|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Gangamai Industries And Constructions Ltd. | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | Mr. A. L. More | | (c)Registered Address | 2nd floor , Tapadia Terraces, Adalat Road, Aurangabad - 431001,2nd floor , Tapadia Terraces, Adalat Road, Aurangabad - 431001,Ahmednagar,Maharashtra-431001 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Mr. Vishnu S Khedekar | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Vise President | | (c)Address | NIL | | (d)Pin code | 431001 | | (e)E-mail | gangamaisugar_ind@rediffmail.com | | (f)STD Code. | 240(f)Telephone No. | 2333933 | | (g)Fax No. | 2333927 | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(g) Distilleries
| | Minor Activity | | | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/MH/IND2/55812/2014 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/89779/2018 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | 6, 222/3, 223, 224, 228/1, 228/2, 228/3, 233, 234 | | (b)Pincode | 414502 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 192238.22 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 192255.27 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 751648.82 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 751709.86 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 47M3, 47 M7 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 450 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 5 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 2 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Maharashtra | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Maharashtra | Ahmednagar | Shevgaon | |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | J-11011/14/2015/IA II (I) | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR | 30 Apr 2015 | | (f)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | | (b)Date of Apply of EC | 09 Jun 2016 | | (c)Date of Issue of EC | 07 Jan 2020 | | (d)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 17 Oct 2018 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0 |
| At the Factory site - Gangamai Industries And Constructions Ltd., (GIACL), Najik Babulgaon, Post- Rakshi, Tal.: Shevgaon, Dist.: Ahmednagar, Maharashtra State. | | State : | Maharashtra | | District : | Ahmednagar | | Tehsil : | Shevgaon | | Village : | Najik babhulgaon |
| 178 | There was no any major issues raised during Public hearing. Few issues raised they are as –
- provision of employment to local people
- provision of health care facilities
- supply of boiler ash i | District Magistrate | |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Nagpur | | (iii)Letter No. | EC-909/RON/2018-NGP/4701 | | (iv)Status of Compliance | Compiled | | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | | (vi)Date of site visit | Dec 12 2018 12:00AM | | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Rectified Spirit | 60 | 90 | 150 | Kilo Litre per Day(KLD) | | Road | | | (2.) | Compost (from spentwash treatment) | 20935 | 0 | 20935 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | | | (3.) | Spentwash Dry powder (99% solids) | 0 | 33000 | 33000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | | | (4.) | Extra Neutral Alcohol | 60 | 90 | 150 | Kilo Litre per Day(KLD) | | Road | | | (5.) | Ethanol | 60 | 90 | 150 | Kilo Litre per Day(KLD) | | Road | | | (6.) | Spentwash Dry powder (95 % solids) | 0 | 24090 | 24090 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | |
|
| | | (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
| S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Daitillery | 60 KLPD | 90 KLPD | 150 KLPD | |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | 18 May 2018 | | (iv)Valid Upto | 31 Aug 2018 | | (v)File No. | Format - 1.0/BO/CAC-CELL/UAN NO 0000034874/O/CAC-1 | | (vi)Application No. | MPCB-CONSENT-0000034874p | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 19.18 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 7.70 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 0.5 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 0.53 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 10800 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 7200 | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 18000 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Molasses | 118800 | Tons per Annum | | Own Sugar Factory | Pipe Conveyor | | 0.5 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Mar 2018 To 31 May 2018 | | (b)Season | Summer | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 30.20 | 9.3 | 27.35 | 80 | | (2.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 26.20 | 13.80 | 22.13 | 60 | | (3.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 68.2 | 55.70 | 64.6 | 100 | | (4.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 39.90 | 14.30 | 35.75 | 80 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.73 | 7.28 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (2.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 50.80 | 10.23 | 100 | 100 | | (3.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 139.54 | 58.12 | 250 | 250 | | (4.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 1020.96 | 359.51 | 500 | 500 | | (5.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.25 | 0.05 | 1 | 1 | | (6.) | Heavy Metals | | Iron as Fe | mg/l | | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.30 | | (7.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 337.57 | 185.59 | 200 | 200 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 3 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | COD | | mg/l | | 28.64 | 20.39 | E | | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 2.8 | 2.4 | E | | (3.) | pH | | NA | | 7.54 | 7.47 | E | | (4.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 11.39 | 8.87 | E |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 7 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 48 | 37 | 70 | | (2.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 68.9 | 49.8 | 75 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | N(Nitrogen) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 953.56 | 144.40 | | (2.) | P(Phosphorus) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 145.64 | 24.12 | | (3.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 2.96 | 1.19 | | (4.) | pH | Others | NA | 7.61 | 7.46 | | (5.) | K(Potassium) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 412.26 | 158.92 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 19.10 To 2.15 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 1.4 To 19.70 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | NA | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 271 | 15 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Jack Well | | Ow. No./JID/N.I.Agreement/6643 | 08 Dec 2014 | 285 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Domestic Effluent | 8 | 25 | STP | Green Belt Renewal Plant | | 8 | | | (2.) | Spentwash | 1182 | 1200 | Biomethanation followed by Conc. in MEE & Powder in ATFD | Others | Spentwash powder is used as mannure | 1182 | 0 | | (3.) | Industrial other effluent | 375.25 | 1000 | CPU comprises of Primary-secondary and tertiary treatment | Reuse within the Plant & Recycling | | 375.25 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 1565.25 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 1565.25 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Yeast Sludge | Industrial Waste | | 13200 | Tons | 5 | Road | | Others | used as mannure |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 22.13 | 1.11 | 0.00039 | 22.13039 | 60 | | (2.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 27.35 | 1.11 | 0.0002 | 27.3502 | 80 | | (3.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 64.6 | 1.11 | 0.0016 | 64.6016 | 100 | | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 35.75 | 1.11 | 0.0001 | 35.7501 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | Boiler | Bagasse | 76 | 4 | PM10 | | 64.60 | | (2.) | Boiler | Biogas | 45 | 1.2 | SO2 | | 63 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 4000 | | (b)Source | Own Co-gen plant | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Copy of Agreement | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 900 KVA | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 5.5 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 33.06 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 33.06 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 18388 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 840 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 130 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 3023 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 1316.9 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 33.06 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 0 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Fallow land | 7684 | | Total (ha.) | 31414.960000000003 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Built Up Area | | 17.95 | Distillery, Sugar factory & Co-gen plant | | (2.) | Green belt | | 10.17 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | ESZs | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project | | (2.) | Corridors | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project | | (3.) | Wildlife Corridors | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project | | (4.) | Critically Polluted Area | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project | | (5.) | WLS | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project | | (6.) | NPA | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project | | (7.) | ESAs | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, WLS, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & Wildlife corridors in 10 Km radious of project |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Defence Installations | | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of defense installation in 10 Km radius of project | | (2.) | Archaeological Sites | | Mahadev Mandir at Ghotan | 2.5 | Not notified by Archaeological department | | (3.) | Forest | | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of defense installation in 10 Km radius of project |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 0 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | 0 | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Schedule-I Species | Indian Blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra) | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | No | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 10 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 30 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 15 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 20 | | (e)No. of working days | 330 | | (f)Total Manpower | 75 | |
|
|
| S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
|---|
| (1.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 10.17 | 0 | 10.17 | | (2.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 38 | 0 | 38 | | (3.) | No. of Plants | 15658 | 0 | 15658 | | (4.) | Funds Allocated | 50 | 0 | 50 |
|
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Social | Employment Generation, Improvement in physical and social infrastructure, .Upliftment of local population, | | (2.) | Financial | The alcohol generated from project would be used for blending it with petrol so as to save foreign currency | | (3.) | Environmental | The community that resides in the nearby areas will be benefited directly or indirectly by this project. |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1518/SA 063 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Equinox Environmets (I) Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur | | (iii)Address | F-11, Namdev Nest, 1160 ‘E’ ward, Opp. Kamala College, Sykes Extension, Kolhapur | | (iv)Mobile No. | 9657865122 | | (v)Landline No. | 0231253123 | | (vi)Email Id | projects@equinoxenvi.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 21 Oct 2018 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | There is no Form-2 and/or any other details visible on the portal. | 05 Jan 2019 | | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 08 Jan 2019 | | 3. | NA | Please inform/provide/clarify the following:-
- Accreditation of EIA consultant is valid only up to 21/10/2018, and as such, the EIA/EMP report is not acceptable.
- Copy of the EC dated 18/10/2017 to be uploaded against column 6(d) of Form-2.
- Firm commitment of the regulatory authority to supply surface water of 271 cum/day.
- | 16 Jan 2019 | | 4. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 25 Jan 2019 | | 5. | NA | Earlier EC dated 18/10/2017 stipulates one of the condition to obtain wildlife clearance. In this regard, please submit authentic documents to confirm that the project site is outside the notified ESZ for the Jayakwadi Bird Sanctuary. Also, clarification for no more requirement of wildlife clearance from the concerned regulatory authority.
Present status for accreditation of the EIA consultant needs to be confirmed by NABET. | 02 Feb 2019 | | 6. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 06 Feb 2019 | | 7. | NA | - As requested earlier also, please clarify for no requirement of wildlife clearance along with supporting documents.
- Status of earlier proposal submitted on 9/6/2016 for wildlife clearance from the Standing Committee of NBWL.
- Present status of NABET accreditation of the EIA consultant. | 09 Feb 2019 | | 8. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 05 Mar 2019 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | ADS Letter | Remarks | Date of ADS |
|---|
| 1. | ADS Reply Letter | Amendment in ToR's through revised Form-1 for regularizing total project land area from 27.06 Ha to 33.7 Ha as per clarification presented. | 20 Sep 2019 | | 2. | NA | | 20 Aug 2019 | | 3. | ADS Reply Letter | R.O Certified report on compliance of EC conditions granted to 5500 TCD sugar factory and 32 MW Co-gen plant | 21 Jun 2019 | | 4. | NA | Deferred | 17 May 2019 |
|
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Mr. Vishnu S Khedekar | | Designation | Vise President | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | Mr. A. L. More | | Address | 2nd floor , Tapadia Terraces, Adalat Road, Aurangabad - 431001 |
|