|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | M/s Tirupati Sugars Limited | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | TIRUPATI SUGARS LIMITED | | (c)Registered Address | 18 KRISHNAKAMAL BHATTACHARYA LANE, GROUND FLOOR, HOWRAH 711101,,Howrah,West Bengal-711101 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Deepak Yadav | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Director | | (c)Address | Naraipur, Bagaha, West champaran,,Bagaha,West Champaran,Bihar-845105 | | (d)Pin code | 845105 | | (e)E-mail | lo.patna@yadu.in | | (f)STD Code. | 6251(f)Telephone No. | 227942 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(g) Distilleries
5(j) Sugar Industry
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/BR/IND2/141466/2012 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/141451/2020 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | 267-269,292-315,318-321,328-330,335-343,500-502,51 | | (b)Pincode | 845105 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 27.132119 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 84.079061 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 27.125308 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 84.076708 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 72 A/4 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 92 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 51 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 5 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Bihar | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Gujarat | Bharuch | Anklesvar | GIDC-Panoli |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | 59 | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR | 20 Oct 2014 | | (f)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | | (b)Date of Apply of EC | 31 Aug 2020 | | (c)Date of Issue of EC | 12 Mar 2021 | | (d)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 29 Jun 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0.5 |
| +2 Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Naraipur, Bagaha-2, Dist: West Chaparan | | State : | Bihar | | District : | West Champaran | | Tehsil : | Bagaha | | Village : | Naraipur |
| 84 | Employment Generation, Power Generation, Pollution control , Rain Water Harvesting, Social and Economical Development | District Magistrate | |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Ranchi | | (iii)Letter No. | 113-67/ROR/2019/3500 | | (iv)Status of Compliance | Partially Complied | | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | | (vi)Date of site visit | Aug 22 2019 12:00AM | | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Power | 18 | 70 | 88 | Mega Watt(MW) | | Arial Ropeway | | | (2.) | Ethanol | 0 | 200 | 200 | Kilo Litre per Day(KLD) | | Road | | | (3.) | Sugar | 675.67 | 772.20 | 1447.87 | Others | TPD | Road | |
|
| | | (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
| S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Sugar Mill | 7000 TCD | 8000 TCD | 15000 TCD | Expansion | | (2.) | Captive Power Generation | 18 MW | 70 MW | 88 MW | Expansion | | (3.) | Distillery | 0 | 200 KLD | 200 KLD | New |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | 11 Dec 2018 | | (iv)Valid Upto | 31 Dec 2023 | | (v)File No. | Vide Memo No. 4385, 4386 | | (vi)Application No. | 1877332 | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 307.5 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 35 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 4.61 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 5 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 8000 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 7000 | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 15000 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | UREA ACID , NUTRIENTS | 109500 | Others | Kg per Annum | Nearby Market | Road | | 10 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Sugar cane | 1260000 | Tons per Annum | | Open Market | Road | | 5 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | Molasses as raw material for distillery | 54939.7 | Tons per Annum | | Own Sugar Mill and Other Sugar Mill nearby | Road | | 5 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Bagasse | 360740.7 | Tons per Annum | | Own Sugar Mill | Road,Conveyor Belt | | 0.5 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Nov 2018 To 31 Jan 2019 | | (b)Season | Winter | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 40.1 | 10.1 | 39.5 | 80 | | (2.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 79.3 | 31.6 | 78.2 | 100 | | (3.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 47.3 | 18.9 | 46.7 | 60 | | (4.) | Others | CO | Mili Gram per Meter Cube | 0.84 | 0.08 | 0.78 | 4 | | (5.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 19.5 | 5.9 | 19.5 | 80 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | | (2.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 296.0 | 225.0 | 200 | 600 | | (3.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 55.0 | 18.0 | 250.0 | 1000.0 | | (4.) | Others | Arsenic | | mg/l | | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | | (5.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.50 | 6.78 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (6.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 423.0 | 362.0 | 500 | 2000 | | (7.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.55 | 0.25 | 1.00 | 1.5 | | (8.) | Heavy Metals | | Iron | mg/l | | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 1.0 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 2 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | DO | | mg/l | | 6.8 | 6.3 | B | | (2.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 1.6 | 1.0 | B | | (3.) | pH | | NA | | 7.48 | 7.15 | B | | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 12.0 | 8.0 | B |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 65.7 | 45.8 | 55 | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 41.9 | 32.9 | 45 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 5 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 455.0 | 315.0 | | (2.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 188.0 | 114.0 | | (3.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 16.2 | 12.6 | | (4.) | Electric Conductivity | Others | micro mhos/cm | 328.6 | 278.0 | | (5.) | pH | | | 7.16 | 6.68 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 3 To 5 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 1 To 3 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | GroundWater | | 1800 | 0.1 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Tube Well | | 21-4/253/BR/IND/2017 | 25 May 2017 | 740 | | (2.) | GroundWater | | 1500 | 0.1 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Tube Well | | 21-4/253/BR/IND/2017 | 25 May 2017 | 740 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Waste water | 1200 | 1400 | ETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 1200 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 1200 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 1200 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Bagasse | Industrial Waste | | 772920 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Used as Fuel in Sugar Mill boiler | | (2.) | Boiler Ash | Industrial Waste | | 34740 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Sold to brick manufacturers | | (3.) | Molasses | Industrial Waste | | 117720 | Tons | 0 | Others | pipeline | Others | Raw materials for own distillery project | | (4.) | Press Mud | Industrial Waste | | 78840 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Will be Sold to Farmers |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 47.3 | 1 | 1.5 | 49 | 60 | | (2.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 19.5 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 80 | | (3.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 79 | 1 | 3 | 85 | 100 | | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 40.1 | 1 | 0 | 41 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | Sugar Mill (Existing) | Bagasse | 70 | 3.2 | Others | PM | 12.63 gm/sec | | (2.) | Distillery project (New) | Spent Wash | 40 | 1.5 | Others | PM | 2.77 gm/sec | | (3.) | SUgar Mill (Existing) | Bagasse | 40 | 1.6 | Others | PM | 3.15 gm/sec | | (4.) | Cogeneration Project (New) | Bagasse | 76 | 3.2 | Others | PM | 11.89 gm/sec. |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 8800 | | (b)Source | Own Cogeneration Plant | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 0 | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 76 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 50.58 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 50.58 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 16425 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 1030 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 7024 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 2301 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 1274 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 50.58 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 942 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Agriculture Crop Land | 1543 | | Total (ha.) | 30589.5800 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Main Plant | | 9.5 | Sugar Mill, Cogeneration & Distillery | | (2.) | Green belt | | 35 | | | (3.) | Others | Road, Paved and Open Area | 6.08 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | ESZs | Valmiki Tiger Reserve | 0.71 | NOC from APCCF-cum-Chief Wildlife Warden Bihar | | (2.) | NPA | NA | 0 | NA | | (3.) | ESAs | NA | 0 | NA | | (4.) | Corridors | NA | 0 | NA | | (5.) | Wildlife Corridors | NA | 0 | NA | | (6.) | Critically Polluted Area | NA | 0 | NA | | (7.) | WLS | Valmiki Tiger Reserve | 4.46 | NOC from APCCF-cum-Chief Wildlife Warden Bihar |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Archaeological Sites | | NA | 0 | NA | | (2.) | Defence Installations | | NA | 0 | NA | | (3.) | Forest | | NA | 0 | NA | | (4.) | Others | Budi Gandhak River | Budi Gandhak River | 1.75 | West |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 50.58 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | NA | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | NA | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Schedule-I Species | Tiger, Indian Wolf, Sloth Bear, One Horned Rhino, Leopard, Black Buck, Indian Gazelle | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | Yes | | (i)Uploaded copy of conservation plan | Copy of conservation plan | | (ii)Fund Provision made | 5 lakhs per annum | | (iii)Period of Implementation | Ongoing activity | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | River Budhi Gandak | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | West | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 1.75 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 0 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 35 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 25 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 0 | | (e)No. of working days | 340 | | (f)Total Manpower | 60 | |
|
|
| S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
|---|
| (1.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 32.4 | 2.6 | 35 | | (2.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 64 | 5 | 69 | | (3.) | No. of Plants | 4000 | 3900 | 7900 | | (4.) | Funds Allocated | 25 | 40 | 65 |
|
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Financial | Govt. Revenue | | (2.) | Social | Employment Generation, Power Generation, Pollution control , Rain Water Harvesting, Social and Economical Development |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | QCI/NABET/EIA/ACO/19/0897 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | PARAMARSH | | (iii)Address | B1/67, SECTOR-G, JANKIPURAM LUCKNOW, UTTAR PRADESH | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9044905077 | | (v)Landline No. | 0522411425 | | (vi)Email Id | paramarsh.env@gmail.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 01 May 2021 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | (i) This is an expansion proposal accordingly. The RO MoEFCC in its Report mentioned certain non-compliances. However PP has not uploaded the completion of non-compliances. PP shall submit the report and revised the Form 2 (S.No 9 of Form 2 has to revised and uploaded),
(ii) PP submitted the baseline data for the months ie. From November To January, However it should be either October-December or Dec-Feb or March-May).
(iii) Details (S.No. 18.1 at Form 2) w.r.t. Air Quality Impact Prediction needs to checked. How incremental GLC for most of the parameters are same as 2.75. Please check again.
(iv) As per information submitted by PP, they have submitted application to CGWA in 2017, however the approval of water has not granted yet. PP mentioned that they have their own borewell. Please clarify how PP is operating an Unit with out approval of water.
(v) As per s.no. 28 of form 2, Schedule I species reported NIL. Please check again for the presence of Schedule I Species. If yes species specific conservation plan needs to be prepared and submitted to CWLW for their approval.
(vi) Details of Raw material and its linkage and its mitigation measure during transportation needs to be submitted (13.1 of form 2)
(vii) As per Form 2 (S.No. 20) Land Ownership Pattern reported is 50.58 ha, however Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area is reported 50.58ha, how it is possible. Kindly check the data and revise the form 2 accordingly.
(viii) PP in form 2 (S.No. 27) has not adequately mentioned the details of R&R. Everything mentioned zero.
(ix) All old CTOs not uploaded to verify the violation, if any done by PP (S No. 9.1 of Form 2).
(x) Details of earlier production capacity needs to be authenticated and uploaded to check the violation, if any.
(xi) It is mentioned that the processing of EC proposal, in the Ministry, is through Parivesh Portal only, therefore providing the requisite information/documents shall be in compliance as per Form 2 and accordingly the PP/Consultant are kindly requested to revise the application in the Form 2 alongwith EIA/EMP Report and resubmit the same. The EIA/EMP Report shall match with the information as filled in Form 2 for further appraisal necessary action. It is also mentioned that after acceptance the Proposal, EIA/EMP report/Form 2 can not be revise. Therefore, PP/Consultant is requested to kindly do needful. | 17 Jul 2020 | | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 31 Aug 2020 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | Pointwise submission for ADS is attached herewith. | 21 Jan 2021 | | 2. | NA | The EAC has deliberated on the proposal. The Committee noted that the project proponent has not able to provide the status of project site for industrial purpose. The Committee has noted that the project site is located adjacent to the Valmiki Tiger Reserve and the project proponent needs to submit application for obtaining recommendations of Standing Committee of NBWL. The EAC, after detailed deliberations has desired for additional information/inputs in respect of the following:
(i). EAC noted that PP has not submitted adequately TOR compliance and PP needs to be resubmit the TOR compliance adequately.
(ii). Details of land conversion for industrial purpose.
(iii). Status of NBWL recommendations for the existing and proposed project.
(iv). Details of the ESZ of the Valmiki Tiger Reserve and distance of the site from Tiger reserve and ESZ.
(v). Details of Wildlife conservation action plan submitted to State Wildlife Department/CWLW.
(vi). Public hearing issues, action plan and activities proposed in the study area needs to be submitted.
(vii). Details of ground water permission.
(viii). Action Taken Report on non-complied points to be forwarded by the Regional Office.
(ix). Details of incremental value for PM10 & PM2.5 & SOx needs to be verified and resubmitted. Air Quality Impact Prediction mentioned is inadequate kindly check and correct it accordingly.
The proposal was accordingly DEFERRED for the needful. | 29 Oct 2020 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Deepak Yadav | | Designation | Director | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | TIRUPATI SUGARS LIMITED | | Address | 18 KRISHNAKAMAL BHATTACHARYA LANE, GROUND FLOOR, HOWRAH 711101 |
|