|
| 1. | | Whether it is a violation case and application is being submitted under Notification No. S.O.804(E) dated 14.03.2017 ? | No | | Details of Project: | | (a)Name of the project(s) | Harsha Sugars Ltd | | (b)Name of the Company / Organisation | HARSHA SUGARS LIMITED | | (c)Registered Address | Sy No 411/1, 411/2, 413/1, 412 Saundatti Village, Belgaum,,Belgaum,Karnataka-591126 | | (d)Legal Status of the Company | Private | | (e)Joint Venture | No | |
|
| 2. | | Address for the correspondence: | | (a)Name of the Applicant | Channaraj Hattiholi | | (b)Designation (Owner/ Partner/ CEO) | Director | | (c)Address | Plot No 151, 2 nd Stage, Opp Hanuman Temple, Hanuman Nagar, Belagavi,,Belgaum,Belgaum,Karnataka-590001 | | (d)Pin code | 590001 | | (e)E-mail | harshasugarseia@gmail.com | | (f)STD Code. | 831(f)Telephone No. | 2459977 | | (g)Fax No. | | | (h)Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority of the person making this application to make application on behalf of the User Agency . | Annexure-Uploaded Copy of documents in support of the competence/authority | |
|
| 3. | | Category of the Project/Activity as per Schedule of EIA Notification,2006: | | (a.I)Project/Activity | 5(g) Distilleries
5(j) Sugar Industry
| | Minor Activity | 1(d) Thermal Power Plants
| | (b)Category | A | | (c)Proposal Number | IA/KA/IND2/64689/2017 | | (d)Master Proposal Number(Single Window) | SW/78241/2018 | | (e)EAC concerned (for category A Projects only) | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (f)Project Type | Fresh EC |
|
|
| 4. | | Location of the Project: | | (a)Plot/Survey/Khasra No. | Sy No 411/1, 411/2, 413/1, 412, 411/3 Saundatti Vi | | (b)Pincode | 591126 | | (c)Bounded Latitudes (North) | | | From | | | Degree | 15.71 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 15.72 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (d)Bounded Longitudes (East) | | | From | | | Degree | 75.05 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | From | | | Degree | 75.06 | | Minutes | | | Second | | | (e)Survey of India Topo Sheet No. | 48M1 48M2 48I13 48I14 | | (f)Uploaded Topo Sheet File | Copy of Topo Sheet File | | (g)Maximum Elevation Above Means Sea Level(AMSL) | 657 | | (h)Uploaded (kml) File | Copy of Kml File  | | (i)Distance of Nearest HFL from the project boundary within the study area | 5 | | (j)Seismic Zone | 2 | |
|
| 5. | | (a)Number of States in which Project will be Executed | 1 | | (b)Main State of the project | Karnataka | |
|
|
| Details of State(s) of the project |
|---|
| S. No. | State Name | District Name | Tehsil Name | Village Name |
|---|
| (1.) | Himachal Pradesh | Kangra | Dharmsala(T) | | | (2.) | Karnataka | Belgaum | Saundatti | |
|
|
| 6. | | Details of Terms of Reference (ToR): | | (a)MoEF&CC / SEIAA File Number | IA-J-11011/236/2017-IA-II(I) | | (b)Date of Apply of TOR | 20 May 2017 | | (c)Date of Issue of TOR / Standard ToR | 19 Jul 2017 | | (d)Previous TOR Letter | Copy of Previous TOR letter | |
|
| 7. | | Details of Public Consultation: | | (a)Whether the Project Exempted from Public Hearing? | No | | (b)Whether details of Public Hearing available? | Yes | | (c)Whether Public hearing was presided over by an officer of the rank of Additional District Magistrate or above | Yes | |
|
| 7.1. Details of Public Hearing |
|---|
|
| S. No. | Details of Advertisement | Details of Public Hearing | Venue | Location Details | No. of People Attended | Issues Raised | Designation of Presiding Officer | Other Designation of Presiding Officer |
|---|
| (1.) | | | Copy of Public Hearing : | Copy of Public Hearing | | Date : | 18 Jul 2018 | | Distance of Public Hearing Venue from the Proposed Project : | 0 |
| Project site | | State : | Karnataka | | District : | Belgaum | | Tehsil : | Saundatti | | Village : | Saundatti |
| 215 | Positive reposnse by the public | Deputy Commissioner | |
|
| 8. | | Details of Project Configuration/Product: | |
|
| 8.1. Project Configuration |
|---|
| S. No. | Plant/Equipment/Facility | Configuration | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Distillery | 60 KLPD | | | (2.) | Sugar cane crushing | 7500 TCD | | | (3.) | Cogeneration Power | 33 MW/hr | inclusive of 3 MW/hr from incineration boiler |
|
| 8.2. Product |
|---|
| S. No. | Product/Activity (Capacity/Area) | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product | Other Mode of Transport / Transmission of Product |
|---|
| (1.) | Sugar | 7500 | Tons Crushed per Day | | Road | | | (2.) | Power | 33 | Mega Watt(MW) | | Others | Transferred to grid | | (3.) | Distillery (Ethanol/ ENA/RS) | 60 | Kilo Litre per Day | | Road | |
|
|
| 9. | | In case of Expansion / Modernisation / One Time Capacity Expansion (only for Coal Mining) / Expansion under Clause 7(ii) / Modernisation under Clause 7(ii) / Change of Product Mix under Clause 7(ii): | | Details Not Applicable | |
|
| 9.1. | | Details of Consent to Operate | | (i)Whether Consent to operate obtained ? | NA | | (ii)Copies of all Consent to operate obtained since inception | NA | | (iii)Date of Issue | 15 Sep 2018 | | (iv)Valid Upto | 30 Jun 2022 | | (v)File No. | 307796 4098 | | (vi)Application No. | 35496 | | (vii)Copy of Consent to operate valid as on date | Copy of Consent to Operate | |
|
|
| 10. | | Project Cost: | | (a)Total Cost of the Project at current price level (in Crores) | 307.32 | | (b) Funds Allocated for Environment Management (Capital) (in Crores) | 9.39 | | (c) Funds Allocated Towards CER (Corporate Environment Responsibility) (in Crores) | 7.7 | | (d) Funds Allocated for Environment Management Plan (EMP) (Recurring per Annum) (in Crores) | 0.87 | |
|
| 11. | | Whether project attracts the General Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
| |
| 12. | | Whether project attract the Specific Condition specified in the Schedule of EIA Notification ? | No |
|
|
| 13. | | Raw Material / Fuel Requirement: | | (a)Proposed quantity of raw material/fuel | 7500 | | (b)Existing quantity of raw material/fuel | N/A | | (c)Total quantity of raw material/fuel | 7500 | |
|
| 13.1. Raw Material / Fuel Profile |
|---|
| S. No. | Raw Material / Fuel | Quantity | Unit | Other Unit | Source (incase of Import. please specify country and Name of the port from which Raw Material / Fuel is received ) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Distance of Source from Project Site (in Kilometres) (In case of import, distance from the port from which the raw material / fuel is received) | Type of Linkage | Other Type of Linkage | Uploaded Copy of Linkage |
|---|
| (1.) | Sugar cane | 1350000 | Tons Crushed per Day | | Cane Allotted area | Road | | 15 | Others | Cane allotment | Copy of Linkage | | (2.) | Molasses | 72000 | Tons per Annum | | Inhouse | Pipe Conveyor | | 0 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | | (3.) | bio fuel as rice husk/bagasse | 362400 | Tons per Annum | | Inhouse | Conveyor Belt | | 0 | Captive | | Copy of Linkage | | (4.) | Sulphur powder | 900 | Tons per Annum | | Mumbai | Road | | 430 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (5.) | limestone/hydrated lime | 2880 | Tons per Annum | | Lokapur | Road | | 57 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage | | (6.) | Nutrients | 18 | Tons per Annum | | Mumbai | Road | | 430 | Open Market | | Copy of Linkage |
|
|
| 14. | | Baseline Data : | | (a)Period of Base Line Data Collection | FROM 01 Oct 2017 To 31 Dec 2017 | | (b)Season | Winter | |
|
| 14.1. No. of ambient Air Quality (AAQ) monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | 98 Percentile Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM10 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 80 | 47 | 80 | 100 | | (2.) | Others | CO | Mili Gram per Meter Cube | 0.99 | 0.62 | 0.98 | 4 | | (3.) | PM2.5 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 24 | 11 | 23.54 | 60 | | (4.) | SO2 | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 13.87 | 7.10 | 12.21 | 80 | | (5.) | NOx | | Micro Gram per Meter Cube | 19.87 | 14.32 | 18.64 | 80 |
|
| 14.2. No. of Ground Water monitoring locations : 6 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Heavy Metal | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Desirable Limit | Maximum Permissible Limit |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | | NA | | 7.7 | 7.24 | 6.5 | 8.5 | | (2.) | TDS | | | mg/l | | 1852 | 452 | 500 | 2000 | | (3.) | TSS | | | mg/l | | 140 | 6 | 0 | 0 | | (4.) | Heavy Metals | | COPPER | mg/l | | 0.013 | 0.007 | 0.05 | 1.5 | | (5.) | Fluoride | | | mg/l | | 0.86 | 0.20 | 1.0 | 1.5 | | (6.) | Total Hardness | | | mg/l | | 650 | 174 | 200 | 600 | | (7.) | Chlorides | | | mg/l | | 649.67 | 62.61 | 250 | 1000 |
|
| 14.3. No. of Surface Water monitoring locations : 3 |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Classification of inland water body |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | | NA | | 8.1 | 7.8 | E | | (2.) | DO | | mg/l | | 5.6 | 5.2 | E | | (3.) | BOD | | mg/l | | 6 | 4 | E | | (4.) | COD | | mg/l | | 24 | 16 | E | | (5.) | Others | TDS | mg/l | | 938 | 214 | E |
|
| 14.4. No. of Ambient Noise monitoring locations : 8 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | Leq(Day) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 52.15 | 46.28 | 55 | | (2.) | Leq(Night) | A-weighted decibels(dB(A)) | 50.54 | 36.1 | 45 |
|
| 14.5. No. of Soil Sample Monitored locations : 7 |
|---|
| S. No. | Parameter | Unit | Other Unit | Maximum Value | Minimum Value |
|---|
| (1.) | pH | Others | No unit | 9.8 | 8.77 | | (2.) | N(Nitrogen) | Kilogram per hectare | | 220.71 | 147.14 | | (3.) | P(Phosphorus) | Kilogram per hectare | | 120.06 | 53.64 | | (4.) | Electric Conductivity | Millisiemens per Centimetre | | 207 | 82.6 | | (5.) | K(Potassium) | Milliequivalents per 100 Gram | | 95.77 | 39.90 |
|
|
| 14.6. | | Details of Ground Water Table: | | (a)Range of Water Table Pre-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 10 To 5 | | (b)Range of Water Table Post-Monsoon Season (Meters Below Ground Level (m bgl)) | From 2 To 5 | | (c)Whether Ground Water Intersection will be there ? | No | |
|
| 15. Details of Water Requirement (During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Source Other | Required Quantity (Kilolitre per Day (Kld)) | Distance from Source | Copy of Permission from Competent Authority | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Method of Water Withdrawal | Other Method of Water Withdrawal | Letter No. | Date of Issue | Permitted Quantity |
|---|
| (1.) | Surface | | 1417 | 12.2 | Copy of Permission Letter | Pipeline | | Jack Well | | 3645 | 03 Oct 2018 | 3000 |
|
|
| 15.1. | | (a)Whether Desalination is proposed | No | |
|
| 16. Waste Water Management(During Operation) |
|---|
| S. No. | Type/Source | Quantity of Waste Water Generated (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Capacity (Kilolitre per Day) | Treatment Method | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal | Quantity of Treated Water Used in Recycling/Reuse (Kilolitre per Day) | Quantity of Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) |
|---|
| (1.) | Cogenration Effluent during Offseason | 619 | 1000 | UASB | Green Belt Renewal Plant | | 619 | | | (2.) | Sugar unit Effluent during season | 772 | 1000 | UASB | Green Belt Renewal Plant | | 772 | |
|
|
| 16.1. | | (a)Total Waste Water Generation (Kilolitre per Day) | 1391 | | (b)Total Discharged Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 0 | | (c)Total Reused Water (Kilolitre per Day) | 1391 | |
|
| 17. Solid Waste Generation/Management |
|---|
| S. No. | Name of Waste | Item | Other Item | Quantity per Annum | Unit | Distance from Site(KM) | Mode of Transport | Other Mode of Transport | Mode of Disposal | Other Mode of Disposal |
|---|
| (1.) | Boiler ash | Fly Ash | | 3000 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Others | Flyash Brick Manufacturers | | (2.) | Pressmud | Industrial Waste | | 54000 | Tons | 15 | Road | | Others | Member Farmers | | (3.) | Domestic | Municipal Solid Waste | | 28 | Tons | 6.5 | Road | | Authorized Recyclers | | | (4.) | Incineration flyash | Fly Ash | | 1550 | Tons | 10 | Road | | Others | Flyash Brick Manufacturers | | (5.) | Sludge from ETP and CPU | Others | Sludge | 10 | Tons | 15 | Road | | Others | Member Farmers | | (6.) | Lime Grit | Industrial Waste | | 54 | Tons | 0 | Road | | Others | Used inhouse | | (7.) | Yeast sludge | Industrial Waste | | 1800 | Tons | 15 | Road | | Others | Member farmers |
|
|
|
| 18.1. Air Quality Impact Prediction |
|---|
| S. No. | Criteria Pollutants | Other Criteria Pollutants | Unit | Baseline Concentration | Distance GLC | Incremental Concentration | Total GLC | Prescribed Standard |
|---|
| (1.) | PM10 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 80.0 | 500 | 0.772 | 80.772 | 100 | | (2.) | PM2.5 | | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | (3.) | NOx | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 16.42 | 500 | 0.187 | 16.807 | 80 | | (4.) | SO2 | | Microgram per Meter Cube | 9.51 | 500 | 0.148 | 9.658 | 80 |
|
|
| 18.2. Stack Details |
|---|
| S. No. | Source | Fuel | Stack Height(m) | Stack Diameter(m) | Pollutants | Other Pollutants | Emission (GLS) |
|---|
| (1.) | 140 TPH Boiler | Bagasse | 85 | 3.2 | SO2 | | 4.47 | | (2.) | 22 TPH IB | Slop+Bagasse | 70 | 2.8 | NOx | | 48.4 | | (3.) | 140 TPH Boiler | Bagasse | 85 | 3.2 | PM10 | | 125.8 | | (4.) | 22 TPH IB | Slop+Bagasse | 70 | 2.8 | SO2 | | 20.62 | | (5.) | 140 TPH boiler | Bagasse | 85 | 3.2 | NOx | | 22.93 | | (6.) | 22 TPH IB | Slop+Bagasse | 70 | 2.8 | PM10 | | 58.5 |
|
|
| 19. | | Power Requirement: | | (a)Quantity (Kilo Volt Amps (kVA)) | 9500 | | (b)Source | Captive | | (c)Uploaded Copy of Agreement | Copy of Agreement | | (d)Standby Arrangement (Details of DG Sets) | 2 X 1250 KVA | | (e)Stack Height (in m) | 15 | |
|
| 20. | | Land Ownership Pattern: | | (a)Forest Land (ha.) | 0 | | (b)Private Land (ha.) | 20.7 | | (c)Government Land (ha.) | 0 | | (d)Revenue Land (ha.) | 0 | | (e)Other Land (ha.) | 0 | | Total Land (ha.) | 20.7 | |
|
| 21. | | Present Land Use Breakup of the Study Area in Ha: | | (a)Agriculture Area (ha.) | 29632 | | (b)Waste/Barren Land (ha.) | 5 | | (c)Grazing/ Community Land (ha.) | 1047 | | (d)Surface Water Bodies (ha.) | 2299 | | (e)Settlements (ha.) | 1031 | | (f)Industrial (ha.) | 0 | | (g)Forest (ha.) | 10 | | (h)Mangroves (ha.) | 0 | | (i)Marine Area (ha.) | 0 | | (j)Others (ha.) : Eucalyptus Plantation | 30 | | Total (ha.) | 34054 | |
|
| 22. Land requirement for various activities |
|---|
| S. No. | Description of Activity / Facility / Plant / Others | Others | Land Requirement (ha.) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Main Plant | | 9.7 | Sugar + Cogen + Distillery | | (2.) | Green belt | | 6.9 | | | (3.) | Others | Storage yard+ internal road + parking | 4.1 | |
|
|
|
| 23. | | Ecological and Environmental Sensitivity (Within 10 Km):- WLS-Wild Life Sanctuaries; NPA-Notified Protected Area; ESAs-Eco Sensitive Areas; ESZs-Eco Sensitive Zones : | |
|
| 23.1. Details of Ecological Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Ecological Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | ESAs | NA | 0 | No EAS | | (2.) | Wildlife Corridors | NA | 0 | No WL Corridor | | (3.) | Critically Polluted Area | NA | 0 | No Critically Polluted area | | (4.) | WLS | NA | 0 | No WLS | | (5.) | NPA | NA | 0 | No NPA | | (6.) | ESZs | NA | 0 | No ESZ | | (7.) | Corridors | NA | 0 | No Corridor |
|
| 23.2. Details of Environmental Sensitivity : |
|---|
| S. No. | Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Other Details of Environmental Sensitivity | Name | Distance from the Project (Km) | Remarks |
|---|
| (1.) | Defence Installations | | NA | 0 | No Defence Installations | | (2.) | Forest | | Yellamma Gudda Open Scrub Forest | 7.09 | Towards NE | | (3.) | Archaeological Sites | | Srine of Godess Yellamma | 10.2 | Yellamma Temple located at Yelamma Gudda which is located at 7.09 kms |
|
|
| 23.3. | | (a)Whether Noc / Permission from the competent authority is required? | No | | (b)Whether NBWL recommendation is required? | No | |
|
| 24. | | Forest Land: | | Whether any Forest Land involved? | No | |
|
| 25. | | Tree Cutting: | | (a)No. of Trees Cut for the Project (if Forest Land not Involved) | 0 | | (b)Details of Tree Cutting and Planting of Trees | Not Applicable | |
|
| 26. | | Land Acquisition Status: | | (a)Acquired Land(Ha) | 20.7 | | (b)Land yet to be acquired(Ha) | 0 | | (c)Status of Land acquisition if not acquired | Land already in the name of Harsha Sugars Ltd | |
|
| 27. | | Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R): | | (a)No. of Villages | 0 | | (b)No. of Households | 0 | | (c)No. of PDFs (Project Displaced Families) | 0 | | (d)No. of PAFs (Project Affected Families) | 0 | | (e)Funds Allocated for R&R(in INR) (in Lacs) | 0 | | (f)Status of R&R | Completed | |
|
| 28. | | Details of Presence of Schedule-I Species: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Schedule-I Species ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Schedule-I Species | 3 species found in study area | | (b)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been prepared ? | Yes | | (i)Uploaded copy of conservation plan | Copy of conservation plan | | (ii)Fund Provision made | 100000 | | (iii)Period of Implementation | 3 years | | (c)Whether conservation plan for Schedule-I Species has been approved by competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 29. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Core Area ? | No | | (b)Whether there is Diversion Required ? | No | | (c)Whether permission has been obtained from competent authority ? | No | |
|
| 30. | | Details of Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area: | | (a)Whether there is Presence of Water Bodies in Buffer Area ? | Yes | | (i)Details of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | Renuka Sagar Reservoir | | (ii)Direction of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | North | | (iii)Distance of Water Bodies in Buffer Area | 5.0 | |
|
| 31. | | Manpower Requirement: | | (a)Permanent Employment-During Construction | 50 | | (b)Permanent Employment-During Operation | 250 | | (c)Temporary Employment- During Construction | 350 | | (d)Temporary Employment- During Operation | 120 | | (e)No. of working days | 300 | | (f)Total Manpower | 770 | |
|
| 32. | | Green Belt in Ha: | | (a)Total Area of Green Belt | 9.8 | | (b)Percentage of Total Project Area | 47.34 | | (c)No. of Plants to be Planted | 10158 | | (d)Funds Allocated for Plantation | 2500000 | | (e)Uploaded Green Belt plan | Copy of Green Belt Plan | |
|
| 33. Project Benefits |
|---|
| S. No. | Type of Project Benefits | Details of Project Benefits |
|---|
| (1.) | Environmental | Green belt will be developed within the plant premises covering a total area of about 17 acres (33 % of total area) and also in the buffer zone. This will not only help to create healthy environment in the area but also acts as pollution sink. Further avi-fauna population of the area will increase. | | (2.) | Social | With the implementation of the total project, the socio-economic status of the local people will improve and infrastructure facilities like roads, communication systems, drinking water, etc. will also develop. The land rates in the area will escalate due to the project. This will help in upliftment of the social status of the people in the area. Educational institutions will also come-up and will lead to improvement of educational status of the people in the area. Medical facilities will certai | | (3.) | Financial | The company’s management will recruit semi skilled & unskilled workers from the nearby villages, thereby improving in the social status of the villagers. It creates employment opportunities to 100-110 No's directly &200 No's indirectly. Further, the management will support the local administration and provide other form of assistance for the development of public amenities viz., water distribution, building of school rooms, health centres, Education programme, Health camps, Agricultural program |
|
|
| 34. CRZ Specific Details : Not Applicable |
| 35. Sector Specific Details : NOT APPLICABLE |
| 35. Sector Specific Details For Industrial Projects - 2 |
|
|
| 36. | | Details of Court Cases: | | (a)Whether there is any Court Cases pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up ? | No | |
|
| 37. | | Details of Direction Issued under Environment (Protection) Act / Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution)) Act / Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act: | | (a)Whether any Direction issued under EPA Act/Air Act/Water Act ? | No | |
|
| 38. | | Details of EIA Consultant: | | (a)Have you hired Consultant for preparing document? | Yes | | (i)Accreditation No. | QCI/NABET/EIA/ACO/18/00732 | | (ii)Name of the EIA Consultant | M/s Environmental Health and Safety Consultants Pv | | (iii)Address | No 174/New No .13/2, 14th 'E' Cross, Industrial Town, Agrahara Dasarahalli, Bangalore - 560 044 | | (iv)Mobile No. | 8971871282 | | (v)Landline No. | 0802301620 | | (vi)Email Id | ehscblr@yahoo.com | | (vii)Category of Accreditation | A | | (viii)Sector of Accreditation | Industrial Projects - 2 | | (ix)Validity of Accreditation | 14 Feb 2019 | | (x)Uploaded Certificate of Accreditation certified by QCI/NABET | Copy of Certificate of Accreditation | |
|
|
| Essential Detail Sought: |
|---|
| Sno. | EDS Letter | Remarks | Date of EDS |
|---|
| 1. | NA | Please inform/provide the following:-
- Copy of Consent to Operate issued by SPCB is not attached.
- Details of clearances to meet the requirement of surface water of 1567 cum/day during off season from Malprabha river. | 15 Sep 2018 | | 2. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 17 Sep 2018 | | 3. | NA | - No document attached to support the details in item 9.1.
- No confirmation regarding surface water requirement of 1567 cum/day. The letter dated 18/3/2015 and that too, for 1000 cum/day, hence not meaningful. | 21 Sep 2018 | | 4. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 04 Oct 2018 | | 5. | NA | In continuation to our earlier observations, please inform/clarify the following:-
- CTO dated 15/9/2018 is for sugar cane crushing capacity of 3750 TCD. How the proposed expansion would be from 4500 TCD to 7500 TCD.
- No progress towards clearance required for meeting the surface water requirement of 1567 cum/day.
- Rationale for the proposed expansion when the project envisaged earlier is yet to be implemented. | 09 Oct 2018 | | 6. | NA | The correction have been made as per the instruction received | 12 Nov 2018 |
|
| Additional Detail Sought : NIL |
| | Undertaking |
| I hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application and enclosures are true to be best of my knowledge and belief. And I am aware that if any part of the data and information found to be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given, if any to the project will be revoked at our risk and cost. In addition to above, I hereby give undertaking that no activity/ construction/ expansion has since been taken up. |
| | | Name of Applicant | Channaraj Hattiholi | | Designation | Director | | Name of Company (Applicant Name should not be given here) | HARSHA SUGARS LIMITED | | Address | Sy No 411/1, 411/2, 413/1, 412 Saundatti Village, Belgaum |
|