|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Establishment of 10,000 TCD Sugar Factory (scrapping of existing 800 TCD plant), 60 MW Co-gen Plant (50 MW from Co-gen plant & 10 MW from distillery) and 200 KLPD molasses based Distillery by Shivneri | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | SHIVNERI SUGARS LTD. | | (c)Registered Address | A/p. Ganesh tekadi, Nhavi (Bk.), Tal. Koregaon, Dist. Satara, Maharashtra,,Satara,Maharashtra-415511 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Others | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Sushant Shrimant Patil | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | ExecutiveDirector | | (c)Address | 2nd floor, Shiv Pavillion, Near Ram Mandir, Sangli-Miraj Road, Sangli, Maharashtra,,Miraj,Sangli,Maharashtra-416416 | | (d)Pin code | 416416 | | (e)E-mail | sushant.shivneri@gmail.com | | (f)STD Code. | 233(f)Telephone No. | 2373885 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(g) Distilleries
5(j) Sugar Industry
| | Minor Activity | 1(d) Thermal Power Plants
| | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/MH/IND2/78167/2018 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/120982/2019 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | S. No. 164, 166, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 180 | | (b)Pincode | 416416 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 173324.32 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 173351.71 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 741440.26 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 74151.43 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 47K2, 47K3, 47K6, 47K7 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 695 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 8.5 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 4 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Maharashtra | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Maharashtra | Satara | Koregaon | |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | IA-J-11011/277/2018-IA-II(I) | | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 07 Sep 2018 | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 12 Oct 2018 | | (d)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 03 May 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0 |
| Shivneri Sugars Ltd., Ganesh tekadi, Nhavi (Bk.), Tal.: Koregaon, Dist.: Satara, MS | | State : | Maharashtra | | District : | Satara | | Tehsil : | Koregaon | | Village : | Nhavi (Bk.) |
| 69 | During public hearing issue was raised regarding IEM validity. | Others | Additional District Magistrate |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
| 8.1. Project Configuration |
|---|
| S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Sugar Factory | 10,000 TCD | | | (2.) | Co-generation Plant | 60 MW | | | (3.) | Distillery Unit | 200 KLPD | |
|
| 8.2. Product |
|---|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Sugar | 36000 | Others | MT/M | Road | | | (2.) | Electricity | 60 | Mega Watt(MW) | | Others | Grid | | (3.) | CO2 | 4500 | Others | MT/M | Others | Cylinders | | (4.) | Pressmud | 12000 | Others | MT/M | Road | | | (5.) | Molasses | 12000 | Others | MT/M | Road | | | (6.) | Bagasse | 90000 | Others | MT/M | Conveyor Belt | | | (7.) | RS / ENA/ Ethanol | 6000 | Others | KL/M | Road | |
|
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | N/A | | (iv)Valid Upto | N/A | | (v)File No. | NA | | (vi)Application No. | NA | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | NA | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 620 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 73 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 6.20 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 7.33 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 10000 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 10000 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Lime | 3240 | Tons per Annum | | Local Vendor | Road | | 20 | Others | Local Vendor | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Sugar cane | 1800000 | Tons per Annum | | Near By Farms | Road | | 35 | Others | Near By Farms | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | Sulphur | 1080 | Tons per Annum | | Local Vendor | Road | | 20 | Others | Local Vendor | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Molasses | 244530 | Tons per Annum | | Own Sugar Factory / Outside Purchase | Road | | 50 | Others | Own Sugar Factory / Outside Purchase | Copy of Linkage | | (5.) | Urea | 2640 | Tons per Annum | | Local Vendors | Road | | 20 | Others | Local Vendor | Copy of Linkage | | (6.) | Bagasse | 720000 | Tons per Annum | | Own Sugar Factory | Conveyor Belt | | 0 | Others | Own Sugar Factory | Copy of Linkage | | (7.) | Yeast | 198 | Tons per Annum | | Local Vendors | Road | | 50 | Others | Local Vendors | Copy of Linkage | | (8.) | De-Foaming Oil | 7590 | Tons per Annum | | Local Vendors | Road | | 20 | Others | Local Vendor | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Oct 2018 To 31 Dec 2018 | | (b)Season | Post-Monsoon | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Others | CO | Mili Gram per Meter Cube | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 2 (8Hrs) | | (2.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 64.95 | 51.06 | 64.91 | 100 | | (3.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 28.78 | 19.76 | 28.16 | 60 | | (4.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 30.54 | 18.39 | 30.18 | 80 | | (5.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 34.33 | 25.57 | 34.21 | 80 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.84 | 7.48 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (2.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.63 | 0 | 1 | 1 | | (3.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 787.27 | 330.90 | 500 | 500 | | (4.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 295.04 | 123.88 | 200 | 200 | | (5.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 211.47 | 94.17 | 250 | 250 | | (6.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 55.12 | 12.64 | 100 | 100 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | DO | | mg/l | | 3.10 | 0.10 | E | | (2.) | pH | | NA | | 7.92 | 7.58 | E | | (3.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 40.15 | 11.45 | E | | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 98.65 | 24.13 | E |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 60.4 | 38.9 | 70 | | (2.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 69.7 | 50.1 | 75 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | 7.94 | 7.50 | | (2.) | N(Nitrogen) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 468.97 | 260.47 | | (3.) | P(Phosphorus) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 100.24 | 49.21 | | (4.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 1858.16 | 1145.77 | | (5.) | K(Potassium) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 316.98 | 198.14 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 10 To 5 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 20 To 40 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 1061 | 9.5 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Jack Well | | 07 | 24 Aug 2017 | 1500 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Industrial (Distillery - Spentwash) | 1560 | 1600 | Concentrated in MEE followed by Incineration | Others | Incineration | 1560 | 0 | | (2.) | Industrial (Distillery - Other) | 1640 | 1680 | Treated in Proposed Condensate Polishing Unit (CPU) | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 1640 | | | (3.) | Domestic (Sugar, Co-gen & Distillery) | 67 | 75 | Proposed STP | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 67 | | | (4.) | Industrial (Sugar & Co-gen) | 565 | 600 | Proposed ETP | Others | Irrigation | 565 | 0 |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 3832 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 3832 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | CPU Sludge | Industrial Waste | | 528 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Burnt in Incineration boiler | | (2.) | Boiler ash (Bagasse) | Bottom Ash | | 10800 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Others | Used as manure | | (3.) | Boiler Ash (Spentwash & Coal) | Bottom Ash | | 35970 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Others | Given to brick manufacturers or cement industry | | (4.) | ETP Sludge | Industrial Waste | | 102 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Others | Burnt in Incineration boiler | | (5.) | Yeast Sludge | Industrial Waste | | 6270 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Burnt in Incineration boiler | | (6.) | Spent Oil | Hazardous Waste (as per Hazardous and Other Waste Management rules 2016) | | 3 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Others | Burnt in Incineration boiler |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 30.18 | 2.2 | 0.01 | 30.191 | 80 | | (2.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 32.48 | 2.03 | 0.01 | 32.491 | 80 | | (3.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 25.37 | 2.01 | 0.01 | 25.381 | 60 | | (4.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 64.91 | 2.06 | 0.01 | 64.921 | 100 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | 200 TPH Boiler | Bagasse - 2400 MT/D | 90 | 6 | SO2 | | 30.18 | | (2.) | 75 TPH Incineration Boiler | Spentwash (320 MT/D) & Coal (216 MT/D) | 82 | 3.2 | SO2 | | 30.18 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 23000 | | (b)Source | Own Co-gen plant | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 1000 KVA (2 Nos. ) | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 7 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 20.64 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 20.64 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 12380 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 1850 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 0185 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 0970 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 0 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 2070 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Fallow Land & Open Scrub Land | 13960 | | Total (ha.) | 31415 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Built Up Area | | 6.80 | | | (2.) | Green belt | | 6.87 | | | (3.) | Others | Open Space | 6.97 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | WLS | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project | | (2.) | ESZs | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project | | (3.) | Critically Polluted Area | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project | | (4.) | NPA | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project | | (5.) | ESAs | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project | | (6.) | Corridors | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project | | (7.) | Wildlife Corridors | NA | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZ corridor and wildlife corridors in 10 km radius of project |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Defence Installations | | NA | 0 | There is no defence installations within 10 km from project site | | (2.) | Forest | | NA | 0 | There is no forest land within 10 km from project site | | (3.) | Archaeological Sites | | NA | 0 | There is no any archaeological sites within 10 km from project site |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 20.64 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | 0 | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Schedule-I Species | Blackbuck, Indian wolf, Indian monitor lizard, Indian peafowl, Leopard. | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Krishna river | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | West | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 9.36 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 0 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 640 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 80 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 0 | | (e)No. of working days | 330 | | (f)Total Manpower | 720 | |
|
| 32. | | Green Belt in Ha: | | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 6.88 | | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 33.33 | | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 10220 | | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 7000000 | | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Environmental | 1. Augmentation of proposed green belt in the industrial area and its surrounding shall help in improving the aesthetic beauty of the surrounding environment giving a pleasant look and improvising the air quality.
2. Green belt will help in arresting dust emissions as well as noise. | | (2.) | Social | 1. Employment generation
2. Improvement in the Physical & Social Infrastructure
3. Upliftment of local peoples | | (3.) | Financial | 1. The community that resides in the nearby areas will be benefited directly or indirectly by this project
2. After establishment, the industry will meet the national interest of economical growth through sustainable development, as alcohol has been a great source of revenue through excise duty levied by the Government |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1821/RA 0135 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Equinox Environments (I) Pvt. Ltd. | | (iii)Address | F-11, Namdev Nest, 1160 ‘E’ ward, Opp. Kamala College, Sykes Extension, Kolhapur | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9657865122 | | (v)Landline No. | 0231253123 | | (vi)Email Id | projects@equinoxenvi.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 21 Oct 2021 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought : NIL |
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | We are hereby submitting the Compliance Report of Additional Detail Sought (ADS) raised on 24.03.2023 | 06 Apr 2023 | | 2. | NA | Please furnish the following information :
(i)why previous public hearing was not accepted and had to be reconducted?
(ii) Fresh public hearing report and copy Advt.
(iii) How close are the habitations from the project as there are many complaints in PH regarding pollution from project? | 24 Mar 2023 | | 3. | ADS Reply Letter | We are hereby submitting the Compliance Report of Additional Detail Sought (ADS) raised on 05.06.2021 | 01 Mar 2023 | | 4. | NA | Pl. refer EDS dated 7th April, 2021, as per Chairman statement, PH is not concluded/valid, the same shall be conducted again following the procedure mentioned in EIA Notification, 2006. After compliance of the above points, your proposal will be considered further.
Apart from this, also submit:
1.Surface water permission in true/attested English copy clearly mentioning validity and quantity of water withdrawal permitted.
2.Air quality impact prediction: incremental concentrations need to be revised/rechecked.
3.Schedule 1 species are present in study area, kindly prepare a conservation plan and submit to DFO and upload both the documents in Form 2.
4.Land and land conversion documents to be uploaded. | 05 Jun 2021 | | 5. | ADS Reply Letter | We are hereby submitting the Compliance Report of Additional Detail Sought (ADS) raised during 17th EAC meeting for industry-II held on 27.02.2020. | 16 Apr 2021 | | 6. | NA | Pl. refer MoM of 17th EAC (Ind -2) meeting dated 25th to 27th February, 2020, Committee desired certain additional information/document which is still not complied by you. Further,the PH is not concluded/valid, the same shall be conducted following the procedure mentioned in EIA Notification, 2006. After compliance of the above points, your proposal will be considered further. | 07 Apr 2021 | | 7. | ADS Reply Letter | We are hereby submitting the Additional Detail Sought (ADS) reply raised during 17th
EAC meeting for industry-II held on 27.02.2020. | 27 Mar 2021 | | 8. | NA | The Committee after detailed deliberations desired for the following additional
information/documents:
(i) Clarification from the SPCB/ADM regarding sanctity and conclusion of the public
hearing already conducted. If the public hearing is not concluded/valid, the same shall
be conducted following the procedure mentioned in the EIA Notification, 2006.
(ii) Site visit report from the Regional Office of the Ministry regarding the status of existing
project, details of activities started in the complex, etc.
(iii) Water balance and effluent management scheme shall be revised reducing the fresh
water requirement (viz. zero fresh water requirement utilizing the water from sugar
crushing) and with ZLD scheme (treatment system, incineration, etc).
MINUTES OF THE 17th MEETING OF THE EAC (INDUSTRY-2 SECTOR) HELD DURING FEBRUARY 25-27, 2020 Page 99 of 185
The proposal was accordingly deferred for the needful. | 11 Mar 2020 | | 9. | ADS Reply Letter | Request for reconsidering our proposal - M/s. Shivneri Sugars Ltd, Ganesh Tekadi, Nhavi, Tal: Koregaon,
Dist: Satara, Maharashtra in upcoming EAC meeting for grant of Environmental Clearance (EC). | 19 Feb 2020 | | 10. | NA | The project proponent, vide email dated 31.12.2019, has informed their inability to attend the
EAC meeting and requested to defer the proposal. Based on the request of the project
proponent, the Committee has accordingly decided to defer the proposal. | 15 Jan 2020 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Sushant Shrimant Patil | | Designation | ExecutiveDirector | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | SHIVNERI SUGARS LTD. | | Address | A/p. Ganesh tekadi, Nhavi (Bk.), Tal. Koregaon, Dist. Satara, Maharashtra |
|