| APPENDIX I | | (See Paragraph-6) | | FORM 1 | | | | Note : If space provided against any parameter is inadequate, Kindly upload supporting document under 'Additional Attachments if any' at the last part of the Form1. Please note that all such Annexures must be part of single pdf document. | | (I) Basic Information | | | Is your project Comes under Notified Industrial Area | NA |
| | Whether proposal involved violation of EIA notification | N/A | | Weather Consent to Establishment Obtained | N/A | | Upload copy of CTE | N/A |
| | 1. | |
| Name of the Project/s | Sondenahalli Iron and Ore Mine (Area 64.35 Ha), M. L. No 2175 | Brief summary of project | Annexure-Brief summary of project | | Proposal Number | IA/KA/MIN/75303/2018 | | Project Cost | 200 lacs | |
| | 2. | |
| S. No. in the schedule | 1(a) Mining of minerals
| Project Sector | Non-Coal Mining | |
| | 3. | Proposed capacity/area/length/tonnage to be handled/command area/lease area/number or wells to be drilled | 60,000 tonnes per annum, 64.35 ha ha. |
| | 4. | | New/Expansion/Modernization | New |
|
| | 5. | Existing Capacity/Area etc. | 60000 ha. |
| | 6. | Category of project i.e. 'A' or 'B' | A | | | 7. | | Does it attract the general condition? If yes, please specify | No |
| | | 8. | | Does it attract the specific condition? If yes, please specify | No |
|
| | 9. | |
| Location of the project | Toposheet No.: 57-C/11 Latitude & Longitude of all corner boundary point/ pillars LBS - A: N 13° 21’ 57.63107’’; E 76° 42’ 03.47099’’ LBS - B: N 13° 21’ 23.02287’’; E 76° 42’ 18.11179’’ LBS - C: N 13° 21’ 23.74449’’; E 76° 42’ 15.43868’’ LBS - D: N 13° 21’ 25.49564’’; E 76° 41’ 50.82524’’ LBS - E: N 13° 21’ 59.53624’’; E 76° 41’ 49.74653’’ LBS - F: N 13° 22’ 00.35111’’; E 76° 42’ 00.17973’’ | | Shape of the project land | Block (Polygon) | | Uploaded GPS file | Annexure-GPS file  | | Uploaded copy of survey of India Toposheet | Annexure-Survey of india toposheet | | Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Sy.No.37 (part), 41 (part) | | Town / Village | Sondenahalli | | State of the project | Karnataka | |
| | Details of State of the project |
|---|
| S.no | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Karnataka | Tumkur | Chikkanayakanahalli |
| | 10. | |
| Nearest railway station along with distance in kms | Ammasandra railway station (Southwestern Railway), 15 km | Nearest airport along with distance in kms | Bengaluru, 150 km | |
| | 11. | Nearest Town/City/District Headquarters along with distance in kms | Chikkanayakanahalli , 10 km | | | 12. | Village Panchayats, Zila Parishad, Muncipal Corporation, Local body (Complete postal address with telephone nos. to be given) | Godekere Village Panchayat, C N Halli Taluk, Tumkur District-Pin: 572114
Phone- 08133266290 |
| | 13. | Name of the Applicant | ASHWYN |
| | 14. | Registered Address | Tumkur Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
No.-2, "Shiva Nilaya", 1st Floor,
Near Saw Mill, Banasandra Road, K B Cross, Tiptur Taluka, Tumkur District, karnataka |
| | 15. | |
| Address for correspondance: | | Name of the Company | TUMKUR MINERALS PVT LTD | | Name of the Applicant | ASHWYN | | Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | DIRECTOR | | Pin code | 560001 | | E-mail | akn@vmsbgoa.com | | Telephone No. | 08134-262000 | | Fax No. | 08134- | | Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
| | 16. | | Details of Alternative Sites examined, if any. Location of these sites should be shown on a toposheet | No |
|
| | 17. | Whether part of Interlinked projects? | No |
| | 18. | Whether separate application of Interlinked project has been submitted? | N/A |
| | 19. | | If Yes, MoEF file number | N/A | | Date of submission | N/A |
|
| | | | 21. | | Whether the proposal involves Approval/ Clearance under: if yes, details of the same and their status to be given | | (i) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act,1980? | No | | (ii) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the wildlife (Protection) Act,1972? | No | | (iii) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the C.R.Z notification, 2011? | No |
|
| | 22. | | Whether there is any Government Order/Policy relevant/relating to the site? | No |
|
| | 23. | | Whether any Forest Land Involved? | No | | Area of Forest land Involved (hectares) | N/A |
|
| | 24. | | Whether there is any litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up? | No | | (a) Name of the Court | N/A | | (b) Name of the Sub court | N/A | | (c) Case No. | N/A | | (d) Orders/directions of the court, if any and relevance with the proposed project | N/A |
|
|
| 1 | Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.) |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details there of (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 1.1 | Permanent or temporary change in land use, land cover or topography including increase in intensity of land use (with respect to local land use plan) | Yes | The existing land use of the area is 5.85 ha under mining pits, 6.16 ha under waste dumps, 4.49 ha under mineral storage, 0.16 ha under infrastructure (workshop, administrative buildings), 0.75 ha under roads, 6.29 ha under others (green belt & environmental protection) and balance 40.20 ha of virgin undisturbed area.
Major portion of the area is rocky barren and partly mineralized. It does not sustain any vegetation except for shrubs and bushes. It also cannot serve as grazing ground. | | 1.2 | Clearance of existing land, vegetation and buildings? | No | The ML area is rocky, barren and mineralized. It does not sustain any vegetation except for shrubs and bushes. Total of 24.15ha of ML area is already put on use under different mining uses with open pits, dumps, mineral storage, infrastructure, roads & others. | | 1.3 | Creation of new land uses? | Yes | Proposed additional 2.48 ha under mining along with the present Land use pattern in the mining plan period 2018-19 to 2022-23 | | 1.4 | Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore houses, soil testing? | Yes | Proposed 4 Nos. of DTH drill holes during the Mining Plan period 2018-19 to 2022-23 to know if any mineralized portion at depth | | 1.5 | Construction works? | No | Nil | | 1.6 | Demolition works? | No | Nil | | 1.7 | Temporary sites used for construction works or housing of construction workers? | No | Not Applicable | | 1.8 | Above ground buildings, structures or earthworks including linear structures, cut and fill or excavations and fill or excavations | No | No new permanent structures will be constructed. | | 1.9 | Underground works including mining or tunnelling? | No | Not Applicable | | 1.10 | Reclamation works? | Yes | Initially for the period 2018-19 to 2022-23, the entire quantity of generated waste will be dumped on the existing surface dump and subsequently after plan period exhausted portion of pit is available for backfilling and reclamation till the end of mine lease period is found to be adequate. The backfilled area shall be rehabilitated by plantation. Fully stabilized dump slope is rehabilitated with plantation
Mined out portion of the mining pit will be partially backfilled and finally rehabilitat | | 1.11 | Dredging? | No | Not Applicable | | 1.12 | Offshore structures? | No | Not Applicable | | 1.13 | Production and manufacturing processes? | Yes | By considering geological parameters of the ore body and the geo-technical observations, conventional mechanized open cast mining is opted for developing the deposit. The same method shall be continued throughout the lease period.
Ore and overburden are soft and amenable to ripper / dozer, hence no blasting is practiced at this mine. Excavation and loading of ore and waste is carried out by hydraulic excavator (backhoe). The transportation of ore and waste from pit to stack yard / dump is carri | | 1.14 | Facilities for storage of goods or materials? | Yes | Grade wise Screened/crushed material shall be stacked in the earmarked non-mineralized area only. | | 1.15 | Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid waste or liquid effluents? | Yes | No liquid effluents are generated. The solid waste generated during removal of overburden and side burden are non-toxic and does not contain any leachable heavy metals. The waste rock consists of laterite, phyllitic clay, limonitic and manganiferous clay. During insuing mining plan period generated waste will be dumped on the existing surface dump and subsequently after plan period exhausted portion of pit is available for backfilling | | 1.16 | Facilities for long term housing of operational workers? | No | The workers and staff come from the nearby villages and do not require accommodation at the site. | | 1.17 | New road, rail or sea traffic during construction or operation? | No | No new roads and rail operations envisaged, whereas, mined out ore will be transported to the buyers using existing infrastructure. | | 1.18 | New road, rail, air water borne or other transport infrastructure including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc? | No | The present infrastructure available is capable of handling transportation of ore etc. | | 1.19 | Closure or diversion of existing transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in traffic movements? | No | Not envisaged | | 1.20 | New or diverted transmission lines or pipelines? | No | Not envisaged | | 1.21 | Impoundment, damming, culverting, realignment or other changes to the hydrology of watercourses or aquifers? | No | Nil | | 1.22 | Stream crossings? | No | No stream crossings. | | 1.23 | Abstraction or transfers of water from ground or surface waters? | No | The ground water table is expected to be below 823 m MSL. Since at the conceptual stage the pit floor shall reach up to 900 m MSL that is 77m above the ground water table, there is no possibility of encountering ground water. | | 1.24 | Changes in water bodies or the land surface affecting drainage or run-off? | No | The natural drainage system will not be disturbed. | | 1.25 | Transport of personnel or materials for construction, operation or decommissioning? | Yes | Conveyance shall be provided to the Staff and workmen residing in the nearby villages. | | 1.26 | Long-term dismantling or decommissioning or restoration works? | Yes | Will be addressed in final mine closure plan. | | 1.27 | Ongoing activity during decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment? | Yes | As mentioned above, decommissioning aspects of the mining activity will be discussed in the Final Mine Closure Plan. | | 1.28 | Influx of people to an area in either temporarily or permanently? | No | This is an operating mine and no influx of people is envisaged. | | 1.29 | Introduction of alien species? | No | No | | 1.30 | Loss of native species or genetic diversity? | No | No | | 1.31 | Any other actions? | No | Not Applicable | |
| 2 | Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply): |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 2.1 | Land especially undeveloped or agricultural land (ha) | Yes | This mine is under operation since 11/11/1993 therefore land is undeveloped barren area. There is no agriculture land involved within ML area. | | 2.2 | Water (expected source & competing users) unit: KLD | Yes | Expected sources: Requirement is met by procurement of water from the bore well situated in the buffer zone and also rain water collected and stored in the settling ponds
Dust Suppression : 160 KL/day
Plantation : 15 KL/day
Drinking & Domestic : 5 KL/day | | 2.3 | Minerals (MT) | Yes | Central Empowered Committee formed by Hon’ble SC has fixed the annual production of iron ore as 0.06 million tonnes/annum.
With additional exploration the sub surface geology was established and reserves are re-estimated as 6.977 Million tonnes of proved ore reserve as on 01.04.2018, thus the anticipated life of the mine shall be 116 years @0.06MTPA. | | 2.4 | Construction material – stone, aggregates, sand / soil (expected source – MT) | No | Not Applicable | | 2.5 | Forests and timber (source – MT) | No | Not Applicable | | 2.6 | Energy including electricity and fuels (source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT),energy (MW) | Yes | Power supply for lighting through generator/ batteries.
HSD oil will be used for running of machinery | | 2.7 | Any other natural resources (use appropriate standard units) | No | Not Applicable | |
| 3 | Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 3.1 | Use of substances or materials, which are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or the environment (flora, fauna, and water supplies | No | No substances or materials which are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or the environment are used | | 3.2 | Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases) | No | Not Applicable | | 3.3 | Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing living conditions? | No | Not Applicable | | 3.4 | Vulnerable groups of people who could be affected by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the elderly etc. | No | Not Applicable | | 3.5 | Any other causes | No | Not Applicable | |
| 4 | Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or decommissioning (MT/month) |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 4.1 | Spoil, overburden or mine wastes | Yes | Around 0.7512 Million ton of waste will be generated during 2018-19 to 2022-23 mining plan period. The entire generated waste shall be dumped on the existing surface dump and subsequently after plan period exhausted portion of pit is available for backfilling. They will be reclaimed by afforestation and other engineering measures will be undertaken. | | 4.2 | Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial wastes) | No | No commercial municipal waste will be generated. | | 4.3 | Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste Management Rules) | No | Wastes / residues containing oil and used /spent oil will be disposed-off properly as per the statutory provisions. | | 4.4 | Other industrial process wastes | No | Not Applicable | | 4.5 | Surplus product | No | Not Applicable | | 4.6 | Sewage sludge or other sludge from effluent treatment | Yes | Solid waste in the form of sludge from washrooms shall be disposed in soak pit. | | 4.7 | Construction or demolition wastes | No | Not Applicable | | 4.8 | Redundant machinery or equipment | No | Not Applicable | | 4.9 | Contaminated soils or other materials | No | Not Applicable | | 4.10 | Agricultural wastes | No | Not Applicable | | 4.11 | Other solid wastes | No | Not Applicable | |
| 5 | Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air(Kg/hr) |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 5.1 | Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from stationary or mobile sources | Yes | HSD operated heavy machines are used for mining operations and transportation. With regular maintenance as specified by the manufacturer, the emissions will be within limits. PUC shall be monitored regularly for all transport vehicles. It is ensured that the emission of PM10, PM2.5, SO2 & NO2 shall be within the permissible limits. | | 5.2 | Emissions from production processes | Yes | The projected total handling during the mining plan period 2018-19 to 2022-23 is 1.088 million tonnes including ore and waste rock. i.e. about 3,627 tonnes per day for 300 working days. Hence mining operation is carried out eco-friendly manner using ripper dozers for breaking hard to semi hard overlying lateritic/lumpy formation, hence, no drilling and blasting is carried out.
Regular water spray on the haulage roads and mine workings to reduce the dust emissions shall be made. Provision of mul | | 5.3 | Emissions from materials handling including storage or transport | Yes | The maximum uncontrolled PM10 and PM2.5 emission level projected at any one time due to the transport operation shall be within permissible limits. | | 5.4 | Emissions from construction activities including plant and equipment | No | Not applicable | | 5.5 | Dust or odours from handling of materials including construction materials, sewage and waste | Yes | Water spraying on solid waste generated and green barrier surrounding the mining area will control the dust from spreading to nearby areas. Sewage sludge generated if any shall be treated in the soak pits. | | 5.6 | Emissions from incineration of waste | No | Not applicable | | 5.7 | Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g. slash materials, construction debris) | No | Not applicable | | 5.8 | Emissions from any other sources | No | Not applicable | |
| 6 | Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat: |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 6.1 | From operation of equipment e.g. engines, ventilation plant, crushers | Yes | The maximum noise produced from source by operation of earth moving machineries & movement of dumpers and the noise levels monitored in buffer zone have values well below the prescribed day and night limits.
Noise level at boundary shall be within 42-45 dB (A), which shall be within the permissible limits as per CPCB standards. No negative impacts are anticipated at the nearest villages. | | 6.2 | From industrial or similar processes | No | Not applicable | | 6.3 | From construction or demolition | No | Not applicable | | 6.4 | From blasting or piling | No | No blasting operations are proposed in the mine. | | 6.5 | From construction or operational traffic | Yes | The maximum Noise level projected due to the operational traffic, without any attenuation measures, will not exceed 75 dB(A). | | 6.6 | From lighting or cooling systems | No | Not applicable | | 6.7 | From any other sources | No | Not applicable | |
| 7 | Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea: |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 7.1 | From handling, storage, use or spillage of hazardous materials | No | HSD oil shall be bought as per the requirement and stored in the tank to be used and there shall be no spillage. | | 7.2 | From discharge of sewage or other effluents to water or the land (expected mode and place of discharge) | No | Not applicable | | 7.3 | By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into the land or into water | Yes | During transportation of iron ore some dust may be deposited on the adjacent fields. To minimize dust deposition, roads will be graded and maintained regularly. All the loaded trucks will be covered with tarpaulin to avoid spillage and speed limits shall be enforced. Dust suppression measures will be undertaken through regular water spray arrangements and airborne dust suppression system. Crusher/Screen shall be provided with enclosures. Wide green belts shall be developed surrounding the ML are | | 7.4 | From any other sources | No | Not applicable | | 7.5 | Is there a risk of long term build up of pollutants in the environment from these sources? | No | Not applicable | |
| 8 | Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect human health or the environment |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 8.1 | From explosions, spillages, fires etc from storage, handling, use or production of hazardous substances | No | No explosives shall be used in the mine. There shall not be bulk fuel storage facility in mining lease area. Risk of accidents due to spillage, use, storage & handling of HSD is fully minimized as only limited quantity is stored in the approved type of container and handled by approved type of pumps. Further the MMR 1961 rules and the circulars given by DGMS on prevention of fires will be strictly followed. | | 8.2 | From any other causes | Yes | Fires due to short circuiting in equipment, batteries for which MMR 1961 & Indian Electricity rules shall be strictly followed and firefighting equipment shall be provided at all conspicuous places with trained persons in firefighting and rescue works. Accidents due to operation of mining machinery and transport vehicles shall be kept to the minimum following the statutory requirement in operation of mines. | | 8.3 | Could the project be affected by natural disasters causing environmental damage (e.g. floods, earthquakes, landslides, cloudburst etc)? | No | The average rainfall of 735 mm/annum in Shettikere – Hobli. There is no record of cloudbursts. The ML area is located on an elevated place. The highest elevation being 1023 MSL and the lowest is 942 MSL. There are no perennial water courses. Therefore, there are no chances of flooding of this area. The area falls under zone II under the seismic zone map of India. Thus, there are remote chances of occurrence of earthquakes. The rock types exposed are hard and strong and therefore there shall be n | |
| 9 | Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality |
| S.No | Information/Checklist confirmation | Yes/No | Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data | | 9.1 | Lead to development of supporting utilities, ancillary development or development stimulated by the project which could have impact on the environment e.g.:
- Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply,waste or waste water treatment, etc.)
- housing development
- extractive industries
- supply industries
- Other
| No | This is a working mine and the required infrastructure facilities are already provided and no major adverse impact on the environment is observed. No major additional infrastructure is necessary for this project. There shall be no housing development, extractive industries, supply industries or any other ancillary development.
Hence, there will be minimal adverse impact on land environment. | | 9.2 | Lead to after-use of the site, which could have an impact on the environment | Yes | It is proposed that part of the pit will be kept as water reservoir which will act as a water harvesting structure helping in the recharge of ground water. The backfilled and the reclaimed area of the pit will be rehabilitated by vegetation to develop forestry, improving the biodiversity. | | 9.3 | Set a precedent for later developments | Yes | Employment potential will be increased and also indirect employment in service sector will increase. | | 9.4 | Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other existing or planned projects with similar effects | Yes | Within 10km radius, the mining lease is surrounded with other mines.
Some of the mines mentioned below;.
1. Latha Minerals
2. Sudarshan Singh Mine
3. Hind Mining Co
4. Sankeshwar Mining Co
5. Karnataka Mining Co.
6. Dayanath Singh
7. Upendra Mine
8. Yarekatte Limestone Mine of Mysore Cements Ltd., - Working Mine
9. Jyothi Mine
10. Sondenahalli Iron Ore Mine
They are all small mines and hence, their cumulative effect on environment is restricted to their own lease areas. | |
| (III) | Environmental Sensitivity | | S.No | Areas | Name/Identity | Aerial distance (within 15km.) Proposed project location boundary | | 1 | Areas protected under international conventions, national or local legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value
| No | None | | 2 | Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests | Yes | There are three water tanks as shown below
•Jayachamarajapura village tank- 6.0km
•Naduvanahalli village tank - 4.5km
•Kondli village tank - 3.5km | | 3 | Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration | No | Nil | | 4 | Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters | No | Nil | | 5 | State, National boundaries | No | Nil | | 6 | Routes or facilities used by the public for access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas | No | Nil | | 7 | Defence installations | No | Nil | | 8 | Densely populated or built-up area | Yes | There are no settlements or structure of any sort with in ML area.
Densely populated areas within buffer zone are:
Muskondli- 1,001
Sondenahalli-4,795
Rajatadripura-1,557
Godekere-2,104
Kondli-2,017
Doddarampura-1,113
Neralakere-1,224 | | 9 | Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community facilities) | Yes | In the above villages there are Govt. schools and medical facilities.
Narasimha swamy temple which is 5.03 km from mine. | | 10 | Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources.(ground water resources,surface resources,forestry,agriculture,fisheries,tourism,minerals) | No | Nil | | 11 | Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage.(those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) | No | Nil | | 12 | Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause the project to present environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic conditions) similar effects | No | Not Applicable | | | (IV) | Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies | | Essential Detail Sought : NIL | | | Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | Based on the document submitted and presentation made the Committee was of the view that as per KML file there is sign of mining in continuation of ML of the PP. The Committee therefore deferred the proposal and ask the PP to submit the following, (a) Copy of mining lease deed executed after transfer of the same, b) Mining lease boundary duly authenticated by State Government, (b) Clarification from State Government that mining carried out in continuation to mining lease by PP is within the ML before reduction of area by CEC, (c) Past production details duly authenticated by DMG since inception of the mines for all the Minerals viz. iron Ore, clay and Manganese, (d) copy of production schedule proposed and achieved as per approved mining plan and subsequent scheme of mining, (e) The Mining | 30 Jul 2018 |
| | (V) | Undertaking | | I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. | | V.(i) | | Name of Applicant | ASHWYN | | Designation | DIRECTOR | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | TUMKUR MINERALS PVT LTD | | Address | Tumkur Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
No.-2, "Shiva Nilaya", 1st Floor,
Near Saw Mill, Banasandra Road, K B Cross, Tiptur Taluka, Tumkur District, karnataka |
|
|