APPENDIX I
(See Paragraph-6)
FORM 1
Note : If space provided against any parameter is inadequate, Kindly upload supporting document under 'Additional Attachments if any'  at the last part of the Form1. Please note that all such Annexures must be part of single pdf document.
(I) Basic Information
S.No.Item Details
Is your project Comes under Notified Industrial Area NA
Whether proposal involved violation of EIA notificationN/A
Weather Consent to Establishment ObtainedN/A
Upload copy of CTE N/A
1.
Name of the Project/s Mangaluru Integrated Gas Project
Brief summary of projectAnnexure-Brief summary of project
Proposal Number IA/KA/IND2/73570/2018
Project Cost 34000 lacs
2.
S. No. in the schedule6(a) Oil & gas transportation pipe line (crude and refinery/ petrochemical
Project Sector Industrial Projects - 2
3. Proposed capacity/area/length/tonnage to be handled/command area/lease area/number or wells to be drilled The project is designed for a maximum LNG throughput of 3.0 Million Metric Tonnes per Annum (MMTPA) (Approximately 10.8 Million Metric Standard Cubic Meters of Gas per Day - MMSCMD). Based on the current demand scenario, a maximum throughput of 1.5 MMTPA (5.4 MMSCMD) can be expected in the initial years of operation. ha.
4.
New/Expansion/ModernizationNew
5. Existing Capacity/Area etc. 0 ha.
6. Category of project i.e. 'A' or 'B' A
7.
Does it attract the general condition? If yes, please specify No
8.
Does it attract the specific condition? If yes, please specify No
9.
Location of the projectMangalore, Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka
Shape of the project landBlock (Polygon)
Uploaded GPS fileAnnexure-GPS file      
Uploaded copy of survey of India ToposheetAnnexure-Survey of india toposheet
Plot/Survey/Khasra No.Within Limits of New Mangalore Port Trust and Mangalore Special Economic Zone Limited.
Town / VillagePanambur
State of the projectKarnataka
Details of State of the project
S.no State Name District Name Tehsil Name
(1.)KarnatakaDakshina KannadaMangalore
10.
Nearest railway station along with distance in kms Surathkal, 7.6 km
Nearest airport along with distance in kms Mangaluru Airport, 12 km
11. Nearest Town/City/District Headquarters along with distance in kms Mangaluru , 7 km
12. Village Panchayats, Zila Parishad, Muncipal Corporation, Local body (Complete postal address with telephone nos. to be given) The proposed project is planned within existing New Mangalore Port limits. Concerned officials may be contacted at: New Mangalore Port Trust, Panambur, Mangalore - 575010, Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka Tel: 0824-2407341 Fax:2408390
13. Name of the Applicant Abhirup
14. Registered Address H-Energy Private Limited, 12th Floor, Knowledge Park,Hiranandani Business Park,Powai,Mumbai
15.
Address for correspondance:
Name of the Company H ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
Name of the Applicant Abhirup
Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) VP
Pin code 400076
E-mail kkumar@in.henergy.com
Telephone No. 22-25715100
Fax No. 22-
Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority
16.
Details of Alternative Sites examined, if any. Location of these sites should be shown on a toposheet Yes
Uploaded detailsAnnexure-Uploaded details
17. Whether part of Interlinked projects? No
18. Whether separate application of Interlinked project has been submitted? N/A
19.
If Yes, MoEF file numberN/A
Date of submissionN/A
20. If No, Reason N/A
21.
Whether the proposal involves Approval/ Clearance under: if yes, details of the same and their status to be given
(i) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act,1980?No
(ii) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the wildlife (Protection) Act,1972?No
(iii) Whether the proposal involves approval/clearance under the C.R.Z notification, 2011?Yes
22.
Whether there is any Government Order/Policy relevant/relating to the site?No
23.
Whether any Forest Land Involved?No
Area of Forest land Involved (hectares)N/A
24.
Whether there is any litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up?No
(a) Name of the CourtN/A
(b) Name of the Sub courtN/A
(c) Case No.N/A
(d) Orders/directions of the court, if any and relevance with the proposed projectN/A
(II) Activity
1 Construction, operation or decommissioning of the Project involving actions, which will cause physical changes in the locality (topography, land use, changes in water bodies, etc.)
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details there of (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
1.1 Permanent or temporary change in land use, land cover or topography including increase in intensity of land use (with respect to local land use plan) No The proposed project is planned at the existing Jetty No. 9 (or Jetty No. 13 as per the new numbering) within the limits of New Mangalore Port. As the project essentially envisages the mooring of a Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU), a supply shuttle vessel at an existing jetty and evacuation through pipeline laid on an existing pipe rack, the project does not propose any changes to the existing land use pattern.
1.2 Clearance of existing land, vegetation and buildings? No As the project shall be located at the existing Jetty No. 9 within New Mangalore Port and evacuation shall be via a pipeline on an existing elevated pipe rack the existing infrastructure shall be used for this project.
1.3 Creation of new land uses? No The project is essentially restricted to Jetty No. 9 at New Mangalore Port and the existing elevated pipe rack operated by Mangalore SEZ Ltd. and does not envisage creation of new land uses.
1.4 Pre-construction investigations e.g. bore houses, soil testing? No Existing infrastructure is being used for this project.
1.5 Construction works? Yes As the project site is an existing Jetty within New Mangalore Port, minor construction activities such as installation of marine unloading arms for cargo transfer from the FSRU to the shore are envisaged. Some Jetty strengthening activities may be undertaken (if required) based detailed engineering and Dead Weight Tonnage of the vessels being used for the project. An R-LNG pipeline shall be laid on the existing elevated pipe rack for ~ 15 km connecting the project site to customers at MS
1.6 Demolition works? No No Demolition Works are envisaged for this project. Jetty strengthening works viz. replacement of fenders, mooring equipment may be undertaken if deemed necessary at the time of detailed engineering.
1.7 Temporary sites used for construction works or housing of construction workers? Yes The project location is in the coastal sea water of Jetty No. 9. Jetty refurbishment activities (if necessary) requires primarily a limited number of skilled workforce. Workers for this activity and their required facilities will be arranged by the local contractor employed for these works. Temporary sheds may be erected for storage pipes and other equipment at spaces designated by NMPT or MSEZL.
1.8 Above ground buildings, structures or earthworks including linear structures, cut and fill or excavations and fill or excavations Yes Jetty strengthening works shall be undertaken on the existing Jetty No. 9 if deemed necessary. Civil foundation works for installation of marine unloading arms and allied facilities shall be undertaken on the existing Jetty. The proposed pipeline shall be laid in a designated elevated pipeline corridor where a RoU width shall be provided by MSEZL. The pipeline shall be completely over ground and laying shall be on an existing pipe rack. No excavation / filling works are envisaged.
1.9 Underground works including mining or tunnelling? No No mining or tunneling works are envisaged for this project. In case refurbishment of fenders / mooring dolphins are required associated RCC piling works may be undertaken.
1.10 Reclamation works? No No land reclamation works are envisaged for this project.
1.11 Dredging? No Maintenance dredging is carried out as required by New Mangalore Port Trust from time to time. The proposed project location being an existing Jetty has sufficient draft of ~ 12 m and does not require capital dredging for mooring the envisaged vessels.
1.12 Offshore structures? No No offshore structures are envisaged for this project. One FSRU having a maximum storage capacity of 50,000 cu.m. is proposed to be permanently berthed at the existing Jetty No. 9 within New Mangalore Port. This shall be supplied by one shuttle vessel having a maximum storage capacity of 50,000 cu.m. which shall deliver coastal cargoes to the FSRU. The Jetty already has mooring dolphins in place for the mooring of these vessels. Strengthening work for these shall be undertaken if necessa
1.13 Production and manufacturing processes? No No manufacturing processes are envisaged for the proposed project. The regasification of LNG into R-LNG shall be done using suitable vaporizers installed on board the FSRU.
1.14 Facilities for storage of goods or materials? No Both the FSRU and Shuttle Vessel have adequate facilities for storage of goods and materials required for this project. Temporary storage sheds for material may be erected at a suitable location within the port premises if deemed necessary during construction phase.
1.15 Facilities for treatment or disposal of solid waste or liquid effluents? Yes Both the FSRU and Shuttle vessel shall have sewage and effluent treatment facilities installed on board in accordance to MARPOL Regulations. Any other solid / hazardous wastes generated during construction / operation will be disposed off in accordance with HWM Rules 2008 / 2010 (Amendment) in co-ordination with local Municipal Corporation / Pollution Control Board / Existing Port Waste Management Plan.
1.16 Facilities for long term housing of operational workers? No Not envisaged as the vessel shall employ a minimum crew for operation who shall be housed in the accommodation quarters provided on board the vessel itself. Housing facilities for manpower used for on shore duties is not envisaged.
1.17 New road, rail or sea traffic during construction or operation? Yes As the FSRU is proposed to be permanently moored to the existing Jetty No. 9, the shuttle vessel is the only vessel that is expected to bring in coastal cargoes from its port of loading to New Mangalore Port during operational phase. Pipeline shall be laid on the existing elevated pipe rack so no increase in road, rail or sea traffic is envisaged during construction or operation phase.
1.18 New road, rail, air water borne or other transport infrastructure including new or altered routes and stations, ports, airports etc? No The project envisages enhancement of existing sea port activities by including the handling of LNG and R-LNG as new products. No additional infrastructure is expected to be created.
1.19 Closure or diversion of existing transport routes or infrastructure leading to changes in traffic movements? No No closure or diversion of existing transport routes are envisaged leading to changes in traffic movements. Cargo movement shall be within existing routes.
1.20 New or diverted transmission lines or pipelines? Yes An R-LNG pipeline is envisaged as part of this project. The pipeline shall be laid entirely on the existing elevated pipe rack operated by MSEZL. No new transmission lines are envisaged for this project.
1.21 Impoundment, damming, culverting, realignment or other changes to the hydrology of watercourses or aquifers? No Not Applicable
1.22 Stream crossings? Yes The proposed R-LNG pipeline shall cross the Gurupur River to reach the MSEZ. However, since the pipeline shall be laid on the existing elevated pipe rack, no environmental impacts from laying of this pipeline are envisaged.
1.23 Abstraction or transfers of water from ground or surface waters? Yes During operational phase, ~ 170,000 KLD of sea water shall be taken into the FSRU to be used as a medium of heat exchange for regasification. The water will then be discharged back into the surrounding sea. This discharged water will be ~ 5 -7 deg C lower than the ambient water temperature.
1.24 Changes in water bodies or the land surface affecting drainage or run-off? No Not Applicable
1.25 Transport of personnel or materials for construction, operation or decommissioning? Yes Envisaged during construction and operational phase. Details shall be included in EIA report.
1.26 Long-term dismantling or decommissioning or restoration works? No Not Envisaged
1.27 Ongoing activity during decommissioning which could have an impact on the environment? No Not Envisaged
1.28 Influx of people to an area in either temporarily or permanently? Yes Envisaged during construction and operational phase. Details shall be included in EIA report.
1.29 Introduction of alien species? No Not envisaged.
1.30 Loss of native species or genetic diversity? No Not envisaged. Marine bio-diversity study shall be conducted during EIA.
1.31 Any other actions? No Not envisaged
2 Use of Natural resources for construction or operation of the Project (such as land, water, materials or energy, especially any resources which are non-renewable or in short supply):
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
2.1 Land especially undeveloped or agricultural land (ha) No Not Applicable. The project shall utilize the facilities of the existing Jetty No. 9 within New Mangalore Port and the elevated pipe rack belonging to MSEZL.
2.2 Water (expected source & competing users) unit: KLD Yes The domestic / potable water requirement is estimated as 3.5 - 5 KLD during operation phase. This shall be sourced from NMPT. Sea water will be used for proposed LNG regasification (as once through heating medium for LNG) at FSRU. The sea water requirement is estimated as about 170,000 KLD, which will be returned completely to sea as per prevailing local environmental norms.
2.3 Minerals (MT) Yes The proposed project aimed at import, regasification and supply of Natural Gas, a cleaner burning fossil fuel / mineral resource. The maximum throughput envisaged is 3 MMTPA.
2.4 Construction material – stone, aggregates, sand / soil (expected source – MT) Yes The quantum of envisaged construction material shall be estimated during EIA Studies.
2.5 Forests and timber (source – MT) No Not Applicable
2.6 Energy including electricity and fuels (source, competing users) Unit: fuel (MT),energy (MW) Yes The power requirement of the proposed FSRU at the Jetty will primarily be met by the BOG generated out of cargo tanks of the FSRU. Typically, for achieving ~ 1 MMTPA throughput, approximately 2.5 – 3.0 MW power would be required. Any additional power / energy requirement for the FSRU operations will be met / arranged locally.
2.7 Any other natural resources (use appropriate standard units) No None Envisaged.
3 Use, storage, transport, handling or production of substances or materials, which could be harmful to human health or the environment or raise concerns about actual or perceived risks to human health
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
3.1 Use of substances or materials, which are hazardous (as per MSIHC rules) to human health or the environment (flora, fauna, and water supplies Yes The proposed project is to develop infrastructure for LNG import, storage regasification and supply of Natural Gas in bulk quantity (Max. 3 MMTPA). The MSIHC rules would be applicable to R-LNG in view of its fire hazard. It is possible that final selected technology suppliers may use small amount of some chemicals as per the requirement for utilities. These details will be provided in EIA report.
3.2 Changes in occurrence of disease or affect disease vectors (e.g. insect or water borne diseases) No Not envisaged.
3.3 Affect the welfare of people e.g. by changing living conditions? Yes During operation phase, direct employment opportunities would be limited due to the requirement of skilled manpower. Potential scope for indirect employment opportunities is envisaged once the project is operational. The availability of natural gas would grant access to clean burning natural gas thereby improving quality of life and improving Human Development Index positions. The project will have negligible impact on existing fishermen communities.
3.4 Vulnerable groups of people who could be affected by the project e.g. hospital patients, children, the elderly etc. No The envisaged project is within the limits of New Mangalore Port / On the elevated pipe rack operated by MSEZL. The impact on coastal marine related communities during normal operation phase is expected to be negligible. The impacts during accidental condition / emergency shall be assessed during RRA study.
3.5 Any other causes No Nil.
4 Production of solid wastes during construction or operation or decommissioning (MT/month)
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
4.1 Spoil, overburden or mine wastes No Not envisaged
4.2 Municipal waste (domestic and or commercial wastes) Yes Insignificant quantity on continuous basis during operation phase. The details about safe / secured storage periodical disposal through MoEF&CC / CPCB authorized agencies with strict compliance to local / MARPOL regulations and shall be dealt in EIA report
4.3 Hazardous wastes (as per Hazardous Waste Management Rules) Yes Negligible in construction phase. In operation phase oily waste including bilge (waste) water of FSRU will be treated onboard as per MARPOL regulations as well as local coastal marine standards
4.4 Other industrial process wastes No Not applicable
4.5 Surplus product No Not Envisaged
4.6 Sewage sludge or other sludge from effluent treatment Yes Sewage generated on board the FSRU shall be treated on board itself. Any other wastes shall be collected in safe storage containers and periodical disposal shall be carried out through authorized agencies.
4.7 Construction or demolition wastes Yes No demolition waste is envisaged. Construction wastes shall be collected and disposed through authorized agencies as per prevailing norms.
4.8 Redundant machinery or equipment No Only equipment necessary for the commissioning / operation of the envisaged project shall be used.
4.9 Contaminated soils or other materials No Not envisaged
4.10 Agricultural wastes No Not envisaged
4.11 Other solid wastes No Not envisaged
5 Release of pollutants or any hazardous, toxic or noxious substances to air(Kg/hr)
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
5.1 Emissions from combustion of fossil fuels from stationary or mobile sources Yes During operation phase mainly NOx, CO2 and traces of un-burnt hydrocarbons would be emitted through the exhausts of onboard power generator and steam generator of FSRU and shall comply to Annexure-VI of MARPOL as well as local / MoEF&CC / CPCB standards. The details of emissions shall be included in EIA study.
5.2 Emissions from production processes No Except regasification of LNG and power generation for meeting hotel load there will be no production process involved in proposed project. Moreover these activities will be in within the limits of New Mangalore Port.
5.3 Emissions from materials handling including storage or transport Yes Trace emissions during storage and transport shall be the same as for the FSRU. Refer response 5.1 above.
5.4 Emissions from construction activities including plant and equipment Yes The details of emissions during construction activities shall be included in EIA study.
5.5 Dust or odours from handling of materials including construction materials, sewage and waste No Not envisaged.
5.6 Emissions from incineration of waste No Not envisaged.
5.7 Emissions from burning of waste in open air (e.g. slash materials, construction debris) No Not envisaged.
5.8 Emissions from any other sources No Not envisaged.
6 Generation of Noise and Vibration, and Emissions of Light and Heat:
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
6.1 From operation of equipment e.g. engines, ventilation plant, crushers Yes The construction contractor will be informed about the prescribed Indian standards corresponding to noise generation sources i.e. equipment / machinery and will be insisted upon strict compliance at nearest work environment (75dB(A)) as well as ambient noise levels. Necessary EMP as per the recommendations in EIA report will be implemented.
6.2 From industrial or similar processes Yes As per response 6.1 above.
6.3 From construction or demolition Yes The construction activities shall be so planned that ambient noise levels as well as vibration levels outside proposed project premises complies prescribed standards. No demolition work is envisaged at proposed project site.
6.4 From blasting or piling No No blasting is envisaged for this project. Necessary precautions shall be taken in case piling works are deemed necessary.
6.5 From construction or operational traffic Yes Shall be controlled through proper maintenance of construction equipment and vehicles.
6.6 From lighting or cooling systems No Deck lighting on FSRU and jetty shall be as per the requirement for safe operation. The impact from deck lighting of FSRU would be negligible and shall remain similar to a sailing ship.
6.7 From any other sources No None envisaged.
7 Risks of contamination of land or water from releases of pollutants into the ground or into sewers, surface waters, groundwater, coastal waters or the sea:
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
7.1 From handling, storage, use or spillage of hazardous materials No Not possible during normal operation phase. Since the material to be handled (bulk LNG and Natural Gas) is hazardous all necessary and possible precautionary safety measures will be integrated / interlocked in design, implementation and operation phases along with continuous/regular monitoring & alarm system at all critical locations for overall project to avoid any incidents. In case of any spillage occurrence, it shall be suitably collected / diverted to control / treatment systems.
7.2 From discharge of sewage or other effluents to water or the land (expected mode and place of discharge) Yes The FSRU shall use on board treatment systems separately for sewage and bilge water to comply with MARPOL, international and local standards.
7.3 By deposition of pollutants emitted to air into the land or into water No Not envisaged due to proposed control measures as well as the local coastal dispersion
7.4 From any other sources No None envisaged.
7.5 Is there a risk of long term build up of pollutants in the environment from these sources? No Not envisaged as the combustion of LNG emits 80% less SOx and NOx in comparison to fuel oil.
8 Risk of accidents during construction or operation of the Project, which could affect human health or the environment
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
8.1 From explosions, spillages, fires etc from storage, handling, use or production of hazardous substances Yes LNG is flammable with potential scope for BLEVE and Flash Fire depending on the local circumstances. Proposed bulk LNG and Natural Gas handling would be fire hazard prone activities. All necessary precautionary safety measures in compliance with international (MARPOL) / Indian safety standards prescribed by OISD / CCoE for storage and handling of LNG and R-LNG will be integrated into proposed project from design stage onwards. Project specific RA study will be carried out as part of EIA.
8.2 From any other causes Yes Potential risk due to dropped objects from crane hoist. Risk of cold burns due to cryogenic storage temperature during operation phase.
8.3 Could the project be affected by natural disasters causing environmental damage (e.g. floods, earthquakes, landslides, cloudburst etc)? Yes Severe weather conditions can impact regular operations of the project.
9 Factors which should be considered (such as consequential development) which could lead to environmental effects or the potential for cumulative impacts with other existing or planned activities in the locality
S.No Information/Checklist confirmation Yes/No Details thereof (with approximate quantities/rates, wherever possible) with source of information data
9.1 Lead to development of supporting utilities, ancillary development or development stimulated   by the project which could have impact on the environment e.g.:
  • Supporting infrastructure (roads, power supply,waste or waste water treatment, etc.)
  • housing development
  • extractive industries
  • supply industries
  • Other
 Yes The availability of gas in the region will directly benefit local fertilizer and petrochemical industries as it can be used as a feed stock. As gas is a clean feed stock and can also be used for power generation, there is a possibility of rapid development of gas based industries which will lead to associated employment, infrastructure development etc.
9.2 Lead to after-use of the site, which could have an impact on the environment No Not envisaged
9.3 Set a precedent for later developments Yes Connectivity pipelines for gas transport can be envisaged.
9.4 Have cumulative effects due to proximity to other existing or planned projects with similar effects No None envisaged at this point.
(III) Environmental Sensitivity
S.No Areas Name/Identity Aerial distance (within 15km.) Proposed project location boundary
1 Areas protected under international conventions, national or local legislation for  their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value
 No None.
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests Yes The proposed project is sea front based development, falls in coastal zone of New Mangalore Port. The Gurupur River flows in close proximity of the port limits. The proposed R-LNG pipeline however shall be laid on the existing elevated pipe rack belonging to MSEZL and does not envisage any impact or alterations to the existing ecology and environment.
3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration No None.
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters Yes As the FSRU shall be moored at the existing Jetty # 9 within New Mangalore Port, the proposed project falls under purview of Coastal Regulatory Zone only. The route of the pipeline does not pass through any Forests / Ecologically Sensitive Areas / Coral Reefs.
5 State, National boundaries No None.
6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access to recreation or other tourist, pilgrim areas Yes The New Mangalore Port is well connected to NH - 66
7 Defence installations No None.
8 Densely populated or built-up area No Mangalore City falls in the buffer zone of this project. The approximate population of Mangalore is 8,23,860.
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community facilities) Yes Within 10 km radius of the project.
10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources.(ground water resources,surface resources,forestry,agriculture,fisheries,tourism,minerals) No None.
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage.(those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) Yes Project is within New Mangalore Port
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause the project to present environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic conditions) similar effects Yes Adverse climatic conditions may affect project operations.
(IV) Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies
1 Uploaded Proposed TOR File Annexure-TOR file
2 Uploaded scanned copy of covering letter Annexure-scanned copy of covering letter
3 Uploaded Pre-Feasibility report(PFR) Annexure-PFR
4 Uploaded additional attachments(only single pdf file) Annexure-Additional attachments
Additional Attachments, if any
Attached File
Essential Details Sought
Essential Details Sought - 2
            Essential Detail Sought:
Sno. EDS Letter Remarks Date of EDS
1.NAThe documents/additional information submitted is unable to justify the categorization of the project. 17 May 2018
2.NAThe correction have been made as per the instruction received 07 May 2018
3.NAPlease justify the categorization of project under Category A. 01 May 2018
4.NAThe correction have been made as per the instruction received 23 Mar 2018
5.NAPlease provide documentary proof that the proposed pipeline passes through national parks/sanctuaries/coral reefs/ESA 23 Mar 2018
      Additional Detail Sought : NIL
(V) Undertaking
I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief and I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost.
V.(i)
Name of ApplicantAbhirup
DesignationVP
Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here)H ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
AddressH-Energy Private Limited, 12th Floor, Knowledge Park,Hiranandani Business Park,Powai,Mumbai
Print