|
1. | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | Details of Project: | (a)Name of the project(s) | Daund Sugar Pvt. Ltd | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | DAUND SUGARS LTD | (c)Registered Address | NIL | (d)Legal Status of the Company | NIL | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
2. | Address for the correspondence: | (a)Name of the Applicant | Shahaji Balasaheb Gaikwad | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Whole Time Director | (c)Address | NIL | (d)Pin code | 413801 | (e)E-mail | daundsugars@gmail.com | (f)STD Code. | 2117(f)Telephone No. | 305801 | (g)Fax No. | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
3. | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(g) Distilleries
| Minor Activity | | (b)Category | A | (c)Proposal Number | IA/MH/IND2/132134/2017 | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/131937/2019 | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 3 | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
4. | Location of the Project: | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Gut No.99 | (b)Pincode | 413801 | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | From | | Degree | 182532.11 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 182539.74 | Minutes | | Second | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | From | | Degree | 743742.91 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 743807.65 | Minutes | | Second | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 47 J/11 | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 523 | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 6.0 | (j)Seismic Zone | 3 | |
|
5. | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | (b)Main State of the project | Maharashtra | |
|
|
Details of State(s) of the project |
---|
S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
---|
(1.) | Gujarat | Jamnagar | Jamnagar | Sikka | |
|
6. | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | IA-J-11011/467/2017-IA-II(I) | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 11 Oct 2017 | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 16 Nov 2017 | (d)Date of Apply of EC | 02 Jul 2015 | (e)Date of Issue of EC | 22 Mar 2016 | (f)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | (g)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
7. | Details of Public Consultation: | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
---|
|
S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
---|
(1.) | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | Date : | 19 Jun 2020 | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0.5 |
| Within the Existing factory premises of M/s Daund Sugar Pvt. Ltd. | State : | Maharashtra | District : | Pune | Tehsil : | Daund | Village : | Alegaon |
| 50 | 1.Due to expansion of the project, there will increase in waste water. How it will be managed? 2.After expansion of the project, whether local people will get job opportunities? 3.What steps will b ta | District Magistrate | | |
8. | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | Details Not Applicable | |
|
9. | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Nagpur | (iii)Letter No. | EC No.J-11011/212/2014-IA II (I) dated 22 March 20 | (iv)Status of Compliance | Compiled | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | (vi)Date of site visit | Jan 10 2017 12:00AM | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
---|
(1.) | Expansion of existing sugar mill | 6000 | 1500 | 7500 | Tons Crushed per Day(TCD) | | Others | NA | (2.) | Existing molasses distillery | 90 | 30 | 120 | Kilo Litre per Day(KLD) | | Others | NA | |
| (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Plant | Exiting Distillery Units area | Expansion of Distillery Units area | 25.93 Acre | NA | (2.) | Plant | Existing sugar Mill area and Cogeneration plant | Expansion of Sugar Mill and Cogeneration plant | 53.0145 Acre | NA | |
9.1. | Details of Consent to Operate | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | (iii)Date of Issue | 02 Jan 2020 | (iv)Valid Upto | 31 Aug 2022 | (v)File No. | 1.0/CAC/UAN NO.0000075817/CR-2001000072 | (vi)Application No. | 000075817 | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
10. | Project Cost: | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 137.74 | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 7.09 | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 3.92 | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 1.36 | |
|
11. | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No | | |
12. | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No | | |
13. | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 30 | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 90 | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 120 | |
|
  13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
---|
S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
---|
(1.) | Bagasse | 1176 | Million Liters per Day | | NA | Conveyor Belt | | 0 | Others | FROM FARMERS | Copy of Linkage | (2.) | Coal | 150 | Million Liters per Day | | OPEN MARKET | Road | | 500 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (3.) | Sugar cane | 7500 | Million Liters per Day | | Agriculture | Road | | 100 | Others | Farmers | Copy of Linkage | (4.) | Furnace Oil | 750 | Others | kg/hr | NA | Road | | 200 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | |
|
14. | Baseline Data : | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Dec 2017 To 28 Feb 2018 | (b)Season | Winter | |
|
14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 37.2 | 12.5 | 18.9 | 80 | (2.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 73.6 | 55.2 | 73.4 | 100 | (3.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 20.5 | 11.3 | 16.5 | 80 | (4.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 32.6 | 16.5 | 24.6 | 60 | |
14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
---|
(1.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 1650 | 495 | 500 | 2000 | (2.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 533.61 | 78.96 | 250 | 1000 | (3.) | pH | | | NA | | 8.0 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 8.5 | (4.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (5.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | (6.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 640 | 135 | 200 | 600 | (7.) | Heavy Metals | | Pb | mg/l | | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.5 | |
14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 3 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
---|
(1.) | pH | | NA | | 7.8 | 7.4 | B | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 5.2 | 4.8 | B | (3.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 2 | 0 | B | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 8 | 4 | C | |
14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 73.5 | 68 | 75 | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 54 | 48 | 70 | |
14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
---|
(1.) | N(Nitrogen) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 0.15 | 0.11 | (2.) | Electric Conductivity | Others | Mho/cm | 195 | 146 | (3.) | K(Potassium) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 0.14 | 0.03 | (4.) | P(Phosphorus) | | | 0 | 0 | (5.) | pH | | | 8.2 | 6.87 | |
|
14.6. | Details of Ground Water Table: | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 20 To 40 | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 0.65 To 15.65 | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
---|
(1.) | Surface | | 603 | 2.5 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Others | Dam | Ja.Kra.Kha.Pa.Vi/Bigar Sinchan /2594/San 2015 | 13 Jul 2015 | 0.26 | |
|
15.1. | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
---|
(1.) | Total moderate effluent generation from sugar | 403 | 750 | Biological treatment consisting of extended aeration followed by settling tank or an- aerobic lagoons, aerobic lagoon based on the imperviousness of soil in thearea Biological treatment followed by disinfection by Chlorination/Ultrafiltration. | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 403 | | |
|
16.1. | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 403 | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 403 | |
|
17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
---|
S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
---|
(1.) | Press Mud | Others | Press Mud | 300 | Tons | 0 | Conveyor Belt | | Others | Sold to nearby farmers as fertilize | (2.) | Bagasse | Fly Ash | | 24.55 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Sold to brick manufacturers | (3.) | Other | Bottom Ash | | 6.14 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | used as manure | (4.) | Other | Others | sludge generated from ETP | 85 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | sent to land fill or used as manure | |
|
|
18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 27.7 | 6.3 | 7.2 | 35 | 80 | (2.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 72.9 | 6.3 | 0.4 | 74 | 100 | (3.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 0 | 6.3 | 0 | 1 | 60 | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 37.9 | 6.3 | 1.0 | 39 | 80 | |
|
18.2. Stack Details |
---|
S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
---|
(1.) | Boiler | Bagasse | 81 | 3.5 | PM10 | | NA | (2.) | Boiler | Bagasse | 81 | 3.5 | SO2 | | NA | (3.) | Boiler | Bagasse | 81 | 3.5 | NOx | | NA | |
|
19. | Power Requirement: | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 2000 | (b)Source | MSEDCL /Own cogeneration | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 2 x 1010 kVA --- 2nos. | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 81 | |
|
20. | Land Ownership Pattern: | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 57.38 | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | Total Land (ha.) | 57.38 | |
|
21. | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 0 | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 0 | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 0 | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 0 | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 21.45 | (g)Forest (ha.) | 0 | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | (j)Others (ha.) : Distillery open space reservoir roads | 35.93 | Total (ha.) | 57.3800 | |
|
22. Land requirement for various activities |
---|
S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Main Plant | | 57.38 | INDUSTRIAL AREA | |
|
|
23. | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | NPA | None | 0 | NA | (2.) | Critically Polluted Area | None | 0 | NA | (3.) | ESAs | None | 0 | NA | (4.) | ESZs | None | 0 | NA | (5.) | Wildlife Corridors | None | 0 | NA | (6.) | Corridors | None | 0 | NA | (7.) | WLS | None | 0 | NA | |
23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Others | NA | None | 0 | NA | (2.) | Archaeological Sites | | None | 0 | NA | (3.) | Forest | | None | 0 | NA | (4.) | Defence Installations | | None | 0 | NA | |
|
23.3. | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
24. | Forest Land: | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
25. | Tree Cutting: | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
26. | Land Acquisition Status: | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 57.38 | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | NA | |
|
27. | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | (b)No. of Households | 0 | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | (f)Status of R&R | Yet To Start | |
|
28. | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
29. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
30. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Bhima River | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | South West | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 3.5 | |
|
31. | Manpower Requirement: | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 0 | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 577 | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 0 | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 42 | (e)No. of working days | 330 | (f)Total Manpower | 619 | |
|
|
S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
---|
(1.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 105431 | 189355 | 294786 | (2.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 33 | 33 | 66 | (3.) | No. of Plants | 1500 | 1500 | 3000 | (4.) | Funds Allocated | 5500000 | 1000000 | 6500000 | |
|
33. Project Benefits |
---|
S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
---|
(1.) | Environmental | Flood control by rain water arresting and harvesting. Erosion control by nalla training, terracing and bonding.
Groundwater levels increase by recharging by rainwater harvesting.
Aesthetics improvement by general greenery with emphasis on biodiversity. | (2.) | Financial | There will be an increase in indirect employment and earnings of the small time shop owners like tea vendors, transporters.
The easy availability of infrastructure, manpower, raw materials will reduce the production cost as well as demand supply gap. The same will bring revenue to the state ex- chequer by way of duties and taxes.
This project will have long run benefits for Daund Taluka of Pune District. Sugar mill is an agro based project using Sugarcane as sole raw material. Sugarcane cultivat | (3.) | Social | Developed economy strengthens demographic set up that will bring weightage to secure better school-subsidy and health institute.
Daund Sugar Pvt. Ltd. will recruit manpower of around 42 persons for proposed Expansion of Sugar and Distillery Plant during operational phase; apart from that many local people will be getting indirect employment.
The Project proponent has planned to contribute in socio-economic development of the area and will organize health awareness campaigns; regular health check | |
|
34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 3 |
|
|
36. | Details of Court Cases: | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
37. | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
38. | Details of EIA Consultant: | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1619/SA066 | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Mantras Green Resources Ltd. | (iii)Address | Hall No.1, 1st Floor, NICE Sankul, Plot No.A9, Opp.Nashik Merchant Co-op Bank Ltd, ITI Signal, MIDC Satpur , Nasik-422007, | (iv)Mobile No. | 8999257583 | (v)Landline No. | 0253235566 | (vi)Email Id | info@mantrasresources.com | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 3 | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 29 Sep 2020 | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
Essential Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
---|
1. | NA | (i) This is expansion case however PP has not uploaded Certified compliance report from regional Office MoEFCC.
(ii) This is an expansion case kindly upload earlier EC details (S. no. 6 of form 2).
(iii) Details of Raw material linkage (S. no. 13.1 of form 2) and its mitigation measure during transportation needs to be submitted.
(iv) Public hearing proceedings to be forwarded by the Member Secretary, SPCB along with complete public hearing/consultation documents. Also issues raised during public hearing, response by the project proponent, action plan with budgetary allocation has not been submitted. Kindly upload the requisite documents. Form 2 (S.no. 7.1)
(v) The details with regard to Land Ownership Pattern: (S./ no. 20 and 21 of form 2 ) and details of Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: are same however both are different kindly update the same.
(vi) All old CTOs not uploaded to verify the violation, if any done by PP.
(vii) In view of the above, PP/Consultant are requested to revise the application for grant of EC and accordingly revise the Form 2 alongwith EIA/EMP Report. The EIA/EMP Report shall match with the information as filled in Form 2. On examination it is observed that the Consultant has not adequately submitted the application as per the provisions of the EIA Notification, 2006. Consultant has to read the documents before uploading the information in Form 2 /EIA/EMP report. | 05 Feb 2020 | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 10 Jun 2020 | 3. | NA | 1. Please read the earlier EDS sought by the Ministry earlier. The matter was again examined and noted that PP has not revised the Form 2 and not uploaded the requisite information on Parivesh Portal. (For eg. PH proceeding forwarded by SPCB to MoEFCC not corrected in Form 2 at S. No. 7.1 & Certified compliance report has not uploaded and not legible also (starting pages).
2. It is pertain to mentioned that the processing of EC proposal, in the Ministry, is through Parivesh Portal only, therefore providing the requisite information/documents shall be in compliance as per Form 2 and accordingly the PP/Consultant are kindly requested to revise the application in the Form 2 alongwith EIA/EMP Report and resubmit the same. The EIA/EMP Report shall match with the information as filled in Form 2 for further appraisal necessary action.
3. It is also mentioned that after acceptance the Form 2 and EIA/EMP report can not be revise. Therefore, PP/Consultant is again requested to kindly do needful. | 26 Jun 2020 | 4. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 06 Jul 2020 | |
Additional Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
---|
1. | ADS Reply Letter | Subject:Point wise reply raised in 24th EAC meeting of Industry 20-22nd October 2020
Reference: 24th EAC meeting held on 21st October 2020 item no.24.18
1. Plan for achieving complete Zero Liquid Discharge System. The unit
shall achieve ZLD through ETP/MEE/RO technologies.
2. Plan for installation of incineration boiler for treating spent wash.
3. Compliance status of the existing EC and ATR on non-complied points forwarded through Regional Office of the Ministry.
4. Revised water balance with reduction in freshwater consumption (3KL/KL of production). | 13 Nov 2020 | 2. | NA | The EAC has deliberated on the proposal. The Committee took serious note on the details submitted by the project proponent. The Committee noted that the PP has not reworked on the water balance and ZLD plan. It was suggested that action needs to be taken against the consultant for misleading the PP and for submission of incomplete information. The Committee after detailed deliberations, reiterated its earlier decision and desired for the documents/information as under:
(i). Plan for achieving complete Zero Liquid Discharge System. The unit shall achieve ZLD through ETP/MEE/RO technologies.
(ii). Plan for installation of incineration boiler for treating spent wash.
(iii). Compliance status of the existing EC and ATR on non-complied points forwarded through Regional Office of the Ministry.
(iv). Revised water balance with reduction in freshwater consumption (3KL/KL of production)
(v). Public hearing issues, action plan with proposed activities to address the issues needs to be submitted.
The proposal was accordingly DEFERRED for the needful. | 29 Oct 2020 | 3. | ADS Reply Letter | Submission of Compliance Statement for the minutes of meeting of 22nd EAC Meeting held on dated 19.08.2020 for “Proposed Expansion of Sugar 6000 TCD to 7500 TCD and Molasses based Distillery 90 KLPD to 120 KLPD at Gut No. 99, Alegaon Village, Daund Tehsil, Pune District, Maharashtra by Daund Sugar Pvt. Ltd.” | 11 Sep 2020 | 4. | NA |
The EAC during deliberations noted that the project proponent is not achieving ZLD in letter and spirit and has proposed for bio-composting and to send treated waste water outside. It is suggested that the treated industrial effluent shall not be send outside the premises/not to be used for greenbelt inside the premises. PP can use treated domestic water for greenbelt development. The Committee has also observed that the issues raised in the public hearing required detailed deliberations along with action plan.
The Committee, after detailed deliberations desired for following additional information/inputs in respect of the following:
(i) Plan for achieving complete Zero Liquid Discharge System.
(ii) This is expansion case and as per Ministry’s OM May 2012, Latest certified compliance report from the Regional Office of the Ministry, and details of compliance status thereof needs to be submitted.
(iii) Revised water balance with reduction in freshwater consumption.
(iv) Details of power utilization from solar sources.
(v) Ash management plan.
(vi) Public hearing issues, action plan with CER allocation as per Ministry’s OM dated 01.05.2018 needs to be submitted.
(vii) PP uploaded the water approval in Regional language. The Committee also noted that PP/Consultant needs to be uploaded the legible document and in case of document issued in regional language then English translation copy needs to be uploaded.
(viii) The EAC during deliberations noted that the consultant has not prepared adequate report. The Committee also suggested that the Consultant shall do proper study and then submit the report so that proposal is not delayed.
The proposal was accordingly DEFERRED for the needful.
| 01 Sep 2020 | |
| Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| Name of Applicant | Shahaji Balasaheb Gaikwad | Designation | Whole Time Director | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | DAUND SUGARS LTD | Address | |
|