|
1. | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | Details of Project: | (a)Name of the project(s) | Desh Bhakt Ratnappa Kumbhar Panchganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (DBRKPSSKL) Leased to Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | DBRK PANCHGANGA SSK LTD LEASED UNIT OF SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD | (c)Registered Address | A/p. Ganganagar, Ichalkaranji, Tal.: Hathkanangale, Dist.: Kolhapur,,Kolhapur,Maharashtra-416116 | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Others | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
2. | Address for the correspondence: | (a)Name of the Applicant | Prakash Shripati Sawant | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | GeneralManager | (c)Address | A/p. Ganganagar, Ichalkaranji, Tal.Hathkanangale, Dist. Kolhapur,,Belgaum,Belgaum,Karnataka-590001 | (d)Pin code | 590001 | (e)E-mail | savant@renukasugars.com | (f)STD Code. | 831(f)Telephone No. | 2404000 | (g)Fax No. | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
3. | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(j) Sugar Industry
| Minor Activity | | (b)Category | A | (c)Proposal Number | IA/MH/IND2/84951/2000 | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/84947/2018 | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 3 | (f)Project Type | Expansion |
|
|
4. | Location of the Project: | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | 29, | (b)Pincode | 590001 | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | From | | Degree | 16.7136 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 16.7175 | Minutes | | Second | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | From | | Degree | 74.4477 | Minutes | | Second | | From | | Degree | 74.4501 | Minutes | | Second | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 47L5, 47L6, 47L9, 47L10 | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 582 | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 4 | (j)Seismic Zone | 3 | |
|
5. | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | (b)Main State of the project | Maharashtra | |
|
|
Details of State of the project |
---|
S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
---|
NIL | |
|
6. | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR)/EC: | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | MPCB-CONSENT-0000051296 | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 08 Nov 2000 | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 08 Nov 2000 | (d)Date of Apply of EC | 25 Jun 2018 | (e)Date of Issue of EC | 25 Jun 2018 | (f)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | (g)Previous EC Letter | Copy of Previous EC letter | |
|
7. | Details of Public Consultation: | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
---|
|
S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
---|
(1.) | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | Date : | 04 Sep 2018 | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0 |
| D.B.R.K. Panchaganga S.S.K. Ltd. Sugar Factory, Tal.:Hatkanangale, Dist.: Kolhapur, State: Maharashtra | State : | Maharashtra | District : | Kolhapur | Tehsil : | Hatkanangle | Village : | Ichalkaranji |
| 150 | 1.Air pollution due to bagasse particles suspened from overhead conveyor belt.
2.Improper environmental management at Distillery in project complex
3.Air pollution due to fly ash | Others | Additional District Magistrate | |
8. | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | Details Not Applicable | |
|
9. | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | (a)Details of certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance condition | (i)Certified Compliance By | Regional | (ii)Details of Regional Office of MoEFCC / Zonal Office of CPCB / SPCB / UTPCC from which certified report on | Nagpur | (iii)Letter No. | EC-786/RON/2018-NGP/4134 | (iv)Status of Compliance | Compiled | (v)Certified report on compliance of earlier environmental clearance conditions (Including Monitoring Report) | Copy of Certified Compliance Report | (vi)Date of site visit | Jul 12 2018 12:00AM | (b)Details of Capacity Expansion | |
|
S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity From | Quantity To | Total | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
---|
(1.) | Molasses | 45000 | 45000 | 90000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | | (2.) | Bagasse | 300000 | 300000 | 600000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Conveyor Belt | | (3.) | Sugar | 130000 | 130000 | 260000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | | (4.) | Pressmud | 40000 | 40000 | 80000 | Tons per Annum(TPA) | | Road | | |
| (c)Details of Configuration | |
|
S. No. | Plant / Equipment / Facility | Existing Configuration | Proposed Configuration | Final configuration after expansion | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Sugar Factory | 5000 TCD | 5000 TCD | 10000 TCD | - | |
9.1. | Details of Consent to Operate | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | (iii)Date of Issue | 04 Dec 2015 | (iv)Valid Upto | 31 Jul 2016 | (v)File No. | Format 1.0/BO/CAC-CELL/EIC No. PN-26272-15/R/CAC-1 | (vi)Application No. | MPCB-CONSENT-0000051296 | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
10. | Project Cost: | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 80.90 | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 2.54 | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 2 | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 12.90 | |
|
11. | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | Yes | d)Inter-State boundaries and international boundaries | Yes | | |
12. | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No | | |
13. | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 5000 | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | 5000 | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 10000 | |
|
  13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
---|
S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
---|
(1.) | Sugar cane | 2000000 | Tons per Annum | | Near by Farms | Road | | 25 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | (2.) | Bagasse as fuel for co generation power plant | 305280 | Tons per Annum | | Own sugar factory | Conveyor Belt | | 0 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | |
|
14. | Baseline Data : | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Oct 2017 To 31 Dec 2017 | (b)Season | Post-Monsoon | |
|
14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 28.90 | 12.90 | 20.78 | 60 | (2.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 47.90 | 14.22 | 30.29 | 80 | (3.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 73.30 | 33.70 | 64.53 | 100 | (4.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 63.00 | 19.40 | 55.65 | 80 | |
14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
---|
(1.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.42 | 0.17 | 1 | 1 | (2.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 804.13 | 364.17 | 200 | 200 | (3.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 1328.33 | 804.27 | 500 | 500 | (4.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 337.18 | 265.71 | 250 | 250 | (5.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.87 | 7.1 | 6.5 | 8.5 | (6.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 52 | 40 | 100 | 100 | |
14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
---|
(1.) | COD | | mg/l | | 385.23 | 33.30 | E | (2.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 140.66 | 12.80 | E | (3.) | DO | | mg/l | | 5.1 | 1.4 | E | (4.) | pH | | NA | | 8.06 | 7.15 | E | |
14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 74.1 | 44.1 | 75 | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 65.3 | 35.4 | 70 | |
14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 5 |
---|
S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
---|
(1.) | pH | Others | NA | 8.0 | 7.5 | (2.) | K(Potassium) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 485.36 | 335.32 | (3.) | P(Phosphorus) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 30.25 | 17.23 | (4.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 160 | 105 | (5.) | N(Nitrogen) | Milligram per Kilogram | | 923.54 | 632.51 | |
|
14.6. | Details of Ground Water Table: | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 1.5 To 11.7 | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 0.3 To 9.6 | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
---|
(1.) | Surface | | 50 | 4.8 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Jack Well | | 6673 | 31 Aug 2013 | 2315 | |
|
15.1. | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
---|
S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
---|
(1.) | Domestic Effluent | 45 | 50 | Proposed STP | Green Belt Renewal Plant | Used for Flushing purpose | 45 | | (2.) | Industrial Effluents (Sugar & Co-gen) | 890 | 1000 | Existing ETP to be upgraded under expansion. | Green Belt Renewal Plant,Others | treated water-for crop cultivation | 890 | 0 | (3.) | Industrial Effluent (Distillery) | 360 | 360 | Reboiler followed by comoposting | Others | Used for composting | 360 | 0 | |
|
16.1. | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 1295 | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 1295 | |
|
17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
---|
S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
---|
(1.) | Boiler Ash | Bottom Ash | | 4320 | Tons | 25 | Road | | Others | Farmers/ sale to brick manufactures | (2.) | ETP Sludge | Industrial Waste | | 3.5 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Used for plantation as Manure | (3.) | Boiler Ash (Distillery Leased to Saideep Traders) | Bottom Ash | | 600 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Mixed with pressmud and used for composting | |
|
|
18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
---|
S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
---|
(1.) | PM2.5 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 24.85 | 1.08 | 1.2 | 26.05 | 60 | (2.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 41.66 | 1.08 | 0.1 | 41.76 | 80 | (3.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 64.53 | 1.08 | 8.77 | 73.3 | 100 | (4.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 55.65 | 0 | 0 | 55.65 | 80 | |
|
18.2. Stack Details |
---|
S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
---|
(1.) | 140 TPH boiler | Bagasse | 75 | 4.43 | PM10 | | 0 | |
|
19. | Power Requirement: | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 13000 | (b)Source | Own Co-gen plant | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Not Applicable | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 1010 KVA (2No) | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 6 | |
|
20. | Land Ownership Pattern: | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 59.46 | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | Total Land (ha.) | 59.46 | |
|
21. | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 14740 | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 6881.62 | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 0 | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 228.86 | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 5772.4 | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 0 | (g)Forest (ha.) | 0 | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | (j)Others (ha.) : Scrub land | 3791.72 | Total (ha.) | 31414.6 | |
|
22. Land requirement for various activities |
---|
S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Built Up Area | | 21.22 | | (2.) | Green belt | | 19.62 | | |
|
|
23. | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Critically Polluted Area | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | (2.) | WLS | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | (3.) | NPA | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | (4.) | Corridors | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | (5.) | Wildlife Corridors | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | (6.) | ESZs | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | (7.) | ESAs | Nil | 0 | There is no presence of any CPA, NPA, ESAs, ESZs, Corridors & wildlife corridors in 10 Km radius of project | |
23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
---|
S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
---|
(1.) | Forest | | NA | 0 | There is no forest land within 10 km from project site | (2.) | Archaeological Sites | | NA | 0 | There are no archealogical sites within 10 km from project site | (3.) | Defence Installations | | NA | 0 | There are no any defence installations within 10 km from project site | |
|
23.3. | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
24. | Forest Land: | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
25. | Tree Cutting: | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
26. | Land Acquisition Status: | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 0 | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | Nil | |
|
27. | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | (b)No. of Households | 0 | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
28. | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | No | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | No | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
29. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | Yes | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Core Area | Panchganga River | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
30. | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | No | |
|
31. | Manpower Requirement: | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 0 | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 00 | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 25 | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 0 | (e)No. of working days | 200 | (f)Total Manpower | 25 | |
|
|
S. No. | Description | Existing | Proposed | Total |
---|
(1.) | Total Area of Green Belt | 89197.7 | 107037.25 | 196234.95 | (2.) | No. of Plants | 1546 | 2500 | 4046 | (3.) | Funds Allocated | 3500000 | 4000000 | 7500000 | (4.) | Percentage of Total Project Area | 15 | 18 | 33 | |
|
33. Project Benefits |
---|
S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
---|
(1.) | Environmental | Sugar Factory is the 2nd Largest agro-based industry in the Country.
Maximum Utilization of Sugarcane in Command Area tho’ Sugar Factory Expansion. | (2.) | Social | Sugar Industry is instrumental in Resource Mobilization, Employment Generation, Income Generation and in creating Social Infrastructure in Command Area | |
|
34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 3 |
|
|
36. | Details of Court Cases: | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | Yes | (b)Name of the Court | High Courts | (c)Name of the Sub Court | Bombay | (d)Case No. | No. 126/2013 | (e)Orders/Directions of the court ,if any and its relevance with the proposed project | Removal of bagasse conveyor belt across road | (f)Case Details | Regarding removal of bagasse carrying conveyor bel | (g)Uploaded Court Order | Copy of Court Order | |
|
37. | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
38. | Details of EIA Consultant: | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | (i)Accreditation No. | NABET/EIA/1518/SA 063 | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | Equinox Environmets (I) Pvt. Ltd. | (iii)Address | F-11, Namdev Nest, 1160 ‘E’ ward, Opp. Kamala College, Sykes Extension, Kolhapur | (iv)Mobile No. | 9657865122 | (v)Landline No. | 0231253123 | (vi)Email Id | projects@equinoxenvi.com | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 3 | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 21 Oct 2018 | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
Essential Detail Sought: |
---|
Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
---|
1. | NA | Please confirm categorization of the unit vis-a-vis the schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. | 23 Nov 2018 | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 28 Nov 2018 | |
Additional Detail Sought : NIL |
| Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| Name of Applicant | Prakash Shripati Sawant | Designation | GeneralManager | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | DBRK PANCHGANGA SSK LTD LEASED UNIT OF SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD | Address | A/p. Ganganagar, Ichalkaranji, Tal.: Hathkanangale, Dist.: Kolhapur |
|