MINUTES
The
Minutes of the 85th Meeting of the Expert Appraisal Committee for
Building Construction Projects, Coastal Regulation Zone, Infrastructure
Development and Miscellaneous projects held on 25th – 26th
February, 2010 at Conference Hall, SCOPE Complex,
1. Opening
Remarks of the Chairman.
The
Chairman welcomed the members to the 85th meeting of the EAC. The
Member Secretary informed about the action taken on the decisions of the 84th
meeting held on 27th – 29th January,
2. Confirmation
of the Minutes of the 84th Meeting of the EAC held on 27th – 29th
January, 2010 at
Minutes
of the 84th Meeting of the EAC held on 27th
– 29th January, 2010 at
3.
Consideration of old Proposals:
3.1
Amendment
to the EC issued for development of shipyard – cum – minor port complex at
Kattupalli, Tamil Nadu by M/s. L & T Shipbuilding Ltd. [F.No.10-130/2007-IA.III].
As presented by the
project proponent, Environmental Clearance for development of Shipyard - cum -
minor port complex at Kattupalli, Tamil Nadu was issued by the Ministry on 03.07.2009,
wherein under specific conditions, sub-clause No. (vi) and (xviii), which are
reproduced below certain amendments were required to be incorporated in the
scheme of the project:
vi)
No
dumping of dredging material in the sea shall be undertaken. In case sea
dumping is required, integrated model study to be carried out to locate the
dump site so that it does not cause any problem to
(xviii)
There
shall be no reclamation /dredging of areas.
Further, it was clarified that about
8.5 million Cum of material would be dredged, out of which about 7.0 million Cum
shall be used for reclamation. The balance quantity of 1-1.5 million Cum, which
is mainly silt and clay material that cannot be used for reclamation shall be
disposed off-shore. As per the study undertaken by L&T Ramboll, the site
for off-shore dumping is identified at about
With regard to condition (xviii) of
the EC, it has been indicated that the project area would be reclaimed by using
the dredged material, as dredging would be carried out to a depth of
During
discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The
details of combined effect on both the Ports (i.e.
(ii)
A
comparison between model study and actual dumping shall be carried out to
examine the impacts both on North-East and South-West of the Ports and shall be
submitted to the Ministry.
(iii)
No
reclamation of the areas outside the Port limit and
The Committee recommends for the issue
of amendment to the Clearance issued
on 03.07.2009 with the above conditions under CRZ Notification, 1991.
3.2
Amendment
to the CRZ Clearance issued for setting up of vessel traffic and port
management system along the gulf of Khambhat, Gujarat by M/s. Atash Norcontrol
Ltd. [F.No.11-85/2008-IA.III].
The representatives from the Gujarat
Maritime Board informed that as the recommendations of the Gujarat Coastal Zone
Management Authority has not been received yet, the proposal may be deferred.
The Committee decided to defer the
project and shall be taken up only after the recommendations of the GCZMA.
3.3
CRZ clearance for RO RO Ferry Service Project of
Dahej-Ghogha Project at Gujarat by M/s.
As presented by the project proponent,
the proposal involves construction and operation of RO-RO Ferry Service
Terminals at Ghogha (21o
SCZMA recommended the project on 28.07.2008.
The project has been earlier appraised
by the EAC in its meeting held on 23rd - 24th November,
2009 and certain observations were made.
The proponent has submitted the information, which was examined by the
Members. During discussion, the
following points emerged:
(i)
It
was informed that the project site is about 54 kms. from Nahar village, which
is identified as hotspot in the ICMAM report and also about 84 kms from
shoreline and based on this the project proponent requested that a
comprehensive Environment Impact Assessment studies is not required for a three
seasons data.
(ii)
Submit
a copy of oil spill contingency plan and Disaster Management Plan.
(iii)
The
temporary colony shall be located beyond CRZ area.
(iv)
The
Environmental Management Plan and Monitoring Plan prepared by NIO both for
construction and operation phase as presented during the meeting on 25th
February, 2010 shall be complied.
(v)
Containment
bund shall be provided at the dredge disposal site identified by NIO and DHI (
(vi)
There
shall not be any movement of Ferry vessels within
(vii)
Mangrove
plantation shall be carried out on an area of
The Committee deferred the decision
and the project will be taken up again for reconsideration after the site visit
report of Dr. Ramesh Ramachandran, Expert Committee Member, who is scheduled to
visit the area in the 2nd / 3rd week of March, 2010.
3.4
CRZ
Clearance for proposed reconstruction of an existing school building on plot
bearing CTS No. A/761 of Bandra village, Bandra Reclamation Bandra (W)
construction of ‘C’ Wing by M/s. Mumbai Education Trust.
[F.No.11-30/2009-IA.III]
As presented by the project
proponent, the project involves the construction of existing school building. The
CRZ clearance for the existing buildings was obtained from the Ministry in
1996. The total area of the plot is 7066.30 sq.m. and total built up area of
existing buildings is 17002.787 sq.m. and proposed built up area is 9775.00
sq.m. The proposed building will be 16 storeys with basement, stilt and 2 upper
floors for parking. The water requirement is 157.5 KLD (existing) and proposed
is 225 KLD. The capacity of STP proposed is 200 KLD. Treated waste water to be
used for flushing of toilets 150 KLD and gardening 5 KLD. Solid waste
generation is 700 Kg/day (existing) and proposed is1000 Kg/day. The total
parking spaces are 78 (existing) and proposed are 91.
The above plot falls in
CRZ-II and on the landward side of the existing road. MCZMA discussed the matter in its 48th
meeting held on 17th January 2009 and forwarded the proposal to the
Ministry along with the detailed assessment of the project carried out by the
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai.
The project was earlier appraised by
the EAC in its meeting held on 21st - 22nd May, 2009. The revised project submitted by the proponent has been
examined.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The height and coverage of the construction
should be in accordance with the existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal
Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii) The demolition
debris shall be disposed at identified and designated dump site. Prior
permission shall be obtained from local body/municipal corporation.
(iii)
The domestic wastewater shall be treated and
reused.
(iv) Necessary
permission shall be obtained from Central Ground Water Authority for the
construction of basement in the CRZ area.
(v)
Adequacy of parking facilities provided
within the building /plot as per provision of National Building Code /
standards practiced in Mumbai.
(vi) Adequate
fire safety measures should be made in the building premises as per the norms
in the National building code.
(vii)
Proposal
for maintaining the site free from dust and noise during operation phase,
disposal of Municipal Solid Waste generated and the scheme for reuse of treated
water from sewage treatment plant to be provided.
(viii)
The
building with 16 floors with basement, stilt and 2 upper floors for parking is
proposed. Certificates from concerned State Government authorities should be
obtained on the following and submitted to the Ministry.
1.
Safety in evacuating children from the 16
floor building during emergencies such as fire, earthquake, etc. should be
built with the project design.
2.
Traffic circulation and management near the
school site (from the Mumbai City Traffic Police).
The
Committee recommends the proposal for CRZ Clearance with the above conditions
in the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.
3.5
CRZ
Clearance for the construction of Hotel at Plot bearing F.P.No.1211 on TPS-4,
Mahim Division, Prabhadevi, Mumbai by M/s. Chaitra Realty Ltd.
[F.No.11-66/2009-IA.III]
As presented by the project proponent,
the project involves construction of a star category hotel/business centre on a
plot area of 21,489.30 Sq.m. The plot was earlier used as Hindustan Spinning
and Weaving Mills Ltd., which was closed down and at this location no polluting
industry or SEZ is permitted to develop. All around the plot is residential
houses within
The proposal was also considered by
the additional Expert Appraisal Committee for Building Construction and Area
Development Projects in its 19th meeting held in the month of July,
2007 and 21st EAC meeting held in the month of September, 2007 and
the Committee recommended the project for the issue of Environmental Clearance subject
to obtaining approval under CRZ Notification, 1991.
The proposal was considered by
Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority in its 52nd meeting
held on 14.05.2009. The above plot falls under CRZ-II as per CZMP, 2000 and the
plot is towards the landward side of existing authorized buildings prior to
1991.
The project was put up earlier for
appraisal in the EAC in its 81st meeting held on 29th – 30th
October, 2009 and the Committee made certain observations. The proponent has
submitted the information. A site visit was also undertaken by the EAC on 22nd
December, 2009 and made certain recommendations. The response of the project proponent on the
recommendations of the site visit report and also observations made earlier by
the Expert Appraisal Committee were discussed.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The
height and coverage of the construction should be in accordance with the
existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as
per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii)
All safety
measures shall be taken as per the Disaster Management Plan submitted.
(iii)
Adequate
fire safety measures should be made in the building premises as per the norms
in the National building code.
(iv)
The
demolition debris shall be disposed at identified and designated dump site.
Prior permission shall be obtained from local body/municipal corporation.
(v)
Proposal
for maintaining the site free from dust and noise during construction and operation
phase, disposal of Municipal Solid Waste generated and the scheme for reuse of
treated water from sewage treatment plant to be provided.
(vi)
Construction
of basements (3) shall be carried out only after the necessary permission / NOC
obtained from Central Ground Water Authority.
(vii)
The parking
calculations should be based on different uses like no. of rooms, banquet
facilities and restaurants, etc. Also examine the alternative parking options, if
three basements are not permitted by the Central Ground Water Authority in the
CRZ area. Submit details. In any likelihood it should be ensured that the no.
of parking being shown at present should not be reduced.
(viii)
Submit a
copy of certificate from Department of Urban Development regarding change of
land use.
(ix)
A
clarification may be obtained from MCZMA in view of the earlier use of the plot
for industry and now proposed for Hotel with a higher FSI.
Provided the response of the project
proponent to the aforesaid observations is to the satisfaction of the
committee, the proposal may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
4. Consideration
of New Proposals:
4.1
Environmental
Clearance for developing a Cargo Handling Facility at Jaigad, District
Ratnagiri, Maharashtra by M/s. Jaigad Ports Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
[F.No.11-55/2007-IA.III].
As presented by the project proponent,
the project involves development of a Cargo Handling Facility at Jaigad, which is one of the
7 identified locations for development of port facility by State Government
under BOOST Scheme. Jaigad harbour is located in Ratnagiri District at Latitude
17o
Reclamation
to zero contour level is envisaged upto (+
During
Construction Phase 500 KVA supply is required while Operation phase requires
1500 KVA of supply. Standby Generator is proposed. Total water requirement will
be 50 m3/day. Connection of water supply is from Gram Panchayat / Maharashtra
Jeevan Pradhikaran. Storm water drainage is proposed. Sewerage system connected
to the drainage system of the project area.
High
Tide Line demarcation carried out by NIOT. HTL at the survey site was taken to
be at +
The project has been appraised by the
EAC in its 70th meeting held on 22nd – 23rd
October 2008 and suggested additional TOR along with public hearing under
Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 2006. The Public hearing was conducted on 14th
July, 2009. Major issues raised in the
public hearing were employment, handling of material and flooding. The MCZMA
has recommended the proposal vide letter No. MCZMA 2008/CR 15/TC II, dated
29.12.2008.
It was
informed by the project proponent that the ICMAM report identified Ratnagiri as
hot spot, which is
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
Shore line changes shall be monitored periodically (every 3 month for a
period of 2 years) and a report shall be submitted to the Ministry.
(ii)
The cargo
handling facility shall be carried out within the Port area.
(iii)
Necessary
funds shall be allocated for the construction / development of facilities like
schools, hospitals for physically disabled under Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR).
(iv)
The responses/commitments made during public hearing should be complied
with letter and spirit.
(v)
All the recommendation of EMP/DMP shall be strictly complied with.
The Committee recommends the proposal for Clearance with
the above conditions in the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the
project proponent.
4.2
CRZ clearance for mining of rare minerals in
Azhagappapuram village, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu
by M/s. Chandrakala Farm Products Private Limited [F.No.11-88/2007-IA-III]
As presented by the
project proponent, the project involves mining of rare minerals in
Alagappapuram village in Kanyakumari. As per the proposal M/s Chandrakala Farm
Products have an area of 2.13.5 ha for mining bearing plot No.1125/3, 1125/4,
1124/4, 1098/4. The minerals to be mined are garnet, illiminite and rutile. The
geological reserves of beach sands within the mine lease area of
After the mining is
carried out backfilling with the rejects of 47% of raw sand will be transported
by trucks from the processing units for backfilling and restoring the mining
area to the original state. As a part of EMP the back filled or reclaimed area
will be covered with vegetation and coconut plantation. The water requirement
of 200 litres/day will be obtained from existing dug well. The mineral
processing unit will be located outside the CRZ area.
The
project has been appraised by the EAC in its 60th meeting held on 27th
- 29th December, 2007. The project attracts EIA notification, 2006
and CRZ Notification, 1991. The Committee suggested the additional TOR
including public hearing for the project. Public hearing conducted on 25.06.2009.
During
discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
Submit a
copy of the recommendations of Tamil Nadu State Coastal Zone Management
Authority.
(ii)
Submit
a copy of the CRZ map demarcating HTL/LTL superimposing the area proposed to be
mined through an authorized agency.
(iii)
Examine
and submit soil analysis report and impacts of mining upto a depth of 2.5 mts. No machine shall be used for mining activities.
(iv)
Mineral
processing plant shall be located outside CRZ area.
(v)
Examine
and submit a report from approved authorized agency to examine the depth of
water table in the region and the impact on quality of water.
(vi)
Examine
and submit the details to confirm that there is no degradation of ground water
quality.
(vii)
Submit a
copy of the certificate from the Babha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) certifying
that the manual mining of beach sand is safe.
(viii)
Submit the
details of the safety measures for workers to prevent radioactive impact on
health.
(ix)
Submit
details about transporting the mined sand to processing site and bringing back
to the original site.
(x)
Submit
details of Corporate Social commitments due to additional mining of sand in
three districts.
(xi)
Submit the
permission of concerned authority for disposal of tailing containing atomic
wastes.
In
view of the foregoing observations, the proposal shall be reconsidered after
the above observations are addressed and submitted to the Ministry.
4.3
Environmental
Clearance for
As presented by the project proponent,
the project involves setting up of a green field
airport near Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh. An area of
The project has been appraised by the
EAC in its 72nd meeting held on 19th – 20th
December, 2008 and suggested the additional TOR. EIA prepared as per ToR and
conducted Public hearing. Clearance for diversion of the
During discussion, the following points are emerged:
(i)
As the Airport site is
located in the hilly terrain and there is a proposal of diversion of forest, it
is suggested that necessary cross drainage of the airport site be built into
the design of the project and runways shall be properly sloped to avoid over
flooding of the surrounding area.
(ii)
The architectural design of
the terminal building should reflect the local architectural style of the area.
(iii)
All the recommendations of Environmental Monitoring Plan / Disaster
Management Plan shall be strictly complied with.
The
Committee recommends the proposal for Clearance with the above conditions in
the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.
4.4
CRZ
clearance for revised proposal for reconstruction of existing Hotel Sea Rock on
plot bearing CTS No B-1150, B-1153 B-1155 & B-1156 at Bandra, B. J. Road, Band Stand, Mumbai by M/s. Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd. [F.No.11-128/2008-IA.III]
As presented by the
project proponent, the project involves reconstruction of existing Sea Rock
Hotel on plot bearing CTS No B-1150, B-1155, B-1156 & B-1153 (pt). CRZ
Clearance was issued to the project vide letter No. 11-128/2008-IA-III dated
17.03.2009 for the reconstruction of 22 floors (262 rooms) hotel. The existing
building has 19 numbers of floors and FSI consumed in the existing building is
2.49 (1 permissible and 1.50 allotted by Government in 1972). Location of the
existing building is on the seaward side abutting the sea.
Now additional 3 FSI has
been sanctioned and it is proposed for the construction of 34 floors with 3
basements.
MCZMA stated that as per
the approved CZMP, some part of land under reference falls in CRZ-I and rest of
the land falls in CRZ-II. The entire land is situated on the seaward side of
the existing road. The concept of imaginary line cannot be made applicable in
the instant case, as no authorized structures exist on the plots abutting the
land under reference. However, construction can be permissible on the plinth of
the existing authorized structure of Sea Rock Hotel only.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The height and coverage of the construction
should be in accordance with the existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal
Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii)
The
entire land is situated on the seaward side of the existing road. The concept
of imaginary line cannot be made applicable in the instant case, as no
authorized structures exist on the plots abutting the land under reference. The
proposed construction can be permissible on the plinth of the existing
authorized structure of Sea Rock Hotel only.
(iii)
The
details submitted and presented during the meeting does not clarify the exiting
plinth of the hotel building. Submit a copy of the building plans – basement to
upper floors, superimposing the existing building, building proposed with 2.5
FSI and the details of proposed building with 5.5 FSI. Also submit the cross
section of the building indicating the levels with reference to road level and
sea level and the existing plinth level of the building.
(iv)
The
construction is permissible only on the landward side of the existing plinth. The
proposal should be revised accordingly with the recommendations of MCZMA.
(v)
Examine
and submit details of parking calculations based on different uses like no. of
rooms, banquet facilities and restaurants, etc. Also examine the alternative
parking options, if three basements are not permitted by the Central Ground
Water Authority in the CRZ area.
In
view of the foregoing observations, the proposal is deferred and shall be reconsidered
after the above observations are addressed and submitted.
4.5
Environment
and CRZ clearance for development of LNG Terminal at Mundra Port, Kutch,
Gujarat by M/s. GSPC LNG Ltd. (F.No.10-2/2009-IA.III)
As
presented by the project proponent, the project involves development of LNG
Terminal at
The project was earlier appraised by
the EAC in its 73rd meeting held on 30th – 31st
January, 2009 and finalized the additional TOR for further study. The project proponent requested for the
exemption of public hearing stating that it was conducted by the M/s. Mundra
Port Ltd., for which Environmental Clearance was issued by the Ministry and the
above project is part of the total project of M/s. Mundra Port Ltd. The issue
was examined by the EAC in its 79th meeting held on 27th – 28th
August 2009 and the Committee after a detailed discussion, recommended to
exempt the public hearing as it was already conducted earlier for whole of the
project. The project proponent submitted the EIA as per ToR finalized earlier.
The details were discussed by the Committee.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
Submit a
copy of the recommendations from Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority.
(ii)
All the recommendations of Environmental Monitoring Plan /Disaster
Management Plan shall be strictly complied with.
(iii)
Separate
Clearance shall be obtained for setting up of 25 MW LNG based power plant.
(iv)
There
shall be no hindrance to the fishing activities in the area.
Provided the response of the project
proponent to the aforesaid observations is to the satisfaction of the
committee, the proposal may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
4.6
Finalization
of TOR for setting up of an Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management
Facility for the city of Gurgaon and Faridabad at village Mohabbatabad
District, Faridabad by M/s. Faridabad Municipal Corporation
[F.No.10-88/2009-IA.III]
As presented by the
project proponent, the proposal is for setting up of an Integrated Municipal
Solid Waste Management Facility for the city of
Haryana Urban
Development Authority (HUDA) had identified a land in Gurgaon earlier for
setting up a waste processing and disposal site near village Bhandwari,
The proposed site is an
abandoned mine area. Near by settlements are Pali and Nayagaon which are approx.
During
the discussions, the Committee finalized the following TOR for further study:
(i)
Examine
a
(ii)
Examine
and submit details of storm water/ leachate collection from the composted area.
(iii)
Examine
and submit details of monitoring of water quality around the landfill site.
Water analysis shall also include for nitrate and phosphate.
(iv)
Examine
and submit details of the odour control measures.
(v)
Examine
and submit details of impact on water bodies/rivers/ ponds and mitigative
measures during rainy season.
(vi)
Submit
the criteria for assessing waste generation.
(vii)
Submit
a copy of the layout plan of project site showing solid waste storage, green
belt (width & length, 33% of the project area should be reserved for green
belt), all roads, prominent wind direction, processing plant & buildings
etc. should be provided.
(viii)
Submit
a copy of the land use certificate from the competent authority.
(ix)
Submit
a copy of the status of ambient air quality and surface and ground water
quality, soil type, cropping pattern, land use pattern, population,
socio-economic status, anticipated air and water pollution.
(x)
Submit
a copy of the topography of the area.
(xi)
Examine
and submit the details of impact on the drainage and nearby
habitats/settlements (surroundings).
(xii)
Examine
and submit the details of surface hydrology and water regime and impact on the
same.
(xiii) Examine and submit the details of one
complete season AAQ data (except monsoon) with the dates of monitoring, impact
of the project on the AAQ of the area (including H2S, CH4).
(xiv)
Submit
a copy of detailed plan of waste management.
(xv)
Submit
the details of sanitary land fill site impermeability and whether it would be
lined, if so details thereof.
(xvi)
Examine
the details of the design of the bottom layer based on the permeability of soil
at the site.
(xvii) Examine the details of the Traffic
management with reference to transportation of trucks.
(xviii) Shall comply with the regulation of the
Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000.
(xix)
Examine
the quality of hazardous waste, e-waste and bio-medical waste generated in the
city and mode of disposal.
(xx)
Examine
the depth of ground water table both in rainy season and non-rainy season.
Monitoring of the groundwater around the site shall be carried out periodically
to check the contamination if any.
(xxi)
Examine
and submit the details of impact on environmental sensitive areas.
(xxii) Examine and submit the details of
rehabilitation/compensation package for the project effected people, if any.
(xxiii) Submit Environmental Management Plan
and Environmental Monitoring Plan with costs and parameters.
Public hearing to be conducted
for the project as per provisions of Environmental Impact Assessment
Notification, 2006 and the issues raised by the public should be addressed in
the Environmental Management Plan.
A
detailed draft EIA/EMP report should be prepared as per the above TOR and
should be submitted to the Ministry as per the Notification.
4.7
CRZ
clearance for redevelopment of property bearing CS No. 195, 200, 202, 210, 211
& 212 of Mazgaon Divison, Nawab Tank Road, E-Ward, Mazgaon, Mumbai,
Maharashtra by M/s. Bomanji Dhunjibhoy Pvt. Ltd. [F.No.11-115/2009-IA-III]
As presented by the project proponent,
the project involves for redevelopment of property bearing CS No. 195, 200,
202, 210, 211 & 212 of Mazgaon Division,
The building falls in CRZ-II, landward
side of the existing road and MCZMA has recommended the project vide letter No.
MCZMA 2009/CR 192/TC-3, dated 12.11.2009.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The site
is close to the defence establishment.
Submit a copy of NOC from Mazgaon Dock.
(ii)
The entry
to the school building should be from the
(iii)
Examine
and submit the revised proposal providing the approach to the project from the
wider road.
(iv)
Submit a
copy of plan showing the layout of the existing building / garden area superimposing
on HTL/LTL map.
Provided the response of the project proponent to the
aforesaid observations is to the satisfaction of the committee, the proposal
may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
4.8
CRZ clearance for redevelopment of Mariamma Sagar, Lower Parel Division,
G South Ward, Mumbai, Maharashtra by M/s. Akshay Sthapatya Pvt. Ltd.
[F.No.11-128/2009-IA.III].
As presented
by the project proponent, the proposal involves redevelopment of slum
rehabilitation on a plot area of 20,500 Sq.m. The total built-up area is 64,778
Sq.m. The Scheme includes 5 rehabilitation buildings, 2 sale towers, 1 bridge
across the drain and a museum. It was also informed that one six storey
building and a transit camp was earlier constructed but due to some resistance
at the site, the construction was stopped. The project will have 80 apartments
for sale and 1041 units for rehabilitations. The total water requirement is 893
KLD (fresh water requirement is 583 KLD). The capacity of STP proposed is 800 KLD.
Treated waste water to be used for flushing of toilets – 293 KLD. 397 KLD will
be given to Nehru Science Centre or Race Course. Total solid waste generation
will be 2.34 ton/day (Bio-degradable – 1.06 T/day and non-bio-degradable – 1.28
T/day).
It was also
informed that the project has been cleared by SEAC in its 16th
meeting held on 9th September 2009 and the proposal has already been
submitted to SEIAA. The proposed site is in under CRZ-II area and landward side
of existing authorized road as per the approved CZMP of Mumbai. MCZMA has
recommended the proposal for the issue of Clearance.
A complaint received by this Ministry on
22.02.2010 from Shri Raman B Jaibhawe, stating that “Prior Environmental
Clearance” is required for present project under EIA Notification, 1994 whereas
the application was submitted under EIA Notification, 2006 and SEAC has wrongly
appraised and recommended the proposal.
Complainant also appeared before the Committee and informed that the
work was started before the issue of Clearance. Project proponents got the
Clearance only for 1041 units, whereas presently there are 1600 inhabitants and
NOC from Nehru Science Centre was not obtained.
During discussion, the following points
emerged:
(i)
The proposed construction will be as per CRZ Notification, 1991
and FSI will be as per DCR 1967.
(ii)
A MoU/an Agreement will be signed with Nehru Science Centre / Race
Course for accepting the balance treated waste water.
(iii)
As
regards the complaint, EAC were of the view that the matter more appropriately
comes under the purview of the State Govt.
Therefore, it was decided that the copy of the
complaint may be sent to Secretary, Environment/Member Secretary, SEIAA for
further examination and necessary action.
The
Committee recommends the proposal for Clearance with the above conditions in
the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.
2nd Day:
26th February, 2010:
4.9
Finalization
of TOR for installation of Plasma Thermal Destruction and Recovery System at
GIDC, Nandesari, District Vadodara, Gujarat by M/s. Nandesari Environ Control
Ltd. [F.No.10-1/2010-IA-III].
As presented by the
project proponent, the proposal is for development of Common Solid Waste Disposal
Facility at GIDC, Nandesari, District Vadodara,
The project is located within
the existing facility of NECL, GIDC, Nandesari. The total area of the plot is
66,000 sq.m. Area required for PTDR is 7700 sq.m. The existing storage facility
of NECL will be utilized for storage of hazardous waste. The total water requirement is 100.64
KLD. Waste water generation will be
73.02 KLD. Waste water will be sent to
CETP of NIA, Nandesari. The thermal energy generated will be used for de-water
15 KLD of aqueous wastes. Solid waste
generation will be 2.4 MT/day, which will be sold as a road construction
material. Total power requirement will
be 750 KW x 2 streams. The total cost of
the project is Rs.22 crores x 2 phases.
At present, two
incinerators are provided for incineration of high organic content solid waste.
(500 kg/hr and 200 kg/hr). NECL intends to install two units of proprietary
Plasma Thermal Destruction and Recovery System (PTDR-500). In the first phase,
One PTDR-500 will be installed which will process 410 kg/hr of industrial
/hazardous solid, semi solid and organic liquid (non-aqueous) wastes in each
unit. Using the energy-rich syngas, the project would dewater an expected total
of
The
project proponents requested for the exemption of public hearing as the project
is located within the existing solid waste disposal facility site.
During the discussions, the Committee
finalized the following TOR for further study:
(i)
Submit
details of pilot plant study report and views/ approval/ recommendations of
CPCB/ Gujarat Pollution Control Board regarding the technology and the process
proposed to be adopted.
(ii)
Submit
type of industries who have approached or likely to approach and details of
MOU/ arrangement proposed with them.
(iii)
Carryout
inventories of the waste generation, in the industrial units planned to be
covered.
(iv)
Examine
the details of land use of the surrounding area and details of nearby
eco-sensitive areas, if any.
(v)
Examine
the details of road network around the project site and impact of the project
on the Traffic.
(vi)
Examine the details of on line pollutants and their
monitoring.
(vii)
Examine the details of monitoring of Dioxin and
Furon, which requires to be built into the system on a long term basis. Spell out the details.
(viii)
Examine the details of transportation of Hazardous
wastes and its safety in handling.
(ix)
Submit
the details of compliance of various conditions by the existing system along
with valid consent orders for the incinerator
(x)
Submit
valid consent orders of CETP.
(xi)
Submit
MoU made with the CETP for the disposal of effluent.
(xii)
Submit
the details of TCLP test report of Slag.
(xiii) Explore the possibilities for providing
treatment for Sewage or sending to CETP instead of disposal through soak pit
(xiv)
Revise
the water balance considering the recycling of treated wastewater.
(xv)
Submit
the details of Air environment due to replacement of incinerator by plasma
incinerator
(xvi)
Submit
the details of location and capacity of DG sets.
(xvii) Comparison of emissions standards off
site risk assessment and emergencies.
(xviii) Disaster management plan and emergency
capabilities both off site and on site along with the copy of safety manual to
be submitted to the Ministry.
The
Committee after discussion recommended for the exemption of Public Hearing
since the project is proposed within notified industrial estate and within the
existing site.
A
detailed draft EIA/EMP report should be prepared as per the above TOR and
should be submitted to the Ministry as per the Notification.
4.10 Finalization of TOR for establishment
of Common Facilities for Treatment and Disposal of Common Effluent and Hazardous
Solid Waste Facilities at KIADB Industrial Area, Sompura 1st State
Dobaspet, Nelamangala Taluk, Banglore Rural District, Karnataka by M/s.
Banglore Eco-Park Pvt. Ltd. [F.No.10-2/2010-IA-III].
As presented by the project proponent,
the proposal is to establish common facilities for treatment and disposal of hazardous
solid and liquid wastes at KIADB Industrial Area, Sompura 1st State
Dobaspet, Nelamangala Taluk, Banglore Rural District in
The proposed common waste treatment
facility shall consist of Effluent treatment plant for treatment and disposal
of Biodegradable effluent and Non Biodegradable Effluent, Incineration plant
for treatment and disposal of Hazardous Solid Waste. ETP for biodegradable
effluent will be treated by conventional methods such as neutralization,
clarification, anaerobic and aerobic methods to irrigation standards.
Non-biodegradable effluents will be treated by methods such as multi effect
evaporation, crystallization and centrifuge. The incineration plant is designed
for thermal treatment for disposal of hazardous solid wastes. The plant
consists of primary chamber, secondary chamber followed by flue gas treatment
system (scrubbing system). Hazardous solid wastes will be burnt completely in
the primary & secondary chambers of the incinerator. The flue gases
generated will be treated in scrubbing system.
The total area of the plot is 16,188
sq.m. allotted by KIADB. Out of which, built up area proposed is - 4,920 sq.m.
and green belt - 5,503 sq.m. It is to proposed to develop a Common Treatment
Facility for Bio-degradable Effluent – 300 cum / day, non-bio-degradable
effluent – 60 cum/day and common incineration plant – 200 kg/hr. The capacity
of boiler will be 2 ton/hr at 15 kg/cm2. Boiler fuel will be agro waste and the power
requirement will be 125 KVA. The fresh water requirement is 21 KLD and source
is KIADB. The total cost of the project is Rs. 4.9 crores.
During the discussions, the Committee
finalized the following TOR for further study:
(i)
Evaluate
the technology available for incineration and submit the justification for the
selection of the Technology.
(ii)
Submit
the details of inventory of the wastes generation category wise and MoU in
proper model.
(iii)
Submit details of Environmental Management Plan and
Environmental Monitoring Plan with parameters and costs.
(iv)
Submit
the details of HAZOP and Safety analysis.
(v)
Submit
the details of characterization of the wastewater inlet and outlet.
(vi)
Submit
a copy of the MoU with the operating units.
(vii)
Examine
and submit the details of land use around the site and impact of the project on
the surrounding uses.
(viii)
Examine
the ground water quality and level of ground water table.
(ix)
Examine
the details of wind direction and impact on surrounding area.
(x)
Examine
the details of inlet and outlet water characterization.
(xi)
Submit
Disaster Management Plan and Emergency Evacuation Plan both for natural and
man-made disasters especially with reference to fire because of the chemical
storage facilities.
(xii)
As
per Rule 18(2) of the HWM Rules, 2008 - The operator of the Common Facilities
or occupier of a captive facility shall design and set up the treatment,
storage and disposal facility as per the technical guidelines issued by the
CPCB in this regard from time to time and shall obtain approval from the
SPCB/PCC for design and layout in this regard from time to time.
The
Committee after discussion recommended for the exemption of Public Hearing
since the project is proposed within notified industrial estate and within the
existing site.
A
detailed draft EIA/EMP report should be prepared as per the above TOR and
should be submitted to the Ministry as per the Notification.
4.11 Finalization of TOR for widening of
existing 2- lane to 4 lane from km 130.00 to km 188 of NH1A in Doda District of
Jammu & Kashmir from Nasiri to Banihal, in the section of Udhampur- Banihal
by M/s. NHAI. [F.No.10-3/2010-IA-III].
The proposed project is widening of
existing two lane road to four lane of NH-1A from km 130 to km 188. The above
corridor falls in Doda District of Jammu & Kashmir (Known as Package – III,
IV & V of Udhampur – Banihal Section) for a total length of about
The
project proponent informed that under EIA Notification, 1994 the project was
submitted to State Pollution Control Board for Public hearing, which was
conducted on 28.11.2006. In the meantime, Ministry issued EIA Notification, 2006
on 14th September, 2006. The present project is submitted for the
issue of Environmental Clearance.
Earlier,
the project was categorized under Category ‘B’, because at few locations, land
acquisition is more than
During discussions, the Committee
finalized the following TOR for further study:
(i)
The road
is passing through steepest terrains and most complex geological conditions.
Opinion on the design in respect of stability of slopes along the road should
be wetted by the Geological Survey of India.
(ii)
The road
is in a very sensitive area and likely to be used by Indian Army for their
operations. NHAI should have consultation with the Director General of Border
Roads Organization and Indian Army (Engineer in Chief Branch).
(iii)
There is a
high demand for coarse aggregate in this region due to various construction
activities (construction of Dam/Railway line etc.) leading to shortage in
supply of coarse aggregate. Therefore,
quarry sites should be identified and approved by the concerned agencies.
(iv)
Number of
road tunnels are proposed. Details of safety measures provided including
lighting, fire safety etc. to be explained.
(v)
Details on
plantation of trees (including fruit bearing trees) to be explained.
(vi)
Details on
river protection measures wherever the road is crossing streams and rivers.
(vii)
Necessary
permission shall be obtained from Forest Department for cutting of trees.
(viii)
Examine
and submit the details of quantity required for making the natural
gradient for widening and also the location of sand quarry with the necessary
permission.
(ix)
As the entire
road stretch is in the hilly terrain, proper drainage system should be proposed. The drainage should be located at the bottom
of the edge of the slope to minimize the erosion.
(x)
Submit the details of road safety and signages.
(xi)
IRC
guidelines shall be followed for widening & upgradation of road.
(xii)
Examine and submit the details of measures taken
during constructions of bridges across river/canal/major or minor drains
keeping in view the flooding of the rivers and the life span of the existing
bridges.
(xiii) Examine and
submit the details of burrow area and rehabilitation.
(xiv)
Examine and submit the details of the accident
prone zone and the mitigation measures.
(xv)
Examine and submit the details of vehicular under
passes.
(xvi)
Rain
water harvesting pit should be at least 3 –
(xvii) Adequate
cattle passes for the movement of agriculture material shall be provided at the
stretches passing through habitation areas.
(xviii) Necessary green belt shall be provided
on both side of the highway with proper central verge and cost provision should
be made for regular maintenance.
Regarding
the exemption of conducting fresh Public Hearing, in view of the Public Hearing
already conducted on 28.11.2006 and looking at the present situation in State
of Jammu & Kashmir, the NHAI may submit a justification to the Ministry for
a decision.
The EIA/EMP report should be modified
incorporating the above observations and submit to the Ministry as per EIA Notification,
2006 as amended in 2009.
4.12 Finalization of ToR for 4/6- laning of
Jammu-Udhampur Section including Nagrota Bypass and Udhampur By pass of NH-1A
in the State of Jammu & Kashmir by M/s. NHAI. [F.No.10-4/2010-IA-III]
The proposed project is for 4/6-
laning of Jammu-Udhampur Section (
Total of
The
project proponent informed that under EIA Notification, 1994 the project was submitted
to State Pollution Control Board for Public hearing, which was conducted on 07.10.2007
for Jhajhar Kotli to Udhampur section of NH-1A and 12.10.2007 for Sindra (
During discussions, the Committee
finalized the following TOR for further study:
(i)
The road
is passing through steepest terrains and most complex geological conditions.
Opinion on the design in respect of stability of slopes along the road should
be wetted by the Geological Survey of India.
(ii)
The road
is in a very sensitive area and likely to be used by Indian Army for their
operations. NHAI should have consultation with the Director General of Border
Roads Organization and Indian Army (Engineer in Chief Branch).
(iii)
There is a
high demand for coarse aggregate in this region due to various construction
activities (construction of Dam/Railway line etc.) leading to shortage in
supply of coarse aggregate. Therefore,
quarry sites should be identified and approved by the concerned agencies.
(iv)
Number of
road tunnels are proposed. Details of safety measures provided including
lighting, fire safety etc. to be explained.
(v)
Details on
plantation of trees (including fruit bearing trees) to be explained.
(vi)
Details on
river protection measures wherever the road is crossing streams and rivers.
(vii)
Necessary
permission shall be obtained from Forest Department for cutting of trees.
(viii)
Examine
and submit the details of quantity required for making the natural
gradient for widening and also the location of sand quarry with the necessary
permission.
(ix)
As the
entire road stretch is in the hilly terrain, proper drainage system should be
proposed. The drainage should be located
at the bottom of the edge of the slope to minimize the erosion.
(x)
Submit the details of road safety and signages.
(xi)
IRC
guidelines shall be followed for widening & upgradation of road.
(xii)
Examine and submit the details of measures taken
during constructions of bridges across river/canal/major or minor drains
keeping in view the flooding of the rivers and the life span of the existing
bridges.
(xiii) Examine and
submit the details of burrow area and rehabilitation.
(xiv)
Examine and submit the details of the accident
prone zone and the mitigation measures.
(xv)
Examine and submit the details of vehicular under
passes.
(xvi)
Rain
water harvesting pit should be at least 3 –
(xvii) Adequate
cattle passes for the movement of agriculture material shall be provided at the
stretches passing through habitation areas.
(xviii) Necessary green belt shall be provided
on both side of the highway with proper central verge and cost provision should
be made for regular maintenance.
(xix)
The
road is passing through 2 wildlife sanctuaries (Nandini Wildlife Sanctuary and
Ramnagar Sanctuary). Necessary permission shall be obtained from the concerned
Wildlife Department.
(xx)
Cutting
and filling at different stretches of the road for widening from
(xxi)
It
is proposed to cut 4345 trees, 3 times of the trees to be planted as a
compensatory afforestation.
(xxii) The entire stretch is located in a
highly seismic zone – IV. Also some of
the stretch may be experiencing heavy snow fall during the winter season.
Necessary provisions should be made for safety from avalanches and also from
land sliding.
Regarding
the exemption of conducting fresh Public Hearing, in view of the Public Hearing
already conducted on 07.10.2007 for Jhajhar Kotli to Udhampur section of NH-1A
and 12.10.2007 for Sindra (
The EIA/EMP report should be modified
incorporating the above observations and submit to the Ministry as per EIA
Notification, 2006 as amended in 2009.
4.13 CRZ clearance of construction of Jetty
at Gandhi Nagar in Great Nicobar Islands by M/s. Chief Engineer and
Administrator, A & N. [F. No. 11-4/2010-IA-III]
As presented by the project proponent, the proposal involves
construction of Jetty at Gandhi Nagar in Great Nicobar Islands. The mega earthquake followed by Tsunami of 26th
December 2004 caused extensive damage to life and property of great
Accordingly, a small RCC
jetty founded on board cast in situ RCC piles with RCC decking by pre cast
slab, having RCC piled and solid approach is proposed to be constructed at
Gandhi Nagar,
A
& N CZMA recommended this project for CRZ clearance in its meeting held on
02.12.2009.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
No
beach sand shall be used for construction activities.
(ii)
There
shall be no disposal of solid and liquid waste into the coastal area.
The
Committee recommends the proposal for CRZ Clearance with the above condition in
the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.
4.14 CRZ clearance for redevelopment of the property
/bungalow known as Garden View on plot bearing CS No. 09/596 of Malabar Hill
Division situated at Oomer Park along Bomanji Petit Marg, D Ward, Mumbai by
M/s. Nihil Pratapari Gandhi Family Trust, Mumbai [F.No.11-5/2010-IA.III]
As presented by the project proponent,
the proposal involves the redevelopment of the property / bungalow on a plot area of 720.74 Sq.m. The total
built-up area proposed is 958.58 Sq.m. It is proposed to have 2 stilt floor and
15 upper floors with 6 dwelling units. The total water requirement is 5 KLD.
The capacity of STP proposed is 5 KLD. Total solid waste generation will be 20 Kg/day.
The power requirement is 50 KVA. The
total parking spaces proposed are for 24 ECS (lower and upper stilt, 1, 5 &
7 floor). Total cost of the project is Rs. 63.78 Crores.
MCZMA has recommended the project vide
letter No. MCZMA 2009/CR 10, dated 19th December, 2009. Project
falls under CRZ-II.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The
height and coverage of the construction should be in accordance with the
existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as
per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii)
Non-recyclable/non-
reusable debris shall be disposed at the designated dump site.
(iii)
The
domestic wastewater shall be treated and reused for flushing and horticulture
purposes.
The
Committee recommends the proposal for CRZ Clearance with the above conditions
in the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.
4.15 CRZ Clearance for redevelopment of residential
cum commercial building at CS No.63, FP No. 875 of TPS IV of Mahim Division at
SK Bole Marg, Mumbai,
The proposal is to demolish the existing building and redevelopment of new building consist of wing A and wing B on a plot area of 1655 Sq.m. The total built-up area is 10,450 Sq.m. Wing a comprising of basement + ground floor for Rehab shop + 1st floor for part residential flats for sale + 2nd to 5th floor for parking and other amenities + 6 floor for parking & swimming pool and double ht. Still + 8th to 20th upper residential floors and wing B comprising of basement + ground floor for Rehab shop + 1st floor for sales flats + 2nd and 3rd floor partly for parking & partly or other amenities and Rehab flat + 4th to 20th upper floors for residential use. The rehabilitation units will be 25, 20 shops, a society office and 52 sale flats. The total water requirement is 58 KLD (fresh water requirement is 37 KLD). The capacity of STP proposed is 53 KLD. Treated waste water to be used for flushing of toilets – 20 KLD, horticulture – 1 KLD. Total solid waste generation will be 191 Kg/day. The power requirement is 1065 KW. The total parking spaces proposed are for 82 ECS. The total cost of the project is Rs.20.19 crore.
As per the approved CZMP
land under reference falls under CRZ-II area and situated on landward side of
existing road.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
The
height and coverage of the construction should be in accordance with the
existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as
per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii)
Non-recyclable/non-
reusable debris shall be disposed at the designated dump site.
(iii)
The
domestic wastewater shall be treated and reused.
(iv)
The car parking
lift should be re-oriented and placed in such a way that vehicles may enter
from one side and may go out from other side for easy movement.
(v)
Provision
should also be made for static tank for fire fighting and it shall not be used for other
purposes.
The
Committee recommends the proposal for CRZ Clearance with the above conditions
in the Clearance letter for strict compliance by the project proponent.
4.16 Construction of Group
Housing project at Alangad Village, Paraveer Taluk, District Ernakulam, Kerala
by M/s. Sanchari Properties and Developers Pvt. Ltd. (F.No.21-53/2009-IA.III)
The Committee decided to defer the
project, since the project proponent requested for postponement vide letter
dated 19.02.2010.
4.17 Finalization of TOR for
area development project with mixed use at Chillamathur village, Anathapur
District, Andhra Pradesh
M/s. Lepakshi Knowledge Hub Pvt. Ltd. (F.No.21-1/2010-IA.III)
The Committee decided to defer the
project, since the project proponent requested for postponement vide letter dated
22.02.2010.
4.18 Construction of Group housing project “City
Scapes” at Sy.No.2571/1-5, 2571/1-6, 2571/1-7, 2571/1-8, 2571/1-4-1, PTP Nagar,
Vattiyoorkavu village, Trivandrum District, Kerala by M/s. Skyline Foundations
and Structures Pvt. Ltd. (F.No:21-2/2010-IA.III)
The project involves construction of group
housing on a plot area of
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i) Examine and submit the details for the
disposal of excavated earth for
the construction of three level basements.
(ii) Re-examine
and submit the details of drainage pattern of the site and surrounding area with reference to the contours.
(iii) The
project site is located
Provided the response of the project
proponent to the aforesaid observations is to the satisfaction of the Committee,
the proposal may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
4.19 Construction of Commercial Building “Maria
Park” at S.No.143/10A2, 143/10A5, 143/10C, 143/11A, 145/7A, Village Edapally
South, Taluk Kanayannur, Ernakulam District, Kerala by M/s. Unique Estates
Development Co. Ltd. (F.No.21-3/2010-IA.III)
The project involves construction of
commercial project on a plot area of 17339.978 sq. mts. The total built-up area of the entire
project is 53408.6 Sq.m. The total water requirement is 173 KLD. (Fresh water
requirement is 83 - KLD). The capacity of STP proposed is 120 KLD. Treated
water available is for flushing 35 KLD; horticulture 6.5 KLD and AC Cooling 23
KLD & DG Cooling 26 KLD. Total solid waste generation will be 926
kg/day. Total power requirement is 11,000 KVA from State Electricity Board
(KSEB). The total car parking provided is of 842 cars (lower basement-255,
upper basement-223 and surface-364) + 76 two wheelers. Total cost of the
project is Rs. 85.9 Crores.
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
Separate
details have not been worked out for retail shopping, food court and business
centre. The requirement of infrastructure will be different for different type
of activities. Re-examine the details
and submit the revised proposal clearly identifying the activities and
calculate the requirement of water, utilization of treated waste water, solid
waste generation and disposal, power requirement and parking.
(ii)
Revise and
submit the details of energy conservation and compliance with ECBC guidelines.
(iii)
Revise and
submit the details of rainwater harvesting.
(iv)
Examine
and submit the details of disposal of excavated soil.
In
view of the foregoing observations, the proposal shall be reconsidered after
the above observations are addressed and submitted for reconsideration.
4.20 Construction of Group Housing at Sy.No.75/15-1,
15-2, 15-3, 12, 13, 21-2, 27, 21-1, 14, 74/1, 2, 76/9 and 10 at Kazhakultam
Village, Trivandrum District, Kerala by M/s. Skyline Foundations and Structures
Pvt. Ltd. (F.No.21-4/2010-IA.III)
The project involves construction of
group housing on a plot area of
During discussion, the following points emerged:
(i)
Submit the
details of disposal of excavated soil.
(ii)
Examine
and submit details of drainage pattern due to cut and fill of the site and its
impact on the surrounding drainage pattern.
Provided the response of the project
proponent to the aforesaid observations is to the satisfaction of the
committee, the proposal may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
5. Recommended
proposals:
In the light of
Ministry’s circular F.No. J-11013/41/2006-IA-II(1) dated December 8, 2006
regarding recommendations of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) after
appraisal of Development projects, following proposals, in which Committee had
earlier recommended the project for Environmental Clearance, subject to
satisfactory compliance of some observations were put up with their replies and
details submitted by them.
5.1
CRZ
Clearance for reconstruction of existing building on plot bearing CTS No. 907,
907/1, to 3 907/4C of Village Juhu - Tara Road, Mumbai by M/s. Beachwood
Properties Pvt. Ltd. [F. No. 11-40/2009-IA.III].
The proposal involves reconstruction
of existing building on a plot area of 1,342.50 sq.m. There are
existing old structures which are proposed to be demolished. The site is
located in a well developed suburb of Mumbai. The land is on the seaward side
of the existing road and falls in the residential zone. It is proposed to
construct 3 dwelling units. The building will comprise of two levels of
basement + stilt level + two levels of podiums for car park + 1st to
6th upper floors. Sewage treatment plant will be provided and the
treated water will be reused for landscaping. Wet garbage is proposed to be
recycled and reused as fertilizer while dry garbage will be disposed off for
recycling purpose. The storm water drains will be constructed as per municipal
specifications to collect the storm water from the paved surfaces,
conservation, rainwater from terrace will be diverted to storm water
drain. Fly-ash cement is proposed to be
used in the concrete work and all public areas will have CFL lighting for
energy
The project was earlier appraised by
the EAC in its 78th meeting held on 20th - 22nd
July, 2009. The EAC after examination called for additional information. The
details submitted by the project proponent were taken up for discussion in the
80th EAC meeting held on 17th – 18th September
2009. The committee recommended for the clearance. However, Ministry has called
for certain additional information regarding evidence for the existence of
building prior to 1991, the location with respect to CRZ, etc. The proponent
has submitted the information.
The details submitted by the project proponent were examined by the
Committee and it was suggested to include the following conditions:
(i)
The
height and coverage of the construction should be in accordance with the
existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as
per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii)
The
demolition debris shall be disposed at identified and designated dump site.
Prior permission shall be obtained from local body/municipal corporation.
The Committee recommends the proposal for issue of CRZ
Clearance with the above conditions in the Clearance letter for strict
compliance by the project proponent.
5.2
CRZ
Clearance for establishment of Vedanta University at Puri, Orissa by M/s. Anil
Agarwal Foundation. [F.No.11-38/2009-IA.III].
The proposal involves
establishment of a fully residential multi-disciplinary University having a capacity of 1
lakh students along with support facilities and township at Puri. The Project
envisages construction of 2,73,68,959 Sq meters spread out over approximately
The
Proposal was appraised again by EAC in its 78th meeting held on 20th to 22nd
July, 2009 The committee after deliberation recommended the project subject to
incorporation of following conditions that the layout plan of the complex shall
be superimposed on the HTL/LTL map prepared and demarcated by an authorized
agency shall be submitted to the Ministry within three months.
The project proponent submitted
the map. Constructions proposed are beyond
The Committee recommends the project for Clearance under CRZ Notification,
1991.
5.3 Environmental
Clearance for proposed Treatment Storage & Disposal Facility (TSDF), &
Common Hazardous Waste Incinerator Facility at Plot No. 18, GIDC Estate,
Panoli, District Bharuch, Gujarat by M/s. Panoli Solid Waste Management Ltd.
[F.No.11-17/2007-IA.III].
As presented by the project proponent,
the proposal involves establishment of Treatment Storage & Disposal
Facility (TSDF), & Common Hazardous Waste Incinerator Facility at GIDC
Estate, Panoli, District Bharuch,
The EAC in its
meeting held on 19th - 21st April, 2007 suggested ToR,
which was issued on 10.05.2007. Public
hearing was conducted on 11.10.2007. The proponent submitted an EIA and EMP
which were discussed in detail by the EAC in its meeting held on 21st
–23rd December, 2009 and raised certain points. The
project proponent submitted the details which were examined by the Committee.
During discussion, the following point emerged:
(i)
Present CETP is not meeting the standards. TDS, BOD and COD values and other
parameters are not confirming to the consent to establish conditions of Gujarat
Pollution Control Board. Re-examine and
submit the details with reasons of corrective measures taken to comply with
before taking up the expansion of the project.
Provided the response of the project
proponent to the aforesaid observation is to the satisfaction of the committee,
the proposal may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
As presented by
the project proponent, the proposal
involves reconstruction of existing building and
The land under reference
falls with in CRZ-II and proposed reconstruction is on the seaward side of the
existing road. Construction towards sea ward side should not go beyond the
imaginary line drawn from the seaward side of the existing authorized structure
on the adjoining plot.
MCZMA recommended the proposal for CRZ
Clearance with the certain conditions.
The proposal was appraised by 79th
EAC in its meeting held on 27th - 28th August, 2009.
Further, Ministry asked the proponent to draw the imaginary line on
the HTL/LTL map prepared by an authorized agency. Accordingly, the proponent
has submitted the same, which was put up for consideration. The proposal was
considered by the EAC in its meeting held on 27th – 29th
January 2010 and raised certain points.
The details submitted by the project proponent
were discussed by the Committee and it was suggested to include the following
conditions:
(i)
The
height and coverage of the construction should be in accordance with the
existing FSI/FAR norms as per Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 1991 and as
per DC Rules, 1967.
(ii)
The
demolition debris shall be disposed at identified and designated dump site.
Prior permission shall be obtained from local body/municipal corporation.
The Committee recommends the proposal
for issue of CRZ Clearance with the above conditions in the Clearance letter
for strict compliance by the project proponent.
5.5 Construction
of Commercial complex at at Survey Nos. 178/1, 178/2, 178/3, 178/4, 178/5,
178/6, 180/3, 180/4, 180/8, 181/1, 181/2, 181/3, 181/10, 182/2, 182/3, 182/4,
182/5, 182/6, 182/7, 182/8, 182/9, 182/16, 182/17, 182/24, Block No. 13,
Kundannur, Kanayannur Taluk, District Ernakulam, Kerala by M/s. Colossal
Projects Pvt. Ltd. (F.No:21-48/2009-IA.III)
As
presented by the project proponent, the project involves
construction of commercial project shopping mall + office blocks + 198
rooms hotel on a plot area of
The proposal was put up for
consideration in the 84th EAC meeting held on 27th – 29th
January, 2010, wherein certain issues raised. The details submitted by the project proponent were
discussed by the Committee and it was suggested to include the following
conditions:
(i)
All
the recommendation of EMP/DMP shall be strictly complied with.
(ii)
The
excess treated sewage shall be reused / used in nearby municipal gardens.
The Committee recommends the proposal for issue of
Environmental Clearance with the above conditions in the Clearance letter for
strict compliance by the project proponent.
5.6
Construction of Group Housing at Sy. No.
243/2, 243/1-1, 243/1-2 Village and
Panchayat Menamkulam, Taluka and District
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala by M/s. Maars Property Developers Co. Pvt. Ltd. (F.No.21-49/2009-IA.III)
As
presented by the project proponent, the project
involves construction of group housing on a plot area of
The
proposal was put up for consideration in the 84th EAC meeting held
on 27th – 29th January, 2010, wherein certain issues
raised. The details
submitted by the project proponent were discussed by the Committee and it was
suggested to include the following condition:
(i)
All
the recommendation of EMP/DMP shall be strictly complied with.
(ii)
The
excess treated sewage shall be reused / used in nearby municipal gardens.
The Committee recommends the proposal for issue of
Environmental Clearance with the above conditions in the Clearance letter for
strict compliance by the project proponent.
5.7 Construction
of Group Housing ‘Samrudhi Lakeview’ at Sy. No. 1875/1-3, 1875/1-1, 1877/1,
1877/1-1, 1875/4, 1877/2, Village Kadakampally, District Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala by M/s. Artech Realtors Pvt. Ltd (F.No.21-50/2009-IA.III)
As
presented by the project proponent, the project
involves construction of group housing on a plot area of
The
proposal was put up for consideration in the 84th EAC meeting held
on 27th – 29th January, 2010, wherein certain issues were
raised. The details
submitted by the project proponent were discussed by the Committee and it was
suggested to include the following conditions:
(i)
All
the recommendation of EMP/DMP shall be strictly complied with.
(ii)
The
excess treated sewage shall be reused / used in nearby municipal gardens.
The Committee recommends the proposal for issue of
Environmental Clearance with the above conditions in the Clearance letter for
strict compliance by the project proponent.
5.8 Construction
of Group Housing at Survey No. 162/8, 170/1A, 160/2A 1B1 and 160/2A 1B,
Nellikoda Village, Kozhikode Taluk, Olavanna Panchayat, Thondayad, Calicut,
Kerala by M/s. Apollo Build-Tee (India) Pvt. Ltd. (F.No.21-51/2009-IA.III)
As presented by the project proponent,
the project involves construction of group housing on
a plot area of
The
proposal was put up for consideration in the 84th EAC meeting held
on 27th – 29th January, 2010, wherein certain issues
raised. The details
submitted by the project proponent were discussed by the Committee and it was
suggested to include the following condition:
(i)
All
the recommendation of EMP/DMP shall be strictly complied with.
(ii)
The
excess treated sewage shall be reused / used in nearby municipal gardens.
The Committee recommends the proposal for issue of
Environmental Clearance with the above conditions in the Clearance letter for
strict compliance by the project proponent.
5.9 Development of SEZ for Pharmaceutical and Chemical
manufacturing units at Sy. No. 215, 286/1, 286/2, 283/1 in Ch. Lakshmi Puram,
312/1 to 312/5, 312/10 to 312/12, 313/1 to 313/7 of Rajayyapeta, 19 (part), in
Pedda Teernala, 117/1 to 117/3, 119/1, 119/2, 120/1, 120/2, 125, 126, 129/1 to
129/9, 138, 142, 150,215, N. Narasapuram Village, Nakkapalli Mandal,
Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh by M/s. Hetero Infrastructure SEZ Ltd.
(F.No.21-641/2007.IA.III)
As presented by the project proponent,
the project involves development of Pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities
(SEZ) on a plot area of
The proposal was
put up for consideration in the 71st EAC meeting held on 3rd
March, 2009 wherein the project proponent requested for postponement. On his
request, the proposal was put up again for consideration in the 72nd
EAC meeting held on 15th April, 2009. The EAC after examination called for additional
information. The details submitted by the project proponent were taken up for
discussion in the 75th meeting held on 6th – 7th
October, 2009. The EAC after examination
called for additional information. The details submitted by the project
proponent were taken up for discussion in the 84th meeting held on
27th – 29th January, 2010 wherein certain issues were
raised.
The details submitted by the project
proponent were discussed by the Committee and it was suggested to include the
following condition:
(i)
Submit
a clear recommendation of State Coastal Zone Management Authority regarding the
disposal of marine outfall.
(ii)
The
co-ordinates of project location are to be cross-checked with reference to the critically
polluted area with a CEPI score of 70.82.
Provided the response of the project proponent to the
aforesaid observations is to the satisfaction of the committee, the proposal
may be considered for recommendation for Clearance.
The next meeting of
the Committee would be held on 25th – 26th March, 2010 at
The meeting ended
with a vote of thanks to the Chair.
***
Chairman
Member Secretary
85th
Meeting
of the Expert Appraisal Committee for Infrastructure Development, Coastal
Regulation Zone and Miscellaneous projects held on 25th – 26th
February, 2010 at Conference Hall, SCOPE Complex,
List of Participants
Expert Committee
1.
Shri Nirmal Narinder Andrews
Chairman
2.
Prof. M.M. Kamath Vice Chairman
3.
Lt. Gen. Arvind Mahajan Member
4.
Dr. S. Manjappa Member
5.
Dr. H.R.V. Reddy Member
6.
Dr. T. Anantarajan Member
7.
Dr. Ramesh Ramachandran Member
8.
Dr. Chitrarajagopalan Member
9.
Shri V.K. Mathur Member
10.
Representative from CPCB
Member
11.
Shri Bharat Bhushan Member Secretary
Special Invitees:
12. Ms. Mili Mazumdar, Ex-Member, EAC for
Construction Committee.
Supporting Staff
13. Shri E. Thirunavukkarasu Dy.
Director, MoEF
14. Shri P.V. Subba Rao Research
Officer, MoEF
Project Authorities:
1. Representatives from M/s. L & T Shipbuilding Ltd.
2. Representatives from M/s. Atash Norcontrol Ltd.
3. Representatives from M/s.
4. Representatives from M/s. Mumbai Education Trust
5. Representatives from M/s. Chaitra Realty Ltd.
6. Representatives from M/s. Jaigad Ports Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
7. Representatives from M/s. Chandrakala Farm
Products Pvt. Ltd.
8. Representatives from M/s. Airport Authority of
9. Representatives from M/s. Elel Hotels and Investments Ltd.
10. Representatives from M/s. GSPC LNG Ltd.
11. Representatives from M/s. Faridabad Municipal Corporation
12. Representatives from M/s. Bomanji Dhunjibhoy Pvt. Ltd.
13. Representatives from M/s. Akshay Sthapatya Pvt. Ltd.
14. Representatives from M/s. Nandesari Environ Control Ltd.
15. Representatives from M/s. Banglore Eco-Park Pvt. Ltd.
16. Representatives from M/s. NHAI
17. Representatives from M/s. Chief Engineer & Administrator, A & N.
18. Representatives from M/s. Nihil Pratapari Gandhi Family Trust
19. Representatives from M/s. Nakoda Enterprises
20.Representatives
from M/s. Skyline Foundation & Structures
Pvt. Ltd.
21.Representatives
from M/s. Unique Estates Development Co. Ltd.
22.Representatives
from M/s. Skyline Foundation & Structures
Pvt. Ltd.
***