
Boilers will pass through steam turbine and will be coupled to generator to
generate 45 MW electricity. This power generated will be utilized for captive
requirements of the Steel plant.
Electrostatic precipitator (ESP) will be provided to DRI kiln and AFBC boiler
to control particulate emissions within 50 mg/Nm3. Bag filters will
be installed to control emissions from induction furnace and rolling
mill. Flue gases for DRI plant will be utilized in Waste heat recovery
boiler (WHRB) and passed through ESP and then into atmosphere through ID fans
and chimney. Hot gases for DRI plant will pass through dust settling
chamber (DSC) and after burning chamber (ABC), WHRB and stack. Fume extraction
system with ID fan will be provided to IF. Dust suppression (chemical and dry
fog type) will be provided to control emissions. Bag filters will be
provided to material handling areas, coal handling areas, crusher, stock house,
cooler discharge area, screening area etc.
The water required for the proposed expansion will be 17,670
cum/day of water. This includes Make-up water for Cooling, make-up water for
Boiler, DM Plant regeneration and for domestic water. Water required for the
expansion project will be sourced from Yeruru tank which will be supplemented
by water from Kandaleru Reservoir. As air cooled condensers are proposed, the
water consumption for the power Plant will reduce drastically. Closed circuit
cooling system will be adopted in sponge iron. The effluent from power plant
will be treated in ETP and after ensuring compliance with APPCB norms, the
treated effluent will be utilized for dust suppression, Ash conditioning and
green belt development. Service water will be passed through oil separator to
remove oil content in the effluent. Domestic effluent will be treated in
septic tank followed by soak pit. No effluent will be discharged outside
the premises and Zero discharge will be adopted. Rain water harvesting
will be done.
Char generated from DRI process will be used in FBC boiler
as fuel. Slag generated from SMS will be used for road making and land
filling. Mill scales generated from the rolling will be reused in SMS.
Tailings from pellet plant will be given to ceramic industry. Bottom ash will
be used for low land filling. Fly ash from FBC power plant will be sold to fly
ash brick manufacturers and cement grinding units. Waste oil and used batteries
will be sold to authorized recyclers/re-processors.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study.
1.
Executive
summary of the project.
2.
Photographs
of the existing and proposed plant area
3.
Compliance to the conditions stipulated in the Environmental
Clearance of existing plant. Recent monitoring report from SPCB, which shall
include data on AAQ, water quality, solid waste etc. shall be submitted.
4.
Has the unit received any notice under the
Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and
Water Acts? If so, compliance to the notice(s)
5.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
6.
A
copy of the mutual agreement for land acquisition signed with land oustees. Break up of small, medium and large farmers
from whom the land is being acquired. If small farmers are involved, a detailed
R&R plan.
7.
Firm
Coal linkages should be submitted along with the EIA report
8.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site. A photograph of the site should also be included.
9.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
10.
Topography
of the area should be given clearly indicating whether the site requires any
filling. If so, details of filling, quantity of fill material required, its
source, transportation etc. should be given.
11. Location of national parks / wildlife
sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius should specifically be
mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved forests, wildlife
sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of the project site.
12. Project site layout plan using AutoCAD
showing raw materials, fly ash and other storage plans, bore well or water
storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas, water
bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be included.
13.
Coordinates
of the plant site as well as ash pond with topo sheet co-ordinates of the plant
site as well as ash pond with topo sheet should also be included.
14. Details and classification of total
land (identified and acquired) should be included.
15. Rehabilitation & Resettlement (R
& R) should be as per policy of the State Govt. and a detailed action plan
should be included.
16. Permission from the tribals, if tribal
land has also to be acquired along with details of the compensation plan.
17. Permission and approval for the use of
forest land, if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. .
18. A list of industries containing name
and type in 25 km radius should be incorporated.
19. Residential colony should be located
in upwind direction.
20. List of raw material required from
coal linkage, analysis of all the raw materials and source along with mode of
transportation should be included. All the trucks for raw material and finished
product transportation must be “Environmentally Compliant”.
21. Petrological and Chemical analysis and
other chemical properties of raw materials used (with GPS location of source of
raw material) i.e. ores, minerals, rock, soil, coal, iron, dolomite quartz etc.
using high definition and precision instruments mentioning their detection
range and methodology such Digital Analyzers, AAS with Graphite furnace, ICPMS,
MICRO-WDXRF, EPMA, XRD, Nano studies or at least as per I30-10500 and WHO
norms. These analysis should include trace element and metal studies like Cr
(vi) Ni, Fe, As, Pb, Zn, Hg, Se, S etc. Presence of
radioactive elements (U, Th etc.), if applicable, should also be
included..
22.
Petrography,
grain size analysis and Major element analysis of raw material and soil from
project site and raw material should be done on the same parameters along with
analysis for SiO2, Al2O3, MgO, MnO, K2O,
CaO, FeO, Fe2O3, P2O5, H2O,
CO2.
23. If the rocks, ores, raw material has
trace elements their petrography, ore microscopy, XRD, elemental mapping EPMA,
XRF is required to quantify the amount present in it and hence future risk
involved while using it and management plan.
24. Action plan for excavation and muck
disposal during construction phase.
25. Studies for fly ash, muck, slurry,
sludge material disposal and solid waste generated, if the raw materials used
has trace elements and a management plan should also be included.
26. Manufacturing process details for all
the plants should be included.
27. Non-recovery coke oven
with waste heat recovery plant shall be provided with dry coke cooling and lime
scrubbing for desulphurizing the exit gas after waste heat recovery from
boilers.
28. Mass balance for the raw material and
products should be included.
29. Energy balance data for all the
components of steel plant including proposed power plant should be
incorporated.
30. Site-specific micro-meteorological
data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and
rainfall should be collected.
31. Data generated in the last three years
i.e. air, water, raw material properties and analysis (major, trace and heavy
metals), ground water table, seismic history, flood hazard history etc.
32.
One
season site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative
humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except
monsoon) should be collected. The monitoring stations should take into account
the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including
reserved forests.
33. Ambient air quality at 8 locations
within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage from project site with one
AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
34. The suspended particulate matter
present in the ambient air must be analyzed for the presence of poly-aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and
incorporating of RSPM data.
35. Determination of atmospheric inversion
level at the project site and assessment of ground level concentration of
pollutants from the stack emission based on site-specific meteorological
features.
36. Air quality modeling for steel plant
for specific pollutants needs to be done.
APCS for the control of emissions from the kiln and WHRB should also be
included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
37. Action plan to follow National Ambient
Air Quality Emission Standards issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E)
dated 16th November, 2009 should be included.
38. Ambient air quality monitoring
modeling along with cumulative impact should be included for the day (24 hrs)
for maximum GLC along with following :
i)
Emissions (g/second) with and without the air
pollution control measures
ii)
Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind
direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing
height using SODAR) on hourly basis
iii)
Model input options for terrain, plume rise,
deposition etc.
iv)
Print-out of model input and output on hourly
and daily average basis
v)
A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC
scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact
location of GLC.
vi)
Details of air pollution control methods used
with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate estimation with
respect to each pollutant
vii)
Applicable air quality standards as per LULC
covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to the
applicable Air quality standard. In case of expansion project, the contribution
should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.
viii) No. I-VII
are to be repeated for fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant
and used for industry
ix)
Graphs of monthly average daily concentration
with down-wind distance
x)
Specify when and where the ambient air
quality standards are exceeded either due to the proposed plant alone or when
the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi)
Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction
technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
39. A plan for the utilization of
waste/fuel gases in the WHRB for generating power have to be set out.
40. Impact of the transport of the raw
materials and end products on the surrounding environment should be assessed
and provided. The alternate method of raw material and end product
transportation should also be studied and details included.
41. One season data for gaseous emissions
other than monsoon season is necessary.
42. An action plan to control and monitor
secondary fugitive emissions from all the sources as per the latest permissible
limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R. 414(E) dated 30th May,
2008.
43. Presence of aquifer(s) within 1 km of
the project boundaries and management plan for recharging the aquifer should be
included.
44. Source of surface/ground water level,
site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph), metal trace element (as above)
chemical analysis for water to be used. If surface water is used from river,
rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage and distance from project site
should also be included. Information regarding surface hydrology and water regime
should be included.
45. Ground water analysis with bore well
data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to quantify the area and volume
of aquifer and its management.
46. Ground water modeling showing the
pathways of the pollutants should be included
47.
Column
leachate study for all types of stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20oC-50oC
should be conducted and included.
48.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site should be submitted to
harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the
ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to
conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources. Rain water harvesting and groundwater
recharge structures may also be constructed outside the plant premises in
consultation with local Gram Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground
water level. Incorporation of water harvesting plan for the project is
necessary, if source of water is bore well.
49. Permission for the drawl of water from
the State Irrigation Department or concerned authority and water balance data
including quantity of effluent generated, recycled and reused and discharged is
to be provided. Methods adopted/to be adopted for the water conservation should
be included.
50. Optimization
of water consumption per ton of steel.
51. A note on the impact of drawl of water
on the nearby River during lean season.
52. Surface water quality of nearby River
(60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface drains at eight locations must
be ascertained.
53. If the site is within 10 km radius of
any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation Mapping is required at 1:5000 to
1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean river discharge as well as flood
occurrence frequency.
54. A note on treatment of wastewater from
different plants, recycle and reuse for different purposes should be included.
55. Provision of traps and treatment
plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with oil, grease and cleaning
agents.
56. If the water is mixed with solid
particulates, proposal for sediment pond before further transport should be
included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100 times the transport
capacity.
57. Wastewater characteristics (heavy
metals, anions and cations, trace metals, PAH) from any other source should be
included.
58. The pathways for pollution via
seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be studied for surface water
(drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and ground water with a
monitoring and management plans.
59. Ground water monitoring minimum at 8
locations and near solid waste dump zone, Geological features and
Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial and Aquatic)
is vital.
60. Geotechnical data by a bore hole of upto
40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground water level, SPTN values, soil
fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for liquefaction studies and to
assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk Management in the area.
61. Action plan for solid/hazardous waste
generation, storage, utilization and disposal particularly slag from all the
sources, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU regarding utilization of ash should
also be included.
62. Details of evacuation of ash, details
regarding ash pond impermeability and whether it would be lined, if so details
of the lining etc. needs to be addressed.
63. A note on the treatment, storage and
disposal of all type of slag should be included. Identification and details of
land to be used for SMS slag disposal should be included. Details of secured
land fill as per CPCB guidelines should also be included.
64. End use of solid waste and its
composition should be covered. Toxic
metal content in the waste material and its composition should also be
incorporated particularly of slag.
65. All stock piles will have to be on top
of a stable liner to avoid leaching of materials to ground water.
66. Action plan for the green belt
development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than 1,500 trees per ha.
giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. should
be included. The green belt should be around the project boundary and a scheme
for greening of the travelling roads should also be incorporated. All
rooftops/terraces should have some green cover.
67. Detailed description of the flora and
fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given with special reference to rare,
endemic and endangered species.
68. Disaster Management Plan including
risk assessment and damage control needs to be addressed and included.
69. Occupational health:
a)
Details of existing Occupational & Safety
Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and whether
they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,
what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of
the workers can be preserved,
b)
Details of exposure specific health status
evaluation of worker. If the workers’
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c)
Annual report of heath status of workers with
special reference to Occupational
Health and Safety.
d)
Action plan for the implementation of OHS
standards as per OSHAS/USEPA.
e)
Plan and fund
allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and
sub-contract workers.
70.
Details regarding infrastructure facilities
such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force
during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers
during operation phase.
71.
Impact
of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as road network and
whether any additional infrastructure needs to be constructed and the agency
responsible for the same with time frame.
72. Environment Management Plan (EMP) to
mitigate the adverse impacts due to the project along with item wise cost of
its implementation. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for
environmental pollution control measures should be included.
73. Public
hearing issues raised and commitments made by the project proponent on the same
should be included separately in EIA/EMP Report in the form of tabular
chart.
74. Corporate Environment Policy
i.
Does the company has a well laid down
Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA report.
ii. Does the
Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to
bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental
or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.
iii. What is the
hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the
environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental
clearance conditions. Details of this system may be given.
iv. Does the
company has system of reporting of non compliances / violations of
environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or
shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be
detailed in the EIA report.
75. At least 5 % of the total cost of the
project should be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on
public hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound action plan
should be included. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated
upon.
76. Plan for the implementation of the
recommendations made for the steel plants in the CREP guidelines must be
prepared.
77. A note on identification and
implementation of Carbon Credit project should be included.
78. Any litigation pending against the
project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the
project, if so, details thereof should also be included.
It was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee-1 (Industry) should be
considered for preparation of EIA / EMP
report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant
information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. Where the documents provided are in a
language other than English, an English translation should be provided. The
draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control
Board for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall
be incorporated in the EIA report. The
final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental
clearance.
The TORs
prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the
EIA/EMP reports along with public hearing proceedings.
34.2.13
Proposed Steel
Plant at Jamuria Industrial Eastate, Dist. Burdwan, West Bengal by M/s.
Shree Ramdoot Rerolling Mills Pvt. Ltd - regarding TORs
The project
authorities and their consultant, M/s Envirotech East Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata gave a
detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and proposed
environmental protection measures, to be undertaken along with the draft Terms
of Reference for the preparation of EIA/EMP Report. The steel plants involving
Primary Metallurgy are listed at S.No. 3(a) under category ‘A’ of Schedule of EIA Notification, 2006 and appraised
by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) of MoEF.
M/s Shree Ramdoot Rerolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. have proposed for a Steel Plant at Jamuria Industrial
Estate, District Burdwan, West Bengal. The
proposed Plant will be installed within the already acquired land of
approximately 23 acres, of which 33% area will be developed under green belt.
The proposed project is not located within 10 km. of Critically Polluted Area.
No National Park / Wildlife Sanctuary / Reserve Forest is located within 10 km.
from the project site. Asansol town is around 13.5 kms. and Burnpur town is
around 17 kms. from the project site. River Ajoy is flowing at 9 km distance.
in north direction while Damodar River is passing at 9 kms. in south direction
w.r.t. the project site. Total cost of the project is Rs. 130.8 Crores. No litigation or Court Case is pending
against the project and/or land.
The proposed
units along with their capacities are as follows:
Unit |
Configuration |
Capacity |
Product |
Induction Furnace |
2 X 12 T |
65,000 TPA |
Liquid Steel |
Ladle Refining Furnace |
1 X 25 T |
64,000 TPA |
Liquid Steel |
AOD |
1 X 35 T |
84,000 TPA |
Liquid Steel |
Continuous Casting Machine |
6 / 11 X 2 |
82,500 TPA |
Steel Billets |
Rolling Mills |
|
80,000 TPA |
Rolled Products |
Ferro Alloy Plant |
2 X 9 MVA |
22, 855 TPA 15,599 TPA |
Ferro Manganese Silico Manganese |
Sponge Iron, Scrap, Pig Iron, Quartzite, Manganese
Ore, Dolomite and Coke Breeze will be used as the major raw materials in the
plant process. The total
power requirement will be about 15 MW, which will be met from the West Bengal
State Electricity Board. There will be emissions during handling of raw
materials and products, which will be controlled by dust suppression system.
All the transfer points will be provided with dry fogging system. The emissions
from the production processes will be passed through bag filters to retain flue
dust particles. The cleaned gases will be discharged to the atmosphere through stacks of
adequate heights.
Total water
requirement for the proposed project will be 30 m3/day, which will
be met from the water supply system of Jamuria Municipality. Coaster water
system will be designed for “Zero Discharge” wherein all discharges will be
treated and reused in the plant. Mill scale and scraps, generated from the
process would be used as raw materials in SMS. Slag generated from Induction
Furnace, Ladle Refining Furnace & AOD will be used for roads and building
construction. Ferro-manganese slag will be used in silico-manganese production.
The slag generated in silico-manganese will be used for roads and building
construction. Flue dust will be sold to the brick manufacturers.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee
prescribed following TORs for undertaking detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive summary of the project.
2.
Photographs of plant area.
3.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
4.
Details
regarding Coal linkage documents
5.
Proposal
should be submitted to the Ministry for environment clearance only after
acquiring total land. Necessary documents indicating acquisition of land should
be included.
6.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in
7.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
8.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within
9.
A
list of industries within 10 km radius of the plant area.
10.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
11.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials and other storage plans, bore well or
water storage, aquifers (within
12.
List
of raw material required, Chemical analysis of all the raw materials including
Trace Elements and source along with mode of transportation should be included.
All the trucks for raw material and finished product transportation must be
“Environmentally Compliant”.
13.
Quantification
& Characterization of solid /hazardous waste & its action plan for
management should be included.
14.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
15.
Energy
balance data for all the components of different units should be incorporated.
16.
Design
details of all the units and manufacturing process details should be included.
17.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall is necessary.
18.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of
19.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble
fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
20.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
21.
Air
quality modeling for ferro alloy plant for specific pollutants needs to be
done. APCS for the control of emissions
should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
22.
Ambient
air quality as per National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by
the Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should
be included.
23.
Air
Quality Impact Predication Modeling based on ISCST-3 or the latest models.
24.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided.
25.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
26.
Presence
of aquifer/aquifers within
27.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included.
28.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
29.
‘Permission’ for the drawl of water should be
obtained. Water balance data must be provided.
30.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
31.
Action
plan for rainwater harvesting measures.
32.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (
33.
If
the site is within
34.
Pretreatment
of raw water, treatment plant for waste water should be described in detail.
Design specifications may be included.
35.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
36.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources should also be included. Land filling is not allowed.
37.
End
use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
38.
Provision
of Toxic Chemical Leachability Potential (TCLP) test for the slag and its end
use should be included.
39.
Commitment
that no Ferro chrome will be manufactured without prior approval of the
Ministry.
40.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area should be included.
41.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
42.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
43.
Occupational
health:
a)
Details of existing Occupational & Safety
Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and whether
they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,
what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of
the workers can be preserved,
b)
Details of exposure specific health status
evaluation of worker. If the workers’
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c)
Annual report of heath status of workers with
special reference to Occupational
Health and Safety.
d)
Plan and fund
allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and
sub-contract workers.
44.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan should be prepared and incorporated.
45.
Total
capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control
measures should also be included.
46.
Any
litigation pending against the project and / or any direction / order passed by
any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
It was
decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by the Expert
Appraisal Committee-1 (Industry) should be considered for preparation of EIA / EMP report for the above
mentioned project in addition to all the relevant information as per the
‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA in the EIA
Notification, 2006. Where the documents provided are in a language other than
English, an English translation should be provided. The final EIA report shall
be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental clearance. Public hearing
is not required as per Para 7(i) III (b) of EIA Notification, 2006 as the
project is located in notified industrial area.
The TORs
prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the
EIA/EMP Report.
34.2.14
Proposed Integrated Steel Plant (0.6 MTPA) at
Village Kudatini, District Bellary, Karnataka by M/s Sathavahana Ispat Ltd. - regarding TORs
The project authorities and their
consultant, M/s Pragathi Labs & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad,
gave a detailed presentation on the salient features of the project and
proposed environmental protection measures to be undertaken along with the
draft TORs for preparation of EIA/EMP. All primary metallurgical industry are
covered under Category A as per para 3(a) of the Schedule of the EIA
notification 2006 and appraised by the Expert Appraisal Committee
(Industry-1) in the MoEF.
M/s Sathavahana Ispat
limited have proposed for Integrated Steel Plant (0.6 MTPA) at Village
Kudatini, District Bellary, Karnataka. Total project
area is 384 acres, out of which existing coke oven plant is in 60 acres, new
plant (integrated steel plant) require 137.2 acres and remaining land 186.8
acres is unused. The total area under
green belt will be 78.1 acres which is 33% of built up area. The
total cost of project is Rs. 2,500 Crores.
Following
are the details of existing and proposed facilities:
S. No. |
Facility |
Capacity |
Existing |
||
1 |
Coke Oven |
3,00,000 TPA |
2 |
Power plant |
100 MW |
Proposed |
||
|
Sinter Plant |
1,071,000 TPA |
|
Blast Furnace |
708,900 TPA of hot
metal |
|
Steel Melting shop |
60 T capacity BOF |
|
Continuous casting plant and Ingot casting |
|
|
Wire Rod & Bar Mill |
500,000 TPA |
|
Forge Shop |
100,000TPA |
|
Oxygen Plant |
450TPD |
|
Lime Plant |
200TPD |
|
Dolomite Plant |
100TPD |
Electrostatic
Precipitator and dust extraction system will be provided to Sinter plant. Gas Cleaning System comprising of dust
collector, saturator and Ventury scrubbers, ESP & Dust extraction system will
be provided to the Blast furnace, dust extraction systems and gas cleaning
plant will be provided in steel melting
shop (Ladle furnace) and dust extraction systems will be provided for
Continuous casting plant & Ingot casting Wire Rod Mill & Forge Shop.
The emission of Particulate Matter in the flue gas from the stack will be controlled
to less than 50 mg/Nm3. Adequate stack height will
be ensured for wider dispersion of emissions.
The water requirement
for proposed expansion is 5,849 m3/day and will be sourced
from Tungabhadra River. Total 15.4 MGD water is allocated by water
resources dept. The wastewater will be
treated and reused for various plant operations. The sinter returns, BF dust
& sludge, CCM scales & sludge, Mill scales and sludge from BOF will be
used in sinter plant. The slag from BF and SMS will be sold to cement
industries. The CCM scrap will be used in BOF.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study.
1.
Executive
summary of the project
2.
Photographs
of the plant area.
3.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
A
copy of the mutual agreement for land acquisition signed with land oustees. Break up of small, medium and large farmers
from whom the land is being acquired. If small farmers are involved, a detailed
R&R plan.
4.
Firm
Coal linkages should be submitted along with the EIA report
5.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site. A photograph of the site should also be included.
6.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
7.
Topography
of the area should be given clearly indicating whether the site requires any
filling. If so, details of filling, quantity of fill material required, its
source, transportation etc. should be given.
8.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius
should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved
forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of
the project site.
9.
Project
site layout plan showing raw materials, fly ash and other storage plans, bore
well or water storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste disposal, green areas,
water bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the project site should be
included.
10. Coordinates of the plant site as well
as ash pond with topo sheet co-ordinates of the plant site as well as ash pond
with topo sheet should also be included.
11.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
12.
Rehabilitation
& Resettlement (R & R) should be as per policy of the State Govt. and a
detailed action plan should be included.
13.
Permission
from the tribals, if tribal land has also to be acquired along with details of
the compensation plan.
14.
Permission
and approval for the use of forest land, if any, and recommendations of the
State Forest Department. .
15.
A
list of industries containing name and type in 25 km radius should be incorporated.
16.
Residential
colony should be located in upwind direction.
17.
List
of raw material required from coal linkage, analysis of all the raw materials
and source along with mode of transportation should be included. All the trucks
for raw material and finished product transportation must be “Environmentally
Compliant”.
18.
Petrological
and Chemical analysis and other chemical properties of raw materials used (with
GPS location of source of raw material) i.e. ores, minerals, rock, soil, coal,
iron, dolomite quartz etc. using high definition and precision instruments
mentioning their detection range and methodology such Digital Analyzers, AAS
with Graphite furnace, ICPMS, MICRO-WDXRF, EPMA, XRD, Nano studies or at least
as per I30-10500 and WHO norms. These analysis should include trace element and
metal studies like Cr (vi) Ni, Fe, As, Pb, Zn, Hg, Se, S etc. Presence of
radioactive elements (U, Th etc.), if applicable, should also be
included..
19. Petrography, grain size analysis and
Major element analysis of raw material and soil from project site and raw
material should be done on the same parameters along with analysis for SiO2,
Al2O3, MgO, MnO, K2O, CaO, FeO, Fe2O3,
P2O5, H2O, CO2.
20.
If
the rocks, ores, raw material has trace elements their petrography, ore microscopy,
XRD, elemental mapping EPMA, XRF is required to quantify the amount present in
it and hence future risk involved while using it and management plan.
21.
Action
plan for excavation and muck disposal during construction phase.
22.
Studies
for fly ash, muck, slurry, sludge material disposal and solid waste generated,
if the raw materials used has trace elements and a management plan should also
be included.
23.
Manufacturing
process details for all the plants should be included.
24.
Non-recovery coke oven with waste heat recovery plant shall be
provided with dry coke cooling and lime scrubbing for desulphurizing the exit
gas after waste heat recovery from boilers.
25.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
26.
Energy
balance data for all the components of steel plant including proposed power
plant should be incorporated.
27.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
28.
Data
generated in the last three years i.e. air, water, raw material properties and
analysis (major, trace and heavy metals), ground water table, seismic history,
flood hazard history etc.
29. One season site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except monsoon) should be
collected. The monitoring stations should take into account the pre-dominant
wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved
forests.
30.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage
from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
31.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble
fraction. Chemical characterization of
RSPM and incorporating of RSPM data.
32.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
33.
Air
quality modeling for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the
kiln and WHRB should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
34.
Action
plan to follow National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by the
Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should be
included.
35.
Ambient
air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included
for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following :
i)
Emissions (g/second) with and without the air
pollution control measures
ii)
Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind
direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing
height using SODAR) on hourly basis
iii)
Model input options for terrain, plume rise,
deposition etc.
iv)
Print-out of model input and output on hourly
and daily average basis
v)
A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC
scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact
location of GLC.
vi)
Details of air pollution control methods used
with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate estimation with
respect to each pollutant
vii)
Applicable air quality standards as per LULC
covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to the
applicable Air quality standard. In case of expansion project, the contribution
should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.
viii) No. I-VII
are to be repeated for fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant
and used for industry
ix)
Graphs of monthly average daily concentration
with down-wind distance
x)
Specify when and where the ambient air
quality standards are exceeded either due to the proposed plant alone or when
the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi)
Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction
technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
36.
A
plan for the utilization of waste/fuel gases in the WHRB for generating power
have to be set out.
37.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided. The alternate method of raw
material and end product transportation should also be studied and details
included.
38.
One
season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is necessary.
39.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
40.
Presence
of aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for
recharging the aquifer should be included.
41.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included. Information regarding
surface hydrology and water regime should be included.
42.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
43.
Ground
water modeling showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included
44. Column leachate study for all types of
stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20oC-50oC should be
conducted and included.
45. Action plan for rainwater harvesting
measures at plant site should be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof
tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for
the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce
the water requirement from other sources.
Rain water harvesting and groundwater recharge structures may also be
constructed outside the plant premises in consultation with local Gram
Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground water level. Incorporation of
water harvesting plan for the project is necessary, if source of water is bore
well.
46.
Permission
for the drawl of water from the State Irrigation Department or concerned
authority and water balance data including quantity of effluent generated,
recycled and reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be
adopted for the water conservation should be included.
47.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
48.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface
drains at eight locations must be ascertained.
49.
If
the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation
Mapping is required at 1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean
river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency.
50.
A
note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for
different purposes should be included.
51.
Provision
of traps and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with
oil, grease and cleaning agents.
52.
If
the water is mixed with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before
further transport should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100
times the transport capacity.
53.
Wastewater
characteristics (heavy metals, anions and cations, trace metals, PAH) from any
other source should be included.
54.
The
pathways for pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be
studied for surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and
ground water with a monitoring and management plans.
55.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
56.
Geotechnical
data by a bore hole of upto 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground
water level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk
Management in the area.
57.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU
regarding utilization of ash should also be included.
58.
Details
of evacuation of ash, details regarding ash pond impermeability and whether it
would be lined, if so details of the lining etc. needs to be addressed.
59.
A
note on the treatment, storage and disposal of all type of slag should be
included. Identification and details of land to be used for SMS slag disposal
should be included. Details of secured land fill as per CPCB guidelines should
also be included.
60.
End
use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
61.
All
stock piles will have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of
materials to ground water.
62.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less
than 1,500 trees per ha. giving details of species, width of plantation,
planning schedule etc. should be included. The green belt should be around the
project boundary and a scheme for greening of the travelling roads should also
be incorporated. All rooftops/terraces should have some green cover.
63.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
64.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
65.
Occupational
health:
a)
Details of existing Occupational & Safety
Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and whether
they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,
what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of
the workers can be preserved,
b)
Details of exposure specific health status
evaluation of worker. If the workers’
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c)
Annual report of heath status of workers with
special reference to Occupational
Health and Safety.
d)
Action plan for the implementation of OHS
standards as per OSHAS/USEPA.
e)
Plan and fund
allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and
sub-contract workers.
66.
Details regarding infrastructure facilities
such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force
during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers
during operation phase.
67. Impact of the project on local
infrastructure of the area such as road network and whether any additional infrastructure
needs to be constructed and the agency responsible for the same with time
frame.
68.
Environment
Management Plan (EMP) to mitigate the adverse impacts due to the project along
with item wise cost of its implementation. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should be included.
69.
Public hearing issues raised and commitments made by
the project proponent on the same should be included separately in EIA/EMP
Report in the form of tabular chart.
70.
Corporate
Environment Policy
i.
Does the company has a well laid down
Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA report.
ii. Does the
Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bring
into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or
forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.
iii. What is the
hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the
environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental
clearance conditions. Details of this system may be given.
iv. Does the
company has system of reporting of non compliances / violations of
environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders
or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the
EIA report.
71.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on public hearing issues and item-wise details
along with time bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic
development activities need to be elaborated upon.
72.
Plan
for the implementation of the recommendations made for the steel plants in the
CREP guidelines must be prepared.
73.
A
note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be
included.
74.
Any
litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any
Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof should also be
included.
It was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee-1 (Industry) should be
considered for preparation of EIA / EMP
report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant
information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. Where the documents provided are in a
language other than English, an English translation should be provided. The
draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to Karnataka State Pollution Control
Board for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall
be incorporated in the EIA report. The
final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental
clearance.
The TORs
prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the
EIA/EMP reports along with public hearing proceedings.
34.2.15
Proposed 2.0 MTPA Integrated Steel Plant
along with 500 MW Captive Power Plant and 0.5 MTPA Auto grade productions at
Tangi Choudwar, District Cuttack in Orissa by M/s Amtek Metal & Mining
Limited - regarding TORs reconsideration
The above proposal was considered
and discussed in the 30th and 32nd Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1)
held during November, 2011 and January, 2012. In the 32nd meeting,
the Committee sought information regarding toposheet, revised plant lay out
with no natural drainages through project site and an alternate site. The project proponent has submitted the toposheet and
tried to justify that no natural drainages are passing through project site.
The committee did not agree with the same.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee prescribed following TORs for undertaking
detailed EIA/EMP study:
1.
Executive
summary of the project
2.
Photographs
of the plant area.
3.
A
line diagram/flow sheet for the process and EMP
A
copy of the mutual agreement for land acquisition signed with land oustees. Break up of small, medium and large farmers
from whom the land is being acquired. If small farmers are involved, a detailed
R&R plan.
4.
Firm
Coal linkages should be submitted along with the EIA report
5.
A
site location map on Indian map of 1:10, 00,000 scale followed by
1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet with at least next 10 Kms of terrains
i.e. circle of 10 kms and further 10 kms on A3/A2 sheets with proper
longitude/latitude/heights with min. 100/200 m. contours should be included.
3-D view i.e. DEM (Digital Elevation Model) for the area in 10 km radius from
the proposal site. A photograph of the site should also be included.
6.
Present
land use should be prepared based on satellite imagery. High-resolution
satellite image data having 1m-5m spatial resolution like quickbird, Ikonos,
IRS P-6 pan sharpened etc. for the 10 Km radius area from proposed site. The
same should be used for land used/land-cover mapping of the area.
7.
Topography
of the area should be given clearly indicating whether the site requires any
filling. If so, details of filling, quantity of fill material required, its
source, transportation etc. should be given.
8.
Location
of national parks / wildlife sanctuary / reserve forests within 10 km. radius
should specifically be mentioned. A map showing land use/land cover, reserved
forests, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, tiger reserve etc in 10 km of
the project site.
9.
Revised plant lay out by excluding
part of the project site so that no natural drainage passes through the project
site.
10.
Project
site layout plan using AutoCAD showing raw materials, fly ash and other storage
plans, bore well or water storage, aquifers (within 1 km.) dumping, waste
disposal, green areas, water bodies, rivers/drainage passing through the
project site should be included.
11. Coordinates of the plant site as well
as ash pond with topo sheet co-ordinates of the plant site as well as ash pond
with topo sheet should also be included.
12.
Details
and classification of total land (identified and acquired) should be included.
13.
Rehabilitation
& Resettlement (R & R) should be as per policy of the State Govt. and a
detailed action plan should be included.
14.
Permission
from the tribals, if tribal land has also to be acquired along with details of
the compensation plan.
15.
Permission
and approval for the use of forest land, if any, and recommendations of the
State Forest Department. .
16.
A
list of industries containing name and type in 25 km radius should be
incorporated.
17.
Residential
colony should be located in upwind direction.
18.
List
of raw material required from coal linkage, analysis of all the raw materials
and source along with mode of transportation should be included. All the trucks
for raw material and finished product transportation must be “Environmentally
Compliant”.
19.
Petrological
and Chemical analysis and other chemical properties of raw materials used (with
GPS location of source of raw material) i.e. ores, minerals, rock, soil, coal,
iron, dolomite quartz etc. using high definition and precision instruments
mentioning their detection range and methodology such Digital Analyzers, AAS
with Graphite furnace, ICPMS, MICRO-WDXRF, EPMA, XRD, Nano studies or at least
as per I30-10500 and WHO norms. These analysis should include trace element and
metal studies like Cr (vi) Ni, Fe, As, Pb, Zn, Hg, Se, S etc. Presence of
radioactive elements (U, Th etc.), if applicable, should also be
included..
20. Petrography, grain size analysis and
Major element analysis of raw material and soil from project site and raw
material should be done on the same parameters along with analysis for SiO2,
Al2O3, MgO, MnO, K2O, CaO, FeO, Fe2O3,
P2O5, H2O, CO2.
21.
If
the rocks, ores, raw material has trace elements their petrography, ore
microscopy, XRD, elemental mapping EPMA, XRF is required to quantify the amount
present in it and hence future risk involved while using it and management
plan.
22.
Action
plan for excavation and muck disposal during construction phase.
23.
Studies
for fly ash, muck, slurry, sludge material disposal and solid waste generated,
if the raw materials used has trace elements and a management plan should also
be included.
24.
Manufacturing
process details for all the plants should be included.
25.
Non-recovery coke oven with waste heat recovery plant shall be
provided with dry coke cooling and lime scrubbing for desulphurizing the exit
gas after waste heat recovery from boilers.
26.
Mass
balance for the raw material and products should be included.
27.
Energy
balance data for all the components of steel plant including proposed power
plant should be incorporated.
28.
Site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall should be collected.
29.
Data
generated in the last three years i.e. air, water, raw material properties and
analysis (major, trace and heavy metals), ground water table, seismic history,
flood hazard history etc.
30. One season site-specific
micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall and AAQ data (except monsoon) should be collected.
The monitoring stations should take into account the pre-dominant wind
direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests.
31.
Ambient
air quality at 8 locations within the study area of 10 km., aerial coverage
from project site with one AAQMS in downwind direction should be carried out.
32.
The
suspended particulate matter present in the ambient air must be analyzed for
the presence of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), i.e. Benzene soluble
fraction. Chemical characterization of RSPM
and incorporating of RSPM data.
33.
Determination
of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and assessment of ground
level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based on
site-specific meteorological features.
34.
Air
quality modeling for steel plant for specific pollutants needs to be done. APCS for the control of emissions from the
kiln and WHRB should also be included to control emissions within 50 mg/Nm3.
35.
Action
plan to follow National Ambient Air Quality Emission Standards issued by the
Ministry vide G.S.R. No. 826(E) dated 16th November, 2009 should be
included.
36.
Ambient
air quality monitoring modeling along with cumulative impact should be included
for the day (24 hrs) for maximum GLC along with following :
i)
Emissions (g/second) with and without the air
pollution control measures
ii)
Meteorological inputs (wind speed, m/s), wind
direction, ambient air temperature, cloud cover, relative humidity & mixing
height using SODAR) on hourly basis
iii)
Model input options for terrain, plume rise,
deposition etc.
iv)
Print-out of model input and output on hourly
and daily average basis
v)
A graph of daily averaged concentration (MGLC
scenario) with downwind distance at every 500 m interval covering the exact location
of GLC.
vi)
Details of air pollution control methods used
with percentage efficiency that are used for emission rate estimation with
respect to each pollutant
vii)
Applicable air quality standards as per LULC
covered in the study area and % contribution of the proposed plant to the
applicable Air quality standard. In case of expansion project, the contribution
should be inclusive of both existing and expanded capacity.
viii) No. I-VII
are to be repeated for fugitive emissions and any other source type relevant
and used for industry
ix)
Graphs of monthly average daily concentration
with down-wind distance
x)
Specify when and where the ambient air
quality standards are exceeded either due to the proposed plant alone or when
the plant contribution is added to the background air quality.
xi)
Fugitive dust protection or dust reduction
technology for workers within 30 m of the plant active areas.
37.
A
plan for the utilization of waste/fuel gases in the WHRB for generating power
have to be set out.
38.
Impact
of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding
environment should be assessed and provided. The alternate method of raw
material and end product transportation should also be studied and details
included.
39.
One
season data for gaseous emissions other than monsoon season is necessary.
40.
An
action plan to control and monitor secondary fugitive emissions from all the
sources as per the latest permissible limits issued by the Ministry vide G.S.R.
414(E) dated 30th May, 2008.
41.
Presence
of aquifer(s) within 1 km of the project boundaries and management plan for
recharging the aquifer should be included.
42.
Source
of surface/ground water level, site (GPS), cation, anion (Ion Chromatograph),
metal trace element (as above) chemical analysis for water to be used. If
surface water is used from river, rainfall, discharge rate, quantity, drainage
and distance from project site should also be included. Information regarding
surface hydrology and water regime should be included.
43.
Ground
water analysis with bore well data, litho-logs, drawdown and recovery tests to
quantify the area and volume of aquifer and its management.
44.
Ground
water modeling showing the pathways of the pollutants should be included
45. Column leachate study for all types of
stockpiles or waste disposal sites at 20oC-50oC should be
conducted and included.
46. Action plan for rainwater harvesting
measures at plant site should be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof
tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for
the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce
the water requirement from other sources.
Rain water harvesting and groundwater recharge structures may also be
constructed outside the plant premises in consultation with local Gram
Panchayat and Village Heads to augment the ground water level. Incorporation of
water harvesting plan for the project is necessary, if source of water is bore
well.
47.
Permission
for the drawl of water from the State Irrigation Department or concerned
authority and water balance data including quantity of effluent generated,
recycled and reused and discharged is to be provided. Methods adopted/to be
adopted for the water conservation should be included.
48.
A
note on the impact of drawl of water on the nearby River during lean season.
49.
Surface
water quality of nearby River (60 m upstream and downstream) and other surface
drains at eight locations must be ascertained.
50.
If
the site is within 10 km radius of any major river, Flood Hazard Zonation
Mapping is required at 1:5000 to 1;10,000 scale indicating the peak and lean
river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency.
51.
A
note on treatment of wastewater from different plants, recycle and reuse for
different purposes should be included.
52.
Provision
of traps and treatment plants are to be made, if water is getting mixed with
oil, grease and cleaning agents.
53.
If
the water is mixed with solid particulates, proposal for sediment pond before
further transport should be included. The sediment pond capacity should be 100
times the transport capacity.
54.
Wastewater
characteristics (heavy metals, anions and cations, trace metals, PAH) from any
other source should be included.
55.
The
pathways for pollution via seepages, evaporation, residual remains are to be
studied for surface water (drainage, rivers, ponds, lakes), sub-surface and
ground water with a monitoring and management plans.
56.
Ground
water monitoring minimum at 8 locations and near solid waste dump zone,
Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area are essential
as also. Ecological status (Terrestrial
and Aquatic) is vital.
57.
Geotechnical
data by a bore hole of upto 40 mts. in every One sq. km area such as ground
water level, SPTN values, soil fineness, geology, shear wave velocity etc. for
liquefaction studies and to assess future Seismic Hazard and Earthquake Risk
Management in the area.
58.
Action
plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal
particularly slag from all the sources, char and fly ash. Copies of MOU
regarding utilization of ash should also be included.
59.
Details
of evacuation of ash, details regarding ash pond impermeability and whether it
would be lined, if so details of the lining etc. needs to be addressed.
60.
A
note on the treatment, storage and disposal of all type of slag should be included.
Identification and details of land to be used for SMS slag disposal should be
included. Details of secured land fill as per CPCB guidelines should also be
included.
61.
End
use of solid waste and its composition should be covered. Toxic metal content in the waste material and
its composition should also be incorporated particularly of slag.
62.
All
stock piles will have to be on top of a stable liner to avoid leaching of
materials to ground water.
63.
Action
plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less
than 1,500 trees per ha. giving details of species, width of plantation,
planning schedule etc. should be included. The green belt should be around the
project boundary and a scheme for greening of the travelling roads should also
be incorporated. All rooftops/terraces should have some green cover.
64.
Detailed
description of the flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) should be given
with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species.
65.
Disaster
Management Plan including risk assessment and damage control needs to be
addressed and included.
66.
Occupational
health:
a)
Details of existing Occupational & Safety
Hazards. What are the exposure levels of above mentioned hazards and whether
they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,
what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of
the workers can be preserved,
b)
Details of exposure specific health status
evaluation of worker. If the workers’
health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other
ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement and periodical examinations give the
details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of
abovementioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
c)
Annual report of heath status of workers with
special reference to Occupational
Health and Safety.
d)
Action plan for the implementation of OHS
standards as per OSHAS/USEPA.
e)
Plan and fund
allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and
sub-contract workers.
67.
Details regarding infrastructure facilities
such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force
during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers
during operation phase.
68. Impact of the project on local infrastructure
of the area such as road network and whether any additional infrastructure
needs to be constructed and the agency responsible for the same with time
frame.
69.
Environment
Management Plan (EMP) to mitigate the adverse impacts due to the project along
with item wise cost of its implementation. Total capital cost and recurring
cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures should be included.
70.
Public hearing issues raised and commitments made by
the project proponent on the same should be included separately in EIA/EMP
Report in the form of tabular chart.
71.
Corporate
Environment Policy
i.
Does the company has a well laid down
Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be
detailed in the EIA report.
ii. Does the
Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to
bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental
or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.
iii. What is the
hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the
environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental
clearance conditions. Details of this system may be given.
iv. Does the
company has system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental
norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or
stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA
report.
72.
At
least 5 % of the total cost of the project should be earmarked towards the
Enterprise Social Commitment based on public hearing issues and item-wise
details along with time bound action plan should be included. Socio-economic
development activities need to be elaborated upon.
73.
Plan
for the implementation of the recommendations made for the steel plants in the
CREP guidelines must be prepared.
74.
A
note on identification and implementation of Carbon Credit project should be
included.
75.
Any
litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any
Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof should also be
included.
It was decided that ‘TORs’ prescribed by the Expert Appraisal Committee-1 (Industry) should be
considered for preparation of EIA / EMP
report for the above mentioned project in addition to all the relevant
information as per the ‘Generic Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and
IIIA in the EIA Notification, 2006. Where the documents provided are in a
language other than English, an English translation should be provided. The
draft EIA/EMP report shall be submitted to Odisha State Pollution Control Board
for public hearing. The issues emerged and response to the issues shall be
incorporated in the EIA report. The
final EIA report shall be submitted to the Ministry for obtaining environmental
clearance.
The TORs
prescribed shall be valid for a period of two years for submission of the
EIA/EMP reports along with public hearing proceedings.
Any
other Item
34.2.16
Expansion of
Polyester chips and polyester filament yarn manufacturing unit at Village:
Jolwa, Taluka Palsana, District Surat in Gujarat by M/s Garden Silk Mills Limited -
regarding Amendment in environmental clearance
Environmental Clearance to the above
proposal was accorded vide MoEF letter no. J-11011/124/2009- IA II (I) dated 10.6.2009. The project
proponent requested for amendment in the above environmental
clearance to increase the coal quantity and incorporate petcoke.
In the said environmental clearance,
it is mentioned that fuel for the boiler would be 288-360 TPD of
Imported/Indian coal. The quantity of coal proposed was based on the Gross
Calorific Value (GCV), whereas in actuality the GCVs of Imported and Indian
Coal are lesser than the assumed. Hence, the quantity of coal would increase
from 410-450 TPD. It was also submitted that since the import of coal and coal
mining is closed in monsoon season, there is fluctuation in coal availability
and hence, it is proposed to use petcoke (20%) – 90 TPD as a fuel in
combination with Lime (20% of pet coke) with normal Imported/ Indian coal/ 10%
Lignite (328-360 TPD) as fuel for the CPP in the monsoon season.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended for
amendment in the above environmental clearance to increase the requirement of coal
and also use petcoke as above subject to submission of information regarding exit gas analysis.
34.2.17
Expansion of
Pellet Plant (from 0.6 MTPA to 0.9 MTPA) and Captive Power Plant (from 20 MW to
44 MW) at Village Jamgaon, District Raigarh in Chhattisgarh by M/s MSP Steel & Power Limited -
regarding Amendment in environmental
clearance
Environmental
Clearance to the above proposal was accorded vide MoEF letter no. J-11011/267/2007- IA II (I)
dated 2.4.2009 and an amendment was issued vide letter of even no. dated
9.9.2010. The project proponent requested for amendment in the above
environmental clearance for change in configuration of SMS and Inclusion of 4.5 MW Biomass based power plant in
the Existing Plant. The project
authorities and their consultant, M/s Pioneer Enviro Laboratories &
Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad also made a presentation before EAC.
The
environmental clearance and its amendment were accorded to the following capacities:
Products |
Capacity for which EC is granted on
2nd April 2009 (TPA) |
Capacity implemented – CFE & CFO
obtained from CECB (TPA) |
Proposed Enhancement capacity (TPA) |
Total capacity after enhancement (TPA) |
|
Before EC |
After EC |
||||
DRI |
2,00,000 |
200,000 |
100,000 |
--- |
4,00,000 |
Ingots
/ Billets / Slabs |
6,95,000 |
95,000 |
46,000 (1x18 MT) |
--- |
6,95,000 |
Rolling Mill (Rolled Products) |
4,80,000 |
80,000 |
1,28,000 |
--- |
4,80,000 |
Pig
Iron/Liquid metal |
4,00,000 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
4,00,000 |
Sinter Plant |
6,41,520 |
--- |
--- |
--- |
6,41,520 |
Coal Washery |
7,20,000 |
--- |
3,60,000 |
--- |
7,20,000 |
Iron Ore benefication / Pellet Plant |
6,00,000 ** |
--- |
3,00,000 |
3,00,000 |
9,00,000 |
Power Generation |
52 MW |
16 MW |
8 MW |
24 MW |
76 MW |
Power through Waste heat recovery |
32 MW |
16 MW |
8 MW |
-- |
32
MW |
Power |
20 MW * (AFBC) |
--- |
--- |
44MW – CFBC technology (Instead of
20 MW AFBC as per earlier EC) |
44
MW |
Change in
configuration of SMS
• The EC was accorded by MoEF for the SMS configuration of 1 x 18 MT Induction Furnace and 2 x 50 MT EAF for producing 6,00,000 TPA of
ingots / billets in addition to the existing capacity of 95,000 TPA thus
totaling the billets/ingots to 6,95,000 TPA.
• Due to techno economic considerations, the following configuration is
proposed to produce Billets/ingots:
• 2 x 35 MT EAFs - 3,66,660 TPA
• 3 x 15 MT Induction Furnaces -
1,39,680 TPA
• 1 x 8 MT Induction Furnace - 24,832
TPA
• Existing capacity of IF is 95,000 TPA and the capacity of IF for which CFO
was obtained is 46,000 TPA.
• Total capacity after change in configuration of SMS will be 6,72,172 TPA, whereas the total capacity permitted in the
environmental clearance is 6,95,000 TPA.
Thus, by change in configuration of SMS, there will be reduction of
capacities permitted earlier.
Inclusion of 4.5
MW Biomass based power plant in the Existing Plant
Ø The company
has obtained CFE from CECB for establishment of 4.5 MW Biomass based power
plant vide order dated 09.10.2007 and
subsequently CECB has accorded Consent
to operate for the Biomass based power plant vide letter dated 21.03.2011.
Ø The 4.5 MW
Biomass based power plant does not attract the provisions of EIA Notification,
2006 and it’s amendments. The proponent requested to include the 4.5 MW Biomass
based power plant under the Existing Plant configuration.
Ø At present,
the existing total power plant capacity is 76.0 MW. Thus after inclusion of 4.5
MW biomass based power plant, the total capacity of power plant will be 80.5
MW.
After detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended for
amendment in the above environmental clearance for change in configuration of
SMS and Inclusion of 4.5 MW Biomass
based power plant in the existing Plant.
34.2.18
Proposed Ferro Alloy Unit (5,000 TPA of Ferro
Silicon Calcium/Ferro Silicon Manganese/Ferro Silicon) at Plot No. 18/S &
17/N, Heavy Industrial Area, Hathkhoj, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh by M/s Sarthak Metals Marketing Private
Limited - regarding amendment in TORs
M/s Sarthak Metals Marketing Private
Limited were accorded ToRs for
preparation of EIA/EMP Report for their proposed Ferro Alloy Unit in Hathkhoj,
Bhilai, Chhattisgarh vide MoEF letter no. J-11011/304/2011- IA II (I)
dated 9.9.2011. In the said letter, there was an error w.r.t the quantities of
the products proposed to be manufactured. Hence, the project configuration
shall be corrected as above and the ToRs dated 9.9.2011 shall remain the same.
34.2.19
Mini Integrated Steel Plant (Sponge Iron,
Induction Furnace, Rolling Mill, Ferro Alloy Plant and Captive Power Plant
(WHRB & AFBC)) at Village Temtema, Tehsil Kharsia, District Raigarh,
Chattisgarh by M/s. Sky Alloys & Power (P) Ltd. - regarding amendment in
Environment Clearance
Environmental
Clearance to the above proposal was accorded vide MoEF letter no. J-11011/380/2009- IA II (I)
dated 22.12.2010. The project proponent requested for amendment in the
above environmental clearance for installation of 12 MW FBC based power plant
instead of 15 MW FBC based Power Plant and clubbing the flue of 12 MW FBC power
plant with 2 x 100 TPD DRI plant with WHRB stack instead of clubbing with 35 MW
FBC power plant. The project
authorities and their consultant, M/s Pioneer Enviro Laboratories &
Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad also made a presentation before EAC.
The
environmental clearance was accorded to the following capacities:
S.No. |
Details |
Installed capacity Units |
Annual Production |
||
1.
|
Sponge Iron |
4 x 100 Tons/ Day |
120000
TPA |
||
2.
|
Induction Furnace |
10 x 3 Tons |
100000
TPA |
||
3.
|
Rolling Mill |
1 x 300 Tons/ Day |
100000
TPA |
||
4.
|
Ferro Alloys Unit |
2 X 9 MVA |
Fe-Mn |
: |
30000 TPA |
Fe-Si |
: |
9600 TPA |
|||
Si-Mn |
: |
21700 TPA |
|||
5.
|
POWER (WHRB) |
4 x 2 MW |
8 MW |
||
6.
|
POWER (FBC) |
1 x 15 MW & 1
x 35 MW |
1.
W |
It was submitted that, due
to certain techno-commercial considerations, 12 MW Power plant is commercially
more viable than 15 MW Power plant and hence, requested permission for same. As
per the environmental clearance, the following stacks were proposed.
S.No. |
Details |
Installed capacity Units |
Nos./ Height of stack |
1.
|
Sponge Iron |
4 x 100 Tons/ Day |
2 nos. each of
60 meters |
2.
|
Induction Furnace |
10 x 3 Tons |
2 nos.
each of 30 meters |
3.
|
Rolling Mill |
1 x 300 Tons/ Day |
1 of 40
meters |
4.
|
Ferro Alloys Unit |
2 X 9 MVA |
1 of 30
meters |
5.
|
POWER (WHRB) |
4 x 2 MW |
Nil |
6.
|
POWER (FBC) |
1 x 15 MW & 1 x 35 MW |
1 of 80 meters |
It is now proposed to club the flue
of 12 MW FBC power plant with the stack (Twin flues) 2 x 100 TPD DRI plant with
WHRB stack instead of clubbing with 35 MW FBC power plant. Hence, the combined
stack with 3 flues (12 MW FBC & 2 x 100 TPD DRI Kilns) is proposed for
effective dispersion of emissions into the atmosphere. A stack of 75 m will be provided to this combined
stack with 3 flues, instead of 60 m of stack to 2 x 100 TPD DRI Kilns. It was
also submitted that there will not be any change in the height of stack
attached to 35 MW FBC based power plant & it will remain 80 m only and there will not be any change in the Stack
& configurations of other units.
The following is the Final
Configuration & Position of stacks:
S.No. |
Details |
Installed capacity Units |
Nos./ Height of stack |
Status |
1.
|
Sponge Iron + Power Plant (WHRB & 12 MW FBC) |
2 x 100
TPD Sponge + 4 MW WHRB
Power Plant +12 MW FBC Power Plant |
1 no. 75 m (with 3 flues) |
Changed |
2.
|
Sponge Iron |
2 x 100
Tons/ Day |
1 of 60 m |
Unchanged |
3.
|
Induction Furnace |
10 x 3
Tons |
2 each of 30 m |
Unchanged |
4.
|
Rolling Mill |
1 x 300
Tons/ Day |
1 of 40 meters |
Unchanged |
5.
|
Ferro Alloys Unit |
2 X 9 MVA |
1 of 30 meters |
Unchanged |
6.
|
POWER (WHRB) |
4 x 2 MW |
Nil |
--- |
7.
|
POWER (FBC) |
1 x 35 MW |
1 of 80 meters |
Unchanged |
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended for
amendment in the above environmental clearance for installation of 12 MW FBC
based power plant instead of 15 MW FBC based Power Plant and clubbing the flue
of 12 MW FBC power plant with 2 x 100 TPD DRI plant with WHRB stack instead of
clubbing with 35 MW FBC power plant.
34.2.20
Expansion of Paper
Production Capacity (from 1,56,000 TPA to 3,21,000 TPA) and installation of New
Captive Co-generation Power Plant (40 MW) at Unit Ballarpur, District
Chandrapur in Maharashtra by M/s Ballarpur Industries Limited - regarding
Transfer of Environmental Clearance
The above
proposal was considered in the 29th
Meeting of the EAC (Industry-1) held during 24th - 25th
October, 2011. The committee has sought a detailed application and
undertaking by both the parties i.e. BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited
(BGPPL) and Avantha Power & Infrastructure Limited (APIL) w.r.t their
relative stakes, environmental liabilities, land requirement, water
requirement, green belt, compliance to the environmental clearance conditions,
environment cell etc.
The following
documents were submitted. The PP and
their consultant, M/s JM EnviroNet Pvt. Ltd. also made a presentation before the EAC.
·
Application
from BGPPL for transfer of Environmental Clearance from Ballarpur Industries Limited to BGPPL
for Paper
& Pulp unit.
·
Application
from APIL for transfer of Environmental Clearance from Ballarpur Industries Limited to APIL for
Captive
Power Plant.
·
Joint
Undertaking of BGPPL and APIL
·
Joint
Undertaking of BILT and APIL for unit Ballarpur.
·
Joint
Undertaking of BILT and BGPPL for unit Ballarpur.
·
Layout
Plan of BGPPL & APIL for unit Ballarpur
·
Copy of
High Court Judgment for demerger of Bilt Power Limited from Ballarpur
Industries Limited
·
Copy of
High Court Judgment for demerger of BGPPL from BILT.
It was submitted that,
reorganization took place in the BILT group. The scheme of arrangement &
reorganization between BILT & BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited (BGPPL)
was then approved by the Hon’ble High Court of Maharashtra (Nagpur Branch). As
per this scheme, all assets, properties (movable or immovable), rights,
liabilities, debts, duties, obligations, employees, licenses, permits,
approvals, consent, sanctions & other authorization in relation to unit
Ballarpur, stand vested & transferred to BGPPL. Further, the Captive Power
Plant assets of the BILT were demerged & have been renamed as Avantha Power
& Infrastructure Limited (APIL). APIL’s Captive Power Plant continues to be
the source of power for BGPPL’s Pulp & Paper Unit. The environmental
clearance already granted for the Ballarpur Unit comprising of the 1) Paper
& Pulp Plant & 2) Captive Power Plant stands valid for the existing
capacities. No increase in Capacity, No change in area is proposed. The
Compliance Report for the same are being submitted to the concerned
authorities.
The EC granted for
Ballarpur unit (Pulp and Paper unit & Captive Power Plant) is requested
to be divided into two parts with new
ownerships, as below : -
Unit |
Name of the Plant |
Capacity |
EC to be transferred to |
Location |
1. |
Paper
& Pulp unit |
3.21 Lac
TPA |
BILT
Graphic Paper Products Limited (BGPPL). |
PO
Ballarpur Paper Mill, Ballarpur, District Chandrapur, Maharashtra |
2. |
Captive
Power Plant |
67.5 MW |
Avantha
Power & Infrastructure Limited (APIL) |
The relative stakes of
BGPPL and APIL w.r.t project area, green belt, project cost, water requirement,
Pollution Control Measures/EMP, environment cell, rain water harvesting, CSR
activities etc. were also submitted.
After detailed deliberations, the committee has recommended the transfer of Environmental Clearance accorded to M/s Ballarpur Industries Limited to BILT
Graphic Paper Products Limited (BGPPL) for Paper & Pulp Plant and
Avantha Power & Infrastructure Limited (APIL) for the Captive Power Plant subject to the specific and general environmental
conditions.
34.2.21
Expansion of Pulp
and Paper Plant (Additional 2 Lakh TPA) and Captive Power Plant (30 MW) at MIDC
Industrial Area, Unit- Bhigwan, District Pune in Maharashtra by M/s
Ballarpur Industries Limited - regarding Transfer of Environmental
Clearance
The above
proposal was considered in the 29th
Meeting of the EAC (Industry-1) held during 24th - 25th
October, 2011. The committee has sought a detailed application and
undertaking by both the parties i.e. BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited
(BGPPL) and Avantha Power & Infrastructure Limited (APIL) w.r.t their
relative stakes, environmental liabilities, land requirement, water
requirement, green belt, compliance to the environmental clearance conditions,
environment cell etc.
The following
documents were submitted. The PP and
their consultant, M/s JM EnviroNet Pvt. Ltd. also made a presentation before the EAC.
·
Application
from BGPPL for transfer of Environmental Clearance from Ballarpur Industries Limited to BGPPL
for Paper
& Pulp unit.
·
Application
from APIL for transfer of Environmental Clearance from Ballarpur Industries Limited to APIL for
Captive
Power Plant.
·
Joint
Undertaking of BGPPL and APIL
·
Joint
Undertaking of BILT and APIL for unit Bhigwan.
·
Joint
Undertaking of BILT and BGPPL for unit Bhigwan.
·
Layout
Plan of BGPPL & APIL for unit Bhigwan.
·
Copy of
High Court Judgment for demerger of Bilt Power Limited from Ballarpur
Industries Limited
·
Copy of
High Court Judgment for demerger of BGPPL from BILT.
It was submitted that,
reorganization took place in the BILT group. The scheme of arrangement &
reorganization between BILT & BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited (BGPPL)
was then approved by the Hon’ble High Court of Maharashtra (Nagpur Branch). As per
this scheme, all assets, properties (movable or immovable), rights,
liabilities, debts, duties, obligations, employees, licenses, permits,
approvals, consent, sanctions & other authorization in relation to unit
Ballarpur, stand vested & transferred to BGPPL. Further, the Captive Power
Plant assets of the BILT were demerged & have been renamed as Avantha Power
& Infrastructure Limited (APIL). APIL’s Captive Power Plant continues to be
the source of power for BGPPL’s Pulp & Paper Unit. The environmental clearance
already granted for the Ballarpur Unit comprising of the 1) Paper & Pulp
Plant & 2) Captive Power Plant stands valid for the existing capacities. No
increase in Capacity, No change in area is proposed. The Compliance Report for
the same are being submitted to the concerned authorities.
The EC granted for
Bhigwan unit (Pulp and Paper unit & Captive Power Plant) is requested
to be divided into two parts with new
ownerships, as below : -
Unit |
Name of the Plant |
Capacity |
EC to be transferred to |
Location |
1. |
Paper
& Pulp unit |
4.0 Lac
TPA |
BILT
Graphic Paper Products Limited (BGPPL). |
MIDC
Industrial area, Bhigwan, Pune, Maharashtra |
2. |
Captive
Power Plant |
60 MW |
Avantha
Power & Infrastructure Limited (APIL) |
The relative stakes of
BGPPL and APIL w.r.t project area, green belt, project cost, water requirement,
Pollution Control Measures/EMP, environment cell, rain water harvesting, CSR
activities etc. were also submitted.
After detailed deliberations, the committee has recommended the transfer of Environmental Clearance accorded to M/s Ballarpur Industries Limited to BILT
Graphic Paper Products Limited (BGPPL) for Paper & Pulp Plant and
Avantha Power & Infrastructure Limited (APIL) for the Captive Power Plant subject to the specific and general environmental
conditions.
34.2.22
Expansion of Steel Plant at Milestone No.
310 of NH No. 8 A, Village Samakhyiali, Taluka Bhachau, Kutch, Gujarat by M/s. Electrotherm India Ltd.-
regarding Bifurcation/transfer
of Environmental Clearance
Environmental
Clearance to the above proposal was accorded vide letter no. J-11011/899/2008- IA II (I)
dated 27.1.2010. The project proponent requested for the transfer of
the Environmental Clearance of DI pipes, Blast Furnace and Sinter Plant to M/s
Shree Ram Electro Cast Ltd., a subsidiary of the company M/s. Electrotherm India Ltd. As a matter
of strategic business opportunity and as a part of the restructuring exercise
of Electrotherm India Ltd.’s business, the above transfer is proposed. Electrotherm India
Ltd. has entered into a Business Transfer Agreement with Shree Ram Electro Cast Ltd. on 14.11.2011 for the above transfer. The
Competition Commission of India (CCI) has approved the transaction on 16.2.2012
under the provisions of Competition Act, 2002.
The comparative
statement/break up of various features is given below.
Feature |
Steel Plant (except DI pipes, Blast Furnace and Sinter Plant) by M/s Electrotherm India
Ltd. |
DI pipes, Blast Furnace and Sinter Plant by M/s Shree Ram Electro Cast Ltd. |
Status of Environmental Clearance |
Obtained |
Obtained in the name of M/s Electrotherm India Ltd. as part of the Steel Plant |
Project Area |
5,27,579 Sq.m |
4,90,621 Sq.m |
Green belt |
1,58,2741 Sq.m |
1,47,186 Sq.m |
Water |
4 MLD |
2 MLD |
Source of Water |
Gujarat Water Infrastructure Ltd. |
Gujarat Water Infrastructure Ltd. |
Power |
40 MW |
20 MW |
Source of Power |
Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. and CPP |
Paschim Gujarat Vij Co. Ltd. |
After detailed deliberations, the committee has recommended the transfer of Environmental Clearance accorded to M/s. Electrotherm India Ltd. for DI pipes, Blast Furnace and Sinter Plant to M/s Shree Ram Electro Cast
Ltd. subject to the specific and general environmental
conditions.
34.2.23
Integrated Steel Plant (3.0 MTPA) along
with 300 MW Captive Power Plant
at Godapiasal, Paschim Medinipur in West Bengal by M/s JSW
Steel Ltd. - regarding transfer of Environment Clearance to Group
Companies
The
above proposal was considered in the 28th
Meeting of the EAC (Industry-1) held during 26th & 27th
September, 2011. The Committee noted that environmental
clearance was granted for the Steel plant and the Captive
Power Plant. Now, the company proposes to segregate the clearance for the
Captive Power Plant to the special power company which may not remain captive
to the JSW Bengal Steel Limited for the 3.0 MTPA Integrated Steel Plant.
Therefore, the Expert Appraisal Committee did not accede to the request of M/s
JSW Steel Limited for transfer of environmental
clearance accorded on 19.02.2008 to M/s JSW Steel Limited for
setting up of 3.0 MTPA Integrated Steel Plant along with 300 MW captive power
plant at Godapiasal, Paschim Medinipur in West Bengal to JSW Bengal Steel Limited for 3.0 MTPA Steel Plant and to M/s
JSW Energy (Bengal) Limited for 300 MW captive
power plant for implementation.
The PP vide letter
dated 13.2.2012 has submitted that JSW Energy
(Bengal) Ltd., the company formed for implementation of the 300 MW
Captive Power Project, has now been
converted into a wholly owned
subsidiary of JSW Bengal Steel Ltd. Certified copies of the Board
Resolutions of the erstwhile JSW Energy (Bengal) Ltd and JSW Bengal Steel
Limited for transfer of shares for making the above change were enclosed. It was also submitted
that formation
of another company for implementation of the power project is solely for ease
of financing and for selecting and retaining the people having the requisite
skill set and expertise in implementing and then running an utility sized power
plant and the promoters have no intention to convert it into an IPP at a later
stage.
The following
documents were submitted. The PP has also
made a presentation before the EAC.
1)
Coal Supply Agreement between WBMDTC and
JSWEBL
2)
Environmental compliance report in respect of
EC conditions, CTE conditions and PH concerns
3)
Statement showing likely changes in the
Project Parameters and Environmental Impacts arising from the proposed transfer
of the Steel Plant and the Power Plant
4)
The Environmental Clearance no.
J-11011/37/2007-1A II (I) dated 19.02.2008, accorded to JSW Steel Limited for
setting up of an 3 MTPA Integrated Steel Plant along with a 300 MW coal-based
Captive Power Plant at Godapiasal, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal
5)
The Development Agreement dated 11.01.2007
signed with the GOWB, West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Limited
(WBIDC) and the West Bengal Mineral Development and Trading Corporation Limited
(WBMDTC). As per this agreement, JSW Steel Ltd. was required to form an SPV
with equity participation of WBIDC and WBMDTC for setting up of the project
6)
Incorporation details of JSW Bengal Steel
Limited, the Articles of Association and the Memorandum of Understanding, etc.
7)
Consent to Establish issued by WBPCB
8)
Letters of allocation for Land and Water by
GOWB
9)
The Board Resolution by JSW Steel Ltd for
transfer of Environmental Clearance obtained for the 3 MTPA Integrated Steel
Plant to JSW Bengal Steel Ltd and the 300 MW Captive Power Plant to JSW Energy
(Bengal) Limited
10)
The Board Resolution by JSW Bengal Steel Ltd.
resolving to make JSW Energy (Bengal) Ltd. its wholly owned subsidiary
11)
The Board Resolution by JSW Energy (Bengal)
Ltd. resolving to make it a wholly owned subsidiary of JSW Bengal Steel Ltd.
12)
Copies
of affidavits by both JSWBSL and JSWEBL to abide by all the clauses in the
original Environmental Clearance
13)
Layout
maps of ISP and CPP
14)
Agreement between JSWBSL and JSWEBL for supply
of 698 m3/hr of water from JSWBSL source to JSWEBL
15) Report
on CSR - Interventions and Initiatives
16) Agreement between JSWBSL and JSWEBL for sale
of capacity and energy produced at the 300 MW CPP to the former
17)
Organizational Charts of Environment
Management Cells of JSWBSL & JSWEBL
The relative stakes of JSW Bengal Steel Limited and JSW
Energy (Bengal) Limited
w.r.t project area, green belt, project cost, water requirement, Pollution
Control Measures/EMP, environment cell, rain water harvesting, CSR activities
etc. and the anticipated environmental impacts were also submitted. The discussion and
deliberations on the subject matter could not be completed and it was decided
that the matter shall be taken up in the next meeting.
34.2.24
Expansion of Integrated
Steel Plant by installing Sponge Iron Plant (2x100 TPD) along with Captive
Power Plant from (30 MW to 90 MW) at Villages Ankulapaturu & Udathavaripalem, Mandal Chillakur,
District SPSR Nellore in Andhra Pradesh by M/s
SBQ Steels Limited - regarding amendment in Environmental
Clearance
Environmental
Clearance to the above proposal was accorded vide MoEF letter no. J-11011/567/2009- IA II (I)
dated 6.5.2011. The project proponent requested for amendment in the
above environmental clearance for change in stack height for 2 x 90 TPD Kiln as
60 m instead of 100 m as per notification vide no. GSR 414 (E) dated 30-05-2008
and for installation of 85 TPD of Lime Kiln.
M/s SBQ Steels Limited obtained environmental
clearance from State Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA),
Andhra Pradesh, for the following units, vide letter No. SEIAA / AP / NLR – 6/08 -1526 dated 30-8-2008.
Unit # 1
S. No |
Unit |
Capacity |
1. |
Coke oven plant (Non-recovery) |
2,00,000 TPA |
2. |
Sponge Iron |
60,000 TPA |
3. |
Cement plant |
2,90,000 TPA |
4. |
Electricity |
20 MW |
They also have obtained environmental clearance from
MoEF for the following units, vide
letter No. J-11011/1301/2007-IA-II(I)
dated 13-06-2008.
Unit # 2
S. No |
Unit |
Capacity |
1. |
Sinter Plant |
5,00,000 TPA |
2. |
Blast Furnace |
5,00,000 TPA |
3. |
Energy Optimization Furnace |
5,90,000 TPA |
4. |
Ladle Refining Furnace |
5,75,000 TPA |
5. |
Vacuum degassing unit |
2,50,000 TPA |
6. |
Continuous casting machine |
2 Twin Strand Bloom -3,25,000 TPA Billet casting lines – 2,25,000 TPA |
7 |
Rolling mill |
2x 2,50,000 TPA |
8 |
Captive power plant (Based on Blast Furnace gas) |
10 MW |
9 |
Oxygen plant |
200 TPD |
Subsequently,
the PP have approached the Ministry for expansion of DRI Plant and Power plant
and have requested to issue a consolidated environmental clearance for the
total project including expansion of DRI and Power Plant. Accordingly, MoEF
issued a consolidated environmental clearance vide letter No. J-11011/567/2009-IA-II (I) dated 06-05-2011.
In the
environmental clearance issued by SEIAA, for Unit # 1, stack height of 100 m
was stipulated for 2 x 90 TPD DRI plant. In the EIA report also, it was
proposed to install stack of 100 m height as per the stipulations of APPCB at
that time. For the same unit, APPCB has stipulated stack of 60 m height in the
CFE, as per the notification vide No. GSR 414 (E) dated 30-05-2008. However,
environmental clearance for Unit # I, has been issued prior to said Notification
of MoEF. The PP approached the SEIAA, AP for amendment of Stack height as per
the notification mentioned above. The
SEIAA, AP has issued a letter to approach MoEF for amendment of the same
as both the Environmental Clearances issued for Unit # I and Unit # II are
merged.
In view of
above, it is requested for change in stack height for 2 x 90 TPD Kiln as 60 m
instead of 100 m as per notification vide no. GSR 414 (E) dated 30-05-2008. In
addition, the company has proposed to install 85 TPD of Lime Kiln to meet the
requirement of Lime in energy optimization Furnace, which has already been
installed. As per the EIA Notification 2006, installation Lime Kiln does not
require Environmental Clearance.
After
detailed deliberations, the Committee recommended for
amendment in the above environmental clearance due to change in stack height
for 2 x 90 TPD Kiln as 60 m instead of 100 m as per notification vide no. GSR
414 (E) dated 30.05.2008 and for installation of 85 TPD Lime Kiln.
30th March, 2012
Proposals
for Environmental Clearance
34.3.1 Expansion of Ferro Alloy Plant (Fe-Mn & Si-Mn) by installing 5.5
MVA SAF at Mouza Nacrajoria, PS Salanpur, Dist. Burdwan, West Bengal by M/s. Hira Concast Limited - Environmental Clearance
The
proponent informed that they will not be able to attend the meeting. The
Committee decided to consider the project as and when requested by the
proponent.
34.3.2 Expansion
of Mini Integrated Steel Plant by
installation of Iron Ore Beneficiation & Pelletization Unit at Village Uliburu,
Barbil, P.O. Nalda, District Keonjhar, Orissa by M/s Beekay Steel and Power Limited - regarding Environmental
Clearance
The project
authorities and their consultant, M/s Pioneer Enviro
Laboratories & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad gave a detailed presentation
on the salient features of the project and proposed environmental protection
measures to be undertaken as per Terms of Reference (ToRs) awarded during the
30th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) held
during 28th – 29th November, 2011 for preparation of
EIA/EMP. All the
steel plants are listed at S.No. 3(a) in primary metallurgical industry under
category-A of
the Schedule of EIA notification 2006 and appraised
by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-1) in the MoEF.