|
1. | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | Details of Project: | (a)Name of the project(s) | Proposed New National Highway NH 754K greenfield alignment Sanchore to Santalpur section starting from Vantdau in Banaskantha district to Ranmalpura in Patan district in the state of Gujarat | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) | (c)Registered Address | G-5 & G-6, Sector 10,Dwarka, New Delhi,New Delhi,Delhi-110075 | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Central Government | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
2. | Address for the correspondence: | (a)Name of the Applicant | Prabhat Kumar Singh | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | PD | (c)Address | Gandhidham, Z-6, Ground Floor,Near Divine Life Society Hospital, Adhipur,Gandhidham,kutch,Gujarat-370205 | (d)Pin code | 370205 | (e)E-mail | pksinghnhai.2011@gmail.com | (f)STD Code. | 283(f)Telephone No. | 66260104 | (g)Fax No. | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
3. | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | (a.I)Project/Activity | 7(f) Highways
| Minor Activity | | (b)Category | A | (c)Proposal Number | IA/GJ/MIS/75732/2018 | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/141529/2020 | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | INFRA-2 | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
4. | Location of the Project: | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Banaskantha and Patan | (b)Pincode | 385001 | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | From | | Degree | 234430.81 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 243919.45 | Minutes | | Second | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | From | | Degree | 710811.02 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 714429.27 | Minutes | | Second | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | F42F1, F42F2, F42F5, F42F6, F42F9,G42X7, G42X8, G4 | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 99 | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 55 | (j)Seismic Zone | 4 | |
|
5. | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | (b)Main State of the project | Gujarat | |
|
|
Details of State(s) of the project |
---|
S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
---|
(1.) | Gujarat | Banaskantha | Vav | | (2.) | Gujarat | Banaskantha | Tharad | | (3.) | Gujarat | Banaskantha | Bhabhar | | (4.) | Gujarat | Patan | Santalpur | | |
|
6. | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | (a)Whether TOR is mandatory for submitting application | Yes | (b)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | 10-60/2018-IA.III | (c)Date of Apply of TOR | 11 Aug 2018 | (d)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 13 Sep 2018 | (e)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | |
|
7. | Details of Public Consultation: | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
---|
|
S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
---|
(1.) | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | Date : | 07 Aug 2019 | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 1.20 |
| Government Rest House, Near Industrial Training Center, Radhanpur- Santalpur Highway, Santalpur | State : | Gujarat | District : | Patan | Tehsil : | Santalpur | Village : | Santalpur |
| 63 | Enclosed as Annexure-11 of Final EIA/EMP Report | Others | Director-DRDA and Representative of District Magistrate | (2.) | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | Date : | 09 Aug 2019 | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 1.55 |
| Hotel Desert Inn, Banquet hall, Mumbai Market, Highway Char Rasta, Tharad | State : | Gujarat | District : | Banaskantha | Tehsil : | Tharad | Village : | Tharad |
| 61 | Enclosed as Annexure-11 of Final EIA/EMP Report | Others | Director-DRDA and Representative of District Magistrate | |
8. | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
8.1. Project Configuration |
---|
S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | National Highway (NH-754K) | 125.185 Km | Proposed | |
8.2. Product |
---|
S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
---|
(1.) | National Highway (NH-754K) (Area - 843.54 ha) | 125.18 | Kilometers | | Road,Others | National Highway | |
|
9. | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | Details Not Applicable | |
|
9.1. | Details of Consent to Operate | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | (iii)Date of Issue | 15 Feb 2020 | (iv)Valid Upto | N/A | (v)File No. | NA | (vi)Application No. | NA | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
10. | Project Cost: | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 2959.31 | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 14.3 | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 14.796 | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 0.49 | |
|
11. | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | Yes | a)Protected areas notified under the wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 | Yes | d)Inter-State boundaries and international boundaries | Yes | | |
12. | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No | | |
13. | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 3087293 | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 3087293 | |
|
  13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
---|
S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
---|
(1.) | Steel | 302 | Others | MT per KM | approved suppliers in Patan and Banaskantha | Road | | 00 | Others | approved suppliers | Copy of Linkage | (2.) | Bitumen | 38310 | Others | MT per KM | approved supplier | Road | | 00 | Others | approved suppliers | Copy of Linkage | (3.) | cement | 1393 | Others | MT per KM | approved suppliers | Road | | 00 | Others | approved suppliers | Copy of Linkage | (4.) | Aggregate | 21095 | Others | cubic meter per KM | approved mine quarry | Road | | 00 | Others | approved mine quarry | Copy of Linkage | (5.) | Sand | 196130 | Others | cubic meter | Banas River | Road | | 55 | Others | authorized dealers | Copy of Linkage | |
|
14. | Baseline Data : | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Oct 2018 To 31 Dec 2018 | (b)Season | Post-Monsoon | |
|
14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 5 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 159.4 | 87.1 | 157.6 | 100 | (2.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 9.7 | 3.6 | 9.5 | 80 | (3.) | Others | Carbon Monoxide (CO) | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 1252.0 | 348.5 | 1216.0 | 677.7 | (4.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 84.5 | 46.8 | 81.0 | 60 | (5.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 26.2 | 9.4 | 25.6 | 80 | |
14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 6 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
---|
(1.) | pH | | | NA | | 8.26 | 7.41 | 6.5 | 8.5 | (2.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 4624.2 | 182.2 | 500 | 2000 | (3.) | Heavy Metals | | Mercury (Hg) | mg/l | | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | (4.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | (5.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 1080.0 | 104.0 | 200 | 600 | (6.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 2100.0 | 26.0 | 250 | 1000 | (7.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 1.08 | 0.48 | 1.0 | 1.5 | |
14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 6 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
---|
(1.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 16.2 | 5.1 | C | (2.) | pH | | NA | | 8.85 | 8.11 | C | (3.) | DO | | mg/l | | 8.3 | 7.1 | C | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 72.0 | 20.0 | C | (5.) | Others | TDS | mg/l | | 205.0 | 184.0 | C | |
14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 6 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 51.4 | 42.4 | 55 | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 38.7 | 34.8 | 45 | |
14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 6 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
---|
(1.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 68.5 | 37.4 | (2.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 1512.5 | 52.2 | (3.) | Electric Conductivity | Others | µmhos/cm | 495.0 | 133.0 | (4.) | pH | | | 8.89 | 7.81 | (5.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 684.0 | 575.5 | |
|
14.6. | Details of Ground Water Table: | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 17.38 To 199.15 | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 20 To 40 | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
---|
(1.) | Surface | | 252000 | 00 | Copy of Permission Letter | modeOthers | Water Tanker | Others | Water Tanker | 00 | 15 Feb 2020 | 00 | |
|
15.1. | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
---|
(1.) | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | Others | Mobile Toilets | 00 | 00 | |
|
16.1. | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | |
|
17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
---|
S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
---|
(1.) | Construction Waste | Construction & Demolition Waste | | 0.15 | Tons | 00 | Road | | Others | As per Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 | |
|
|
18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 219.4 | 0.13 | 3.83 | 224.0 | 100 | (2.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 84.5 | 0.13 | 2.3 | 87.0 | 60 | (3.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 00 | 00 | 00 | 0.1 | 00 | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 14.2 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 15.0 | 80 | (5.) | Others(Specify) | Carbon Monoxide (CO) | Microgram per Meter Cube | 0 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 4.0 | |
|
18.2. Stack Details |
---|
S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
---|
(1.) | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | NOx | | 00 | (2.) | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | SO2 | | 00 | (3.) | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | PM10 | | 00 | |
|
19. | Power Requirement: | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 00 | (b)Source | Solar Power and Grid Supply | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 00 | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 6 | |
|
20. | Land Ownership Pattern: | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 153.99 | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 685.39 | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 00 | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 00 | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 4.16 | Total Land (ha.) | 843.54 | |
|
21. | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 685.39 | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 00 | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 00 | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 00 | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 00 | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 00 | (g)Forest (ha.) | 153.99 | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 00 | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 00 | (j)Others (ha.) : Protected Area | 4.16 | Total (ha.) | 843.54 | |
|
22. Land requirement for various activities |
---|
S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Others | Road (National Highway - 754K) | 843.54 | Proposed | |
|
|
23. | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Critically Polluted Area | 00 | 00 | Nil | (2.) | ESAs | Flamingo Nest | 4.80 | Seasonal | (3.) | Corridors | 00 | 00 | 00 | (4.) | ESZs | Wild Ass Santuary | 1.87 | Applied (Wildlife Clearance Under Process) | (5.) | WLS | Wild Ass Sanctuary | 1.87 | Applied (Wildlife Clearance Under Process) | (6.) | Wildlife Corridors | 00 | 00 | 00 | (7.) | NPA | 00 | 00 | 00 | |
23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Archaeological Sites | | 00 | 00 | 00 | (2.) | Forest | | Protected and Reserve Forest | 00 | Applied (Forest Clearance Under Process) | (3.) | Defence Installations | | 00 | 00 | 00 | |
|
|
24. | Forest Land: | Whether any Forest Land involved? | Yes | (a)Forests Clearance Status | Under Process(Stage-II) | (b)Legal Status of Forest Land | Protected and Reserve Forest | |
|
|
26. | Land Acquisition Status: | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 843.54 | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 00 | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | Nil | |
|
27. | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | (a)No. of Villages | 41 | (b)No. of Households | 280 | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 1528 | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 7624 | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 232.67 | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
28. | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | Yes | (i)Details of Schedule-I Species | Wild Ass, Peafowl and Black Kite (Cheel) | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | Yes | (i)Uploaded copy of conservation plan | Copy of conservation plan | (ii)Fund Provision made | 2640000 | (iii)Period of Implementation | 00 | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
29. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | Yes | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Core Area | Narmada Main and Kutch Canal | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
30. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 00 | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | East | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 00 | |
|
31. | Manpower Requirement: | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 450 | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 50 | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 40 | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 10 | (e)No. of working days | 365 | (f)Total Manpower | 550 | |
|
32. | Green Belt in Ha: | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 00 | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 0.00 | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 62500 | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 0.00 | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
33. Project Benefits |
---|
S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
---|
(1.) | Environmental | Increase in green belt area | (2.) | Social | Direct employment to eligible persons preferable local persons besides creating indirect employment opportunities. Various CSR, CER activities in adjoining villages will help in improving social status | |
|
34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
35. Sector Specific Details For INFRA-2 |
|
1. | Details of Building Construction: | (a)Maximum Height of the Building (Meters) | 00 | (b)Total No. of Flats to be Build | 00 | (c)No. of Buildings | 00 | (d)Total plot area (sqm) | 00 | (e)Total built up area (sqm) | 00 | |
|
2. | Foreshore Facilities and/or Marine Disposal: | (a)Whether Project Involves Foreshore Activities and/or marine Disposal? | No | |
|
3. | Rain Water Harvesting: | (a)No. of Storage | 00 | (b)Capacity | 00 | (c)No. of Recharge Pits | 250 | (d)Capacity | 00 | |
|
4. | Parking: | (a)Details of 4 Wheeler/ 2 Wheeler Parking | 00 | |
|
5. | Energy Saving Measures: | (a)Source/Mode | Solar Panels, LED etc. | (b)Percentage | 00 | (c)Quantity | 00 | |
|
|
7. Type of Industries to be established with Industrial Estate as per their category A/B |
---|
S. No. | Type of Industry | No. of Units | Category A/B |
---|
NIL | |
8. | Length of the alignment | 00 | |
|
9. | Details Bridges/ROB/Interchanges,Flyovers,Vehicle Underpass and Pedestrian Underpass | (a)Total No. of Bridges | 28 | (b)Total No. of ROB | 00 | (c)Total No. of Interchanges | 04 | (d)Total No. of Flyovers | 00 | (e)Total No. of Vehicle Underpass | 70 | (f)Total No. of Pedestrian Underpass | 00 | (g)Details of other utilities rail and road corridors | 00 | |
|
|
36. | Details of Court Cases: | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
37. | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
38. | Details of EIA Consultant: | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1821/RA0141 | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Amaltas Enviro Industrial Consultant LLP | (iii)Address | 2925-Basement, Sector-46, Gurugram, Haryana | (iv)Mobile No. | 9899531153 | (v)Landline No. | 0124418153 | (vi)Email Id | amaltascon@gmail.com | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | INFRA-2 | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 31 Dec 2021 | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
Essential Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
---|
1. | NA | Please re-submit the application after incorporating compliance in respect of EDS points raised for similar proposal submitted earlier. Most of the points are not yet complied. | 09 Mar 2020 | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 12 Mar 2020 | |
Additional Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
---|
1. | ADS Reply Letter | We are herewith submitting the documents as per the requirement. Kindly consider it and grant the EC at the earliest.
Thanking You. | 06 Jul 2020 | 2. | NA | Please submit the required information and documents as per the minutes of 235th EAC meeting held on 26.05.2020 | 06 Jul 2020 | 3. | ADS Reply Letter | With reference of 234th EAC Meeting held on dated 27.04.2020, we are herewith submitting the reply of ADS raised on 12.05.2020.
It is requested to kindly consider the reply for grant of Environmental Clearance. | 14 May 2020 | 4. | NA | As per ADS raised during 234th EAC meeting held on 27.04.2020, the proponent is required to reply for points no. (v) to (xix) only. It is also observed that two replies have been submitted on 09.05.2020. For examination purpose, the upper one has been considered. The point wise observations are as under:
1. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VI: it is mentioned that detailed study on ‘Salt pan, water bird and water draining pattern and changes that can occur especially during rains and floods’ has been carried out as per scope mentioned in ToR conditions and referred the annexures II and III. However, one perusal it is observed annexure II (page 239 of ADS reply document) is a map only that shows the distance of salt pan from the proposed alignment. Likewise, annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
2. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VII: Same as above. Annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
3. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VIII: Map showing ESZ has been provided (pages 273-275). This does not show the distribution and movement of Wild Ass along the proposed alignment and cross over sites on the basis of Wild Ass census data collected by the State Forest Department of Gujarat.
4. RESPONSE AT S. NO. XIX: Not complied ADS. Only provided the list of species to be planted along with the number of trees and allocated budget (pages 384-385). Comprehensive plan is not provided.
Please provide the above mentioned information/documents at the earliest for further consideration of the proposal. | 12 May 2020 | 5. | NA | As per ADS raised during 234th EAC meeting held on 27.04.2020, the proponent is required to reply for points no. (v) to (xix) only. It is also observed that two replies have been submitted on 09.05.2020. For examination purpose, the upper one has been considered. The point wise observations are as under:
1. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VI: it is mentioned that detailed study on ‘Salt pan, water bird and water draining pattern and changes that can occur especially during rains and floods’ has been carried out as per scope mentioned in ToR conditions and referred the annexures II and III. However, one perusal it is observed annexure II (page 239 of ADS reply document) is a map only that shows the distance of salt pan from the proposed alignment. Likewise, annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
2. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VII: Same as above. Annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
3. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VIII: Map showing ESZ has been provided (pages 273-275). This does not show the distribution and movement of Wild Ass along the proposed alignment and cross over sites on the basis of Wild Ass census data collected by the State Forest Department of Gujarat.
4. RESPONSE AT S. NO. XIX: Not complied ADS. Only provided the list of species to be planted along with the number of trees and allocated budget (pages 384-385). Comprehensive plan is not provided.
Please provide the above mentioned information/documents at the earliest for further consideration of the proposal. | 12 May 2020 | 6. | NA | As per ADS raised during 234th EAC meeting held on 27.04.2020, the proponent is required to reply for points no. (v) to (xix) only. It is also observed that two replies have been submitted on 09.05.2020. For examination purpose, the upper one has been considered. The point wise observations are as under:
1. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VI: it is mentioned that detailed study on ‘Salt pan, water bird and water draining pattern and changes that can occur especially during rains and floods’ has been carried out as per scope mentioned in ToR conditions and referred the annexures II and III. However, one perusal it is observed annexure II (page 239 of ADS reply document) is a map only that shows the distance of salt pan from the proposed alignment. Likewise, annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
2. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VII: Same as above. Annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
3. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VIII: Map showing ESZ has been provided (pages 273-275). This does not show the distribution and movement of Wild Ass along the proposed alignment and cross over sites on the basis of Wild Ass census data collected by the State Forest Department of Gujarat.
4. RESPONSE AT S. NO. XIX: Not complied ADS. Only provided the list of species to be planted along with the number of trees and allocated budget (pages 384-385). Comprehensive plan is not provided.
Please provide the above mentioned information/documents at the earliest for further consideration of the proposal. | 12 May 2020 | 7. | NA | As per ADS raised during 234th EAC meeting held on 27.04.2020, the proponent is required to reply for points no. (v) to (xix) only. It is also observed that two replies have been submitted on 09.05.2020. For examination purpose, the upper one has been considered. The point wise observations are as under:
1. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VI: it is mentioned that detailed study on ‘Salt pan, water bird and water draining pattern and changes that can occur especially during rains and floods’ has been carried out as per scope mentioned in ToR conditions and referred the annexures II and III. However, one perusal it is observed annexure II (page 239 of ADS reply document) is a map only that shows the distance of salt pan from the proposed alignment. Likewise, annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
2. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VII: Same as above. Annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
3. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VIII: Map showing ESZ has been provided (pages 273-275). This does not show the distribution and movement of Wild Ass along the proposed alignment and cross over sites on the basis of Wild Ass census data collected by the State Forest Department of Gujarat.
4. RESPONSE AT S. NO. XIX: Not complied ADS. Only provided the list of species to be planted along with the number of trees and allocated budget (pages 384-385). Comprehensive plan is not provided.
Please provide the above mentioned information/documents at the earliest for further consideration of the proposal. | 12 May 2020 | 8. | NA | As per ADS raised during 234th EAC meeting held on 27.04.2020, the proponent is required to reply for points no. (v) to (xix) only. It is also observed that two replies have been submitted on 09.05.2020. For examination purpose, the upper one has been considered. The point wise observations are as under:
1. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VI: it is mentioned that detailed study on ‘Salt pan, water bird and water draining pattern and changes that can occur especially during rains and floods’ has been carried out as per scope mentioned in ToR conditions and referred the annexures II and III. However, one perusal it is observed annexure II (page 239 of ADS reply document) is a map only that shows the distance of salt pan from the proposed alignment. Likewise, annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
2. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VII: Same as above. Annexure III (pages 240-272) shows only certain hydraulic calculations for one major bridge and five minor bridges along with few maps (date and scale not mentioned) showing boundaries of catchment areas. The detailed of methodology for data collection, analysis and subsequent findings are not discussed and compiled in report form.
3. RESPONSE AT S. NO. VIII: Map showing ESZ has been provided (pages 273-275). This does not show the distribution and movement of Wild Ass along the proposed alignment and cross over sites on the basis of Wild Ass census data collected by the State Forest Department of Gujarat.
4. RESPONSE AT S. NO. XIX: Not complied ADS. Only provided the list of species to be planted along with the number of trees and allocated budget (pages 384-385). Comprehensive plan is not provided.
Please provide the above mentioned information/documents at the earliest for further consideration of the proposal. | 12 May 2020 | 9. | ADS Reply Letter | Submitting the Compliance of observations raised in 234th EAC Meeting held on 27th April, 2020 for obtaining Environmental Clearance | 09 May 2020 | 10. | ADS Reply Letter | Submitting the Compliance of observations raised in 234th EAC Meeting held on 27th April, 2020 for obtaining Environmental Clearance | 09 May 2020 | 11. | NA |
|
|