|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Expansion of Integrated Steel Plant from 6 to 8 MTPA Crude Steel and 9 MTPA Finished Steel | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | TATASTEEL KALINGANAGAR | | (c)Registered Address | NIL | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | NIL | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Rajiv Kumar | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Vice President- Operations,TSk | | (c)Address | NIL | | (d)Pin code | 755026 | | (e)E-mail | bhanu.yadav@tatasteel.com | | (f)STD Code. | 6726(f)Telephone No. | 660704 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non ferrous)
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/OR/IND/128148/2016 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/128142/2019 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Please see Annexure 1 of Additional Attachments Fi | | (b)Pincode | 755026 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 20.56 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 21.58 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 85.59 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 86.02 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | F45U1, F45T13, F45O4, F45N16 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 120 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 7 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 2 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Orissa | |
|
|
| Details of State of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| NIL |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | J-11011/07/2006-IA.II(I) | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR | 14 Mar 2017 | | (f)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | | (b)Date of Apply of EC | 13 Jun 2020 | | (c)Date of Issue of EC | 24 Dec 2020 | | (d)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 25 Oct 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 4.5 |
| JDCL Complex | | State : | Orissa | | District : | Jajpur | | Tehsil : | Sukinda | | Village : | Pankapal |
| 326 | Local Employment, Health, Drinking Water, Periphery development, Training, Plantation, Environment protection | Others | Additional District Magistrate |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Bhubaneswar | | (iii)Letter No. | 101-208/06/EPE & 101-208/EPE/304 | | (iv)Status of Compliance | Compiled | | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | | (vi)Date of site visit | Nov 7 2019 12:00AM | | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | HR Coil (including 2.2 MTPA CR Coil) | 5500000 | 1500000 | 7000000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road,Rail | | | (2.) | Long Product | 0 | 2000000 | 2000000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road,Rail | | | (3.) | Coke | 1400000 | 2350000 | 3750000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | | | (4.) | CR Coil | 0 | 2200000 | 2200000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road,Rail | | | (5.) | Captive Power | 166 | 199 | 365 | Mega Watt(MW) | | Others | NA | | (6.) | Sinter | 5750000 | 1480000 | 7230000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | | | (7.) | Pellet | 0 | 8100000 | 8100000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | | | (8.) | Lime/Dolo | 400000 | 400000 | 800000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | | | (9.) | Crude Steel | 3000000 | 5000000 | 8000000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Others | Internal transport by rail | | (10.) | Hot Metal | 3280000 | 5470000 | 8750000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Others | Internal transport by rail |
|
| | | (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
| S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Sinter Plant | 1 x 496 sq m | - | 1 x 496 sq m | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (2.) | Lime Calcining Plant | 2 x 600 TPD | 2 x 600 TPD | 4 x 600 TPD | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (3.) | LF | - | 2 x 310 t | 2 x 310 t | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (4.) | LP Mill | - | 2.0 MTPA | 2.0 MTPA | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (5.) | Captive Power Plant | 2 x 67.5 MW | 2 x 67.5 MW | 4 x 67.5 MW | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (6.) | By product recovery type coke ovens | 2 x 88 Ovens, 5 m tall | 3 x 62 Ovens, 6.25 m tall | 2 x 88 ovens, 3 x 62 ovens | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (7.) | Pellet Plant | - | 1 x 744 sq m | 1 x 744 sq m | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (8.) | CAS-OB | 1 x 310 t | - | 1 x 310 t | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (9.) | Blast Furnace | 1 x 4300 cum | 1 x 5870 cum | 1 x 4330 cum, 1 x 5870 cum | Please se Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (10.) | RH | - | 1 x 310 t twin RH | 1 x 310 t twin RH | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (11.) | Hot Strip Mill | 5.5 MTPA | Upgradation by 1.5 MTPA | 7.0 MTPA | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (12.) | BOF/LD | 2 x 300 t | 1 x 310t | 3 x 310 t | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments | | (13.) | Cold Rolling Mill | 2.2 MTPA | - | 2.2 MTPA | Please see Annexure 3 of additional attachments |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | 27 Mar 2020 | | (iv)Valid Upto | 31 Mar 2021 | | (v)File No. | 3938/IND-I-CON-6447 | | (vi)Application No. | ID No. 2766418 | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 21000 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 2620 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 42.75 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 50 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 14614814 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 9480000 | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 24094814 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Lump Ore/External Pellet | 1471400 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic (Captive mines/local sources) | Road,Rail | | 400 | Others | Captive mines/open market | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Non coking coal for PCI | 1600000 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic (Captive mines/local sources) | Road,Rail | | 600 | Others | Captive mines/open market | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | Ferro Alloy | 57670 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Iron Ore fines | 12132070 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic (Captive mines/local sources) | Road,Rail | | 400 | Others | Captive mines and open market | Copy of Linkage | | (5.) | Scrap | 500000 | Tons per Annum | | Domestic | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (6.) | Anthracite coal | 95438 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic (local sources) | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (7.) | Limestone | 2152973 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (8.) | Bentonite | 56000 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (9.) | Pyroxenite/Olivine/Quartzite | 667697 | Tons per Annum | | Import Domestic | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (10.) | DRI | 432000 | Tons per Annum | | Domestic | Road,Rail | | 300 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (11.) | Coking coal | 4929566 | Tons per Annum | | Import/Domestic (Captive mines/local sources) | Road,Rail | | 600 | Others | Captive mines/Open market | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 22 Dec 2016 To 27 Mar 2017 | | (b)Season | Winter | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 67.2 | 36.1 | 60.5 | 60 | | (2.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 25.4 | 5.2 | 23.7 | 80 | | (3.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 40 | 22.1 | 39.3 | 80 | | (4.) | Others | O3 | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 36.5 | 10 | 36.5 | 100 | | (5.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 105.5 | 66.6 | 102.8 | 100 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.08 | 6.16 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (2.) | TSS | | | Others | NTU | 10.26 | 1.26 | 1 | 5 | | (3.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1 | 1.5 | | (4.) | Heavy Metals | | Chromium | mg/l | | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 | | (5.) | Others | As | | mg/l | | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | | (6.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 370.67 | 110 | 200 | 600 | | (7.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 1113.33 | 215.50 | 500 | 2000 | | (8.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 139.31 | 18.64 | 250 | 1000 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | NA | | 7.2 | 7.1 | B | | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 6.2 | 5.4 | B | | (3.) | Others | Fecal Coliform | Others | MPN/100ml | 230 | 120 | B | | (4.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 10.3 | 3.0 | B | | (5.) | COD | | mg/l | | 37.8 | 9.6 | B |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 78.7 | 56.3 | NA | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 69.6 | 48.3 | NA |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 3 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | 7.38 | 7.1 | | (2.) | N(Nitrogen) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 890 | 482 | | (3.) | P(Phosphorus) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 680 | 360 | | (4.) | Electric Conductivity | Others | dS/m | 0.35 | 0.28 | | (5.) | K(Potassium) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 1680 | 982 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 3.05 To 8.38 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 0.92 To 4.58 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 112704 | 14 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Intake Well | | 24977/WR | 07 Nov 2019 | 181829.5 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Captive Power Plant | 2808 | 2808 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 2808 | | | (2.) | CRM | 4272 | 4272 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 4272 | | | (3.) | HSM and LP Mills | 1440 | 1440 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 1440 | | | (4.) | Soft water plant, DM Water plant and miscellaneous | 4248 | 4248 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 4248 | | | (5.) | Air Separation Plant | 1056 | 1056 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 1056 | | | (6.) | Coke ovens and byproduct plant | 8112 | 8112 | Effluent would be treated in BOD plant a part of which would undergo tertiary treatment and be reused as plant make up. Balance will be treated in CETP for reuse | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 8112 | | | (7.) | Sinter and Pellet Plant | 168 | 168 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 168 | | | (8.) | Sewage Treatment Plant | 2304 | 2304 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 2304 | | | (9.) | SMS | 2088 | 2088 | Reuse as plant makeup water after treatment in CETP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 2088 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 26496 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 26496 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Coal Tar and BOD Sludge | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 100000 | Tons | 0 | Others | NA | Others | Recycled back in Coke Ovens | | (2.) | Flue dusts | Industrial Waste | | 82469 | Tons | 0 | Others | NA | Others | Reused in process | | (3.) | Chrome Sludge | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 5 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | | (4.) | SMS Slag | Industrial Waste | | 1200000 | Tons | 0 | Others | NA | Others | Reused after processing in MRP | | (5.) | Mill scale/sludge | Industrial Waste | | 58214 | Tons | 0 | Others | NA | Others | Reused in Sinter Plant | | (6.) | BF Slag | Industrial Waste | | 2648132 | Tons | 500 | Road,Rail | | Others | Sold as granulated BF Slag |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 51.7 | 3.75 | 0.5 | 52.21 | 60 | | (2.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 34.1 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 37.51 | 80 | | (3.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 24.9 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 25.41 | 80 | | (4.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 96.7 | 4.9 | 1 | 97.71 | 100 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | COB#4 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 1.35 | | (2.) | COB#3 | By product Gas | 150 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 1.35 | | (3.) | COB#5 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | PM10 | | 1.35 | | (4.) | COB#5DE | NA | 30 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.44 | | (5.) | COB#2CDQ | NA | 30 | 2.0 | PM10 | | 0.65 | | (6.) | PLP#Discharge&HLSBDE | NA | 35 | 2.0 | PM10 | | 1.51 | | (7.) | PLP#Dryer1&2DE | NA | 55 | 3.9 | PM10 | | 4.33 | | (8.) | PLP#BallMill1DE | NA | 55 | 2.3 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (9.) | BF#2Stove | Mixed Gas | 80 | 6.3 | PM10 | | 6.67 | | (10.) | BF#2CH2 | NA | 35 | 5.4 | PM10 | | 10.5 | | (11.) | BOF#SE2 | NA | 70 | 6.8 | PM10 | | 2.5 | | (12.) | LF1#FE | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 2.58 | | (13.) | LF2#FE | NA | 70 | 3.5 | PM10 | | 2.58 | | (14.) | CRMPLTCM#1PF | NA | 30 | 0.85 | PM10 | | 0.2 | | (15.) | CRMPLTCM#1DE | NA | 30 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.25 | | (16.) | CRMPLTCM#1TCMF | NA | 30 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 3.0 | | (17.) | CRMCGL#1-2SPM | NA | 60 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.17 | | (18.) | PLP#waste gas | By product gas | 87 | 8.5 | PM10 | | 32.29 | | (19.) | Lime Kiln#3 | By product gas | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 0.67 | | (20.) | Lime Kiln#4 | By product gas | 55 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 0.67 | | (21.) | LP Mill1 | By product gas | 65 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (22.) | LP Mill 2 | By product gas | 65 | 3.0 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (23.) | CPP1#4 | By product gas | 120 | 3.4 | PM10 | | 2.78 | | (24.) | COB#3 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 18.0 | | (25.) | COB#4 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 18.0 | | (26.) | COB#5 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | SO2 | | 18.0 | | (27.) | CRM CAL#1-1 | By product gas | 45 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.56 | | (28.) | CRM CGL#1-1 | By product gas | 60 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.65 | | (29.) | COB#3 CDQ | NA | 30 | 2.0 | SO2 | | 13 | | (30.) | CRM CGL#2-1 | By product gas | 60 | 0.6 | SO2 | | 3.25 | | (31.) | LP Mill 1 | By product gas | 65 | 3 | SO2 | | 4.17 | | (32.) | COB#3 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | NOx | | 9 | | (33.) | CPP1#3 | By product gas | 120 | 3.4 | SO2 | | 5.56 | | (34.) | CPP1#4 | By product gas | 120 | 3.4 | SO2 | | 5.56 | | (35.) | Incinerator | NA | 30 | 1.0 | SO2 | | 0.42 | | (36.) | COB#4 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | NOx | | 9 | | (37.) | COB#5 | By product gas | 150 | 4.5 | NOx | | 9 | | (38.) | COB #3 CDQ | NA | 30 | 2.0 | NOx | | 6.50 | | (39.) | PLP Waste gas | By product gas | 87 | 8.5 | NOx | | 121.08 | | (40.) | BF#2 stove | By product gas | 80 | 6.3 | NOx | | 25.0 | | (41.) | CRM CGL#2-1 | By product gas | 60 | 0.6 | NOx | | 5.42 | | (42.) | LP Mill 2 | By product gas | 65 | 3.0 | NOx | | 12.50 | | (43.) | CPP1#3 | By product gas | 120 | 3.4 | NOx | | 22.22 | | (44.) | COB#3CDQ | NA | 30 | 2 | PM10 | | 0.65 | | (45.) | PLP#BallMill2DE | NA | 55 | 2.3 | PM10 | | 1.25 | | (46.) | CRMARP#1AF | NA | 30 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.03 | | (47.) | CRMARP#1DE | NA | 30 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.17 | | (48.) | HSM RHF#3 | By product gas | 85 | 3.1 | PM10 | | 1.55 | | (49.) | CRM CGL#2-1 | By product gas | 60 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.65 | | (50.) | COB#4DE | NA | 30 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.44 | | (51.) | COB#2 CDQ | NA | 30 | 2.0 | SO2 | | 13 | | (52.) | CRM CAL#1-1 | By product gas | 45 | 0.6 | SO2 | | 2.79 | | (53.) | CRM CGL#1-1 | By product gas | 60 | 0.6 | SO2 | | 3.25 | | (54.) | LP Mill 2 | By product gas | 65 | 3.0 | SO2 | | 4.17 | | (55.) | CRM CAL#1-1 | By product gas | 45 | 0.6 | NOx | | 4.65 | | (56.) | CPP1#3 | By product gas | 120 | 3.4 | PM10 | | 2.78 | | (57.) | COB#3DE | NA | 30 | 2.5 | PM10 | | 1.44 | | (58.) | BF#2CH1 | NA | 35 | 5.4 | PM10 | | 10.5 | | (59.) | CRMCAL#1-2SPM | NA | 45 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.17 | | (60.) | PLP Waste gas | By product gas | 87 | 8.5 | SO2 | | 40.36 | | (61.) | BF#2 Stove | By product gas | 80 | 6.3 | SO2 | | 33.33 | | (62.) | HSM RHF#3 | By product gas | 85 | 3.1 | SO2 | | 5.17 | | (63.) | Incinerator | NA | 30 | 1.0 | PM10 | | 0.08 | | (64.) | HSM RHF#3 | By product gas | 85 | 3.1 | NOx | | 15.5 | | (65.) | CRM CGL#1-1 | By product gas | 60 | 0.6 | NOx | | 5.42 | | (66.) | CPP1#4 | By product gas | 120 | 3.4 | NOx | | 22.22 | | (67.) | BF#2SHIF1 | NA | 35 | 3.8 | PM10 | | 5.0 | | (68.) | BF#2SHIF2 | NA | 35 | 3.8 | PM10 | | 5.0 | | (69.) | COB#2 CDQ | NA | 30 | 2.0 | NOx | | 6.50 | | (70.) | LP Mill 1 | By product gas | 65 | 3.0 | NOx | | 12.50 | | (71.) | BF#2SHCF | NA | 35 | 2.8 | PM10 | | 2.83 | | (72.) | CRMCGL#2-2SPM | NA | 60 | 0.6 | PM10 | | 0.17 | | (73.) | Incinerator | NA | 30 | 1.0 | NOx | | 0.69 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 664000 | | (b)Source | Grid,Captive power & open Access | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Copy of Agreement | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 57400 kVA | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 79 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 1405 | | Total Land (ha.) | 1405 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 0 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 1405 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 0 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : others | 0 | | Total (ha.) | 1405.0000 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Water Reservoir | | 84 | | | (2.) | Green belt | | 101 | Peripheral greenery area:364 ha | | (3.) | Main Plant | | 745 | | | (4.) | Others | Vacant Area | 475 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | ESZs | NA | 0 | NA | | (2.) | Corridors | NA | 0 | NA | | (3.) | Wildlife Corridors | NA | 0 | NA | | (4.) | NPA | NA | 0 | NA | | (5.) | Critically Polluted Area | NA | 0 | NA | | (6.) | ESAs | NA | 0 | NA | | (7.) | WLS | NA | 0 | NA |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Forest | | Dangadi PF | 5 | Protected Forest | | (2.) | Archaeological Sites | | NA | 0 | NA | | (3.) | Defence Installations | | NA | 0 | NA | | (4.) | Others | NA | NA | 0 | NA |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 0 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | NA | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Brahmani River | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | South | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 6.75 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 500 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 1500 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 15000 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 2000 | | (e)No. of working days | 330 | | (f)Total Manpower | 19000 | |
|
|
| S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
|---|
| (1.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 26 | 7 | 33 | | (2.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 365 | 99 | 464 | | (3.) | No. of Plants | 584000 | 160000 | 744000 | | (4.) | Funds Allocated | 233600000 | 80000000 | 313600000 |
|
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Social | Peripheral Development activities. Promotion of ancillary businesses and development of local economy. Social upliftment through CER activities | | (2.) | Environmental | Improvemnt through greenery development and improvement of road conditions | | (3.) | Financial | Revenue generation through taxes and duties |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 1 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | Yes | | (b)Name of the Court | NGT | | (c)Name of the Sub Court | NGT Eastern Zone | | (d)Case No. | OA No.169/2016/EZ | | (e)Orders/Directions of the court ,if any and its relevance with the proposed project | - | | (f)Case Details | Forest Clearance | | (g)Uploaded Court Order | Copy of Court Order | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1821/RA 0131 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | M N Dastur & Co. (P) Ltd | | (iii)Address | M N Dastur & Co. (P) Ltd, P-17 Mission Row Extn, Kolkata 700013 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9433341156 | | (v)Landline No. | 0332225050 | | (vi)Email Id | sandip.m@dastur.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 17 May 2021 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | Proposal is returned due to the following shortcomings:
Existing project:
i. Details of the construction activities undertaken from 7/11/2016 to till date.
ii. Permission obtained from MoEF&CC if any, for undertaking construction of balanced facilities envisaged in the existing EC dated 7/11/2006 after the expiry of the validity period of the EC. If no, reasons for undertaken construction activity after the expiry of the validity period of the EC shall be submitted.
iii. Copies of Consent to Operate obtained from OSPCB from 7/11/2016 to till date.
EIA report:
i. EIA report is silent on the implementation status of the existing Environmental Clearances accorded by MoEF&CC and the details of the ongoing construction activities at the site at present.
ii. Consolidated water balance diagram for the existing and proposed expansion shall be furnished.
iii. Figure numbers mentioned in the EIA report does not match with description. For instance, Fig. No. 3-12 is post monsoon water level in the study area whereas in description it is mentioned as land use map. Overall EIA report needs to be re-checked.
iv. Satellite image of the land cover/land use map of the study area has not been furnished.
v. Noise quality modelling has not been carried out.
vi. Action plan for solid waste utilization has not been submitted.
vii. Traffic assessment study has not been carried out.
viii. Quantity of raw materials and finished products to be specifically transported by road and rail has not been furnished.
ix. Confirmed iron ore linkage for the proposed expansion has not been furnished.
x. Material balance and Energy balance has not been furnished.
xi. BOD plant details for the treatment of coke oven plant have not been furnished.
xii. Risk assessment has not been carried out specific to the project activity. No scientific tools have been used to quantify the risk.
xiii. Cost earmarked towards the CER is not as per the slab specified in the Ministry’s O.M. dated 1/05/2018.
xiv. EMP is generic and not specific to the proposed expansion.
xv. Input file used for the AAQ modelling shall be furnished.
Form 2:
S.No. 7.1: Complete PH proceedings inter-alia including attendance sheet and written representations have not been furnished.
S.No.9: Certified compliance report for all the existing ECs is not accessible on PARIVESH. On perusal of the report received through email, it is noted that non-compliances have been reported in respect of excess water drawl beyond the permitted capacity, discharge of waste water and de-siltation of drain at raw material storage. It is requested to obtain the closure report from the Regional Office on the observed non-compliance’s.
S.No. 9(b): Details of capacity expansion of all the facilities have not been mentioned.
S.No.36: Court orders uploaded on PARIVESH is not accessible. | 08 Jan 2020 | | 2. | NA | Proposal is returned due to the following shortcomings:
Existing project:
i. Details of the construction activities undertaken from 7/11/2016 to till date.
ii. Permission obtained from MoEF&CC if any, for undertaking construction of balanced facilities envisaged in the existing EC dated 7/11/2006 after the expiry of the validity period of the EC. If no, reasons for undertaken construction activity after the expiry of the validity period of the EC shall be submitted.
iii. Copies of Consent to Operate obtained from OSPCB from 7/11/2016 to till date.
EIA report:
i. EIA report is silent on the implementation status of the existing Environmental Clearances accorded by MoEF&CC and the details of the ongoing construction activities at the site at present.
ii. Consolidated water balance diagram for the existing and proposed expansion shall be furnished.
iii. Figure numbers mentioned in the EIA report does not match with description. For instance, Fig. No. 3-12 is post monsoon water level in the study area whereas in description it is mentioned as land use map. Overall EIA report needs to be re-checked.
iv. Satellite image of the land cover/land use map of the study area has not been furnished.
v. Noise quality modelling has not been carried out.
vi. Action plan for solid waste utilization has not been submitted.
vii. Traffic assessment study has not been carried out.
viii. Quantity of raw materials and finished products to be specifically transported by road and rail has not been furnished.
ix. Confirmed iron ore linkage for the proposed expansion has not been furnished.
x. Material balance and Energy balance has not been furnished.
xi. BOD plant details for the treatment of coke oven plant have not been furnished.
xii. Risk assessment has not been carried out specific to the project activity. No scientific tools have been used to quantify the risk.
xiii. Cost earmarked towards the CER is not as per the slab specified in the Ministry’s O.M. dated 1/05/2018.
xiv. EMP is generic and not specific to the proposed expansion.
xv. Input file used for the AAQ modelling shall be furnished.
Form 2:
S.No. 7.1: Complete PH proceedings inter-alia including attendance sheet and written representations have not been furnished.
S.No.9: Certified compliance report for all the existing ECs is not accessible on PARIVESH. On perusal of the report received through email, it is noted that non-compliances have been reported in respect of excess water drawl beyond the permitted capacity, discharge of waste water and de-siltation of drain at raw material storage. It is requested to obtain the closure report from the Regional Office on the observed non-compliance’s.
S.No. 9(b): Details of capacity expansion of all the facilities have not been mentioned.
S.No.36: Court orders uploaded on PARIVESH is not accessible. | 08 Jan 2020 | | 3. | NA | Proposal is returned due to the following shortcomings:
Existing project:
i. Details of the construction activities undertaken from 7/11/2016 to till date.
ii. Permission obtained from MoEF&CC if any, for undertaking construction of balanced facilities envisaged in the existing EC dated 7/11/2006 after the expiry of the validity period of the EC. If no, reasons for undertaken construction activity after the expiry of the validity period of the EC shall be submitted.
iii. Copies of Consent to Operate obtained from OSPCB from 7/11/2016 to till date.
EIA report:
i. EIA report is silent on the implementation status of the existing Environmental Clearances accorded by MoEF&CC and the details of the ongoing construction activities at the site at present.
ii. Consolidated water balance diagram for the existing and proposed expansion shall be furnished.
iii. Figure numbers mentioned in the EIA report does not match with description. For instance, Fig. No. 3-12 is post monsoon water level in the study area whereas in description it is mentioned as land use map. Overall EIA report needs to be re-checked.
iv. Satellite image of the land cover/land use map of the study area has not been furnished.
v. Noise quality modelling has not been carried out.
vi. Action plan for solid waste utilization has not been submitted.
vii. Traffic assessment study has not been carried out.
viii. Quantity of raw materials and finished products to be specifically transported by road and rail has not been furnished.
ix. Confirmed iron ore linkage for the proposed expansion has not been furnished.
x. Material balance and Energy balance has not been furnished.
xi. BOD plant details for the treatment of coke oven plant have not been furnished.
xii. Risk assessment has not been carried out specific to the project activity. No scientific tools have been used to quantify the risk.
xiii. Cost earmarked towards the CER is not as per the slab specified in the Ministry’s O.M. dated 1/05/2018.
xiv. EMP is generic and not specific to the proposed expansion.
xv. Input file used for the AAQ modelling shall be furnished.
Form 2:
S.No. 7.1: Complete PH proceedings inter-alia including attendance sheet and written representations have not been furnished.
S.No.9: Certified compliance report for all the existing ECs is not accessible on PARIVESH. On perusal of the report received through email, it is noted that non-compliances have been reported in respect of excess water drawl beyond the permitted capacity, discharge of waste water and de-siltation of drain at raw material storage. It is requested to obtain the closure report from the Regional Office on the observed non-compliance’s.
S.No. 9(b): Details of capacity expansion of all the facilities have not been mentioned.
S.No.36: Court orders uploaded on PARIVESH is not accessible. | 08 Jan 2020 | | 4. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 13 Jun 2020 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | Submission of Additional Information for Environmental Clearance proposal for Expansion of Integrated Steel Plant Expansion from 6 to 8 MTPA Crude Steel and 9 MTPA Finished Steel by Tata Steel Limited at Kalinganagar Industrial Complex | 11 Nov 2020 | | 2. | NA | Proposal deferred for want of additional information | 15 Sep 2020 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Rajiv Kumar | | Designation | Vice President- Operations,TSk | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | TATASTEEL KALINGANAGAR | | Address | KNIC, DUBURI-755026, DIST JAJPUR, ODISHA |
|