|
1. | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | Details of Project: | (a)Name of the project(s) | A new technical grade pesticides plant capacity of 750 MTPA by MS POPULAR CHEMICAL MANUFACTURER AND SUPPLIES | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | MS POPULAR CHEMICAL MANUFACTURER AND SUPPLIES | (c)Registered Address | Hastha Hosamane Extension Chikmagalur, Karnataka,,Hassan,Karnataka-577101 | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
2. | Address for the correspondence: | (a)Name of the Applicant | Vedanth M Prabhakar | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Partner | (c)Address | Hastha Hosmane Extension Chikmagalur Karnatak,,Chikkamagalur,Chikmagalur,Karnataka-577101 | (d)Pin code | 577101 | (e)E-mail | chemicalspopular@gmail.com | (f)STD Code. | 8262(f)Telephone No. | 239838 | (g)Fax No. | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
3. | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(b) Pesticides industry and pesticide specific intermediates (excluding formulations)
| Minor Activity | | (b)Category | A | (c)Proposal Number | IA/KA/IND2/145725/2018 | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/145621/2020 | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
4. | Location of the Project: | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Survey No. 380, Karagada village, Belur Tehsil, H | (b)Pincode | 573115 | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | From | | Degree | 131444.86 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 131450.44 | Minutes | | Second | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | From | | Degree | 755051.65 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 755054.33 | Minutes | | Second | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 48 O/15; 48 O/16 | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 713 | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 965 | (j)Seismic Zone | 2 | |
|
5. | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | (b)Main State of the project | Karnataka | |
|
|
Details of State(s) of the project |
---|
S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
---|
(1.) | Jharkhand | East Singhbhum | musabani | Surda | |
|
6. | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | No.IA-J-11011/367/2018-IA-II(I) | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 02 Nov 2018 | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 18 Dec 2019 | (d)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | |
|
7. | Details of Public Consultation: | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
---|
|
S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
---|
(1.) | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | Date : | 18 Dec 2019 | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0.01 |
| Project Site | State : | Karnataka | District : | Hassan | Tehsil : | Belur | Village : | Karagada |
| 74 | 1. What is the impact of the chemical factory on the existing agricultural land, air, water and soil?
2. Is there any chances of getting health hazards like respiratory problems, through air pollutio | Others | Additional Deputy Commissioner | |
8. | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
8.1. Project Configuration |
---|
S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Total Plot Area | 8215.12 | Sq.m. | (2.) | Total Production Capacity | 750 | TPA | |
8.2. Product |
---|
S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
---|
(1.) | Aluminium Phosphide | 500 | Tons per Annum | | Road | | (2.) | Zinc Phosphide | 250 | Tons per Annum | | Road | | |
|
9. | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | Details Not Applicable | |
|
9.1. | Details of Consent to Operate | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | (iii)Date of Issue | N/A | (iv)Valid Upto | N/A | (v)File No. | NA | (vi)Application No. | NA | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | NA | |
|
|
10. | Project Cost: | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 5 | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 0.25 | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 0.10 | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 0.05 | |
|
11. | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No | | |
12. | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No | | |
13. | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 162.55 | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 162.55 | |
|
  13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
---|
S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
---|
(1.) | Paraffin Wax | 2.9 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (2.) | Ammonium Carbamate | 19.50 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (3.) | Zinc stearate | 4.5 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (4.) | Zinc Dust | 39.90 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (5.) | Urea | 4.20 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (6.) | Groundnut Oil | 0.5 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (7.) | Aluminium Powder | 35 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (8.) | Graphite Powder | 5.80 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (9.) | yellow/Red Phosphorous | 50.25 | Tons per Annum | | Local Market | Road | | 10 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | |
|
14. | Baseline Data : | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Dec 2018 To 28 Feb 2019 | (b)Season | Winter | |
|
14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 71.92 | 44.55 | 71.41 | 100 | (2.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 23.17 | 13.77 | 22.40 | 80 | (3.) | Others | CO | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 0.85 | 0.18 | 0.85 | 4 | (4.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 71.92 | 24.98 | 39.64 | 60 | (5.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 15.09 | 6.33 | 11.71 | 80 | |
14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
---|
(1.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 700 | 36 | 250 | 1000 | (2.) | Others | Zinc | | mg/l | | 1.16 | 0.11 | 5 | 15 | (3.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 2356 | 368 | 500 | 2000 | (4.) | Heavy Metals | | Fe | mg/l | | 0.28 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | (5.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.13 | 6.52 | 6.5 | 8.5 | (6.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 1080 | 156 | 200 | 600 | (7.) | TSS | | | NA | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (8.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | |
14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 6 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
---|
(1.) | pH | | NA | | 7.32 | 7.12 | D | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 5.7 | 5.1 | D | (3.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 1.9 | 1.4 | D | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 12.2 | 8.16 | D | (5.) | Others | TDS | mg/l | | 304 | 206 | D | |
14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 36.3 | 33.7 | 70 | (2.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 50.5 | 40.4 | 75 | |
14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 7 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
---|
(1.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 263.16 | 169.65 | (2.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 85.14 | 71.40 | (3.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 142.56 | 95.04 | (4.) | pH | | | 7.82 | 7.52 | (5.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 387 | 219 | |
|
14.6. | Details of Ground Water Table: | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 1.40 To 21.67 | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 1.00 To 19.42 | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
---|
(1.) | Others | Tanker water supply | 19.13 | 5 | Copy of Permission Letter | modeOthers | Tanker | Others | Tanker | 0 | 10 Mar 2020 | 19.13 | |
|
15.1. | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
---|
(1.) | Industrial Waste Water | 1.2 | 1.2 | Biological Treatment | Green Belt Renewal Plant | | 1.2 | | |
|
16.1. | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 1.2 | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 1.2 | |
|
17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
---|
S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
---|
(1.) | Used Oil | Industrial Waste | | 0.05 | Kilolitre | 10 | Road | | Authorized Recyclers | | (2.) | Process waste | Industrial Waste | | 11.25 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | (3.) | Discarded barrels | Industrial Waste | | 10 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | (4.) | ETP Sludge | Industrial Waste | | 0.6 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | (5.) | Coffeee Husk Briquette ash | Industrial Waste | | 38 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | |
|
|
18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 63.71 | 400 | 1.5 | 66 | 100 | (2.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 11.71 | 400 | 1.1 | 13 | 80 | (3.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 21.91 | 400 | 0.7 | 23 | 80 | (4.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 37.89 | 400 | 0 | 38 | 60 | |
|
18.2. Stack Details |
---|
S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
---|
(1.) | Boiler | 0.6 TPH | 20 | 2 | PM10 | | 1.311 | |
|
19. | Power Requirement: | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 65 | (b)Source | State Electricity Board | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 60 kVA(1 no.) and 25 kVA ( 1no.) | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 30 | |
|
20. | Land Ownership Pattern: | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 0.8215 | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | Total Land (ha.) | 0.8215 | |
|
21. | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 21553.72 | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 0 | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 1235.52 | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 1345.91 | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 0 | (g)Forest (ha.) | 4431.92 | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | (j)Others (ha.) : Fellow land and scrub land | 9641.19 | Total (ha.) | 38208.26 | |
|
22. Land requirement for various activities |
---|
S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Others | Total Plot Area | 0.8215 | | |
|
|
23. | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Critically Polluted Area | None | 0 | 0 | (2.) | Wildlife Corridors | None | 0 | 0 | (3.) | ESZs | None | 0 | 0 | (4.) | NPA | None | 0 | 0 | (5.) | ESAs | None | 0 | 0 | (6.) | WLS | None | 0 | 0 | (7.) | Corridors | None | 0 | 0 | |
23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Forest | | Kalasapur state forest | 5.07 | ENE | (2.) | Archaeological Sites | | None | 0 | 0 | (3.) | Defence Installations | | None | 0 | 0 | |
|
23.3. | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
24. | Forest Land: | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
25. | Tree Cutting: | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
26. | Land Acquisition Status: | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 0.82 | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | Acquired | |
|
27. | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | (b)No. of Households | 0 | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
28. | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
29. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
30. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Yagachi Reservoir | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | South | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 4.61 | |
|
31. | Manpower Requirement: | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 20 | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 30 | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 20 | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 10 | (e)No. of working days | 300 | (f)Total Manpower | 80 | |
|
32. | Green Belt in Ha: | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 0.27 | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 32.87 | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 1500 | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 50000 | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
33. Project Benefits |
---|
S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
---|
(1.) | Environmental | 2868.00 Sq.m. area will be under greenbelt plantation. This will improve the surrounding environment and increase the aesthetic view. | (2.) | Financial | Infrastructure will get improved and enhance the employment opportunity for both skilled and unskilled person from nearby area. Direct employment as well as indirect employment due to ancillary services will be given to the local people. | (3.) | Social | Due to proposed project activity, social infrastructure will be improved by means of civilization, vocational training and basic amenities. | |
|
34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
36. | Details of Court Cases: | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
37. | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
38. | Details of EIA Consultant: | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | (i)Accreditation No. | 169 | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Wolkem India Limited | (iii)Address | E- 101-102, Mewar Industrial Area, Madri, Udaipur – 313003 (Rajasthan) | (iv)Mobile No. | 9772833883 | (v)Landline No. | 0294249460 | (vi)Email Id | info@wolkem.com | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 04 Feb 2021 | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
Essential Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
---|
1. | NA | (i) Public hearing proceedings to be forwarded by the Member Secretary, SPCB along with complete public hearing/consultation documents. Also issues raised during public hearing, response by the project proponent, action plan with budgetary allocation has not been submitted. Kindly upload the requisite documents. Form 2 (Sno. 7.1)
(ii) TOR compliance is not adequate in EIA/EMP report and need to revise as per the terms of reference granted for the project, and shall conform to Appendix III of the EIA Notification, 2006. PP shall provide adequate TOR compliances in the EIA report
(iii) Air Quality Impact Prediction (18.1 of form 2) mentioned wrong. Please correct the same
(iv) Details of R&R
(v) Status of Conservation Plan approval from CWLW.
(vi) Status of Water approval.
(vii) Details of membership for TSDF.
(viii) Details of Raw material linkage (S. no. 13.1 of form 2) and its mitigation measure during transportation needs to be submitted.
(ix) In view of the above, PP/Consultant are requested to revise the application for grant of EC and accordingly revise the Form 2 alongwith EIA/EMP Report. The EIA/EMP Report shall match with the information as filled in Form 2. On examination it is observed that the Consultant has not adequately submitted the application as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. Consultant has to read the documents before uploading the information in Form 2 /EIA/EMP report. | 05 Mar 2020 | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 27 Mar 2020 | 3. | NA | 1. Please read the earlier EDS sought by the Ministry. The matter was again examined and noted that PP has not revised the Form 2 and not uploaded the requisite information. (For example, in S. No. 7.1 of Form 2, the letter from SPCB Head Office w.r.t. forwarding Public hearing proceedings to the Ministry as per EIA Notification 2006 has not be uploaded. However PP in its letter dated 17.03.2020 mentioned they have uploaded. Kindly rectify the error.
2. It is pertain to mentioned that the processing of EC proposal, in the Ministry, is through Parivesh Portal only, therefore providing the requisite information/documents shall be in compliance as per Form 2 and accordingly the PP/Consultant are kindly requested to revise the application in the Form 2 alongwith EIA/EMP Report and resubmit the same. The EIA/EMP Report shall match with the information as filled in Form 2 for further appraisal necessary action.
3. It is also mentioned that after acceptance the application, Form 2 and EIA/EMP report can not be revise. Therefore, PP/Consultant is again requested to kindly do needful. | 04 Apr 2020 | 4. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 21 Apr 2020 | |
Additional Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
---|
1. | ADS Reply Letter | ADS REPLY OF PROJECT "POPULAR CHEMICALS MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIES" | 17 Jul 2020 | 2. | NA | The EAC, after detailed deliberations decided to defer the proposal for want of requisite information as under and have asked the PP to revise the Report alongwith following clarification/information: -
(i) The Committee noted that the KML file shows the construction at the project site and the project proponent has informed that the said construction is for their formulation unit. However, the project proponent could not explain the details and even no documentary evidence provided during the meeting. In this context, the Committee at first instance is of the view that the PP to explain all the details w.r.t. violation, if any, etc.
(ii) The project proponent need to submit clarification with proper proof to establish, past production details.
(iii) Permission for fresh water withdrawal other than gram panchayat.
(iv) Status of TSDF membership.
The EAC therefore deferred the proposal. | 26 Jun 2020 | |
| Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| Name of Applicant | Vedanth M Prabhakar | Designation | Partner | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | MS POPULAR CHEMICAL MANUFACTURER AND SUPPLIES | Address | Hastha Hosamane Extension Chikmagalur, Karnataka |
|