| APPENDIX I | | (See Paragraph-6) | | FORM 1M | | | | Note : If space provided against any parameter is inadequate,Kindly upload supporting document under 'Additional Attachments if any' at the last part of the Form 1M. Please note that all such Annexures must be part of single pdf document. | | (I)Basic Informations | | | (i). | Name of the Mining Lease site | Ganga River Zone/Khand No 10/16 in Village Devrakh /Chatang, District Allahabad, U. P |
| | | (iii). | |
| Type of Lease | Indivisual Area | | Size of the Mining Lease (in ha.) | 4.04 ha. |
|
| | (iv). | Capacity of the Mining Lease (TPA) | 32000 |
| | (v). | Period of Mining Lease | 6 |
| | (vi). | Expected cost of the Project | 6.2 |
| | (vii). | | Have you hired Consultant/Registered Qualified Person(RQP) for preparing document? | Yes | | Accreditation No. | 165 | | Name of Consultant/RQP | Sri UPS Chauhan | | Address | 4/366, Vikas Nagar | | Mobile No. | 9415195706 | | Landline No. | 195706 | | Email Id | upschauhan@gmail.com |
|
| | (II) | Environmental Sensitivity | | S.No | Areas | Distance in kilometer / Details | | | | 1. | (i). Nearest rail or road bridge over the concerned river,rivulet,nallah etc. in kms. | 4.0 km |
| | 2. | (ii). Nearest Infrastructural along with distance in kms | 3.55 km | | (iii). Nearest Railway Line along with distance in kms | 4.0 km | | (iv). Nearest National Highway along with distance in kms | 4.0 km | | (v). Nearest State Highway along with distance in kms | 0 km | | (vi). Nearest Major District Road along with distance in kms | 4.34 km | | (vii). Nearest Any Other Road along with distance in kms | 0 km | | (viii). Nearest Electric transmission line pole or tower distance in kms | 0 km | | (ix). Nearest Canal or check dam or reservoirs or lake or ponds distance in kms | 0 km | | (x). Nearest In-take for drinking water pump house distance in kms | 0 km | | (xi). Nearest In-take for Irrigation canal pumps distance in kms | 0 km |
| | 3. | Areas protected under international conventions, national or local legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value
| Ganga River 50 m(E)
Yamuna River- 6.0 Km (NW) | | 4. | Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons - Wetlands, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres, mountains, forests | Ganga River 50 m(E)
Yamuna River- 6.0 Km (NW) | | 5. | Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration | No | | 6. | Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters | No | | 7. | State, National boundaries | None in 5 Km | | 8. | Routes or facilities used by the public for access to recreation or other tourist,pilgrim areas | NH-76, 3.55 km(W)
Indalpur Road about 4.34 Km (W) | | 9. | Defence installations | None in 5 km | | 10. | Densely populated or built-up area, distance from nearest human habitation | Chak Sati Mishir 470 m (W)
Chak Bhawar vaish 900 m (N)
Naini 3.0 Km (SW) | | 11. | Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship,community facilities) | Naini 3.0 Km (SW)
Jahagir Memorial Charitable Hospital 3.17 Km (W) | | 12. | Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources.(ground water resources,surface resources,forestry,agriculture,fisheries,tourism,minerals) | Ganga River 50 m(E)
Yamuna River- 6.0 Km (NW) | | 13. | Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage.(those where existing legal environmental standards are exceeded) | The study area lies in Seismic Zone III. However natural hazards due to earthquakes are not anticipated to be a major environmental issue owing to the shallow mining depths. Also no major structures are part of the proposed development. Hence environmental impacts due to the proposed development are ruled out.
Erosion is not anticipated and is not considered to be a significant feature in case of flood, as the topsoil content is almost preserved
Flooding may occur depending upon the rainfall, | | 14. | Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause the project to present environmental problems (earthquakes, subsidence, landslides, erosion, flooding or extreme or adverse climatic conditions) | No | | 15. | | Is proposed mining site located over or near fissure/fracture for ground water recharge? | No |
| | 16. | | Whether the proposal involves approval or clearance under the following Regulations or Acts namely? |
| | (a). | | The Forest (Conservation) Act,1980? | No |
|
| | (b). | | The Wildlife (Protection) Act,1972? | No |
|
| | (c). | | The Coastal Regulation Zone (C.R.Z) notification,2011? | No |
|
|
|
| | 17. | | Is forest land involved (ha)? | No |
|
| | 18. | | Whether there is any litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is proposed to be set up? | No |
|
| | 19. | | New/Expansion/Modernization | New | | Proposal Number | DIA/UP/MIN/6550/2017 | | File Number | 610 | | Date of Apply EC | 19 May 2017 |
|
|
|