|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | 120 KLPD Molasses based ethanol plant and 4 MW co-generation power plants | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | INDIAN SUCROSE LTD | | (c)Registered Address | G.T. road Mukerian-144211,District Hoshiyarpur,Punjab,,Hoshiarpur,Punjab-144211 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Ved Prakash Gupta | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Head | | (c)Address | G.T. road Mukerian-144211, District Hoshiyarpur,Punjab,,Hoshiarpur,Hoshiarpur,Punjab-144211 | | (d)Pin code | 144211 | | (e)E-mail | indiansucrose2017@gmail.com | | (f)STD Code. | 124(f)Telephone No. | 4291036 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(g) Distilleries
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/PB/IND2/116878/2018 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/116830/2019 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | 38/9 | | (b)Pincode | 144211 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 315532 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 315538 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 753729 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 753736 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | H43D9, I43V12 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 258 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 433.12 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 4 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Punjab | |
|
|
| Details of State of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| NIL |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | No.IA-J-11011/404/2018-IA-II(I) | | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 05 Dec 2018 | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 07 Jan 2019 | | (d)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 11 Jun 2019 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0 |
| Project Site | | State : | Punjab | | District : | Hoshiarpur | | Tehsil : | Mukerian | | Village : | Chak Allah Baksh |
| 83 | Employment for the locals | Others | Additional Deputy Commissioner |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
| 8.1. Project Configuration |
|---|
| S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Ethanol | 120 KLPD | Molasses |
|
| 8.2. Product |
|---|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Etahnol | 120 | Kilo Litre per Day | | Others | Raw material available within the plant |
|
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | N/A | | (iv)Valid Upto | N/A | | (v)File No. | NA | | (vi)Application No. | NA | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | NA | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 160 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 9.61 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 3.2 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 4.36 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 480 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 480 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Molasses | 480 | Others | Tonnes per day | own sugar industry & nearby sister industry | Road | | 1 | Others | NA | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Oct 2018 To 31 Dec 2018 | | (b)Season | Post-Monsoon | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 56.4 | 35.3 | 53.9 | 60 | | (2.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 31.2 | 16.5 | 29.9 | 80 | | (3.) | Others | CO | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 0.87 | 0.58 | 0.87 | 2 | | (4.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 86.9 | 66.5 | 86.6 | 100 | | (5.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 14.5 | 8.1 | 14 | 80 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.56 | 0.39 | 1.0 | 1.5 | | (2.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 54.62 | 31.42 | 250 | 1000 | | (3.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 4.9 | 3.0 | 500 | 2000 | | (4.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.89 | 7.39 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (5.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 280 | 210 | 500 | 2000 | | (6.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 174 | 140 | 200 | 600 | | (7.) | Heavy Metals | | Mg | mg/l | | 0.06 | 0.006 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | NA | | 7.56 | 7.30 | A | | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 7.1 | 6.3 | A | | (3.) | COD | | mg/l | | 28.50 | 16.40 | C | | (4.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 7.14 | 0.9 | C |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 62.96 | 51.89 | 75 | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 51.40 | 41.15 | 70 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | 7.91 | 7.30 | | (2.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 291 | 210 | | (3.) | K(Potassium) | Kilogram per hectare | | 165.30 | 115.45 | | (4.) | Electric Conductivity | Others | mS/cm | 0.756 | 0.317 | | (5.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 34.96 | 24.56 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 11.5 To 5 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 10 To 4.2 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | GroundWater | | 1150 | 0 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Tube Well | | 21-4/4688/PB/IND/2019 | 14 Jan 2019 | 0 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Industrial | 853 | 0 | 0 | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 853 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 853 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 853 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | MEE salt | Industrial Waste | | 2 | Tons | 0 | Others | used to feed in boiler | Co-Processing | |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 56.4 | 5 | 0.09 | 56.491 | 60 | | (2.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 86.9 | 5 | 0.2 | 87.12714 | 100 | | (3.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 14.5 | 5 | 0.06 | 14.5630 | 80 | | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 23.2 | 5 | 0.01 | 23.220 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | DG set (600 KVA) | HSD | 30 | 0.2 | PM10 | | 0.002 | | (2.) | DG Set (600 KVA) | HSD | 30 | 0.2 | SO2 | | 0.097 | | (3.) | DG Set (600 KVA) | HSD | 30 | 0.2 | NOx | | 0.001 | | (4.) | Boiler (45 TPH) | Bagasse and Spent wash | 75 | 2 | SO2 | | 0.250 | | (5.) | Boiler (45 TPH) | Bagasse and spent wash | 75 | 2 | PM10 | | 0.885 | | (6.) | Boiler (45 TPH) | Bagasse and spent wash | 75 | 2 | NOx | | 0.09 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 3875 | | (b)Source | co-generation power plant | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 1 DG set (600 KVA) | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 30 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 5.26 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 5.26 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 3995.65 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 0 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 141.3 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 737.9 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 0 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 0 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : open shrubs | 455.3 | | Total (ha.) | 5330.15 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Green belt | | 1.74 | | | (2.) | Others | roof top area | 2.37 | | | (3.) | Main Plant | | 1.15 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | WLS | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (2.) | Wildlife Corridors | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (3.) | ESZs | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (4.) | Corridors | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (5.) | NPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (6.) | ESAs | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (7.) | Critically Polluted Area | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Others | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (2.) | Forest | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (3.) | Archaeological Sites | | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (4.) | Defence Installations | | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 5.26 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | 0 | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Schedule-I Species | Pavo cristatus | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | Yes | | (i)Uploaded copy of conservation plan | Copy of conservation plan | | (ii)Fund Provision made | 30 Lakhs | | (iii)Period of Implementation | After Grant of Environment Clearance | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Beas River | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | West | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 8 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 0 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 98 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 0 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 0 | | (e)No. of working days | 330 | | (f)Total Manpower | 98 | |
|
| 32. | | Green Belt in Ha: | | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 1.74 | | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 33.08 | | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 4250 | | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 10 | | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Financial | CER budget proposed by the project proponent is 3.2 Crore. | | (2.) | Environmental | • The project proponent adopts the Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) technology. Hence, there will be NO discharge of liquid effluent outside factory premises. Industrial waste water will be treated in the MEE and Condensate Polishing Unit. | | (3.) | Social | The proposed project has employment generation potential by way of recruiting local people directly for different activities of the project. |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1619/SA077 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Vardan Environet | | (iii)Address | D-142, Sushant Lok-III, Sector-57, Gurugram-122003 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9971684812 | | (v)Landline No. | 0124429103 | | (vi)Email Id | vardanenviro@gmail.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 09 Nov 2019 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought : NIL |
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | ADS reply for 120 KLPD Molasses based ethanol plant and 4 MW
Co-generation power plant | 22 Jul 2020 | | 2. | ADS Raise Letter | The proposal has been examined in the Ministry. It is requested to submit requisite information for further action into the matter: | 04 May 2020 | | 3. | NA | The proposal has been examined in the Ministry. It is requested to submit following information for further action into the matter:
(i) The project proponent shall submit land conversion details for Industrial use from the Revenue Dept/Industries Dept of the State Govt.
(ii) The project proponent shall submit the details of court cases, its present status, operational status of the project in the area, through State Pollution Control Board, along with SPCB’s comments on permission of such polluting Industries in the area.
(iii) Justification for not adhering to the observations of the EAC held during 20-22 November, 2019. The Committee in its meeting held on 13-15 April, 2020 noted that the project proponent has not made any serious rework on the proposal and additional details desired has not been properly provided by the project proponent. Though, EIA report is updated with annexing the additional details, the purpose has not been served and EIA report has not been revised. It was noted that the existing area was with another company and details regarding project operation in the area has not been provided. The information related to court cases require verification from the SPCB and Committee desired that the Ministry may request SPCB regarding the court cases and operation of the project in the area. The Committee also showed its displeasure regarding water balance, baseline data and GLC. The Committee suggested that considering the prevailing situation of the area, CER shall be increased and atleast Rs. 12.8 crores shall be allocated. The PP shall also allocate Rs. 50 lakhs for conservation of schedule 1 species and flora and fauna of the region. The Committee also took serious note on the mismatch of ADS details provided on Parivesh portal and presented before the EAC. The observations of the Committee may be addressed.
(iv) Submit a fresh EIA report as per the ToR and in accordance with the suggestions & observations of the Committee held on 20-22 November, 2019, and addressing all the observations as above. | 04 May 2020 | | 4. | NA | The proposal has been examined in the Ministry. It is requested to submit following information for further action into the matter:
(i) The project proponent shall submit land conversion details for Industrial use from the Revenue Dept/Industries Dept of the State Govt.
(ii) The project proponent shall submit the details of court cases, its present status, operational status of the project in the area, through State Pollution Control Board, along with SPCB’s comments on permission of such polluting Industries in the area.
(iii) Justification for not adhering to the observations of the EAC held during 20-22 November, 2019. The Committee in its meeting held on 13-15 April, 2020 noted that the project proponent has not made any serious rework on the proposal and additional details desired has not been properly provided by the project proponent. Though, EIA report is updated with annexing the additional details, the purpose has not been served and EIA report has not been revised. It was noted that the existing area was with another company and details regarding project operation in the area has not been provided. The information related to court cases require verification from the SPCB and Committee desired that the Ministry may request SPCB regarding the court cases and operation of the project in the area. The Committee also showed its displeasure regarding water balance, baseline data and GLC. The Committee suggested that considering the prevailing situation of the area, CER shall be increased and atleast Rs. 12.8 crores shall be allocated. The PP shall also allocate Rs. 50 lakhs for conservation of schedule 1 species and flora and fauna of the region. The Committee also took serious note on the mismatch of ADS details provided on Parivesh portal and presented before the EAC. The observations of the Committee may be addressed.
(iv) Submit a fresh EIA report as per the ToR and in accordance with the suggestions & observations of the Committee held on 20-22 November, 2019, and addressing all the observations as above. | 04 May 2020 | | 5. | ADS Reply Letter | Submission of replies for 14th EAC Meeting held on 20th November, 2019 at MoEF&CC. | 12 Feb 2020 | | 6. | NA | The EAC, during deliberations noted that the project details mentioned in the EIA
report were not consistent with that presented during the meeting. The
Committee also took serious note on the quality of the EIA/EMP report prepared
by the consultant. The EAC, after detailed
delibe | 06 Dec 2019 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Ved Prakash Gupta | | Designation | Head | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | INDIAN SUCROSE LTD | | Address | G.T. road Mukerian-144211,District Hoshiyarpur,Punjab |
|