|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Proposal for Installation of Polypropylene (PP) unit at Rasayani and Interconnecting Pipelines from BPCL Mumbai Refinery (MR) to Rasayani | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED | | (c)Registered Address | BPCL Mumbai Refinery, Mahul, Chembur iv,Mumbai,Mumbai (Suburban),Maharashtra-400074 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Central PSU | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Vijayanad Damodar Patre | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Sr. Manager (E&E) | | (c)Address | BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. REFINERY,MAHUL,CHEMBUR, MUMBAI,Kurla,Mumbai City,Maharashtra-400074 | | (d)Pin code | 400074 | | (e)E-mail | kandalkarns@bharatpetroleum.in | | (f)STD Code. | 0(f)Telephone No. | 25533197 | | (g)Fax No. | 25542970 | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(c) Petro-chemical complexes (industries based on processing of
6(a) Oil & gas transportation pipe line (crude and refinery/ petrochemical
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/MH/IND2/74952/2018 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/125551/2019 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | 234/482 to 50/2 | | (b)Pincode | 410207 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 185329 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 185407 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 730909 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 730936 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | E43H1 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 21 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 1 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 3 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Maharashtra | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Madhya Pradesh | Chhindwara | Sausar | Khapakarimwar | | (2.) | Maharashtra | Raigad | Panvel | |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | NIL | | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | NIL | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | NIL | | (d)Previous TOR Letter | NIL | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 24 Sep 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 1 |
| Rasayani | | State : | Maharashtra | | District : | Raigad | | Tehsil : | Khalapur | | Village : | Posari |
| 800 | All concerned issues addressed of surrounding villages and area | District Magistrate | |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
| 8.1. Project Configuration |
|---|
| S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Interconnecting Pipelines | 04 | Pipelines from BPCL Mumbai refinery to Rasayani | | (2.) | Polypropylene Unit | 450 KTPA | To produce polypropylene |
|
| 8.2. Product |
|---|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | 450000 | 450000 | Tons per Annum | | Road | |
|
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | N/A | | (iv)Valid Upto | N/A | | (v)File No. | NA | | (vi)Application No. | NA | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | NA | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 6431 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 104.95 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 32.15 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 2.1 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 453.9 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 453.9 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Propylene | 453900 | Tons per Annum | | refinery | Pipe Conveyor | | 50 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Dec 2018 To 28 Feb 2019 | | (b)Season | Winter | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 16.33 | 6.23 | 16.30 | 80 | | (2.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 93.64 | 62.41 | 93.32 | 100 | | (3.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 46.86 | 30.33 | 45.40 | 80 | | (4.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 54.21 | 24.78 | 1.12 | 60 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 5 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 5 | 5 | 15 | 20 | | (2.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 409 | 86 | 500 | 2000 | | (3.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 95.71 | 24.88 | 250 | 1000 | | (4.) | Heavy Metals | | Lead | mg/l | | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | | (5.) | Heavy Metals | | copper | mg/l | | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 1.5 | | (6.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.98 | 7.45 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (7.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 194 | 31.04 | 200 | 600 | | (8.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.64 | 0.23 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 5 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 9.14 | 5 | B | | (2.) | pH | | NA | | 7.83 | 7.28 | B | | (3.) | DO | | mg/l | | 8.6 | 5.9 | B | | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 21.36 | 5 | B |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 5 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 55.29 | 38.73 | 70 | | (2.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 69.2 | 48.24 | 75 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 6 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 322.06 | 104.06 | | (2.) | pH | | | 8.01 | 6.94 | | (3.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 0.49 | 0.19 | | (4.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 24.06 | 9.8 | | (5.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 318.11 | 128.93 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 2.77 To 3.93 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 2.77 To 3.93 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 9000 | 3 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Intake Well | | No CE(HQ)/D23003/2017 | 18 Oct 2017 | 70000 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Industrial | 168 | 168 | MBR | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 168 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 168 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 168 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Spent absorbent | Industrial Waste | | 10 | Tons | 0.5 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | | (2.) | Spent Bag Filter | Industrial Waste | | 0.03 | Tons | 0.5 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | | | (3.) | Spent Filter Elements | Industrial Waste | | 0.2 | Tons | 0.5 | Road | | Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facility(TSDF) | |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM10 | | NA | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.1 | 100 | | (2.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 16.3 | 0.7 | 0.32 | 16.63 | 80 | | (3.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 45.4 | 0.7 | 0.44 | 45.84 | 80 | | (4.) | PM2.5 | | NA | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.1 | 60 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | Boiler Stack | Natural Gas | 50 | 1.5 | SO2 | | 0.53 | | (2.) | Boiler Stack | Natural Gas | 50 | 1.5 | NOx | | 2.64 | | (3.) | Incinerator Stack | Natural Gas | 40 | 1 | NOx | | 0.22 | | (4.) | Incinerator Stack | Natural Gas | 40 | 1 | SO2 | | 0.14 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 42900 | | (b)Source | State Grid | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 0 | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 0 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 135.44 | | Total Land (ha.) | 135.44 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 0 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 0 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 0 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Owned land | 135.44 | | Total (ha.) | 135.44 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Main Plant | | 135.44 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Critically Polluted Area | No | 0 | Not applicable | | (2.) | WLS | no | 0 | Not applicable | | (3.) | Wildlife Corridors | No | 0 | Not applicable | | (4.) | NPA | No | 0 | Not applicable | | (5.) | ESZs | No | 0 | Not applicable | | (6.) | Corridors | No | 0 | Not applicable | | (7.) | ESAs | No | 0 | Not applicable |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Archaeological Sites | | no | 0 | Not applicable | | (2.) | Defence Installations | | no | 0 | Not applicable | | (3.) | Forest | | no | 0 | Not applicable |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 135.44 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | Acquired | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | No | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 100 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 120 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 1700 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 80 | | (e)No. of working days | 330 | | (f)Total Manpower | 2000 | |
|
| 32. | | Green Belt in Ha: | | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 44.8 | | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 33.08 | | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 40000 | | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 15000000 | | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Social | employment opportunity | | (2.) | Environmental | Greenbelt development |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0041 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Engineers India Limited | | (iii)Address | EIL Office Complex, Sector-16, On NH-48 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9818688520 | | (v)Landline No. | 0124380303 | | (vi)Email Id | rb.bhutda@eil.co.in | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 15 Sep 2019 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought : NIL |
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | ADS replies are submitted. | 02 Aug 2023 | | 2. | NA |
During deliberations, EAC discussed following issues:
(i). PP was asked to submit oil spill contingency plan for any potential leakage commensurate to the risk of the spill. PP also to submit its capability to respond the spill with trained manpower and equipment which they have. In case they don’t have the mandatory tier 1 capability then to produce commitment/MoU with service provider.
(ii). From the raw data of ambient air quality data provided it appears that only a single 24 hourly sample has been collected for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, HC, NH3 and Benzene, while 08 hourly sample has been collected CO and O3, which requires further clarification from PP, to ensure reliable data has been generated, since the issue of impacts due to air emissions have been raised during PH.
(iii). PP informed that total SO2 emission from the proposed project will be 2.4 kg/h. EAC suggested to provide basis of estimate of 2.4 Kg/h SO2 emission from the proposed project. Also Sulphur balance to be provided.
The above information has not been provided/circulated by PP to the Expert members of the Committee.
Accordingly, proposal was deferred for want of above additional information. Above all additional information shall be submitted online to the PARIVESH portal for further consideration by EAC. | 24 Jul 2023 | | 3. | ADS Reply Letter | ADS replies have been submitted along with revised EIA Report. | 04 Jul 2023 | | 4. | NA |
During deliberation, the Committee noted the following:
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) has proposed a Polymer Grade Propylene plant at Rasayani, approx. 50 km from Mumbai Refinery. MoEFCC issued standard Terms of Reference (TOR) for carrying out EIA study vide letter no. No. IA-J-11011/168/2018-IA-II(I) dated 17th June, 2018. Public Hearing was conducted on 24.09.2019 at Rasarang Building, HOC Colony, Taluka Khalapur, Dist. Raigad – 410207.
Stage -1 Forest Clearance was obtained from MoEF&CC, Nagpur vide F.No. FC-II/MH-163/2021- NGP/10134 dated 10.08.2022 for 22.9648 ha. However, earlier as per EIA /EMP report, “the total Forest Area to be diverted for laying the pipelines is 25.68 Hectares (Mangrove area: 21.9 ha and Reserved / Protected Forest area: 3.78 ha).
Further, PP explained that the total forest land requirement for the proposal is 22.9648 ha only. The requirement of optimum forest land for the diversion arrived after a joint site inspection with forest officials (undertaken by DCF, Alibag, Raigad) and scrutiny of the proposal. Therefore, Stage -1 Forest Clearance was obtained for lesser area i.e. 22.9648 Hectares.
PP has confirmed that there is no change in project configuration. However, the Committee suggested them to submit the same in writing.
The Committee noted that the ambient air quality monitoring was carried out at 8 locations during December 2018 to February 2019, which more than three years old data. The Committee also noted that the wind rose data shows predominant wind direction is from SE direction. But PP has taken wrong sampling stations i.e. most of stations are located at upwind direction instead of downwind direction. Only one location was shown in downwind direction, which cannot represent correct ambient quality of the area as well as predictions. Considering sampling locations identified earlier was not appropriate and data is more than 3 years old now, the Committee suggested to carry out fresh ambient air quality monitoring for 3 months as per OM dated 8th June, 2022.
1. It was also suggested that AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters i.e. HC, Ozone, BTX and Ammonia shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests.
2. PP shall also confirm that Pipeline is not passing through ESZ of Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary. PP shall provide Map indicating distance of project from the nearest boundary of ESZ authenticated by PCCF/Wildlife warden.
3. Copy of MCZMA recommendations dated 19.11.2019.
Accordingly, proposal was deferred for want of above additional information. Above all additional information shall be submitted online to the PARIVESH portal for further consideration by EAC. | 12 Jan 2023 | | 5. | ADS Reply Letter | We confirm that the total requirement of Forest Land vi-a-vis stage I forest clearance is available. | 28 Dec 2022 | | 6. | NA | Pls. confirm whether the total requirement of Forest land vis-a-vis Stage-I FC is available for total forest land on priority to enable this office to take further action in this regard. | 27 Dec 2022 | | 7. | ADS Reply Letter | Stage-I forest clearance has been obtained and updated its copy. | 10 Nov 2022 | | 8. | NA | This has reference to your Proposal No: IA/MH/IND2/74952/2018 (File No: IA-J-11011/168/2018-IA-II(I)) for environmental and CRZ clearance to the project of Installation of Polypropylene unit of capacity 450 KTPA at Rasayani, Khalapur Taluka, Raigad District, Maharashtra and interconnecting pipelines from BPCL Mumbai Refinery to Rasayani by M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
The proposal considered for grant of environmental & CRZ clearance by the EAC (Industry-2) in its meeting held during 30-31 December, 2019 & 1st January, 2020 and 21-23 January, 2020 subject to the condition as under:
‘Stage-1 forest clearance shall be submitted for the forest area/mangrove area involved under the project as per the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. No installation of pipeline/associated facilities shall be carried out in forest areas without prior permission from the concerned regulatory authority’.
In this regard, it is requested to submit the Stage-I FC for taking further action into the matter. | 24 Feb 2020 | | 9. | ADS Reply Letter | Additional Information submitted as per EDS dated 10/12/2019. | 10 Dec 2019 | | 10. | NA | The Committee, after detailed deliberations, desired for requisite
information/inputs in respect of the following:
(i) Details of protected area/ESA/ESZ within 10 km of the project area/pipeline route.
Details of NBWL clearance and its updated status.
Minutes of 14th meeting of the EAC (Industry-2 Sector) held during November 20-22, 2019 Page 151 of 168
(ii) Details of pipeline route passing through mangrove area, details of area to be diverted
and conservation plan.
(iii) Details of raw material/product taken through pipeline with quantity.
(iv) Action plan vis-à-vis CRZ recommendations/conditions from the SCZMA needs to be
submitetd.
(v) The Committee noted that the project involve forest land. However PP is unable to
explain to provide the details of status of forest clearance and accordingly PP needs to
be submitted the details of FC proposal and its status.
(vi) Details of rivers in the vicinity of the project site and details of mitigation measures to
avoid pollution of rivers.
(vii) Details of map as per requirements under CRZ Notification needs to be submitted.
(viii) Onsite emergency plan as per MSIHC Rules.
(ix) Plan for Corporate Environmental Responsibility with activities and timelines.
(x) The Committee noted that there are Schedule I species in the study area. PP needs to
prepare the species specific conservation plan along with budgetary allocation and PP to
take approval for the Wildlife conservation and management plan from CWLW State
Government.
(xi) Issues raised during public hearing, response by the project proponent, action plan with
budgetary allocation needs to be submitted. All Annexures of Public hearing
proceedings needs to be submitted.
(xii) The Committee also noted that the project involves CRZ issues and accordingly the
comments from CRZ sector also needs to be obtained by the Sector before placing the
project in the EAC.
The proposal was accordingly deferred for the needful. | 10 Dec 2019 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Vijayanad Damodar Patre | | Designation | Sr. Manager (E&E) | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED | | Address | BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. REFINERY |
|