No. J-11015/261/2011-IA.II(M)

Government of India

Ministry of Environment & Forests

Paryavaran Bhawan,

CGO Complex, Lodi Road

New Delhi-110003.

To

Dated: 23rd May 2012

General Manager (E&F),

M/s Western Coalfields Ltd.,

Coal Estate, civil Lines,

NAGPUR -440001.

 

Sub:     Niljai Expansion (Deep) OC Coal Mine Project (expansion in ML area from 1346.63 ha to 1761.22 ha at the existing prod. capacity of 3.5 MTPA) of M/s Western Coalfields Ltd., Dist. Yavatmal, Maharashtra (TOR) -reg

Sir,

 

            This is with reference to your response dated 28.02.2012 on the MOEF letter dated 27.01.2012 on the clarifications sought by the Expert Appraisal Committee (Thermal & Coal Mining) in the meeting held on 2nd-3rd January 2012 for TOR.

 

The proposal was further considered in the EAC (T&C) meeting held on 23rd-24th April 2012. In the presentation made before the Committee, the proponent presented details of the present and proposed expansion for the major operational parameters. It was informed that there would be no change in peak production capacity of 3.5 MTPA, no forestland is involved and no change in mining method that is opencast mining by shovel-dumper combination. It was informed that the expansion involved expansion of ML area from 1346.63 ha to 1761.22 ha and of the total additional area to be acquired, 382.34 ha is agricultural land, 32.25 ha is Govt. land. The total estimated OB generation would also increase from 67.915 Mm3 to 383.51Mm3 as the mine is proposed to be deepened involving higher stripping ratio of 12.39 cum/t. Of the total OB generation, 244 Mm3 of OB would be stored externally and 138.86 Mm3 of OB would be backfilled into two quarries (Quarry-I: 126.13 Mm3 & Quarry–II: 12.73 Mm3). It was informed that as per the conceptual mine closure plan for the ML area of 1761.22 ha, 1072.20 ha area would be developed with plantation, 48 ha for public infrastructure & other uses, 347.90 ha would be undisturbed/technically reclaimed area and a final mine void left in an area of 293.12 ha of 200m depth. It was clarified that the working of the 3 neighbouring mines which are proposed for expansion for a combined production of 8 MTPA by further deepening upto 200m depth of the 3 mines, namely Ukni Extn. (2.2 MTPA), Niljai (North and South) (3.5 MTPA) and Bellora-Naigaon (1.25 MTPA) has been integrated to optimise external dumping of OB and consequently need for acquiring additional land for external dumps and for reducing depth of ultimate mine voids of the three mines.

 

S.N.

Name of Project

Coal (MT)

OB (Mm3)

Stripping Ratio

1.

Ukni

9.28

147.24

15.87

2.

Niljai

26.36

326.56

12.39

3.

Bellora–Naigaon

12.25

122.50

10.00

 

It was informed that the proponent has applied for integral mining of all the 3 mines. It was informed that Ukni would be exhausted first followed by Bellora-Naigaon and lastly, Niljai. At a ultimate working depth of about 250m, it is proposed to accommodate 34.14 Mm3 OB of Niljai into Ukni, which would be raised 60m above ground level and merged with the existing OB dump. By this process an area of 90 ha required for ext. OB dump would be saved. Similarly, the external OB dump of Ukni Deep would be merged with the external dump of Niljai by accommodating 59.68 Mm3 OB and an area 140 ha would be saved by this integration. Similarly by integrating the Niljai OC and Bellora–Naigaon Deep OCP, into one dump for storing 17.92 Mm3 of OB and would result in saving 40 ha of area and by raising the height of the backfilled area of Bellora–Naigaon Deep OC to 60m above ground level, about 80 ha land would be saved.

 

It was informed that further, for Niljai Deep OCP, sequencing of operation of the two quarries with minimum requirement of additional land has been examined, whereby; Q-1 is proposed to be worked first through existing access trench. There would be no internal dumping and the entire OB of Q–I is planned to be dumped in external OB dump. As Q–II begins, the internal dumping of Q–I using OB of Q-II would start. The backfilled area in Q–I would be raised 90m above ground level and merged with the main external OB dump by accommodating 52.42 Mm3 of OB and an area of 112 ha proposed for external dump would be saved.

 

Thus, by the integration of operation of the three mines, a total combined area of 462 ha of land has been avoided for external dumping. The proponent presented a conceptual combined post-mining land use plan of three integrated mines Ukni Extn, Niljai North and South and Bellora–Naigaon for the combined total ML area of 3672.51 ha of which 2204.848 ha will be under plantation, 588.80 ha under voids, 284.50 ha for public use, 594.362 ha undisturbed/technically reclaimed area.

 

The Committee after discussions recommended the project for TOR. The Committee however requested the proponent to examine option of underground mining for preparing the EIA-EMP Report for this project and in such projects whose mine depth increases beyond 250m, especially with high stripping ratios.

 

Based on the application and further clarifications, and presentations made before the EAC, the following TOR is prescribed:

(i)                  The proponent shall examine option of underground mining for preparing the EIA-EMP Report for this project and in such projects whose mine depth increases beyond 250m, especially with high stripping ratios,  based on An EIA-EMP Report would be prepared on the incremental impacts of Nijai expansion in ML area from 1346.63 ha to 1761.22 ha at the existing prod. capacity of 3.5 MTPA based on the generic structure specified in Appendix III of the EIA Notification 2006.

(ii)                Status of compliance of earlier EC along with status of compliance of issues raised in earlier P.H. shall be incorporated as part of EIA-EMP Report.

(iii)               An EIA-EMP Report on the incremental impacts of Niljai expansion in ML area from 1346.63 ha to 1761.22 ha at the existing prod. capacity of 3.5 MTPA would be prepared and cover the impacts and management plan for the project specific activities on the environment of the region, and the environmental quality – air, water, land, biotic community, etc. through collection of data and information, generation of data on impacts including prediction modelling for 3.5 MTPA of coal production based on approval of project/Mining Plan for 3.5 MTPA. Baseline data collection can be for any season except monsoon.

(iv)              A map specifying locations of the State, District and Project location.

(v)                A map of the coal field and location of the coal block on the coal field showing various land use features such as water bodies, transportation routes, other mines and industries, etc.

(vi)              A Study area map of the core zone and 10km area of the buffer zone (1: 50,000 scale) clearly delineating the major topographical features such as the land use, surface drainage of rivers/streams/nalas/canals, locations of human habitations, major constructions including railways, roads, pipelines, major industries/mines and other polluting sources. In case of ecologically sensitive areas such as Biosphere Reserves/National Parks/WL Sanctuaries/ Elephant Reserves, forests (Reserved/Protected), migratory corridors of fauna, and areas where endangered fauna and plants of medicinal and economic importance found in the 15 km area of the buffer zone should be given.

(vii)             Land use map (1: 50,000 scale) based on a recent satellite imagery of the study area may also be provided with explanatory note of the land use. Satellite imagery per se is not required.

(viii)           Map showing the core zone delineating the agricultural land (irrigated and unirrigated, uncultivable land (as defined in the revenue records), forest areas (as per records), along with other physical features such as water bodies, etc should be furnished.

(ix)               A contour map showing the area drainage of the core zone and 2-5 km of the buffer zone (where the water courses of the core zone ultimately join the major rivers/streams outside the lease/project area) should also be clearly indicated as a separate map.

(x)                A detailed Site plan of the mine showing the various proposed break-up of the land for mining operations such as the quarry area, OB dumps, green belt, safety zone, buildings, infrastructure, CHP, ETP, Stockyard, township/colony (within and adjacent to the ML), undisturbed area and if any, in topography such as existing roads, drains/natural water bodies are to be left undisturbed along with any natural drainage adjoining the lease /project and modification of thereof in terms of construction of embankments/bunds, proposed diversion/rechannelling of the water courses, etc., approach roads, major haul roads, etc.

(xi)               In case of any proposed diversion of nallah/canal/river, the proposed route of diversion/modification of drainage and their realignment, construction of embankment etc. should also be shown on the map.

(xii)             Similarly if the project involves diversion of any road/railway line passing through the ML/project area, the proposed route of diversion and its realignment should be shown.

(xiii)            Break up of lease/project area as per different land uses and their stage of acquisition.

 

            LANDUSE DETAILS FOR OPENCAST PROJECT (Original and expansion project)

S.N.

LANDUSE

Within ML Area (ha)

Outside ML Area (ha)

TOTAL

1.

Agricultural land

 

 

 

2.

Forest land

 

 

 

3.

Wasteland

 

 

 

4.

Grazing land

 

 

 

5.

Surface water bodies

 

 

 

6.

Settlements

 

 

 

7.

Others (specify)

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

 

(xiv)                 Break-up of lease/project area as per mining operations.

(xv)                   Impact of changes in the land use due to the start of the projects if much of the land being acquired is agricultural land/forestland/grazing land.

(xvi)           Collection of one-season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on environmental quality - air (PM10, PM2.5, SOx, NOx and heavy metals such as Hg, Pb, Cr, As, etc), noise, water (surface and groundwater), soil along with one-season met data coinciding with the same season for AAQ collection period.

(xvii)          Map of the study area (1: 50, 000 scale) (core and buffer zone clearly delineating the location of various stations superimposed with location of habitats, other industries/mines, polluting sources. The number and location of the stations in both core zone and buffer zone should be selected on the basis of size of lease/project area, the proposed impacts in the downwind (air)/downstream (surface water)/groundwater regime (based on flow). One station should be in the upwind/upstream/non-impact/non-polluting area as a control station. The monitoring should be as per CPCB guidelines and parameters for water testing for both ground water and surface water as per ISI standards and CPCB classification wherever applicable. Values should be provided based on desirable limits.

(xviii)        Study on the existing flora and fauna in the study area (10km) carried out by an institution of relevant discipline and the list of flora and fauna duly authenticated separately for the core and buffer zone and a statement clearly specifying whether the study area forms a part of the migratory corridor of any endangered fauna. If the study area has endangered flora and fauna, or if the area is occasionally visited or used as a habitat by Schedule-I fauna, or if the project falls within 15 km of an ecologically sensitive area, or used as a migratory corridor then a comprehensive Conservation Plan should be prepared and submitted with EIA-EMP Report and comments from the CWLW of the State Govt. also obtained and furnished.

(xix)            Details of mineral reserves, geological status of the study are and the seams to be worked, ultimate working depth and progressive stage-wise working scheme until end of mine life should be reflected on the basis of the approved rated capacity and calendar plans of production from the approved Mining Plan. Geological maps and sections should be included. The progressive mine development and Conceptual Final Mine Closure Plan should also be shown in figures.

(xx)             Details of mining methods, technology, equipment to be used, etc., rationale for selection of that technology and equipment proposed to be used vis-à-vis the potential impacts.

(xxi)            Impact of mining on hydrology, modification of natural drainage, diversion and channelling of the existing rivers/water courses flowing though the ML and adjoining the lease/project and the impact on the existing users and impacts of mining operations thereon.

(xxii)          Detailed water balance should be provided. The break up of water requirement for the various mine operations should be given separately.

(xxiii)         Source of water for use in mine, sanction of the competent authority in the State Govt. and impacts vis-à-vis the competing users.

(xxiv)        Impact of mining and water abstraction use in mine on the hydrogeology and groundwater regime within the core zone and 10 km buffer zone including long–term modelling studies on. Details of rainwater harvesting and measures for recharge of groundwater should be reflected in case there us a declining trend of groundwater availability and/or if the area falls within dark/grey zone.

(xxv)          Impact of blasting, noise and vibrations.                   

(xxvi)        Impacts of mining on the AAQ, predictive modelling using the ISCST-3 (Revised) or latest model.

(xxvii)       Impacts of mineral transportation – within and outside the lease/project along with flow-chart indicating the specific areas generating fugitive emissions. Impacts of transportation, handling, transfer of mineral and waste on air quality, generation of effluents from workshop, management plan for maintenance of HEMM, machinery, equipment. Details of various facilities to be provided in terms of parking, rest areas, canteen, and effluents/pollution load from these activities.

(xxviii)     Calendar plan of programme (original and expansion). Details of waste generation – OB, topsoil – as per the approved calendar programme, and their management shown in figures as well explanatory chapter with tables giving progressive development and mine closure plan, green belt development, backfilling programme and conceptual post mining land use. OB dump heights and terracing should based on slope stability studies with a max of 28o angle as the ultimate slope. Sections of dumps (ultimate) (both longitudinal and cross section) with relation to the adjacent area should be shown.

 

Project

Total waste generation (Mm3)

Topsoil

(Mm3)

Total OB generation (Mm3)

Total OB

in Ext. Dump

Total OB

Backfilled

(Mm3)

Original Project (ha)

 

 

 

 

 

Expansion Project (ha) (balance life)

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL (Mm3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(xxix)         Progressive Green belt and afforestation plan (both in text, figures as well as in tables prepared by MOEF) and selection of species (local) for the afforestation/plantation programme based on original survey/landuse.

 

 

 

Table 1: Stage-wise Landuse and Reclamation Area (ha) separate columns for original and expansion project.

S.N.

Land use Category

Present

(1st Year)

5th Year

10th Year

20th year

24th Year (end of Mine life)*

1.

Backfilled Area (Reclaimed with plantation)

 

 

 

 

 

2.

Excavated Area (not reclaimed)/void

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.

External OB dump

Reclaimed with plantation)

 

 

 

 

 

4.

Reclaimed Top soil dump

 

 

 

 

 

5.

Green Built Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.

Undisturbed area (brought under plantation)

 

 

 

 

 

7.

Roads (avenue plantation)

 

 

 

 

 

8.

Area around buildings and Infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

110*

110*

110*

110*

110*

* As a representative example

 

 

Table 2: Stage-wise Cumulative Plantation (Original and expansion)

S.N

YEAR*

Green Belt

External Dump

Backfilled Area

Others

(Undisturbed

Area/etc)

TOTAL

 

 

Area

(ha)

No. of trees

Area

(ha)

No. of Trees

Area

(ha)

No. of Trees

Area

(ha)

No. of

 Trees

Area

(ha)

No. of

 Trees

1.

1st year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.

3rd year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.

5th year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.

10th yesr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.

15th year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.

20th year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.

25th year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.

30th year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.

34th year (end of mine life)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.

34-37th Year (Post-mining)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85

 

* As a representative example

 

(xxx)          Conceptual Final Mine Closure Plan, post mining land use and restoration of land/habitat to pre- mining. A Plan for the ecological restoration of the area post mining and for land use should be prepared with detailed cost provisions. Impact and management of wastes and issues of rehandling (wherever applicable) and backfilling and progressive mine closure and reclamation.

 

Table 3: Post-Mining Landuse Pattern of ML/Project Area (ha) (original and expansion)

S.N.

Land use during Mining

Land Use (ha)

1.

External OB Dump

Plantation

Water Body

Public Use

Undisturbed

TOTAL

2.

Top soil Dump

 

 

 

 

 

3.

Excavation

 

 

 

 

 

4.

Roads

 

 

 

 

 

4.

Built up area

 

 

 

 

 

5.

Green Belt

 

 

 

 

 

6.

Undisturbed Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

85

 

 

 

110

 

(xxxi)         Flow chart of water balance (original and expansion). Treatment of effluents from workshop, township, domestic wastewater, mine water discharge, etc. Details of STP in colony and ETP in mine. Recycling of water to the max. possible extent.

(xxxii)       Occupational health issues. Baseline data on the health of the population in the impact zone and measures for occupational health and safety of the personnel and manpower for the mine.

(xxxiii)      Risk Assessment and Disaster Preparedness and Management Plan.

(xxxiv)     Integrating in the Env. Management Plan with measures for minimising use of natural resources - water, land, energy, etc.

(xxxv)       Including cost of EMP (capital and recurring) in the project cost and for progressive and final mine closure plan.

(xxxvi)     Details of R&R.  Detailed project specific R&R Plan with data on the existing socio-economic status of the population (including tribals, SC/ST, BPL families) found in the study area and broad plan for resettlement of the displaced population, site for the resettlement colony, alternate livelihood concerns/employment for the displaced people, civic and housing amenities being offered, etc and costs along with the schedule of the implementation of the R&R Plan.

(xxxvii)    CSR Plan along with details of villages and specific budgetary provisions (capital and recurring) for specific activities over the life of the project. Status of CSR activities already carried out in the original project and that proposed for the expansion project.

(xxxviii)  Public Hearing should cover the details of notices issued in the newspaper, proceedings/minutes of public hearing, the points raised by the general public and commitments made by the proponent should be presented in a tabular form. If the Public Hearing is in the regional language, an authenticated English Translation of the same should be provided. Status of compliance of issues raised in earlier P.H.

(xxxix)      In built mechanism of self-monitoring of compliance of environmental regulations.

(xxxx)  Status of any litigations/ court cases filed/pending on the project.

(xxxxi) Submission of sample test analysis of:

Characteristics of coal - this includes grade of coal and other characteristics – ash, S and heavy metals including levels of Hg, As, Pb, Cr etc.

(xxxxii) Copy of clearances/approvals – such as Forestry clearances, Mining Plan Approval,

            NOC from Flood and Irrigation Dept. (if req.), etc. wherever applicable.

 

 

            (A) FORESTRY CLEARANCE

 

TOTAL ML/PROJECT 

AREA (ha)

TOTAL FORESTLAND (ha)

Date of FC

Extent of forestland

Balance area for which FC is yet to be obtained

Status of appl. for diversion of

forestland

 

 

If more than one, provide details of each FC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            (B)        MINING PLAN/PROJECT APPROVAL


            Date of Approval of Mining Plan/Project Approval:

                        Copy of Letter of Approval of Mining Plan/Project Approval

(xxxviii) Corporate Environment Responsibility:

a)     The Company must have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by the Board of Directors.

b)     The Environment Policy must prescribe for standard operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringements/deviation/violation of the environmental or forest norms/conditions.

c)     The hierarchical system or Administrative Order of the company to deal with environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance conditions must be furnished.

d)  To have proper checks and balances, the company should have a well laid down system of reporting of non-compliances/violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and/or shareholders or stakeholders at large.

 

The following general points should be noted:

(i)         All documents should be properly indexed, page numbered.

(ii)        Period/date of data collection should be clearly indicated.

(iii)       Authenticated English translation of all material provided in Regional languages.

(iv)       After the preparation of the draft EIA-EMP Report as per the aforesaid TOR, the proponent shall get the Public Hearing conducted as prescribed in the EIA Notification 2006 and take necessary action for obtaining environmental clearance under the provisions of the EIA Notification 2006.

(v)                The letter/application for EC should quote the MOEF file No. and also attach a copy of the letter prescribing the TOR.

(vi)              The copy of the letter received from the Ministry on the TOR prescribed for the project should be attached as an annexure to the final EIA-EMP Report.

(vii)      The final EIA-EMP report submitted to the Ministry must incorporate the issues in TOR and that raised in Public Hearing. The index of the final EIA-EMP report, must indicate the specific chapter and page no. of the EIA-EMP Report where the specific TOR prescribed by Ministry and the issue raised in the P.H. have been incorporated. Mining Questionnaire (posted on MOEF website) with all sections duly filled in shall also be submitted at the time of applying for EC.

(viii)      General Instructions for the preparation and presentation before the EAC of TOR/EC projects of Coal Sector should be incorporated/followed.

(viii)      The aforesaid TOR has a validity of two years only.

 

The following additional points are also to be noted:

(i)                  Grant of TOR does not necessarily mean grant of EC.

(ii)                Grant of TOR/EC to the present project does not necessarily mean grant of TOR/EC to the captive/linked project and vive-versa.

(iii)               Grant of TOR/EC to the present project does not necessarily mean grant of approvals in other regulations such as the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980 or the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and vice-versa.

(iv)       Grant of EC is also subject to Circulars issued under the EIA Notification 2006, which are available on the MOEF website: www.envfor.nic.in

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

(Dr.T.Chandini)

Director

 

Copy to:  Member-Secretary, Maharashtra State Pollution Control Board, 3rd & 4th Floor, Sion Matunga

            Scheme Road. No.8, Opp. Cine Planet Cinema, Near Sion Circle, Sion (E), MUMBAI – 400002.

 

 

 

 

 

Untitled Page