|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Capacity Expansion of Sri Jayalakshmi Ferro Alloys (P) Limited from 31,320 to 1,30,320 TPA Ferro alloys production by installation of additional 3x9 MVA+ 1X24 MVA Submerged Arc Furnace (SAF) along wit | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | SHRI JAYALAKSHMI FERRO ALLOYS PVT LTD | | (c)Registered Address | P.O. Chirkunda, District- Dhanbad,,Dhanbad,Jharkhand-828202 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Amit Agarwalla | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | ManagingDirector | | (c)Address | P.O. Chirkunda, District - Dhanbad,,Nirsa-Cum-Chirkunda,Dhanbad,Jharkhand-828202 | | (d)Pin code | 828202 | | (e)E-mail | shrijayalakshmiferroalloy@gmail.com | | (f)STD Code. | 124(f)Telephone No. | 4291036 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 3(a) Metallurgical industries (ferrous & non ferrous)
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/AP/IND/117330/2008 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/117327/2019 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Sy.No. 12 to 16, 18, 20, 33, 34 & 49 | | (b)Pincode | 535101 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 18.3214 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 18.3269 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 83.47644 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 85.48219 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | E44L7, E44L8, E44L11 & E44L12 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 116 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 27 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 2 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Andhra Pradesh | |
|
|
| Details of State of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| NIL |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | J-11011/331/2008-IA.II(I) | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR | 10 Jun 2008 | | (f)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | | (b)Date of Apply of EC | 15 Oct 2019 | | (c)Date of Issue of EC | 25 Feb 2020 | | (d)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 04 Jan 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0.2 |
| Near the existing plant of M/s Sri Jayalakshmi Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd | | State : | Andhra Pradesh | | District : | Vizianagaram | | Tehsil : | Gurla | | Village : | Pedabantupalli |
| 60 | During Public Hearing, Issues
regarding the Environment Protection, CER activities and
employment generation were raised. | Others | District Joint Collector |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Chennai | | (iii)Letter No. | EP/12.1/802/AP/1479 | | (iv)Status of Compliance | Compiled | | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | | (vi)Date of site visit | Jun 29 2018 12:00AM | | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Ferro Alloys | 31320 | 99000 | 130320 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | | | (2.) | Sinter | 0 | 18000 | 18000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | | | (3.) | Briquettes | 0 | 150000 | 150000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | |
|
| | | (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
| S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Sinter Plant | 0 | 18000 | 18000 | Sinter | | (2.) | Submerged Arc Furnace | 2x9 MVA | 3x9 MVA & 1x24 MVA | 5x9 MVA & 1x24 MVA | Ferro Manganese /Silico Manganese/Ferro silicon/Ferro Chrome | | (3.) | Briquette Plant | 0 | 150000 | 150000 | Briquettes |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | 17 Apr 2019 | | (iv)Valid Upto | 30 Apr 2020 | | (v)File No. | APPCB/VSP/VZN/18930-1/CFO/HO/2017 | | (vi)Application No. | APPCB/VSP/VSP/32/CFO/HO/2019 | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 182.13 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 11.43 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 1.62 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 1.15 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 402230 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 112770 | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 515000 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Mn ore | 339000 | Tons per Annum | | Brazil, Singapore, Australia through Vizag Port | Road | | 90 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Coke | 118000 | Tons per Annum | | Country : China, Port: Gangavaram Port & RINL Coke | Road | | 100 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | Chrome Ore Fines | 150000 | Tons per Annum | | Odisha | Road | | 400 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Chrome Ore Lumps | 33000 | Tons per Annum | | Domestic, Odisha | Road | | 400 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (5.) | Char/Charcoal | 170000 | Tons per Annum | | Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh | Road | | 100 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (6.) | Dolomite | 26000 | Tons per Annum | | Khammam Telangana | Road | | 470 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (7.) | Magnesite | 52000 | Tons per Annum | | Salem, Tamil Nadu | Road | | 710 | Open Market | Purchase Order | Copy of Linkage | | (8.) | Quartz | 234600 | Tons per Annum | | Dattirajeru Mandal, Vizianagaram | Road | | 17 | Linkage | | Copy of Linkage | | (9.) | Mill Scale | 6500 | Tons per Annum | | Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh | Road | | 100 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (10.) | Coal | 78000 | Tons per Annum | | Country : South Africa, Port:Gangavaram Port | Road | | 100 | Others | Purchase Order | Copy of Linkage | | (11.) | Manganese Slag | 63000 | Tons per Annum | | Japan through Vizag Port | Road | | 90 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Mar 2018 To 31 May 2018 | | (b)Season | Summer | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 08 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 91.4 | 48.2 | 90.9 | 100 | | (2.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 55.4 | 35.2 | 55.2 | 60 | | (3.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 22.3 | 9.4 | 21.4 | 80 | | (4.) | Others | CO | Mili Gram per Meter Cube | 0.96 | 0.55 | 0.96 | 2 | | (5.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 43.8 | 17.3 | 43.1 | 80 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 08 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (2.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 320.52 | 184.52 | 200 | 600 | | (3.) | Heavy Metals | | Zn | mg/l | | 1.95 | 1.24 | 5 | 15 | | (4.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 126.45 | 62.15 | 250 | 1000 | | (5.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.93 | 7.34 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (6.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 575 | 380 | 500 | 2000 | | (7.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 1.03 | 0.52 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 08 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | NA | | 8.33 | 7.41 | C | | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 6.7 | 5.3 | C | | (3.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 21.56 | 12.50 | C | | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 63.15 | 38.10 | C |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 08 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 63.5 | 50.8 | 75 | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 56.8 | 38.9 | 70 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 08 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | 8.20 | 6.97 | | (2.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 272.0 | 243.0 | | (3.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 331.0 | 295.0 | | (4.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 45.16 | 26.84 | | (5.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 0.452 | 0.297 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 1.41 To 12.20 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 0.75 To 11.26 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | GroundWater | | 165 | 0 | Copy of Permission Letter | modeOthers | BOREWELL | Tube Well | | 1633/Hg-II/2018 | 19 Sep 2019 | 170 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Softening Plant Backwash | 20 | 22 | Neutralisation Pit | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 20 | | | (2.) | Sewage | 5 | 6 | Septic Tank & Soak Pit | Others | Gardening | 5 | 0 | | (3.) | Cooling Tower Blowdown from SMS & Power Plant | 15 | 17 | Neutralisation Pit | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 15 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 40 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 40 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Si-Mn Slag | Others | Si-Mn Slag | 65000 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Will be used in road development | | (2.) | Bag Filter Dust | Others | Dust | 3000 | Tons | 0 | Conveyor Belt | | Others | Will Be used in Sinter Plant or Briquette Plant | | (3.) | Fe-Mn Slag | Others | Fe-Mn Slag | 78000 | Tons | 0 | Conveyor Belt | | Others | Reused in Si-Mn Production | | (4.) | Fe-Cr Slag | Others | Fe-Cr Slag | 65000 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Will be used in road development |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 91.4 | 0.5 | 2.57 | 93.98 | 100 | | (2.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 55.4 | 0.5 | 1.54 | 56.95 | 60 | | (3.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 21.5 | 0.5 | 1.12 | 22.63 | 80 | | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 40.1 | 0.5 | 0.80 | 40.91 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | Briquette Plant | - | 30 | 1.0 | PM10 | | 0.25 | | (2.) | SAF 1 | - | 30 | 2 | PM10 | | 0.32 | | (3.) | SAF 2 | - | 30 | 2 | PM10 | | 0.29 | | (4.) | SAF 3,4 & 5 | - | 30 | 1.5 | PM10 | | 0.30 | | (5.) | SAF 6 | - | 30 | 1.5 | PM10 | | 0.36 | | (6.) | Sinter Plant | - | 30 | 1.6 | PM10 | | 0.28 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 56000 | | (b)Source | APEPDCL | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Copy of Agreement | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 1x250KVA and 1x125KVA | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 30 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 17.53 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 17.53 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 19841 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 1731 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 7836 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 747 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 1027 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 247 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 944 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : No other land type | 0 | | Total (ha.) | 32373 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Main Plant | | 4.64 | | | (2.) | Green belt | | 5.79 | | | (3.) | Others | Storage Area & Internal Roads | 7.10 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | ESZs | No ESZ | 0 | No ESZ within 10 km radius of Project site | | (2.) | ESAs | No ESA | 0 | No ESA within 10 km radius of Project site | | (3.) | Critically Polluted Area | No CPA | 0 | No CPA within 10 km radius of Project site | | (4.) | WLS | No WLS | 0 | No WLS within 10 km radius of Project site | | (5.) | Corridors | No Corridors | 0 | No Corridors within 10 km radius of Project site | | (6.) | Wildlife Corridors | No Wildlife Corridors | 0 | No Wildlife Corridors within 10 km radius of Project site | | (7.) | NPA | No NPA | 0 | No NPA within 10 km radius of Project site |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Forest | | No Forest | 0 | No Forest within 10 km radius of Project site | | (2.) | Defence Installations | | No Defence Installation | 0 | No Defence Installation within 10 km radius of Project site | | (3.) | Archaeological Sites | | No Archaeological site | 0 | No Archaeological site within 10 km radius of Project site | | (4.) | Others | Religious Place | Shiv Temple | 0.9 | In South of project site |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 17.53 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | 0 | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Gadigedda Reservoir | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | South | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 3.4 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 150 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 1000 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 50 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 0 | | (e)No. of working days | 300 | | (f)Total Manpower | 1200 | |
|
|
| S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
|---|
| (1.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 3.5 | 2.29 | 5.79 | | (2.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 20 | 13 | 33 | | (3.) | No. of Plants | 5000 | 4000 | 9000 | | (4.) | Funds Allocated | 2500000 | 2000000 | 4500000 |
|
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Social | The region shall also be benefited from the project as there will be direct and indirect employment of people in the Ferro Alloy plant. Preference will be given to the people of the state possessing requisite skill and qualification criteria. Also there will be lot of scope for indirect employment of the people of the state in and around the project site. |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 1 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1619/SA 077 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Vardan Environet | | (iii)Address | Plot no.82A, Sector-5, IMT Manesar, Gurugram, Haryana-122052 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9953147268 | | (v)Landline No. | 0124429103 | | (vi)Email Id | metallurgy@vardanenvironet.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 1 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 09 Nov 2019 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | Proposal is returned due to the following shortcomings:
• Permission for the ground water drawl of 165 KLD from the Competent Authority shall be furnished.
• Plant lay out is not scaled and no legends are mentioned. Engineering layout shall be furnished.
• Existing PM10 level in ambient air is reported as 91 mg/Nm3. Reason for such higher level of particulate matter shall be furnished. | 13 Sep 2019 | | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 28 Sep 2019 | | 3. | NA | Proposal is returned due to followings:
• EIA report does not have signature of the coordinators and functional area experts.
• Engineering plant lay out shall be furnished.
• Social impact assessment has not been carried out. | 15 Oct 2019 | | 4. | NA | Proposal is returned due to followings:
• EIA report does not have signature of the coordinators and functional area experts.
• Engineering plant lay out shall be furnished.
• Social impact assessment has not been carried out. | 15 Oct 2019 | | 5. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 15 Oct 2019 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought : NIL |
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Amit Agarwalla | | Designation | ManagingDirector | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | SHRI JAYALAKSHMI FERRO ALLOYS PVT LTD | | Address | P.O. Chirkunda, District- Dhanbad |
|